WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.720 --> 00:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>This session of the 2013 Adelaide Festival of Ideas was recorded by Radio Adelaide

2
00:00:06.880 --> 00:00:10.500
<v Speaker 1>through the support of the Bar Smith Library, University of Adelaide,

3
00:00:10.600 --> 00:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the University of South Australia Library and Flinders University Library.

4
00:00:15.640 --> 00:00:21.540
<v Phillip Adams>Before we start proceedings, a couple of important matters.

5
00:00:21.580 --> 00:00:25.320
<v Phillip Adams>First of all, the acknowledgement that today we're gathered

6
00:00:25.320 --> 00:00:29.420
<v Phillip Adams>on the traditional country of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains.

7
00:00:29.420 --> 00:00:36.280
<v Phillip Adams>We recognise and we respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and relationships with the land.

8
00:00:36.400 --> 00:00:41.700
<v Phillip Adams>We acknowledge that there are continuing importance to the Kaurna people living today

9
00:00:41.700 --> 00:00:45.340
<v Phillip Adams>and we respect their elders past and present.

10
00:00:46.200 --> 00:00:51.840
<v Phillip Adams>I have to ask you to please dial your telephones

11
00:00:51.840 --> 00:00:56.860
<v Phillip Adams>and alert you to the fact that this little get-together

12
00:00:56.860 --> 00:00:59.400
<v Phillip Adams>is going out as a late night.

13
00:00:59.420 --> 00:01:02.080
<v Phillip Adams>It's going to be a late night live in a few days' time.

14
00:01:03.340 --> 00:01:07.400
<v Phillip Adams>And having said all that, I shall now begin.

15
00:01:09.720 --> 00:01:13.140
<v Phillip Adams>Welcome to the mock-ecclesiastic Bonython Hall

16
00:01:15.020 --> 00:01:17.700
<v Phillip Adams>at Adelaide's Festival of Ideas.

17
00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:24.300
<v Phillip Adams>I'm here to chair a discussion on the most constraining of all possible topics.

18
00:01:25.120 --> 00:01:27.980
<v Phillip Adams>Life, the universe and everything.

19
00:01:28.100 --> 00:01:29.400
<v Phillip Adams>What the hell could I possibly do?

20
00:01:29.420 --> 00:01:31.360
<v Phillip Adams>Get out of that.

21
00:01:32.800 --> 00:01:36.440
<v Phillip Adams>I suppose the organisers are confident that I'll be aided and abetted

22
00:01:36.440 --> 00:01:40.360
<v Phillip Adams>by the loftiest of personages.

23
00:01:41.340 --> 00:01:44.980
<v Phillip Adams>Paul Davies, theoretical physicist, cosmologist, astrobiologist,

24
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:53.220
<v Phillip Adams>best-selling author and also in whom this grand event honours.

25
00:01:53.800 --> 00:01:55.460
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, it's good to see you again.

26
00:01:55.660 --> 00:01:59.400
<v Phillip Adams>Professor Brian Schmidt, laureate fellow at the ANU.

27
00:01:59.420 --> 00:02:02.080
<v Phillip Adams>He's at the University of New Zealand.

28
00:02:02.080 --> 00:02:02.320
<v Phillip Adams>He's at the University of New Zealand.

29
00:02:02.320 --> 00:02:02.680
<v Phillip Adams>He's at the University of New Zealand.

30
00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:05.760
<v Phillip Adams>And of course, in 2011, he shared the Nobel Prize for Physics

31
00:02:05.760 --> 00:02:10.840
<v Phillip Adams>with two Americans for his work on the accelerating universe.

32
00:02:10.960 --> 00:02:11.940
<v Phillip Adams>More of that shortly.

33
00:02:12.280 --> 00:02:17.800
<v Phillip Adams>I'd like to make the point that this gathering dramatises the importance

34
00:02:17.800 --> 00:02:21.240
<v Phillip Adams>of having very tough border protection policies.

35
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:26.080
<v Phillip Adams>Because we are constantly under threat by refugees.

36
00:02:29.520 --> 00:02:30.740
<v Phillip Adams>two of them here.

37
00:02:35.380 --> 00:02:38.360
<v Phillip Adams>I first met Paul about 25 years ago

38
00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:40.020
<v Phillip Adams>when he just snuck under the wire

39
00:02:40.020 --> 00:02:42.960
<v Phillip Adams>as a refugee from Margaret Thatcher.

40
00:02:44.180 --> 00:02:46.240
<v Phillip Adams>And Brian is, I think, a refugee

41
00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:49.340
<v Phillip Adams>from George W. Bush's war against science

42
00:02:49.340 --> 00:02:52.500
<v Phillip Adams>because he was anticipating the Tea Party.

43
00:02:54.640 --> 00:02:55.920
<v Phillip Adams>But you've got to be careful.

44
00:02:56.120 --> 00:02:57.940
<v Phillip Adams>Some of them are still getting in.

45
00:02:57.940 --> 00:03:02.640
<v Phillip Adams>And I'm delighted to say that they will get short shrift

46
00:03:02.640 --> 00:03:04.900
<v Phillip Adams>because they'll arrive in a country

47
00:03:04.900 --> 00:03:07.220
<v Phillip Adams>which has sacked the science ministry.

48
00:03:07.940 --> 00:03:09.580
<v Phillip Adams>There is no minister for science.

49
00:03:09.640 --> 00:03:10.860
<v Phillip Adams>Three cheers for that!

50
00:03:12.260 --> 00:03:14.100
<v Phillip Adams>There's a minister for sport.

51
00:03:15.920 --> 00:03:21.300
<v Phillip Adams>Our bicycling prime minister knows where his priorities lie.

52
00:03:22.160 --> 00:03:24.280
<v Phillip Adams>The other night at the grand opening,

53
00:03:24.380 --> 00:03:27.820
<v Phillip Adams>after Paul discussed three enormously significant

54
00:03:27.940 --> 00:03:29.820
<v Phillip Adams>ideas in science,

55
00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:32.860
<v Phillip Adams>one of which embraced the work of Brian Schmidt,

56
00:03:33.900 --> 00:03:38.720
<v Phillip Adams>I asked him afterwards about his belief in God

57
00:03:38.720 --> 00:03:42.940
<v Phillip Adams>because Paul, unlike Hawking and others,

58
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:47.540
<v Phillip Adams>still dimly sees or requires us to take seriously

59
00:03:47.540 --> 00:03:52.560
<v Phillip Adams>the possibility that there is a guiding hand

60
00:03:52.560 --> 00:03:55.460
<v Phillip Adams>behind these amazing laws of physics.

61
00:03:55.540 --> 00:03:56.780
<v Phillip Adams>So I want to start off, Brian,

62
00:03:56.880 --> 00:03:57.920
<v Phillip Adams>by asking you to tell us a little bit about the laws of physics.

63
00:03:57.940 --> 00:03:59.600
<v Phillip Adams>I'm asking you that question.

64
00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:01.940
<v Phillip Adams>Do you share Paul's views?

65
00:04:03.240 --> 00:04:04.940
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've talked to Paul,

66
00:04:05.040 --> 00:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's different ways of looking at things.

67
00:04:06.880 --> 00:04:07.700
<v Speaker 3>And I think in the end,

68
00:04:07.700 --> 00:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Paul and I see the universe pretty similarly,

69
00:04:10.540 --> 00:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>but I'm going to put it in a slightly different way

70
00:04:12.160 --> 00:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>than you just did,

71
00:04:13.300 --> 00:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>which is that, you know,

72
00:04:16.100 --> 00:04:21.500
<v Speaker 3>when I look at the idea of there being the notion of God,

73
00:04:21.660 --> 00:04:24.020
<v Speaker 3>and that varies tremendously depending on who you talk to,

74
00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:27.260
<v Speaker 3>it is not something I personally feel

75
00:04:27.260 --> 00:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not a fan of.

76
00:04:27.940 --> 00:04:28.820
<v Speaker 3>I think that there is a need for,

77
00:04:29.020 --> 00:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I have no resonance with it,

78
00:04:30.380 --> 00:04:32.140
<v Speaker 3>I have ultimately no faith

79
00:04:32.140 --> 00:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that there is some sort of supreme being out there.

80
00:04:35.580 --> 00:04:36.820
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand,

81
00:04:36.820 --> 00:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel no need to deny it either.

82
00:04:39.840 --> 00:04:42.920
<v Speaker 3>There are questions that I do not know the answer to.

83
00:04:43.060 --> 00:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>There is information that I probably cannot know.

84
00:04:47.440 --> 00:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>And ultimately, I cannot say there is not a God.

85
00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:53.340
<v Speaker 3>And if I cannot say there is not a God,

86
00:04:53.520 --> 00:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't worry too much about it.

87
00:04:54.920 --> 00:04:55.940
<v Speaker 3>My view is,

88
00:04:56.680 --> 00:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>if that is something that I don't know,

89
00:04:57.920 --> 00:04:59.020
<v Speaker 3>if that is something that is important to you,

90
00:04:59.080 --> 00:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and you have faith,

91
00:05:01.120 --> 00:05:01.600
<v Speaker 3>great.

92
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:03.700
<v Speaker 3>Just please make sure your faith

93
00:05:03.700 --> 00:05:05.140
<v Speaker 3>doesn't interfere with my beliefs,

94
00:05:05.320 --> 00:05:08.260
<v Speaker 3>but please don't feel threatened by,

95
00:05:08.360 --> 00:05:09.980
<v Speaker 3>you know, the science I do.

96
00:05:10.160 --> 00:05:11.380
<v Speaker 3>If my science says

97
00:05:11.880 --> 00:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>that the things you believe are not right,

98
00:05:13.820 --> 00:05:15.780
<v Speaker 3>if you believe that the universe is 4,000

99
00:05:15.780 --> 00:05:18.040
<v Speaker 3>or 6,000 years old...

100
00:05:18.040 --> 00:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>That is my belief.

101
00:05:19.120 --> 00:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

102
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.020
<v Speaker 3>Well, then I will try to convince you

103
00:05:23.020 --> 00:05:24.660
<v Speaker 3>that you should alter your faith

104
00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:27.540
<v Speaker 3>to come in line with the facts.

105
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>But I am not going to yell too hard.

106
00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:29.940
<v Speaker 3>I am going to tell you my point of view

107
00:05:29.940 --> 00:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and I am going to let you move on

108
00:05:31.120 --> 00:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>and you can have your own world.

109
00:05:32.920 --> 00:05:36.820
<v Speaker 3>But my world allows us to do technology

110
00:05:36.820 --> 00:05:39.300
<v Speaker 3>and live in the universe,

111
00:05:39.440 --> 00:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>in the world we find today,

112
00:05:40.700 --> 00:05:42.360
<v Speaker 3>which is relatively comfortable

113
00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>compared to the way it was 10,000 years ago.

114
00:05:44.660 --> 00:05:47.540
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, our last discussion on this a few days ago

115
00:05:47.540 --> 00:05:48.480
<v Phillip Adams>was not broadcast.

116
00:05:48.960 --> 00:05:52.960
<v Phillip Adams>So would you please give me the essence of your argument?

117
00:05:53.020 --> 00:05:53.300
<v Speaker 4>Right.

118
00:05:53.320 --> 00:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, the first thing is I would never use the term guiding hand

119
00:05:56.760 --> 00:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>because the one thing

120
00:05:57.760 --> 00:05:59.920
<v Speaker 4>that is really repugnant to a scientist

121
00:05:59.920 --> 00:06:04.100
<v Speaker 4>is the notion of any sort of divine intervention in the world.

122
00:06:04.240 --> 00:06:07.140
<v Speaker 4>Like Brian, I believe that science gives us

123
00:06:07.140 --> 00:06:08.540
<v Speaker 4>a description of the world.

124
00:06:08.640 --> 00:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>We haven't finished the job yet,

125
00:06:10.440 --> 00:06:15.900
<v Speaker 4>but I think that the universe runs according to certain laws

126
00:06:16.760 --> 00:06:23.180
<v Speaker 4>and that we don't want anything like a god or a being

127
00:06:23.180 --> 00:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>sort of meddling in the affairs of the universe.

128
00:06:26.340 --> 00:06:26.580
<v Speaker 4>Right.

129
00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:26.820
<v Speaker 4>So now...

130
00:06:26.820 --> 00:06:29.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that we should also take a strong position against that.

131
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't even like using the word god.

132
00:06:32.680 --> 00:06:37.200
<v Speaker 4>The way I prefer to explain my point of view

133
00:06:37.200 --> 00:06:41.000
<v Speaker 4>is that you can't be a scientist without believing

134
00:06:41.000 --> 00:06:45.220
<v Speaker 4>that the universe is ordered in a rational and intelligible way.

135
00:06:45.560 --> 00:06:48.340
<v Speaker 4>We go about that, we make that assumption,

136
00:06:48.580 --> 00:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>or sometimes I go as far as to say

137
00:06:50.400 --> 00:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>we accept on faith that the universe is like that.

138
00:06:53.660 --> 00:06:56.800
<v Speaker 4>And so when we pursue the scientific question,

139
00:06:56.820 --> 00:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>we're going to find that the universe is like that.

140
00:06:57.520 --> 00:07:01.080
<v Speaker 4>And so what we expect to find is more intelligible order.

141
00:07:01.500 --> 00:07:04.880
<v Speaker 4>And the classic example is the Large Hadron Collider.

142
00:07:05.040 --> 00:07:07.720
<v Speaker 4>When this was being designed and the budget was being allocated,

143
00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:10.300
<v Speaker 4>no scientists were saying,

144
00:07:10.400 --> 00:07:13.640
<v Speaker 4>well, there's a good chance that when we dig down to that deeper level,

145
00:07:13.740 --> 00:07:15.020
<v Speaker 4>we're just going to find nonsense.

146
00:07:15.420 --> 00:07:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Everybody thought, well, we might find the Higgs boson,

147
00:07:18.900 --> 00:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>we might find something else.

148
00:07:19.960 --> 00:07:23.240
<v Speaker 4>But whatever it is would fit into a scheme of things.

149
00:07:23.660 --> 00:07:26.500
<v Speaker 4>So science works on the assumption that the universe

150
00:07:26.500 --> 00:07:26.800
<v Speaker 4>is not like that.

151
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:27.740
<v Speaker 4>It's not arbitrary or absurd,

152
00:07:28.060 --> 00:07:32.120
<v Speaker 4>but there is a scheme of things which we can uncover

153
00:07:32.120 --> 00:07:34.180
<v Speaker 4>using the scientific method and mathematics.

154
00:07:35.340 --> 00:07:40.060
<v Speaker 4>And then I wouldn't say that that really bears very much relation

155
00:07:40.060 --> 00:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>to the god of any sort of religion that I know about.

156
00:07:43.840 --> 00:07:51.860
<v Speaker 4>But the point to understand is that the universe is not arbitrary or absurd,

157
00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:55.840
<v Speaker 4>that it is ordered and it is at least in part intelligible to us.

158
00:07:55.840 --> 00:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>So I would go beyond maybe what Brian would feel comfortable with,

159
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:04.440
<v Speaker 4>which is saying the fact that human beings can come to understand

160
00:08:04.440 --> 00:08:11.200
<v Speaker 4>the universe at least in part indicates that mind or comprehension

161
00:08:11.840 --> 00:08:15.080
<v Speaker 4>is an integral part of this scheme that I'm talking about.

162
00:08:15.200 --> 00:08:18.400
<v Speaker 4>So the scheme is more than just atoms moving around.

163
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:23.800
<v Speaker 4>It also involves life, mind, comprehension as part of that scheme.

164
00:08:23.960 --> 00:08:25.820
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that bears much relation to the universe.

165
00:08:25.820 --> 00:08:29.260
<v Speaker 4>It bears very much relationship to any sort of god of popular religion.

166
00:08:30.380 --> 00:08:32.740
<v Speaker 4>And in particular, what I want to get away from,

167
00:08:32.920 --> 00:08:34.340
<v Speaker 4>because a lot of people make this mistake,

168
00:08:34.580 --> 00:08:41.280
<v Speaker 4>is that if you take the simplest version of Big Bang cosmology,

169
00:08:41.440 --> 00:08:42.300
<v Speaker 4>which may be wrong,

170
00:08:42.580 --> 00:08:47.180
<v Speaker 4>but if you take the simplest version that Big Bang was the origin of space and time,

171
00:08:47.340 --> 00:08:48.940
<v Speaker 4>there was no before,

172
00:08:49.060 --> 00:08:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and the notion of some sort of cosmic magician lurking for all eternity,

173
00:08:55.520 --> 00:08:58.000
<v Speaker 4>at some epoch prior to the Big Bang,

174
00:08:58.160 --> 00:09:00.280
<v Speaker 4>and then pushing the button and making the thing go bang,

175
00:09:00.460 --> 00:09:02.840
<v Speaker 4>and then from time to time prodding a few atoms around.

176
00:09:03.060 --> 00:09:04.540
<v Speaker 4>Please be careful with those gestures.

177
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:09.440
<v Speaker 4>That is repugnant, I think, both theologically and scientifically.

178
00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:13.880
<v Speaker 4>So I want to distance myself from all of that sort of pop religion stuff,

179
00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:15.980
<v Speaker 4>because that's absolutely not what I'm getting at.

180
00:09:16.160 --> 00:09:20.100
<v Speaker 4>And I think that what I really am getting at is to say

181
00:09:20.100 --> 00:09:25.220
<v Speaker 4>that we live in a universe that's not just magnificent and enormous,

182
00:09:25.520 --> 00:09:26.680
<v Speaker 4>or inspiring and so on,

183
00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:28.140
<v Speaker 4>but it is comprehensible,

184
00:09:28.180 --> 00:09:30.880
<v Speaker 4>and that we human beings have a place in it,

185
00:09:30.940 --> 00:09:31.860
<v Speaker 4>not the central place,

186
00:09:31.940 --> 00:09:34.900
<v Speaker 4>but a place nevertheless as part of the universe

187
00:09:34.900 --> 00:09:39.000
<v Speaker 4>coming to understand itself through the emergence of life and mind.

188
00:09:39.260 --> 00:09:41.220
<v Phillip Adams>Now, Brian, you heard that last point,

189
00:09:41.300 --> 00:09:45.360
<v Phillip Adams>that humans have not the central place in it,

190
00:09:45.400 --> 00:09:47.500
<v Phillip Adams>but a significant place in it.

191
00:09:47.580 --> 00:09:48.500
<v Speaker 3>Do you share that view?

192
00:09:48.920 --> 00:09:51.220
<v Speaker 3>Well, I certainly think it's significant to me,

193
00:09:51.340 --> 00:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>and probably to the people in this audience.

194
00:09:53.660 --> 00:09:55.460
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm a little less...

195
00:09:55.460 --> 00:10:01.380
<v Speaker 3>I guess I see us as being part of the universe,

196
00:10:01.660 --> 00:10:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that we have the ability to comprehend it

197
00:10:04.920 --> 00:10:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and that we have this consciousness is remarkable.

198
00:10:09.420 --> 00:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we understand it very well yet,

199
00:10:11.680 --> 00:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>but my underlying feeling is that it probably is understandable at some level.

200
00:10:18.300 --> 00:10:22.120
<v Phillip Adams>Paul would argue that our human consciousness

201
00:10:22.120 --> 00:10:25.440
<v Phillip Adams>limits the amount of information that we have.

202
00:10:25.460 --> 00:10:27.260
<v Phillip Adams>The amount of information or the amount of analysis

203
00:10:27.260 --> 00:10:31.560
<v Phillip Adams>that we may be finally capable of.

204
00:10:32.220 --> 00:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are limits to what we are able to do, absolutely.

205
00:10:37.580 --> 00:10:40.020
<v Speaker 3>And fortunately, our brain is only that big.

206
00:10:40.420 --> 00:10:43.460
<v Speaker 3>And for people trying to do string theory,

207
00:10:43.660 --> 00:10:46.620
<v Speaker 3>you probably need a brain about like that to do it properly,

208
00:10:46.780 --> 00:10:48.140
<v Speaker 3>and no one has a brain that big,

209
00:10:48.280 --> 00:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>hence we haven't been able to make progress.

210
00:10:49.920 --> 00:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So in that sense, I agree.

211
00:10:51.620 --> 00:10:53.940
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's a fundamental limitation,

212
00:10:53.940 --> 00:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>except for what I would describe as our ability

213
00:10:57.520 --> 00:11:00.420
<v Speaker 3>to actually do hard problems.

214
00:11:01.220 --> 00:11:03.460
<v Phillip Adams>If there is a limitation, Paul,

215
00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:06.120
<v Phillip Adams>is there a way around it, for example,

216
00:11:06.120 --> 00:11:07.620
<v Phillip Adams>through artificial intelligence?

217
00:11:08.160 --> 00:11:09.380
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would hope so.

218
00:11:09.460 --> 00:11:12.160
<v Speaker 4>It's very curious that brains which have evolved

219
00:11:12.160 --> 00:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>to fulfil rather practical functions,

220
00:11:14.900 --> 00:11:18.080
<v Speaker 4>like catching falling apples and jumping streams and things like that,

221
00:11:18.160 --> 00:11:21.660
<v Speaker 4>have taken us so far into the realms of quantum field theory

222
00:11:21.660 --> 00:11:23.020
<v Speaker 4>or general relativity.

223
00:11:24.580 --> 00:11:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Now, we couldn't have done that without the use of mathematics.

224
00:11:27.820 --> 00:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>So mathematics is already an extension of the human intellect.

225
00:11:31.100 --> 00:11:33.300
<v Speaker 4>In a way, you know, you write the equations down

226
00:11:33.300 --> 00:11:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and the mathematics sort of follows the logic of its own,

227
00:11:37.220 --> 00:11:39.360
<v Speaker 4>and you don't have to think it through at every step.

228
00:11:39.620 --> 00:11:44.780
<v Speaker 4>So that already is going beyond our intuition and our common sense.

229
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:49.780
<v Speaker 4>But I see no reason why in the future we can't have...

230
00:11:49.780 --> 00:11:52.900
<v Speaker 4>Already we use computers to just do really difficult mathematics,

231
00:11:52.900 --> 00:11:57.560
<v Speaker 4>but that we can't use computers to reframe the concepts,

232
00:11:57.820 --> 00:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>because it seems to me that when we get stuck on things

233
00:12:00.000 --> 00:12:03.220
<v Speaker 4>and you get into these arguments about what causes what

234
00:12:03.220 --> 00:12:05.960
<v Speaker 4>and chains of causation and ultimate explanations,

235
00:12:07.220 --> 00:12:11.660
<v Speaker 4>and it seems that the reason that we get stuck

236
00:12:11.660 --> 00:12:16.820
<v Speaker 4>is probably because we lack the appropriate categories

237
00:12:16.820 --> 00:12:20.040
<v Speaker 4>to address the questions that go beyond that.

238
00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:22.200
<v Speaker 4>We get stuck because the very concepts,

239
00:12:22.900 --> 00:12:26.120
<v Speaker 4>the very notion of an explanation that would satisfy us

240
00:12:26.120 --> 00:12:30.180
<v Speaker 4>is limited by our cognitive architecture,

241
00:12:30.380 --> 00:12:32.940
<v Speaker 4>by the way our minds have been shaped by evolution.

242
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:36.720
<v Speaker 4>But if we could build a super-duper computer,

243
00:12:37.040 --> 00:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>though it wouldn't really be a computer,

244
00:12:38.540 --> 00:12:40.920
<v Speaker 4>then it could maybe just frame the problem differently.

245
00:12:41.280 --> 00:12:42.780
<v Phillip Adams>But we'd better hurry.

246
00:12:42.940 --> 00:12:45.300
<v Phillip Adams>Now, the reason this bloke shared the Nobel

247
00:12:45.300 --> 00:12:47.540
<v Phillip Adams>is, as you pointed out the other night,

248
00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:52.360
<v Phillip Adams>because he's come up with what Al Gore might call an uncomfortable truth,

249
00:12:52.900 --> 00:12:56.600
<v Phillip Adams>and that is that the universe is not only expanding and expanding,

250
00:12:56.880 --> 00:12:58.560
<v Phillip Adams>but it's doing it faster.

251
00:12:58.920 --> 00:13:00.560
<v Phillip Adams>Okay, what are you going to do about it?

252
00:13:01.140 --> 00:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do anything about it.

253
00:13:02.680 --> 00:13:05.900
<v Speaker 3>My job is just to go out and tell the story, I would say.

254
00:13:06.260 --> 00:13:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I think what I'm really curious to find out is why it is doing that,

255
00:13:11.540 --> 00:13:15.960
<v Speaker 3>because that is a fundamental part of the universe we live in,

256
00:13:16.060 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and we as humans like to understand the universe that we live in,

257
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:22.880
<v Speaker 3>partially for aesthetic reasons,

258
00:13:22.880 --> 00:13:25.620
<v Speaker 3>I want to understand what's my place here,

259
00:13:25.720 --> 00:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and I just get a lot of utility,

260
00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:30.420
<v Speaker 3>as my wife, who's an economist, would say, out of that.

261
00:13:30.940 --> 00:13:32.900
<v Speaker 3>But we also get a utility,

262
00:13:32.940 --> 00:13:37.260
<v Speaker 3>which is as we understand how the universe is put together,

263
00:13:37.480 --> 00:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>we're able to do useful things with that information.

264
00:13:40.600 --> 00:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know how we're going to make that useful,

265
00:13:42.540 --> 00:13:46.100
<v Speaker 3>but by learning what goes on and how the universe works,

266
00:13:46.280 --> 00:13:49.260
<v Speaker 3>that has been the basis of modern civilization,

267
00:13:49.540 --> 00:13:52.860
<v Speaker 3>of making the world we live in as nice and beautiful

268
00:13:52.880 --> 00:13:54.740
<v Speaker 3>and as affluent as it is today.

269
00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:59.840
<v Phillip Adams>Paul Davies mentioned in Dispatches on opening night,

270
00:13:59.960 --> 00:14:02.060
<v Phillip Adams>Duncan Steele, a mutual friend of ours,

271
00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:06.280
<v Phillip Adams>who was watching the southern hemispherical heavens

272
00:14:06.280 --> 00:14:10.000
<v Phillip Adams>for the approach of intrusive asteroids.

273
00:14:10.320 --> 00:14:13.040
<v Phillip Adams>The first thing that John Howard did in government

274
00:14:13.040 --> 00:14:14.640
<v Phillip Adams>was scrap his funding.

275
00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:17.720
<v Phillip Adams>The argument being, the Howard argument being,

276
00:14:17.820 --> 00:14:18.740
<v Phillip Adams>what's the point?

277
00:14:19.200 --> 00:14:20.560
<v Phillip Adams>What's the point of knowing?

278
00:14:20.900 --> 00:14:22.860
<v Phillip Adams>Now, applying that same argument,

279
00:14:22.880 --> 00:14:24.360
<v Phillip Adams>that same rigorous intelligence,

280
00:14:25.120 --> 00:14:26.500
<v Phillip Adams>Howard could probably...

281
00:14:26.500 --> 00:14:30.760
<v Phillip Adams>His successor could probably close down most scientific research,

282
00:14:31.040 --> 00:14:34.140
<v Phillip Adams>because finally, it's not going to stop the outcome.

283
00:14:36.340 --> 00:14:39.420
<v Speaker 4>Well, in the case of the asteroid impacts,

284
00:14:39.860 --> 00:14:42.320
<v Speaker 4>the first thing is to find out where they are,

285
00:14:42.480 --> 00:14:44.600
<v Speaker 4>and the next thing is to figure out what to do.

286
00:14:45.560 --> 00:14:47.020
<v Speaker 4>The second part's hard.

287
00:14:48.140 --> 00:14:51.680
<v Speaker 4>But it turns out the first part is actually almost complete,

288
00:14:51.680 --> 00:14:54.160
<v Speaker 4>in spite of the Howard government.

289
00:14:55.320 --> 00:14:58.160
<v Speaker 4>But we haven't quite figured out what to do about the second part,

290
00:14:58.280 --> 00:15:01.140
<v Speaker 4>but we probably don't need to worry too much

291
00:15:01.140 --> 00:15:02.400
<v Speaker 4>in the next few centuries.

292
00:15:02.640 --> 00:15:03.980
<v Speaker 4>So what we really wanted to know is,

293
00:15:04.040 --> 00:15:06.720
<v Speaker 4>are we going to be zapped like in three years' time?

294
00:15:06.880 --> 00:15:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Then we would have had a major problem.

295
00:15:09.760 --> 00:15:11.260
<v Speaker 4>This now seems unlikely.

296
00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:17.960
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of what's the point of finding out

297
00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:19.780
<v Speaker 4>about threats that you can do nothing about,

298
00:15:20.360 --> 00:15:21.220
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a good question.

299
00:15:22.420 --> 00:15:24.600
<v Speaker 4>To some extent, I think that's true.

300
00:15:25.240 --> 00:15:28.860
<v Speaker 4>So with medical diagnostics for conditions you can do nothing about,

301
00:15:28.960 --> 00:15:31.180
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that that really fulfils much of a purpose.

302
00:15:32.040 --> 00:15:36.540
<v Phillip Adams>I raise that point to be capricious rather than anything else,

303
00:15:36.580 --> 00:15:38.100
<v Phillip Adams>but it's interesting,

304
00:15:38.280 --> 00:15:41.980
<v Phillip Adams>because amongst conservative governments pretty much everywhere,

305
00:15:42.100 --> 00:15:44.440
<v Phillip Adams>there has been a war on science.

306
00:15:44.760 --> 00:15:47.200
<v Phillip Adams>Back in the United States of America,

307
00:15:47.280 --> 00:15:50.300
<v Phillip Adams>the Bush administration was pretty relentless,

308
00:15:50.300 --> 00:15:55.640
<v Phillip Adams>and I'm quite sure that if and when the Tea Party form government,

309
00:15:55.800 --> 00:15:57.320
<v Phillip Adams>it'll get tougher again.

310
00:15:57.680 --> 00:16:00.600
<v Phillip Adams>Is it harder to get research money

311
00:16:00.600 --> 00:16:03.380
<v Phillip Adams>for the sort of work that you've been doing

312
00:16:03.380 --> 00:16:04.680
<v Phillip Adams>back in the United States?

313
00:16:05.520 --> 00:16:09.260
<v Speaker 3>Well, the US is going through a very tough fiscal time,

314
00:16:09.360 --> 00:16:14.180
<v Speaker 3>and so I can honestly say that it really isn't a matter

315
00:16:14.180 --> 00:16:19.320
<v Speaker 3>of whether or not governments are conservative or liberal.

316
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>It really is more of what they see as being the value of science.

317
00:16:24.820 --> 00:16:26.860
<v Speaker 3>And so for many years in the United States,

318
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:30.420
<v Speaker 3>the conservative governments were actually much stronger on science,

319
00:16:30.580 --> 00:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>because they believed in the whole machinery,

320
00:16:35.300 --> 00:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>technology, and the industrial complex and going forth.

321
00:16:39.520 --> 00:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>The Tea Party is not what one would call an enlightened conservative party.

322
00:16:44.120 --> 00:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>They are very much into principles,

323
00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:51.180
<v Speaker 3>that are not, I would call, enlightened.

324
00:16:51.220 --> 00:16:52.680
<v Speaker 3>They don't think too much about technology.

325
00:16:52.940 --> 00:16:53.920
<v Speaker 3>They deny it.

326
00:16:54.820 --> 00:16:57.880
<v Speaker 3>And within our own conservative elements here,

327
00:16:58.000 --> 00:17:01.660
<v Speaker 3>there is a whole range of people who have different views,

328
00:17:01.920 --> 00:17:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and quite frankly, on both sides.

329
00:17:03.460 --> 00:17:06.980
<v Speaker 3>If you go and talk to people within labor,

330
00:17:07.180 --> 00:17:09.840
<v Speaker 3>there are people who really don't believe in technology there,

331
00:17:09.940 --> 00:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>because that's just not where they go.

332
00:17:11.840 --> 00:17:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So within the United States, it's a tough time right now, absolutely.

333
00:17:16.120 --> 00:17:17.860
<v Speaker 3>And I think that,

334
00:17:17.860 --> 00:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the U.S. will pay a price of the status they have,

335
00:17:23.440 --> 00:17:25.860
<v Speaker 3>which has been powered by their investment in the past.

336
00:17:26.060 --> 00:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>And if they don't invest, and other people do,

337
00:17:28.360 --> 00:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>they will fall behind,

338
00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:31.860
<v Speaker 3>and that will leave the world in a very interesting

339
00:17:32.460 --> 00:17:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and precarious place in the future.

340
00:17:34.260 --> 00:17:36.620
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, it's good that back in Arizona,

341
00:17:36.740 --> 00:17:38.860
<v Phillip Adams>you are still being, as you say,

342
00:17:38.900 --> 00:17:43.060
<v Phillip Adams>quite generously supported in your work on the origin of life.

343
00:17:43.480 --> 00:17:45.340
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but not from the federal government, no.

344
00:17:45.420 --> 00:17:46.420
<v Speaker 4>Not from the federal government.

345
00:17:46.760 --> 00:17:47.020
<v Phillip Adams>No, no.

346
00:17:47.180 --> 00:17:47.620
<v Speaker 4>Um...

347
00:17:47.860 --> 00:17:49.140
<v Speaker 4>CIA? No?

348
00:17:49.200 --> 00:17:49.480
<v Speaker 4>The...

349
00:17:51.140 --> 00:17:55.060
<v Speaker 4>I have a large cancer research grant from the federal government,

350
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:57.020
<v Speaker 4>from the National Cancer Institute.

351
00:17:57.920 --> 00:18:00.620
<v Speaker 4>But the one thing that is quarantined,

352
00:18:00.620 --> 00:18:02.140
<v Speaker 4>if you look at American politics,

353
00:18:02.260 --> 00:18:04.220
<v Speaker 4>and quarantined everywhere, I think, is cancer research,

354
00:18:04.360 --> 00:18:07.100
<v Speaker 4>because somehow, however much the budget gets cut,

355
00:18:07.280 --> 00:18:10.960
<v Speaker 4>everybody agrees there are two things that must be protected.

356
00:18:11.240 --> 00:18:14.220
<v Speaker 4>One is the military budget, and the other is the cancer budget.

357
00:18:15.500 --> 00:18:17.840
<v Phillip Adams>You were very tough on cancer studies.

358
00:18:17.840 --> 00:18:20.440
<v Phillip Adams>You were very tough on cancer science when you were opening the festival.

359
00:18:20.740 --> 00:18:24.080
<v Phillip Adams>You seem to think that 90% of cancer science

360
00:18:24.080 --> 00:18:26.880
<v Phillip Adams>has got it absolutely and fundamentally wrong.

361
00:18:26.940 --> 00:18:28.700
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a bit of an exaggeration.

362
00:18:29.140 --> 00:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>You were tougher than that.

363
00:18:30.600 --> 00:18:33.060
<v Speaker 4>The official figure from the NCI is 80%.

364
00:18:33.980 --> 00:18:40.880
<v Speaker 4>80% of published cancer research papers contain irreproducible results.

365
00:18:41.160 --> 00:18:44.020
<v Speaker 4>That's the official figure.

366
00:18:44.840 --> 00:18:46.060
<v Speaker 4>There's a million published papers,

367
00:18:46.060 --> 00:18:48.160
<v Speaker 4>so there's still a lot that could have something of value,

368
00:18:48.280 --> 00:18:50.260
<v Speaker 4>but there's a lot that don't.

369
00:18:50.420 --> 00:18:53.460
<v Phillip Adams>But in your view, it's fundamentally wrong-footed.

370
00:18:53.460 --> 00:18:53.840
<v Phillip Adams>Well, there's a paradigm.

371
00:18:53.840 --> 00:18:54.860
<v Phillip Adams>You're looking in the wrong place.

372
00:18:55.180 --> 00:18:57.900
<v Speaker 4>You see, in biology, nothing is black and white.

373
00:18:57.980 --> 00:18:59.060
<v Speaker 4>It's not right and wrong.

374
00:18:59.820 --> 00:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Biology is very... Not like physics,

375
00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:03.520
<v Speaker 4>where you can be absolutely clear

376
00:19:03.520 --> 00:19:07.080
<v Speaker 4>that this is the correct answer or the wrong answer.

377
00:19:08.760 --> 00:19:13.920
<v Speaker 4>In biology, people make up stories.

378
00:19:14.100 --> 00:19:14.780
<v Speaker 4>It's not...

379
00:19:14.780 --> 00:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>If I really want to enrage people,

380
00:19:16.620 --> 00:19:17.860
<v Speaker 4>I'd say biology is not even a science,

381
00:19:17.960 --> 00:19:19.540
<v Speaker 4>because it has no theoretical basis.

382
00:19:20.780 --> 00:19:23.720
<v Speaker 4>So, of course, biologists are scientists.

383
00:19:23.820 --> 00:19:24.940
<v Speaker 4>They use scientific methods.

384
00:19:25.160 --> 00:19:26.960
<v Speaker 4>They use the methods of physics and chemistry.

385
00:19:27.260 --> 00:19:29.780
<v Speaker 4>But there is no set of principles,

386
00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:31.140
<v Speaker 4>other than Darwinian evolution,

387
00:19:32.660 --> 00:19:36.040
<v Speaker 4>that makes it a science in the physics sense of the term.

388
00:19:36.180 --> 00:19:40.040
<v Speaker 4>And so what you've got is a lot of facts and a lot of narratives.

389
00:19:40.640 --> 00:19:43.080
<v Speaker 4>And people weave narratives around these facts,

390
00:19:43.260 --> 00:19:44.740
<v Speaker 4>and there'll be a prevailing paradigm.

391
00:19:44.780 --> 00:19:46.020
<v Speaker 4>And there is in cancer research.

392
00:19:46.300 --> 00:19:50.060
<v Speaker 4>And it's the somatic mutation explanation of cancer,

393
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:53.980
<v Speaker 4>that cells accumulate defects, mutations,

394
00:19:54.340 --> 00:19:55.980
<v Speaker 4>and that a threshold is reached

395
00:19:55.980 --> 00:19:58.520
<v Speaker 4>where they sort of go berserk, and it becomes cancer.

396
00:19:59.040 --> 00:20:01.100
<v Speaker 4>And that's a very easy thing to say.

397
00:20:01.360 --> 00:20:03.180
<v Speaker 4>And when you...

398
00:20:03.780 --> 00:20:05.940
<v Speaker 4>If you're interested in genetic changes,

399
00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:08.500
<v Speaker 4>there's some wonderful technology, sequencing technology,

400
00:20:08.840 --> 00:20:12.000
<v Speaker 4>that can enable you to investigate that,

401
00:20:12.120 --> 00:20:13.880
<v Speaker 4>amass huge amounts of data,

402
00:20:13.880 --> 00:20:15.480
<v Speaker 4>publish vast numbers of papers,

403
00:20:15.660 --> 00:20:18.480
<v Speaker 4>and we're just drowning in sequence data.

404
00:20:18.840 --> 00:20:22.300
<v Speaker 4>And the hope is that looming out of petabytes of data

405
00:20:22.880 --> 00:20:25.820
<v Speaker 4>will be some sort of elusive patterns

406
00:20:25.820 --> 00:20:27.520
<v Speaker 4>that will give a clue to it all.

407
00:20:27.960 --> 00:20:30.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's the wrong way to go.

408
00:20:30.760 --> 00:20:33.100
<v Speaker 4>It's going down a reductionistic path

409
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:35.620
<v Speaker 4>for something which can only be understood

410
00:20:35.620 --> 00:20:37.960
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the system as a whole.

411
00:20:38.060 --> 00:20:42.100
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the cells in a tissue environment.

412
00:20:43.880 --> 00:20:46.220
<v Phillip Adams>I raise this because I wanted to make the point

413
00:20:46.880 --> 00:20:48.760
<v Phillip Adams>that science is anything but monolithic.

414
00:20:49.600 --> 00:20:51.980
<v Phillip Adams>Brian, about over 30 years ago,

415
00:20:52.040 --> 00:20:53.980
<v Phillip Adams>I was invited to have a chat

416
00:20:53.980 --> 00:20:56.720
<v Phillip Adams>to a conference of the CSIRO in Canberra.

417
00:20:57.160 --> 00:21:00.180
<v Phillip Adams>And here was a large-ish room

418
00:21:00.180 --> 00:21:02.640
<v Phillip Adams>full of people researching this and that.

419
00:21:03.020 --> 00:21:07.380
<v Phillip Adams>And I was astonished to discover, simply asking questions,

420
00:21:08.000 --> 00:21:10.580
<v Phillip Adams>that they were almost entirely ignorant

421
00:21:10.580 --> 00:21:13.740
<v Phillip Adams>of what their colleagues were doing in the lab,

422
00:21:13.880 --> 00:21:14.620
<v Phillip Adams>up the hall.

423
00:21:14.960 --> 00:21:18.100
<v Phillip Adams>It was almost they'd dwelt in a series of parallel universes

424
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:20.300
<v Phillip Adams>with precious little overlap.

425
00:21:20.540 --> 00:21:24.540
<v Phillip Adams>And in that lack of, if you like, of a collegiate feeling,

426
00:21:24.740 --> 00:21:27.080
<v Phillip Adams>lay a certain amount of political impotence.

427
00:21:27.080 --> 00:21:29.800
<v Phillip Adams>One of the great ministers for science,

428
00:21:30.020 --> 00:21:31.420
<v Phillip Adams>our mutual friend Barry Jones,

429
00:21:31.720 --> 00:21:33.300
<v Phillip Adams>described them as woozers

430
00:21:33.880 --> 00:21:37.000
<v Phillip Adams>when it came to, you know, to political advocacy.

431
00:21:37.960 --> 00:21:39.880
<v Phillip Adams>But listening to Paul the other night,

432
00:21:40.020 --> 00:21:42.420
<v Phillip Adams>I suspect that 30, 40 years later,

433
00:21:42.420 --> 00:21:44.160
<v Phillip Adams>we still live in a world

434
00:21:44.160 --> 00:21:47.460
<v Phillip Adams>where scientists working at the absolute cutting edge,

435
00:21:47.520 --> 00:21:48.340
<v Phillip Adams>at the top level,

436
00:21:48.520 --> 00:21:50.400
<v Phillip Adams>don't necessarily understand

437
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:52.880
<v Phillip Adams>or don't seem sufficiently interested

438
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:54.340
<v Phillip Adams>in the works of each other.

439
00:21:54.980 --> 00:21:57.140
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think this is a place

440
00:21:57.140 --> 00:21:59.320
<v Speaker 3>where science has probably improved a fair bit,

441
00:21:59.400 --> 00:22:01.820
<v Speaker 3>partially because communication is so much better.

442
00:22:02.080 --> 00:22:03.740
<v Speaker 3>But the other problem we have

443
00:22:03.740 --> 00:22:06.620
<v Speaker 3>is that each scientific discipline has...

444
00:22:06.620 --> 00:22:08.320
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly complex.

445
00:22:08.940 --> 00:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It has... it takes, you know,

446
00:22:10.900 --> 00:22:12.400
<v Speaker 3>three or four years to get there,

447
00:22:12.420 --> 00:22:12.820
<v Speaker 3>and you get a PhD,

448
00:22:13.100 --> 00:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and you typically have 10 years under your belt.

449
00:22:15.720 --> 00:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>And so you get a lot of very specific expertise.

450
00:22:18.860 --> 00:22:21.780
<v Speaker 3>We use jargon, which we try not to use,

451
00:22:21.920 --> 00:22:22.680
<v Speaker 3>but we often do.

452
00:22:22.980 --> 00:22:25.200
<v Speaker 3>And so if I go into, for example,

453
00:22:25.200 --> 00:22:26.860
<v Speaker 3>a physical chemist's lab,

454
00:22:27.020 --> 00:22:29.920
<v Speaker 3>and, you know, we have the same basic tools,

455
00:22:30.180 --> 00:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I won't understand anything that's going on.

456
00:22:32.280 --> 00:22:35.380
<v Speaker 3>So needless to say, I don't go into their lab very often

457
00:22:35.380 --> 00:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>because I'm just kind of dumbfounded

458
00:22:37.080 --> 00:22:40.100
<v Speaker 3>because I don't have the 15 years of experience

459
00:22:40.660 --> 00:22:42.340
<v Speaker 3>to really understand things.

460
00:22:42.420 --> 00:22:43.500
<v Speaker 3>That being said,

461
00:22:44.300 --> 00:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>we are learning to communicate at a higher level

462
00:22:47.080 --> 00:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>where we can understand each other,

463
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:51.460
<v Speaker 3>and there are rewards there,

464
00:22:51.580 --> 00:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's still not perfect.

465
00:22:53.540 --> 00:22:56.440
<v Speaker 3>And I would argue that if you are in a group

466
00:22:56.440 --> 00:22:59.080
<v Speaker 3>where you're not communicating with your colleagues,

467
00:22:59.280 --> 00:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that's a problem.

468
00:23:00.380 --> 00:23:03.860
<v Speaker 3>That's a sign in any organization of dysfunctionality.

469
00:23:04.220 --> 00:23:06.200
<v Speaker 3>And there's no excuse for it,

470
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and it should be stopped.

471
00:23:08.260 --> 00:23:12.060
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, you were expressing some concern about this

472
00:23:12.060 --> 00:23:12.620
<v Phillip Adams>as an issue,

473
00:23:13.400 --> 00:23:15.640
<v Phillip Adams>the fact that scientists don't know enough

474
00:23:15.640 --> 00:23:17.080
<v Phillip Adams>about what each other are doing.

475
00:23:17.380 --> 00:23:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's certainly a problem.

476
00:23:19.380 --> 00:23:20.620
<v Speaker 4>We were talking about the cancer research,

477
00:23:20.820 --> 00:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>a classic example,

478
00:23:22.260 --> 00:23:26.280
<v Speaker 4>because there is a huge amount of money goes into it.

479
00:23:26.340 --> 00:23:29.860
<v Speaker 4>It's funding vast numbers of different research programs,

480
00:23:30.040 --> 00:23:31.440
<v Speaker 4>and these people are very, very narrow,

481
00:23:32.380 --> 00:23:33.000
<v Speaker 4>beavering away,

482
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:37.640
<v Speaker 4>and really can't stand back and see the forest for the trees.

483
00:23:37.880 --> 00:23:39.180
<v Speaker 4>But it's generally true,

484
00:23:39.320 --> 00:23:41.880
<v Speaker 4>as the frontier of science moves,

485
00:23:42.060 --> 00:23:45.680
<v Speaker 4>people specialize more and more narrowly,

486
00:23:46.280 --> 00:23:47.400
<v Speaker 4>but there is a...

487
00:23:48.100 --> 00:23:49.580
<v Speaker 4>First, there's a natural tendency,

488
00:23:49.800 --> 00:23:51.500
<v Speaker 4>but also that there is a professional reason

489
00:23:51.500 --> 00:23:53.360
<v Speaker 4>that young people going into science

490
00:23:53.360 --> 00:23:54.960
<v Speaker 4>need to make their mark.

491
00:23:55.440 --> 00:23:58.620
<v Speaker 4>And it's very, very hard to find a young person

492
00:23:58.620 --> 00:24:00.800
<v Speaker 4>who is prepared to take a broad picture,

493
00:24:00.840 --> 00:24:02.140
<v Speaker 4>to ask the big questions,

494
00:24:02.240 --> 00:24:06.680
<v Speaker 4>to connect across the different aspects of one subject,

495
00:24:06.740 --> 00:24:07.940
<v Speaker 4>let alone several subjects.

496
00:24:08.180 --> 00:24:10.780
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned my young colleague Sarah Walker the other night,

497
00:24:10.780 --> 00:24:12.640
<v Speaker 4>because she's one of the very few young people I know.

498
00:24:12.720 --> 00:24:13.320
<v Speaker 4>She's only 29,

499
00:24:13.520 --> 00:24:17.160
<v Speaker 4>and yet she's prepared to think right across all these disciplines,

500
00:24:17.300 --> 00:24:21.180
<v Speaker 4>mathematics, one day computing, physics, biology,

501
00:24:22.640 --> 00:24:24.780
<v Speaker 4>astrobiology, astronomy, all of these things.

502
00:24:24.820 --> 00:24:27.920
<v Speaker 4>She can move effortlessly between these different subject areas.

503
00:24:28.440 --> 00:24:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Very rare in a young person to do that.

504
00:24:30.960 --> 00:24:33.820
<v Phillip Adams>You try to help this, of course, with your writings, don't you?

505
00:24:34.120 --> 00:24:35.180
<v Speaker 4>Right, yes.

506
00:24:35.320 --> 00:24:37.400
<v Speaker 4>That's one of the main motivations for...

507
00:24:38.100 --> 00:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Because I think if you're going to write about it,

508
00:24:40.780 --> 00:24:40.980
<v Speaker 4>if you're going to write about something,

509
00:24:41.220 --> 00:24:43.680
<v Speaker 4>you need to synthesise the subject,

510
00:24:43.800 --> 00:24:48.460
<v Speaker 4>but also to position it within the great sweep of science as a whole.

511
00:24:48.680 --> 00:24:50.180
<v Speaker 4>There's no point just writing about some...

512
00:24:50.180 --> 00:24:52.980
<v Speaker 4>Unless it's a manual, you know, a how-to thing

513
00:24:52.980 --> 00:24:54.760
<v Speaker 4>for some particular area of science.

514
00:24:55.260 --> 00:24:57.860
<v Speaker 4>If what you're trying to do is to convince people

515
00:24:57.860 --> 00:25:00.440
<v Speaker 4>that this is exciting and important, you've got to show why.

516
00:25:00.660 --> 00:25:04.260
<v Speaker 4>It's got to be connected to the larger corpus of...

517
00:25:04.780 --> 00:25:08.140
<v Phillip Adams>This is Alan Earle coming to you from the Benarthon Hall

518
00:25:08.860 --> 00:25:10.700
<v Phillip Adams>at the Adelaide Writers' Festival.

519
00:25:10.780 --> 00:25:14.260
<v Phillip Adams>And my guests are Paul Davies and Brian Schmidt.

520
00:25:14.620 --> 00:25:17.460
<v Phillip Adams>And I am determined that before we leave this venue,

521
00:25:17.640 --> 00:25:20.780
<v Phillip Adams>we'll have solved the theory of everything.

522
00:25:21.140 --> 00:25:24.060
<v Phillip Adams>To help us do that, I would like to open it to questions.

523
00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:26.640
<v Phillip Adams>We have a...one microphone.

524
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:27.400
<v Phillip Adams>I'm sorry.

525
00:25:28.420 --> 00:25:30.800
<v Phillip Adams>One microphone. Where is it? There it is.

526
00:25:30.920 --> 00:25:33.300
<v Phillip Adams>If you'd like to wave vigorously,

527
00:25:33.880 --> 00:25:37.300
<v Phillip Adams>I'd be most grateful, and we shall listen.

528
00:25:41.080 --> 00:25:45.880
<v Audience>My question is regarding an idea of the Fermi paradox,

529
00:25:46.000 --> 00:25:50.900
<v Audience>that if life can happen easily,

530
00:25:51.100 --> 00:25:55.580
<v Audience>then why don't we see more advanced life,

531
00:25:55.760 --> 00:25:57.740
<v Audience>signs of it from around the universe,

532
00:25:57.780 --> 00:26:04.660
<v Audience>and that perhaps the reason is that as life gets more advanced,

533
00:26:04.800 --> 00:26:06.680
<v Audience>it wipes itself out.

534
00:26:06.740 --> 00:26:09.860
<v Audience>Do either of you have a view on the Fermi paradox?

535
00:26:11.520 --> 00:26:15.100
<v Speaker 4>Happy to take that one, because I think about this a lot.

536
00:26:17.020 --> 00:26:20.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if anyone was there at my session last night,

537
00:26:20.260 --> 00:26:23.560
<v Speaker 4>but I announced the fact that I chair a curious body

538
00:26:23.560 --> 00:26:27.020
<v Speaker 4>called the SETI Post Detection Task Group.

539
00:26:27.500 --> 00:26:32.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's my job to deliberate on what happens if ET calls.

540
00:26:32.600 --> 00:26:33.540
<v Speaker 4>What do we do next?

541
00:26:34.020 --> 00:26:36.300
<v Speaker 4>Who do we tell? Should we reply?

542
00:26:36.580 --> 00:26:38.460
<v Speaker 4>Who speaks for Earth? What should we say?

543
00:26:38.620 --> 00:26:39.800
<v Speaker 4>All that sort of stuff.

544
00:26:39.960 --> 00:26:40.760
<v Speaker 4>People love to talk about that.

545
00:26:40.760 --> 00:26:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Dinner parties.

546
00:26:42.560 --> 00:26:46.640
<v Speaker 4>So of course the Fermi paradox, named after Enrico Fermi,

547
00:26:46.700 --> 00:26:49.780
<v Speaker 4>who first articulated this just after the Second World War.

548
00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:50.940
<v Speaker 4>Where is everybody?

549
00:26:51.520 --> 00:26:53.580
<v Speaker 4>It's based on some simple arithmetic,

550
00:26:53.780 --> 00:26:59.100
<v Speaker 4>which is that our galaxy, vast though it is,

551
00:26:59.860 --> 00:27:01.500
<v Speaker 4>nevertheless is very old,

552
00:27:01.660 --> 00:27:06.400
<v Speaker 4>and there were stars and planets around long before Earth came into existence.

553
00:27:06.600 --> 00:27:09.840
<v Speaker 4>So if life does start up easily and is widespread,

554
00:27:09.840 --> 00:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>and if there is some sort of trend of evolution from simple to complex,

555
00:27:16.580 --> 00:27:19.920
<v Speaker 4>then there ought to be civilizations out there,

556
00:27:20.020 --> 00:27:22.480
<v Speaker 4>and there's plenty of time for them to spread across the galaxy,

557
00:27:22.720 --> 00:27:23.880
<v Speaker 4>so they should be here.

558
00:27:24.080 --> 00:27:25.360
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that they're not here,

559
00:27:26.320 --> 00:27:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Fermi took to be evidence against them existing.

560
00:27:29.780 --> 00:27:32.120
<v Speaker 4>There are many, many flaws in this argument.

561
00:27:33.480 --> 00:27:34.940
<v Speaker 4>And there's even a book,

562
00:27:35.060 --> 00:27:37.780
<v Speaker 4>50 Solutions to the Fermi Paradox.

563
00:27:37.840 --> 00:27:38.700
<v Speaker 4>So you can read that book,

564
00:27:38.700 --> 00:27:39.980
<v Speaker 4>and you can pick one of 50.

565
00:27:40.680 --> 00:27:42.380
<v Speaker 4>The wipe themselves out one,

566
00:27:42.500 --> 00:27:44.700
<v Speaker 4>that's Carl Sagan was fond of saying that.

567
00:27:45.360 --> 00:27:49.620
<v Speaker 4>What you will find is that people's preferred solution reflects the politics of the day.

568
00:27:49.780 --> 00:27:51.480
<v Speaker 4>So he wrote about that during the Cold War.

569
00:27:51.740 --> 00:27:54.500
<v Speaker 4>Since then, the Cold War has gone away,

570
00:27:54.620 --> 00:27:58.080
<v Speaker 4>but we're more concerned about eco-doom.

571
00:27:58.080 --> 00:28:00.160
<v Speaker 4>And so now what you read is,

572
00:28:00.240 --> 00:28:02.160
<v Speaker 4>well, ET doesn't exist,

573
00:28:02.840 --> 00:28:04.680
<v Speaker 4>simply because they plundered their resources,

574
00:28:04.840 --> 00:28:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and like Easter Island have gone into some sort of crash.

575
00:28:07.720 --> 00:28:10.500
<v Speaker 4>In another 50 years, people will have another reason.

576
00:28:10.800 --> 00:28:13.460
<v Speaker 4>I take a very particular point of view.

577
00:28:13.780 --> 00:28:15.140
<v Speaker 4>There's something called the Drake equation,

578
00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:19.220
<v Speaker 4>which is an estimate of the number of communicating civilizations that are out there.

579
00:28:19.940 --> 00:28:22.880
<v Speaker 4>The first two or three terms of that equation we know very well,

580
00:28:23.020 --> 00:28:25.440
<v Speaker 4>like the numbers of Earth-like planets out there.

581
00:28:25.640 --> 00:28:28.280
<v Speaker 4>There's one term we have absolutely no idea,

582
00:28:28.400 --> 00:28:29.780
<v Speaker 4>zero idea whatsoever,

583
00:28:30.140 --> 00:28:32.300
<v Speaker 4>and that is the fraction of Earth-like planets

584
00:28:32.300 --> 00:28:34.280
<v Speaker 4>on which life will emerge,

585
00:28:34.400 --> 00:28:35.860
<v Speaker 4>if you have one.

586
00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:37.700
<v Speaker 4>We have no idea what that number is,

587
00:28:37.720 --> 00:28:41.160
<v Speaker 4>it could very easily be extremely small.

588
00:28:41.340 --> 00:28:45.300
<v Speaker 4>That is, the probability of life popping up in Earth-like conditions

589
00:28:45.300 --> 00:28:48.580
<v Speaker 4>might be so small it's happened only once in the entire universe.

590
00:28:48.780 --> 00:28:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I have no argument against that.

591
00:28:50.760 --> 00:28:52.240
<v Speaker 4>It's very easy to imagine it.

592
00:28:52.680 --> 00:28:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Since we have no idea how life began,

593
00:28:55.380 --> 00:28:57.600
<v Speaker 4>we don't know what the physical process was,

594
00:28:57.840 --> 00:28:59.260
<v Speaker 4>we can't estimate the odds.

595
00:28:59.580 --> 00:29:00.740
<v Speaker 4>So here is an equation.

596
00:29:01.060 --> 00:29:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Not only do we not know the numbers,

597
00:29:03.080 --> 00:29:06.400
<v Speaker 4>we don't even know how to go about thinking about that particular number,

598
00:29:06.540 --> 00:29:07.700
<v Speaker 4>because we don't know the numbers.

599
00:29:07.720 --> 00:29:08.900
<v Speaker 4>We just don't know how life began.

600
00:29:09.180 --> 00:29:11.060
<v Speaker 4>So that's what we're working on

601
00:29:11.060 --> 00:29:13.060
<v Speaker 4>in the Beyond Center at Arizona State University

602
00:29:13.060 --> 00:29:14.440
<v Speaker 4>with Sarah Walker.

603
00:29:14.540 --> 00:29:16.540
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned we've got this research grant

604
00:29:16.540 --> 00:29:18.100
<v Speaker 4>to try and figure out whether

605
00:29:19.020 --> 00:29:21.180
<v Speaker 4>the emergence of life from non-life

606
00:29:21.180 --> 00:29:23.400
<v Speaker 4>is at least quite probable

607
00:29:23.400 --> 00:29:25.360
<v Speaker 4>or exceedingly improbable.

608
00:29:25.500 --> 00:29:26.880
<v Speaker 4>But we don't know what the answer is.

609
00:29:26.980 --> 00:29:29.120
<v Speaker 4>So it seems to me absolutely pointless

610
00:29:29.120 --> 00:29:31.580
<v Speaker 4>worrying about the other terms in the Drake equation,

611
00:29:31.780 --> 00:29:33.260
<v Speaker 4>like if you've got life,

612
00:29:33.420 --> 00:29:35.580
<v Speaker 4>how likely is it you'll have intelligent life?

613
00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:37.260
<v Speaker 4>Because we just don't know that term.

614
00:29:37.260 --> 00:29:38.380
<v Speaker 4>We're just stuck there totally.

615
00:29:38.460 --> 00:29:39.500
<v Speaker 4>The error bars are infinite.

616
00:29:39.560 --> 00:29:40.920
<v Speaker 4>We can't say anything sensible.

617
00:29:41.260 --> 00:29:44.580
<v Phillip Adams>It does, however, focus our minds wonderfully

618
00:29:45.180 --> 00:29:47.560
<v Phillip Adams>on our little planet, does it not,

619
00:29:47.620 --> 00:29:49.460
<v Phillip Adams>and make it even more precious.

620
00:29:49.560 --> 00:29:51.840
<v Phillip Adams>Brian, do you have anything to add to what Paul said?

621
00:29:53.060 --> 00:29:54.340
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I mean,

622
00:29:54.400 --> 00:29:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the Fermi Paradox certainly indicates to me

623
00:29:57.480 --> 00:30:00.260
<v Speaker 3>that there probably aren't civilizations

624
00:30:00.260 --> 00:30:02.920
<v Speaker 3>bouncing around our galaxy all over the place.

625
00:30:02.980 --> 00:30:07.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not Star Wars, a galaxy far, far away type scenario.

626
00:30:07.240 --> 00:30:11.040
<v Speaker 3>The reason for that could be any number of things.

627
00:30:11.220 --> 00:30:14.480
<v Speaker 3>And I can honestly say I don't think I know the answer.

628
00:30:14.860 --> 00:30:18.400
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that we don't see things

629
00:30:18.400 --> 00:30:20.000
<v Speaker 3>is interesting in itself.

630
00:30:21.320 --> 00:30:24.860
<v Speaker 3>The universe is not full of us taking over.

631
00:30:25.020 --> 00:30:26.880
<v Speaker 3>We don't go on forever, it would seem,

632
00:30:27.000 --> 00:30:29.640
<v Speaker 3>unless, as Paul would say,

633
00:30:29.740 --> 00:30:30.860
<v Speaker 3>we are exceedingly unlikely,

634
00:30:31.140 --> 00:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>in which case we could.

635
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:35.760
<v Phillip Adams>Does that devalue or make absurd

636
00:30:36.620 --> 00:30:37.960
<v Phillip Adams>Sagan's SETI program?

637
00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:40.900
<v Speaker 4>Well, the SETI folk,

638
00:30:41.000 --> 00:30:42.340
<v Speaker 4>and I admire them greatly,

639
00:30:42.520 --> 00:30:43.520
<v Speaker 4>I think they're very heroic,

640
00:30:44.180 --> 00:30:45.220
<v Speaker 4>particularly Frank Drake,

641
00:30:45.360 --> 00:30:47.160
<v Speaker 4>who else do you know has designed an experiment,

642
00:30:47.440 --> 00:30:48.800
<v Speaker 4>run it for 52 years,

643
00:30:49.020 --> 00:30:50.020
<v Speaker 4>got a null result,

644
00:30:50.220 --> 00:30:51.920
<v Speaker 4>and is still upbeat about the future.

645
00:30:52.260 --> 00:30:54.420
<v Speaker 4>I think it's an extraordinary testimony.

646
00:30:55.080 --> 00:30:56.980
<v Speaker 4>They say they're doing the experiment.

647
00:30:57.220 --> 00:30:59.700
<v Speaker 4>We can sit and philosophize all we want,

648
00:30:59.780 --> 00:31:00.980
<v Speaker 4>but they actually do the experiment.

649
00:31:01.240 --> 00:31:02.340
<v Speaker 4>I admire them greatly.

650
00:31:03.060 --> 00:31:04.220
<v Speaker 4>Somebody asked last night,

651
00:31:04.300 --> 00:31:05.660
<v Speaker 4>well, how long do you go on doing this?

652
00:31:05.660 --> 00:31:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Before you give up, do something else.

653
00:31:07.540 --> 00:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>My particular point of view

654
00:31:09.320 --> 00:31:12.920
<v Speaker 4>at the 50-year anniversary of SETI

655
00:31:12.920 --> 00:31:14.720
<v Speaker 4>was that we need to broaden the search

656
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:16.860
<v Speaker 4>and get away from the notion of a message

657
00:31:16.860 --> 00:31:19.440
<v Speaker 4>being deliberately beamed at us,

658
00:31:19.560 --> 00:31:21.560
<v Speaker 4>because I don't think that's credible at all,

659
00:31:21.700 --> 00:31:23.800
<v Speaker 4>because ET doesn't know we're here,

660
00:31:23.900 --> 00:31:25.740
<v Speaker 4>even if you take an optimistic view

661
00:31:25.740 --> 00:31:27.180
<v Speaker 4>that the nearest civilization

662
00:31:27.180 --> 00:31:29.120
<v Speaker 4>is a thousand light years away.

663
00:31:29.300 --> 00:31:31.420
<v Speaker 4>They see us as we were a thousand years ago.

664
00:31:31.780 --> 00:31:33.720
<v Speaker 4>We had no radio telescopes then.

665
00:31:33.820 --> 00:31:35.480
<v Speaker 4>There's no reason at all

666
00:31:35.480 --> 00:31:38.020
<v Speaker 4>that they should start beaming radio messages at us.

667
00:31:38.080 --> 00:31:40.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think we should get away

668
00:31:40.520 --> 00:31:42.800
<v Speaker 4>from the idea of deliberately beamed messages

669
00:31:42.800 --> 00:31:45.360
<v Speaker 4>and just search every database

670
00:31:45.360 --> 00:31:48.200
<v Speaker 4>that we can search without a big budget,

671
00:31:48.220 --> 00:31:52.720
<v Speaker 4>every database we've got for signs of alien technology.

672
00:31:53.480 --> 00:31:55.360
<v Phillip Adams>While someone goes to the microphone

673
00:31:55.360 --> 00:31:57.100
<v Phillip Adams>in the center of the universe,

674
00:31:57.740 --> 00:31:59.140
<v Phillip Adams>and I hope someone does...

675
00:31:59.140 --> 00:31:59.860
<v Speaker 4>I only had one question.

676
00:32:00.040 --> 00:32:01.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm only going to get one question.

677
00:32:01.240 --> 00:32:01.940
<v Phillip Adams>I think that was it.

678
00:32:02.020 --> 00:32:02.820
<v Phillip Adams>That was the question.

679
00:32:03.080 --> 00:32:05.460
<v Phillip Adams>But would you fund something like that?

680
00:32:05.480 --> 00:32:06.080
<v Phillip Adams>Would you fund something like that?

681
00:32:06.160 --> 00:32:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah.

682
00:32:07.320 --> 00:32:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it is an interesting question.

683
00:32:10.700 --> 00:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And, you know, we astronomers are here

684
00:32:12.520 --> 00:32:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to answer interesting questions.

685
00:32:15.280 --> 00:32:17.380
<v Speaker 3>And is there life out there?

686
00:32:17.660 --> 00:32:18.860
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting question.

687
00:32:19.060 --> 00:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone in this room,

688
00:32:21.480 --> 00:32:22.460
<v Speaker 3>if I could say,

689
00:32:22.480 --> 00:32:24.180
<v Speaker 3>if we found things,

690
00:32:24.240 --> 00:32:24.980
<v Speaker 3>you would find that interesting,

691
00:32:25.280 --> 00:32:26.900
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone in the room would probably say yes.

692
00:32:27.400 --> 00:32:30.520
<v Speaker 3>So why would you not try to answer that question?

693
00:32:30.680 --> 00:32:32.220
<v Speaker 3>The only reason is because you think

694
00:32:32.220 --> 00:32:34.500
<v Speaker 3>there is no chance of success.

695
00:32:34.500 --> 00:32:37.760
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think we know there's no chance of success.

696
00:32:38.060 --> 00:32:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I think there is...

697
00:32:39.720 --> 00:32:41.200
<v Phillip Adams>It's like the chance of life,

698
00:32:41.880 --> 00:32:42.620
<v Phillip Adams>vanishingly remote,

699
00:32:42.740 --> 00:32:44.320
<v Phillip Adams>but worth pursuit.

700
00:32:44.680 --> 00:32:46.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I wouldn't say it's vanishingly remote.

701
00:32:46.340 --> 00:32:48.580
<v Speaker 3>It may well be that life isn't able

702
00:32:48.580 --> 00:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>to march around the universe easily.

703
00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:54.120
<v Speaker 3>It may be that we find that it is extraordinarily difficult

704
00:32:54.120 --> 00:32:56.940
<v Speaker 3>to get off planet Earth to another solar system.

705
00:32:56.960 --> 00:32:57.700
<v Speaker 3>It's a long ways.

706
00:32:57.740 --> 00:32:59.420
<v Speaker 3>And that may be the big step

707
00:32:59.420 --> 00:33:01.180
<v Speaker 3>that just turns out to be very hard.

708
00:33:01.520 --> 00:33:02.760
<v Audience>Sir, your question.

709
00:33:03.380 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Audience>My question is,

710
00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:05.800
<v Audience>and this is directed to Paul Davies,

711
00:33:06.020 --> 00:33:08.720
<v Audience>I believe there is an after-death project

712
00:33:09.480 --> 00:33:11.000
<v Audience>at the University of Arizona.

713
00:33:11.500 --> 00:33:13.100
<v Audience>Do you know anything about it?

714
00:33:13.140 --> 00:33:14.440
<v Audience>Can you tell us anything about it?

715
00:33:14.520 --> 00:33:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Did you say after death?

716
00:33:17.360 --> 00:33:18.360
<v Audience>After life.

717
00:33:18.600 --> 00:33:19.960
<v Audience>Maybe that's how it's called.

718
00:33:20.080 --> 00:33:21.080
<v Audience>After life project.

719
00:33:21.480 --> 00:33:22.380
<v Speaker 4>It means nothing to me.

720
00:33:22.940 --> 00:33:24.500
<v Speaker 4>I've never heard of such a thing.

721
00:33:24.760 --> 00:33:27.260
<v Audience>Well, have you got any...

722
00:33:27.260 --> 00:33:27.880
<v Audience>I think they all died.

723
00:33:29.680 --> 00:33:32.280
<v Audience>Well, any thought about the possibility

724
00:33:32.280 --> 00:33:33.280
<v Audience>that consciousness,

725
00:33:33.280 --> 00:33:34.380
<v Audience>human consciousness,

726
00:33:34.780 --> 00:33:38.120
<v Audience>could continue after what we call physical death?

727
00:33:39.760 --> 00:33:40.860
<v Speaker 4>That's a tricky one.

728
00:33:41.220 --> 00:33:43.580
<v Speaker 4>People who dabble in consciousness

729
00:33:44.280 --> 00:33:47.060
<v Speaker 4>like to separate the hard problem

730
00:33:47.060 --> 00:33:48.520
<v Speaker 4>from the easy problem.

731
00:33:48.680 --> 00:33:52.180
<v Speaker 4>The easy problem is mapping the neural correlates

732
00:33:52.180 --> 00:33:53.360
<v Speaker 4>of conscious experience.

733
00:33:53.680 --> 00:33:54.900
<v Speaker 4>And it's not so easy,

734
00:33:55.020 --> 00:33:56.860
<v Speaker 4>but at least we can make progress with that.

735
00:33:56.920 --> 00:34:00.080
<v Speaker 4>The hard problem is trying to explain

736
00:34:00.080 --> 00:34:01.840
<v Speaker 4>what philosophers call qualia,

737
00:34:01.840 --> 00:34:03.760
<v Speaker 4>or inner experience,

738
00:34:03.780 --> 00:34:06.380
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the color red, to me,

739
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:08.600
<v Speaker 4>is different from the feel of water.

740
00:34:08.860 --> 00:34:10.280
<v Speaker 4>They're subjectively different.

741
00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:12.980
<v Speaker 4>And we don't really know how to think about that.

742
00:34:13.180 --> 00:34:17.760
<v Speaker 4>So when it comes to the hard problem of consciousness,

743
00:34:18.160 --> 00:34:20.180
<v Speaker 4>I think we don't know,

744
00:34:20.220 --> 00:34:21.600
<v Speaker 4>we don't understand it at all.

745
00:34:22.400 --> 00:34:23.840
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to the easy problem,

746
00:34:23.980 --> 00:34:24.960
<v Speaker 4>the neural correlates,

747
00:34:25.040 --> 00:34:27.100
<v Speaker 4>we can understand more or less in outline.

748
00:34:27.460 --> 00:34:30.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's clear that if once your brain is gone,

749
00:34:30.680 --> 00:34:31.820
<v Speaker 4>it's meaningful to you.

750
00:34:31.840 --> 00:34:33.540
<v Speaker 4>And let's talk about those neural correlates.

751
00:34:33.640 --> 00:34:36.500
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of the hard problem,

752
00:34:36.700 --> 00:34:37.540
<v Speaker 4>the qualia,

753
00:34:37.700 --> 00:34:40.840
<v Speaker 4>as we don't even know how to think about it,

754
00:34:40.900 --> 00:34:43.280
<v Speaker 4>it's impossible to make any meaningful statement

755
00:34:43.840 --> 00:34:48.820
<v Speaker 4>about after life or after death with that.

756
00:34:48.980 --> 00:34:50.820
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think I've said anything useful at all.

757
00:34:52.540 --> 00:34:56.200
<v Phillip Adams>This is the Adelaide Festival of Ideas

758
00:34:56.200 --> 00:34:58.200
<v Phillip Adams>by Nathan Hall, Late Night Live.

759
00:34:58.280 --> 00:35:00.700
<v Phillip Adams>And we have on stage two brains,

760
00:35:00.700 --> 00:35:05.400
<v Phillip Adams>the size of planets in Paul Davies and Brian Schmidt.

761
00:35:05.520 --> 00:35:08.340
<v Phillip Adams>Another question from our central microphone.

762
00:35:09.380 --> 00:35:12.740
<v Audience>What do you think of the idea of the technological singularity

763
00:35:12.740 --> 00:35:14.560
<v Audience>or self-improving artificial intelligence

764
00:35:14.560 --> 00:35:18.820
<v Audience>and, or I guess on that, artificial consciousness,

765
00:35:19.060 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Audience>whether it is possible to have consciousness simulated on a computer

766
00:35:22.800 --> 00:35:24.100
<v Audience>and for it to truly be conscious?

767
00:35:25.000 --> 00:35:27.340
<v Speaker 3>Again, this is a Paul Davies question.

768
00:35:27.920 --> 00:35:28.520
<v Speaker 3>LAUGHTER

769
00:35:29.320 --> 00:35:31.900
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to need to chime in after he answers the question.

770
00:35:33.760 --> 00:35:34.980
<v Speaker 4>Ray Kurzweil's work.

771
00:35:35.180 --> 00:35:39.900
<v Speaker 4>Well, my feeling about the people who promote that idea

772
00:35:39.900 --> 00:35:41.580
<v Speaker 4>is they're putting a little too much faith

773
00:35:41.580 --> 00:35:43.340
<v Speaker 4>in the power of information processing.

774
00:35:43.680 --> 00:35:45.780
<v Speaker 4>Information processing gets you a long way.

775
00:35:45.880 --> 00:35:48.240
<v Speaker 4>It's given us all sorts of dazzling technology,

776
00:35:48.600 --> 00:35:51.000
<v Speaker 4>but we mustn't think that it can solve all problems.

777
00:35:51.200 --> 00:35:53.680
<v Speaker 4>And in particular, it can't transcend the laws of physics.

778
00:35:53.860 --> 00:35:56.820
<v Speaker 4>Just churning bits around ever faster

779
00:35:56.820 --> 00:35:58.440
<v Speaker 4>isn't going to change something.

780
00:35:58.520 --> 00:35:59.160
<v Speaker 4>It's going to change fundamental things.

781
00:35:59.320 --> 00:36:02.080
<v Speaker 4>It won't give you faster-than-the-light travel, for example.

782
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:05.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think a lot of those claims are overblown.

783
00:36:05.240 --> 00:36:05.860
<v Speaker 4>But I see...

784
00:36:05.860 --> 00:36:10.060
<v Speaker 4>Let me just address this point about artificial intelligence.

785
00:36:10.260 --> 00:36:11.260
<v Speaker 4>It's come up a couple of times.

786
00:36:11.940 --> 00:36:16.900
<v Speaker 4>It is clear that the human brain is a physical system

787
00:36:16.900 --> 00:36:17.940
<v Speaker 4>and so, therefore, in principle,

788
00:36:18.480 --> 00:36:22.760
<v Speaker 4>we could artificially create something like consciousness or intelligence

789
00:36:22.760 --> 00:36:24.860
<v Speaker 4>by building a physical system.

790
00:36:25.020 --> 00:36:27.040
<v Speaker 4>It's very far from obvious to me

791
00:36:27.040 --> 00:36:28.880
<v Speaker 4>that this is just a super-duper computer

792
00:36:28.880 --> 00:36:32.440
<v Speaker 4>as we understand the notion of a computer.

793
00:36:32.640 --> 00:36:35.280
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think we know quite what is the gizmo

794
00:36:36.040 --> 00:36:40.840
<v Speaker 4>to make that would simulate or possess consciousness.

795
00:36:41.520 --> 00:36:43.360
<v Speaker 4>But I see no fundamental reason

796
00:36:43.360 --> 00:36:45.880
<v Speaker 4>why we couldn't work that out at some stage in the future.

797
00:36:45.980 --> 00:36:49.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think not by 2036 or whatever is the magic date for the singularity.

798
00:36:50.220 --> 00:36:52.960
<v Speaker 4>And so people here may not even know what this means.

799
00:36:53.080 --> 00:36:56.040
<v Speaker 4>The singularity is a term borrowed from mathematics,

800
00:36:56.040 --> 00:36:58.760
<v Speaker 4>which normally means something shoots off to infinity.

801
00:36:59.140 --> 00:37:00.940
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anybody was claiming infinity.

802
00:37:01.220 --> 00:37:05.320
<v Speaker 4>But the plan is that information processing, Moore's law,

803
00:37:05.480 --> 00:37:07.420
<v Speaker 4>it's improving and doubling so rapidly

804
00:37:08.040 --> 00:37:11.480
<v Speaker 4>that within a very short period of time, a few decades,

805
00:37:12.160 --> 00:37:15.780
<v Speaker 4>it will become so powerful it will transcend all human categories.

806
00:37:15.960 --> 00:37:18.080
<v Speaker 4>All bets are off. That's the basic idea.

807
00:37:18.420 --> 00:37:21.220
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I mean, I agree exactly with what Paul said.

808
00:37:21.340 --> 00:37:25.480
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, hardware itself is a useful part

809
00:37:25.480 --> 00:37:26.020
<v Speaker 3>of the human brain.

810
00:37:26.040 --> 00:37:29.100
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, you have to have the software,

811
00:37:29.180 --> 00:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the program, whatever that is.

812
00:37:31.540 --> 00:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>And that could be extraordinarily complex.

813
00:37:34.660 --> 00:37:37.580
<v Speaker 3>And so it's no guarantee just because we have a big computer

814
00:37:37.580 --> 00:37:40.200
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to have artificial intelligence.

815
00:37:40.460 --> 00:37:42.580
<v Speaker 3>Presumably, the big computer is part of the solution.

816
00:37:43.080 --> 00:37:45.760
<v Speaker 3>But the other part may be really, really hard.

817
00:37:45.920 --> 00:37:47.860
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. We just don't know at this point.

818
00:37:48.120 --> 00:37:50.000
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, when you and I first met,

819
00:37:51.020 --> 00:37:53.940
<v Phillip Adams>TOE, the theory of everything, was a very popular notion.

820
00:37:54.660 --> 00:37:57.480
<v Phillip Adams>And there seemed to be this sort of hubristic idea

821
00:37:57.480 --> 00:38:02.180
<v Phillip Adams>that at any moment now, another wonderfully simple equation

822
00:38:02.700 --> 00:38:04.120
<v Phillip Adams>like E equals MC squared...

823
00:38:04.120 --> 00:38:05.120
<v Phillip Adams>That you wear on your T-shirt.

824
00:38:05.320 --> 00:38:08.340
<v Phillip Adams>...would be stuck on the blackboard or on our T-shirts.

825
00:38:08.520 --> 00:38:08.880
<v Phillip Adams>That's right.

826
00:38:08.920 --> 00:38:10.460
<v Speaker 4>Where is TOE now?

827
00:38:10.540 --> 00:38:12.300
<v Speaker 4>Well, we've got everything in the title,

828
00:38:12.440 --> 00:38:13.740
<v Speaker 4>so I'm pleased this has come up.

829
00:38:14.160 --> 00:38:16.780
<v Speaker 4>And if you talk to the people I do,

830
00:38:16.880 --> 00:38:19.300
<v Speaker 4>then they're all fired up about string theory,

831
00:38:19.440 --> 00:38:23.080
<v Speaker 4>the idea that the universe is not made of little particles

832
00:38:23.080 --> 00:38:25.500
<v Speaker 4>as Democritus thought all those years ago,

833
00:38:25.680 --> 00:38:27.920
<v Speaker 4>but little loops of string which wiggle around.

834
00:38:28.740 --> 00:38:31.320
<v Speaker 4>And it wiggles this way, you get an electron.

835
00:38:31.460 --> 00:38:33.300
<v Speaker 4>Wiggles that way, you get a photon, and so on.

836
00:38:33.460 --> 00:38:36.600
<v Speaker 4>And string theorists remain very upbeat.

837
00:38:36.920 --> 00:38:38.800
<v Speaker 4>They use a lot of arcane mathematics.

838
00:38:39.160 --> 00:38:40.720
<v Speaker 4>They invent some of it as they go along.

839
00:38:41.240 --> 00:38:47.380
<v Speaker 4>So far, it hasn't really connected much with anything that is testable.

840
00:38:47.560 --> 00:38:50.280
<v Speaker 4>It's consistent with what we know about the world,

841
00:38:50.400 --> 00:38:52.580
<v Speaker 4>but it's not predicting anything new

842
00:38:53.080 --> 00:38:53.380
<v Speaker 4>that we can test.

843
00:38:53.660 --> 00:38:55.060
<v Speaker 4>So that's the state of play.

844
00:38:55.160 --> 00:38:56.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not the only game in town.

845
00:38:56.740 --> 00:38:59.600
<v Speaker 4>String theory was only one attempt to pull everything together.

846
00:39:00.920 --> 00:39:04.060
<v Speaker 4>But it's dominating the field at the moment.

847
00:39:04.280 --> 00:39:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I do understand that Ed Witten,

848
00:39:06.060 --> 00:39:07.740
<v Speaker 3>who is the founder of string theory,

849
00:39:07.880 --> 00:39:08.940
<v Speaker 3>has sort of given up and discussed.

850
00:39:09.780 --> 00:39:11.600
<v Speaker 3>So that may or may not be true.

851
00:39:11.700 --> 00:39:12.700
<v Speaker 3>I haven't talked to him directly.

852
00:39:13.120 --> 00:39:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Probably not discussed with the theory,

853
00:39:15.680 --> 00:39:18.140
<v Speaker 4>but more discussed with the distortion of the field

854
00:39:18.140 --> 00:39:20.220
<v Speaker 4>that it is called about.

855
00:39:20.560 --> 00:39:22.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, a lot of talent has been sucked in.

856
00:39:22.400 --> 00:39:23.900
<v Speaker 4>They're doing very clever stuff.

857
00:39:24.020 --> 00:39:25.040
<v Speaker 4>I like talking to them.

858
00:39:25.160 --> 00:39:26.800
<v Speaker 4>But it's a bit like SETI.

859
00:39:26.900 --> 00:39:29.240
<v Speaker 4>After how many decades you go on doing this

860
00:39:29.240 --> 00:39:30.600
<v Speaker 4>before you think enough is enough.

861
00:39:30.920 --> 00:39:31.880
<v Phillip Adams>Madam, your turn.

862
00:39:32.880 --> 00:39:36.380
<v Speaker 4>For Paul Davies, relevant to what you said before,

863
00:39:36.520 --> 00:39:40.220
<v Speaker 4>the Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years,

864
00:39:40.780 --> 00:39:43.440
<v Speaker 4>yet life got started very early

865
00:39:43.440 --> 00:39:46.900
<v Speaker 4>after the Earth was formed, almost immediately.

866
00:39:47.880 --> 00:39:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Isn't that some sort of evidence

867
00:39:49.440 --> 00:39:50.660
<v Speaker 4>for the...

868
00:39:52.660 --> 00:39:53.800
<v Speaker 4>prevalence of life?

869
00:39:54.060 --> 00:39:55.180
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not.

870
00:39:56.000 --> 00:39:56.700
<v Speaker 4>Carry on.

871
00:39:57.920 --> 00:40:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Given the length of time the Earth has been around,

872
00:40:00.580 --> 00:40:02.400
<v Speaker 4>if it was not...

873
00:40:02.400 --> 00:40:05.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, if life was not...

874
00:40:07.560 --> 00:40:09.960
<v Speaker 4>very conducive to getting going,

875
00:40:10.200 --> 00:40:11.780
<v Speaker 4>it would have happened later.

876
00:40:12.040 --> 00:40:13.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a common fallacy.

877
00:40:14.200 --> 00:40:15.500
<v Speaker 4>I'm pleased you raised it.

878
00:40:15.720 --> 00:40:18.020
<v Speaker 4>Carl Sagan expressed it very succinctly.

879
00:40:18.020 --> 00:40:20.160
<v Speaker 4>He said, life must be easy to start

880
00:40:20.160 --> 00:40:21.920
<v Speaker 4>because no sooner was Earth ready for it,

881
00:40:22.400 --> 00:40:22.660
<v Speaker 4>it popped.

882
00:40:23.420 --> 00:40:24.760
<v Speaker 4>And it is a fallacy,

883
00:40:24.960 --> 00:40:28.300
<v Speaker 4>but debunking that fallacy is a little bit subtle.

884
00:40:28.520 --> 00:40:30.340
<v Speaker 4>It was first debunked by Brandon Carter

885
00:40:30.340 --> 00:40:32.140
<v Speaker 4>in a very memorable lecture

886
00:40:32.140 --> 00:40:34.460
<v Speaker 4>at the Royal Society in 1981.

887
00:40:34.720 --> 00:40:35.200
<v Speaker 4>I was there.

888
00:40:35.360 --> 00:40:37.060
<v Speaker 4>I remember it because he went on

889
00:40:37.060 --> 00:40:38.920
<v Speaker 4>for like an hour and a half

890
00:40:38.920 --> 00:40:40.980
<v Speaker 4>in a 45-minute talking slot.

891
00:40:43.000 --> 00:40:45.420
<v Speaker 4>And the argument, roughly speaking,

892
00:40:45.620 --> 00:40:47.040
<v Speaker 4>which you have to nuance it,

893
00:40:47.080 --> 00:40:48.140
<v Speaker 4>goes something like this,

894
00:40:48.240 --> 00:40:50.300
<v Speaker 4>that the window of opportunity

895
00:40:50.300 --> 00:40:52.860
<v Speaker 4>on a planet for life to get going

896
00:40:52.860 --> 00:40:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and then evolve intelligence is finite.

897
00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:56.320
<v Speaker 4>And in the case of Earth,

898
00:40:56.440 --> 00:40:57.840
<v Speaker 4>it'd be about 4 billion years.

899
00:40:58.140 --> 00:41:00.860
<v Speaker 4>Because in another, about 800 million years,

900
00:41:00.920 --> 00:41:01.700
<v Speaker 4>Brian might know better,

901
00:41:01.840 --> 00:41:04.580
<v Speaker 4>the sun will get too hot and the oceans will boil.

902
00:41:04.840 --> 00:41:06.840
<v Speaker 4>So you get a fixed window of opportunity,

903
00:41:07.320 --> 00:41:08.800
<v Speaker 4>whether it's Earth or any planet,

904
00:41:09.040 --> 00:41:09.680
<v Speaker 4>in which,

905
00:41:10.460 --> 00:41:12.500
<v Speaker 4>if we're going to have discussions like this,

906
00:41:12.640 --> 00:41:14.180
<v Speaker 4>life has to pop up and evolve

907
00:41:14.180 --> 00:41:15.960
<v Speaker 4>before the window closes.

908
00:41:16.360 --> 00:41:17.820
<v Speaker 4>And so, very roughly speaking,

909
00:41:18.760 --> 00:41:20.280
<v Speaker 4>if life hadn't got going,

910
00:41:20.300 --> 00:41:22.340
<v Speaker 4>within 200 million years

911
00:41:22.340 --> 00:41:24.020
<v Speaker 4>of it becoming habitable,

912
00:41:24.680 --> 00:41:25.960
<v Speaker 4>we wouldn't be around

913
00:41:25.960 --> 00:41:27.400
<v Speaker 4>to have this discussion

914
00:41:27.400 --> 00:41:29.080
<v Speaker 4>until that window closed.

915
00:41:29.420 --> 00:41:31.860
<v Speaker 4>So this is called a selection effect.

916
00:41:31.940 --> 00:41:33.580
<v Speaker 4>It's very familiar to astronomers

917
00:41:33.580 --> 00:41:35.780
<v Speaker 4>that we observe the universe

918
00:41:35.780 --> 00:41:38.220
<v Speaker 4>and we ask questions, have discussions,

919
00:41:38.600 --> 00:41:41.160
<v Speaker 4>but we will always be selecting the data.

920
00:41:41.260 --> 00:41:43.160
<v Speaker 4>The reason we're selecting Earth for this

921
00:41:43.160 --> 00:41:43.960
<v Speaker 4>is because we live here

922
00:41:43.960 --> 00:41:45.060
<v Speaker 4>and we're having this discussion.

923
00:41:45.420 --> 00:41:47.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's sometimes called the anthropic principle.

924
00:41:47.480 --> 00:41:50.160
<v Speaker 4>The A word plays out badly.

925
00:41:50.300 --> 00:41:52.340
<v Speaker 4>But the argument, I think,

926
00:41:52.340 --> 00:41:53.240
<v Speaker 4>is absolutely sound.

927
00:41:53.980 --> 00:41:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Brandon Carter is spot on

928
00:41:56.560 --> 00:41:57.220
<v Speaker 4>with this argument.

929
00:41:57.620 --> 00:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>And so what I will say is that

930
00:41:59.960 --> 00:42:01.740
<v Speaker 4>the rapid emergence of life on Earth

931
00:42:01.740 --> 00:42:03.880
<v Speaker 4>is consistent with life being

932
00:42:03.880 --> 00:42:06.120
<v Speaker 4>easy to make and it's consistent

933
00:42:06.120 --> 00:42:07.600
<v Speaker 4>with it being very hard to make

934
00:42:07.600 --> 00:42:08.880
<v Speaker 4>and you can do it mathematically

935
00:42:08.880 --> 00:42:10.180
<v Speaker 4>and there's an exact symmetry.

936
00:42:11.420 --> 00:42:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm going to maybe slightly disagree

937
00:42:13.640 --> 00:42:15.680
<v Speaker 3>with Paul here in that I do agree...

938
00:42:16.300 --> 00:42:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I certainly agree that

939
00:42:18.080 --> 00:42:19.580
<v Speaker 3>the anthropic idea

940
00:42:20.300 --> 00:42:22.540
<v Speaker 3>is valid within certain contexts.

941
00:42:22.920 --> 00:42:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I personally see the rapid emergence of life

942
00:42:26.220 --> 00:42:30.460
<v Speaker 3>as being evidence of life being maybe easy,

943
00:42:30.660 --> 00:42:32.900
<v Speaker 3>but it's not strong evidence.

944
00:42:33.200 --> 00:42:34.480
<v Speaker 3>That's where I would change the answer.

945
00:42:34.480 --> 00:42:35.360
<v Speaker 4>It's only one sample.

946
00:42:35.460 --> 00:42:36.340
<v Speaker 4>It's one sample.

947
00:42:36.560 --> 00:42:38.740
<v Speaker 3>If we could see it in three or four places,

948
00:42:39.040 --> 00:42:40.860
<v Speaker 3>then I would start thinking it was strong evidence.

949
00:42:40.940 --> 00:42:42.940
<v Speaker 3>Because it is one, it is weak evidence,

950
00:42:43.100 --> 00:42:44.220
<v Speaker 3>but I would still call it evidence.

951
00:42:44.740 --> 00:42:46.920
<v Phillip Adams>And the next question, thank you very much.

952
00:42:48.720 --> 00:42:49.580
<v Audience>I'm going to ask you a question.

953
00:42:49.580 --> 00:42:50.100
<v Audience>I'm going to ask you a question.

954
00:42:50.100 --> 00:42:51.160
<v Audience>For Paul Davies.

955
00:42:52.220 --> 00:42:54.100
<v Audience>If the blue shift,

956
00:42:56.640 --> 00:42:57.380
<v Audience>if the blue shift,

957
00:42:57.380 --> 00:42:58.040
<v Audience>distant blue shift

958
00:42:58.040 --> 00:42:59.160
<v Audience>is caused,

959
00:42:59.400 --> 00:43:00.900
<v Audience>could it be caused by

960
00:43:01.600 --> 00:43:03.100
<v Audience>a contracting universe?

961
00:43:04.220 --> 00:43:05.180
<v Audience>And if so,

962
00:43:05.380 --> 00:43:07.700
<v Audience>would this explain dark matter

963
00:43:07.700 --> 00:43:08.580
<v Audience>and dark energy?

964
00:43:09.040 --> 00:43:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Ah, well you should put that really to Brian.

965
00:43:12.700 --> 00:43:13.800
<v Speaker 4>The blue shift.

966
00:43:14.160 --> 00:43:15.340
<v Speaker 4>The blue shift.

967
00:43:15.600 --> 00:43:16.460
<v Speaker 4>So the question was

968
00:43:17.100 --> 00:43:18.340
<v Speaker 4>the blue shift.

969
00:43:20.100 --> 00:43:21.300
<v Speaker 4>Well we see a red shift.

970
00:43:21.520 --> 00:43:22.800
<v Speaker 4>You don't see much blue.

971
00:43:23.020 --> 00:43:25.980
<v Speaker 3>So we see blue shift of only a few objects in the sky.

972
00:43:26.080 --> 00:43:27.500
<v Speaker 3>The Andromeda galaxy,

973
00:43:27.680 --> 00:43:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a few other galaxies.

974
00:43:28.880 --> 00:43:31.580
<v Speaker 3>But most objects in the universe

975
00:43:31.580 --> 00:43:32.900
<v Speaker 3>are red shifted because

976
00:43:32.900 --> 00:43:35.100
<v Speaker 3>space is expanding.

977
00:43:35.180 --> 00:43:37.840
<v Speaker 3>That means that as their light comes towards us,

978
00:43:37.880 --> 00:43:39.460
<v Speaker 3>that light gets

979
00:43:39.460 --> 00:43:41.980
<v Speaker 3>essentially stretched by the expansion of space.

980
00:43:42.340 --> 00:43:43.480
<v Speaker 3>And when you stretch light,

981
00:43:43.620 --> 00:43:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you make it appear redder.

982
00:43:45.500 --> 00:43:47.900
<v Speaker 3>And so we believe that

983
00:43:47.900 --> 00:43:49.280
<v Speaker 3>that expansion

984
00:43:50.100 --> 00:43:52.060
<v Speaker 3>is the way the universe was born.

985
00:43:52.180 --> 00:43:54.300
<v Speaker 3>It was born for some reason in a big bang.

986
00:43:54.480 --> 00:43:55.540
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why it was,

987
00:43:55.680 --> 00:43:56.540
<v Speaker 3>but it seems to have.

988
00:43:56.680 --> 00:43:59.580
<v Speaker 3>Because we can run the universe back 13.8 billion years

989
00:43:59.580 --> 00:44:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and we can see it expanding in the past

990
00:44:02.120 --> 00:44:04.460
<v Speaker 3>and changing its rate over time.

991
00:44:05.020 --> 00:44:05.840
<v Speaker 3>So it turns out

992
00:44:05.840 --> 00:44:07.340
<v Speaker 3>it's the way that the expansion

993
00:44:07.340 --> 00:44:08.780
<v Speaker 3>changes over time

994
00:44:08.780 --> 00:44:11.140
<v Speaker 3>that gives you hints about dark matter

995
00:44:11.140 --> 00:44:12.440
<v Speaker 3>and dark energy.

996
00:44:12.700 --> 00:44:15.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's the work that I did to

997
00:44:15.760 --> 00:44:18.540
<v Speaker 3>help earn a Nobel Prize

998
00:44:18.540 --> 00:44:19.980
<v Speaker 3>and the

999
00:44:20.100 --> 00:44:21.960
<v Speaker 3>funny conclusion we have is that

1000
00:44:21.960 --> 00:44:24.340
<v Speaker 3>the universe is in this funny battle

1001
00:44:24.340 --> 00:44:26.560
<v Speaker 3>where it was born expanding

1002
00:44:26.560 --> 00:44:27.300
<v Speaker 3>very quickly,

1003
00:44:27.560 --> 00:44:28.820
<v Speaker 3>it slowed down,

1004
00:44:29.060 --> 00:44:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and then 6 billion years ago it started speeding up.

1005
00:44:32.100 --> 00:44:33.300
<v Speaker 3>And the way we can explain that

1006
00:44:33.300 --> 00:44:35.960
<v Speaker 3>is 70% of the universe is energy

1007
00:44:35.960 --> 00:44:36.700
<v Speaker 3>that's everywhere,

1008
00:44:37.400 --> 00:44:40.100
<v Speaker 3>and 25% of the universe is stuff we call

1009
00:44:40.100 --> 00:44:42.220
<v Speaker 3>dark matter, which has normal gravity,

1010
00:44:42.300 --> 00:44:43.280
<v Speaker 3>we just don't know what it is.

1011
00:44:43.600 --> 00:44:45.920
<v Speaker 3>And 5% of the universe are the atoms

1012
00:44:45.920 --> 00:44:47.700
<v Speaker 3>that we know and love here on Earth.

1013
00:44:48.000 --> 00:44:49.540
<v Speaker 3>And it's a crazy explanation,

1014
00:44:50.100 --> 00:44:51.980
<v Speaker 3>but thus far it has been able

1015
00:44:51.980 --> 00:44:53.300
<v Speaker 3>to predict

1016
00:44:54.100 --> 00:44:55.900
<v Speaker 3>everything we've been able to measure about the universe.

1017
00:44:56.300 --> 00:44:58.300
<v Speaker 4>The gentleman's question was certainly pertinent

1018
00:44:58.300 --> 00:44:59.500
<v Speaker 4>in as much as it is

1019
00:45:00.100 --> 00:45:02.100
<v Speaker 4>the shift in the wavelength of light

1020
00:45:02.100 --> 00:45:03.940
<v Speaker 4>that gives us a clue to how matter moves

1021
00:45:03.940 --> 00:45:06.060
<v Speaker 4>and if there's unseen

1022
00:45:06.060 --> 00:45:07.840
<v Speaker 4>stuff, whether it's dark matter

1023
00:45:07.840 --> 00:45:09.860
<v Speaker 4>or dark energy, we can chart it

1024
00:45:09.860 --> 00:45:11.720
<v Speaker 4>by the motion of the stuff we do see.

1025
00:45:11.960 --> 00:45:13.280
<v Speaker 4>That will trace it.

1026
00:45:13.440 --> 00:45:16.000
<v Speaker 4>So that point is well taken.

1027
00:45:16.980 --> 00:45:18.300
<v Phillip Adams>Next question, thank you.

1028
00:45:18.860 --> 00:45:19.920
<v Audience>Good afternoon gentlemen.

1029
00:45:20.600 --> 00:45:22.180
<v Audience>I'm David, and I'm wondering

1030
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:24.020
<v Audience>to expand on

1031
00:45:24.020 --> 00:45:25.440
<v Audience>Paul Davies, what you said before about

1032
00:45:26.740 --> 00:45:27.620
<v Audience>biology being

1033
00:45:27.620 --> 00:45:29.700
<v Audience>not being a real science.

1034
00:45:29.800 --> 00:45:31.260
<v Speaker 4>Am I speaking to a biologist here?

1035
00:45:31.440 --> 00:45:32.600
<v Audience>I remember when I studied physics,

1036
00:45:32.640 --> 00:45:34.660
<v Audience>it was drilled into me that physics is the one and only

1037
00:45:34.660 --> 00:45:37.520
<v Audience>real science and that everything else is an imprecise science.

1038
00:45:37.940 --> 00:45:39.540
<v Audience>And I would like to expand on that with

1039
00:45:40.100 --> 00:45:40.940
<v Audience>climatology and climate science,

1040
00:45:41.140 --> 00:45:44.060
<v Audience>I see that as an imprecise science

1041
00:45:44.060 --> 00:45:45.920
<v Audience>and it's only been around

1042
00:45:45.920 --> 00:45:47.360
<v Audience>for a decade or so.

1043
00:45:48.400 --> 00:45:49.860
<v Audience>And it's being espoused,

1044
00:45:50.100 --> 00:45:50.720
<v Audience>and it's the greatest science,

1045
00:45:50.880 --> 00:45:52.180
<v Audience>and all these people are getting over

1046
00:45:52.180 --> 00:45:54.160
<v Audience>saying everything they're saying

1047
00:45:54.160 --> 00:45:56.540
<v Audience>when it's really an imprecise science

1048
00:45:56.540 --> 00:45:59.700
<v Audience>that hasn't really clocked up much mileage

1049
00:45:59.700 --> 00:46:00.420
<v Audience>compared to physics.

1050
00:46:01.480 --> 00:46:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Alright, well let me address that.

1051
00:46:04.100 --> 00:46:05.840
<v Speaker 4>When I say that I think

1052
00:46:05.840 --> 00:46:07.480
<v Speaker 4>physics is a real science, that's because

1053
00:46:08.100 --> 00:46:09.660
<v Speaker 4>it has a theoretical basis.

1054
00:46:10.080 --> 00:46:11.380
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people don't understand

1055
00:46:11.380 --> 00:46:12.980
<v Speaker 4>what you mean by theory and physics.

1056
00:46:13.440 --> 00:46:15.260
<v Speaker 4>What we mean are universal

1057
00:46:15.260 --> 00:46:16.940
<v Speaker 4>mathematical principles

1058
00:46:17.440 --> 00:46:19.500
<v Speaker 4>that we have some confidence in.

1059
00:46:20.100 --> 00:46:21.160
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to biology,

1060
00:46:21.960 --> 00:46:23.900
<v Speaker 4>there is one universal

1061
00:46:23.900 --> 00:46:25.380
<v Speaker 4>principle, it's Darwinian evolution.

1062
00:46:26.220 --> 00:46:27.540
<v Speaker 4>But it's not even clear

1063
00:46:28.100 --> 00:46:29.820
<v Speaker 4>that biology has universal

1064
00:46:29.820 --> 00:46:32.020
<v Speaker 4>mathematical principles. It may just be a lot of

1065
00:46:32.020 --> 00:46:33.320
<v Speaker 4>collection of special cases.

1066
00:46:33.680 --> 00:46:35.440
<v Speaker 4>So that's what I was referring to.

1067
00:46:35.840 --> 00:46:37.980
<v Speaker 4>When you take physics and apply

1068
00:46:37.980 --> 00:46:39.960
<v Speaker 4>it to more complex systems, chemistry is

1069
00:46:39.960 --> 00:46:40.720
<v Speaker 4>the first example,

1070
00:46:41.540 --> 00:46:43.720
<v Speaker 4>that the more complex it gets,

1071
00:46:43.820 --> 00:46:45.960
<v Speaker 4>the more hand-wavy and the bigger

1072
00:46:45.960 --> 00:46:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the error bars and the harder it is

1073
00:46:47.560 --> 00:46:49.820
<v Speaker 4>to be predictive. But chemists do

1074
00:46:50.100 --> 00:46:51.900
<v Speaker 4>really pretty well when it comes to

1075
00:46:51.900 --> 00:46:54.000
<v Speaker 4>applying to systems like

1076
00:46:55.460 --> 00:46:56.060
<v Speaker 4>climate.

1077
00:46:56.620 --> 00:46:57.820
<v Speaker 4>You're still applying

1078
00:46:57.820 --> 00:46:59.760
<v Speaker 4>those same physical principles

1079
00:46:59.760 --> 00:47:01.140
<v Speaker 4>that we have great confidence in,

1080
00:47:01.280 --> 00:47:03.400
<v Speaker 4>but because there are so many variables

1081
00:47:04.100 --> 00:47:05.540
<v Speaker 4>then the error bars

1082
00:47:06.100 --> 00:47:07.940
<v Speaker 4>are that much bigger and there's more

1083
00:47:07.940 --> 00:47:09.740
<v Speaker 4>scope for people to disagree

1084
00:47:09.740 --> 00:47:10.660
<v Speaker 4>about the outcome.

1085
00:47:11.140 --> 00:47:12.860
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to walk through that, Meinfield?

1086
00:47:13.140 --> 00:47:15.820
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yeah. So it really comes down to

1087
00:47:16.680 --> 00:47:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the basis of science.

1088
00:47:18.260 --> 00:47:19.740
<v Speaker 3>Science is about taking

1089
00:47:20.100 --> 00:47:21.460
<v Speaker 3>a series of observations,

1090
00:47:21.640 --> 00:47:23.700
<v Speaker 3>some ideas, and predicting

1091
00:47:23.700 --> 00:47:25.880
<v Speaker 3>things. And biology,

1092
00:47:26.040 --> 00:47:27.340
<v Speaker 3>we do that. My father's a

1093
00:47:28.020 --> 00:47:29.600
<v Speaker 3>biologist who predicts fish stocks

1094
00:47:29.600 --> 00:47:31.920
<v Speaker 3>in Alaska. That's what he did when I was a child.

1095
00:47:32.240 --> 00:47:33.500
<v Speaker 3>And it wasn't perfect,

1096
00:47:33.980 --> 00:47:35.380
<v Speaker 3>but it was better than random.

1097
00:47:35.560 --> 00:47:37.520
<v Speaker 3>And he could make predictions and he could

1098
00:47:38.100 --> 00:47:39.800
<v Speaker 3>estimate his uncertainty. And it was

1099
00:47:39.800 --> 00:47:41.440
<v Speaker 3>useful because it told people

1100
00:47:41.440 --> 00:47:43.620
<v Speaker 3>how many fish they could take out this year.

1101
00:47:43.800 --> 00:47:45.840
<v Speaker 3>And if they didn't have the science, they'd have to fish

1102
00:47:45.840 --> 00:47:47.940
<v Speaker 3>less without damaging the crops,

1103
00:47:48.240 --> 00:47:49.620
<v Speaker 3>or damaging the fish stocks.

1104
00:47:50.100 --> 00:47:52.020
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, when you talk to things like

1105
00:47:52.020 --> 00:47:54.040
<v Speaker 3>climate science, as Paul said,

1106
00:47:54.220 --> 00:47:55.020
<v Speaker 3>it is complicated.

1107
00:47:56.020 --> 00:47:58.020
<v Speaker 3>It's based on the physics principles, and indeed

1108
00:47:58.020 --> 00:48:00.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the stuff I use to study stars

1109
00:48:00.200 --> 00:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and understand stars, we use

1110
00:48:02.100 --> 00:48:03.460
<v Speaker 3>in physics codes to

1111
00:48:03.460 --> 00:48:05.100
<v Speaker 3>model the climate.

1112
00:48:05.640 --> 00:48:08.060
<v Speaker 3>So can we model the climate perfectly?

1113
00:48:08.260 --> 00:48:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not. Are there uncertainties?

1114
00:48:10.200 --> 00:48:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Are we better

1115
00:48:11.880 --> 00:48:13.560
<v Speaker 3>than random? Absolutely.

1116
00:48:14.220 --> 00:48:15.980
<v Speaker 3>And so there is information

1117
00:48:16.820 --> 00:48:18.020
<v Speaker 3>in our models

1118
00:48:18.020 --> 00:48:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of climate. It's not perfect,

1119
00:48:20.100 --> 00:48:21.980
<v Speaker 3>but it's better than just going

1120
00:48:21.980 --> 00:48:24.080
<v Speaker 3>blind. And so when people

1121
00:48:24.080 --> 00:48:26.000
<v Speaker 3>say, we think this is going to be the effect,

1122
00:48:26.140 --> 00:48:27.220
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't mean they've got it perfectly,

1123
00:48:27.380 --> 00:48:29.940
<v Speaker 3>but it's better than no information

1124
00:48:29.940 --> 00:48:31.840
<v Speaker 3>at all. And the current estimate

1125
00:48:31.840 --> 00:48:33.800
<v Speaker 3>is, you know, we're

1126
00:48:33.800 --> 00:48:36.040
<v Speaker 3>95% sure that we're

1127
00:48:36.040 --> 00:48:37.940
<v Speaker 3>changing things. Not 100%, it's

1128
00:48:37.940 --> 00:48:39.980
<v Speaker 3>95. And you have a range of

1129
00:48:39.980 --> 00:48:42.000
<v Speaker 3>outcomes for the future. I live in the

1130
00:48:42.000 --> 00:48:43.840
<v Phillip Adams>other 5% with our Prime Minister.

1131
00:48:44.600 --> 00:48:45.760
<v Phillip Adams>Sir, your turn.

1132
00:48:47.140 --> 00:48:47.620
<v Audience>Paul,

1133
00:48:48.380 --> 00:48:50.080
<v Audience>the other night in your opening address, you were talking

1134
00:48:50.100 --> 00:48:51.780
<v Audience>about what Einstein called his

1135
00:48:51.780 --> 00:48:54.040
<v Audience>biggest blunder with his theory about

1136
00:48:54.040 --> 00:48:55.680
<v Audience>reverse gravity and how

1137
00:48:55.680 --> 00:48:58.080
<v Audience>it may actually wind up being quite closely

1138
00:48:58.080 --> 00:49:00.140
<v Audience>related to whatever's going on

1139
00:49:00.140 --> 00:49:01.540
<v Audience>with the work that Brian was talking about.

1140
00:49:01.820 --> 00:49:03.880
<v Audience>I'm sure that the story is much more

1141
00:49:03.880 --> 00:49:05.840
<v Audience>subtle and complex than simply Einstein

1142
00:49:05.840 --> 00:49:07.880
<v Audience>was right after all. I'm

1143
00:49:07.880 --> 00:49:09.760
<v Audience>curious to hear both your thoughts about

1144
00:49:09.760 --> 00:49:11.860
<v Audience>the relation between what Einstein was talking about

1145
00:49:11.860 --> 00:49:13.660
<v Audience>and Brian's work with the

1146
00:49:13.660 --> 00:49:15.660
<v Audience>dark energy and dark matter. Right.

1147
00:49:15.840 --> 00:49:17.980
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think as I explained in that

1148
00:49:17.980 --> 00:49:19.580
<v Speaker 4>opening address, Einstein originally

1149
00:49:20.100 --> 00:49:21.260
<v Speaker 4>thought that the universe was static

1150
00:49:22.100 --> 00:49:23.360
<v Speaker 4>and he wanted

1151
00:49:24.100 --> 00:49:25.840
<v Speaker 4>some way of counterbalancing the

1152
00:49:25.840 --> 00:49:27.940
<v Speaker 4>attraction of gravitation to stop the universe

1153
00:49:27.940 --> 00:49:29.080
<v Speaker 4>collapsing in a big heap.

1154
00:49:29.660 --> 00:49:31.900
<v Speaker 4>And then, so he introduced by

1155
00:49:31.900 --> 00:49:34.180
<v Speaker 4>hand in his equations, very famously,

1156
00:49:34.180 --> 00:49:35.800
<v Speaker 4>an extra term called the cosmological

1157
00:49:35.800 --> 00:49:38.080
<v Speaker 4>term that does the job

1158
00:49:38.080 --> 00:49:39.900
<v Speaker 4>but that the equilibrium is

1159
00:49:39.900 --> 00:49:41.520
<v Speaker 4>unstable and so

1160
00:49:42.320 --> 00:49:44.000
<v Speaker 4>it's not very good for

1161
00:49:44.000 --> 00:49:45.740
<v Speaker 4>the original purpose it was intended

1162
00:49:45.740 --> 00:49:47.460
<v Speaker 4>for. And so he dropped it

1163
00:49:47.460 --> 00:49:49.440
<v Speaker 4>and felt that it was a blunder.

1164
00:49:50.100 --> 00:49:51.360
<v Speaker 4>But it's

1165
00:49:52.100 --> 00:49:53.780
<v Speaker 4>Brian may have his own take on this.

1166
00:49:53.880 --> 00:49:55.900
<v Speaker 4>It's fashionable today to say

1167
00:49:55.900 --> 00:49:58.160
<v Speaker 4>that the universe is being accelerated

1168
00:49:58.160 --> 00:50:00.060
<v Speaker 4>by something we call dark

1169
00:50:00.060 --> 00:50:01.900
<v Speaker 4>energy and the nature of that dark energy

1170
00:50:01.900 --> 00:50:03.260
<v Speaker 4>is a deep mystery.

1171
00:50:03.560 --> 00:50:05.920
<v Speaker 4>And in one sense it is a deep mystery but in

1172
00:50:05.920 --> 00:50:08.080
<v Speaker 4>another sense it is, we know

1173
00:50:08.080 --> 00:50:09.980
<v Speaker 4>no reason at the moment why it

1174
00:50:09.980 --> 00:50:11.640
<v Speaker 4>should not just be Einstein's original

1175
00:50:12.380 --> 00:50:13.340
<v Speaker 4>cosmological term.

1176
00:50:13.580 --> 00:50:15.380
<v Speaker 4>Of course we still have to explain why

1177
00:50:16.100 --> 00:50:17.240
<v Speaker 4>it's there or

1178
00:50:17.240 --> 00:50:20.020
<v Speaker 4>more to the point we have to explain the value of that term

1179
00:50:20.100 --> 00:50:22.020
<v Speaker 4>we don't know what that number is but then we don't

1180
00:50:22.020 --> 00:50:24.020
<v Speaker 4>know what gives the number of Newton's

1181
00:50:24.020 --> 00:50:25.960
<v Speaker 4>gravitational constant or Planck's constant

1182
00:50:25.960 --> 00:50:27.240
<v Speaker 4>or a lot of other things.

1183
00:50:27.520 --> 00:50:30.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think the simplest explanation is it's good old

1184
00:50:30.700 --> 00:50:32.060
<v Speaker 4>Einstein's cosmological constant

1185
00:50:32.060 --> 00:50:34.040
<v Speaker 4>at work. That would

1186
00:50:34.040 --> 00:50:35.780
<v Speaker 4>be refuted however if we found

1187
00:50:35.780 --> 00:50:38.100
<v Speaker 4>that the density of

1188
00:50:38.100 --> 00:50:39.980
<v Speaker 4>dark energy or if you like the value

1189
00:50:39.980 --> 00:50:41.640
<v Speaker 4>of lambda changed over time

1190
00:50:41.640 --> 00:50:43.520
<v Speaker 4>because they've become a time dependent quantity.

1191
00:50:43.740 --> 00:50:45.780
<v Speaker 4>Then we'd need a more elaborate theory

1192
00:50:45.780 --> 00:50:47.960
<v Speaker 4>but for now I'm happy to just stick

1193
00:50:47.960 --> 00:50:50.080
<v Speaker 4>with Einstein's theory.

1194
00:50:50.100 --> 00:50:52.000
<v Speaker 4>It is just the energy density of

1195
00:50:52.000 --> 00:50:52.560
<v Speaker 4>empty space.

1196
00:50:53.980 --> 00:50:55.780
<v Speaker 4>I agree exactly with

1197
00:50:55.780 --> 00:50:57.500
<v Speaker 3>what you said as before but

1198
00:50:58.100 --> 00:51:00.060
<v Speaker 3>I think Einstein would kind of chuckle

1199
00:51:00.060 --> 00:51:01.900
<v Speaker 3>knowing what we know now because

1200
00:51:01.900 --> 00:51:04.080
<v Speaker 3>he did invent the cosmological constant

1201
00:51:04.080 --> 00:51:05.580
<v Speaker 3>for the wrong reason.

1202
00:51:05.940 --> 00:51:08.000
<v Speaker 3>He described himself as acting like a

1203
00:51:08.000 --> 00:51:09.480
<v Speaker 3>donkey later on in life.

1204
00:51:09.780 --> 00:51:11.580
<v Speaker 3>That's the direct translation in German.

1205
00:51:11.880 --> 00:51:12.980
<v Speaker 3>Acting like a donkey.

1206
00:51:13.520 --> 00:51:15.820
<v Speaker 3>So he introduced it for the wrong reason

1207
00:51:15.820 --> 00:51:17.780
<v Speaker 3>but the reason it's interesting is it's the

1208
00:51:17.780 --> 00:51:20.080
<v Speaker 3>simplest modification you could

1209
00:51:20.100 --> 00:51:21.640
<v Speaker 3>make to his equations.

1210
00:51:22.080 --> 00:51:23.720
<v Speaker 3>And when we go out and we

1211
00:51:23.720 --> 00:51:25.500
<v Speaker 3>look in nature, voila,

1212
00:51:25.740 --> 00:51:27.780
<v Speaker 3>that simple modification he

1213
00:51:27.780 --> 00:51:30.020
<v Speaker 3>dreamt up seems to be right.

1214
00:51:30.160 --> 00:51:31.300
<v Speaker 3>So, you know,

1215
00:51:31.360 --> 00:51:34.100
<v Speaker 3>it was a mistake but it turns out to be relevant.

1216
00:51:34.380 --> 00:51:36.020
<v Speaker 3>You know, like many mistakes are.

1217
00:51:37.300 --> 00:51:38.180
<v Phillip Adams>Next question

1218
00:51:38.180 --> 00:51:38.860
<v Phillip Adams>from the floor.

1219
00:51:40.100 --> 00:51:41.560
<v Audience>With the huge popularity

1220
00:51:42.180 --> 00:51:44.100
<v Audience>of science fiction, do you see

1221
00:51:44.100 --> 00:51:46.140
<v Audience>it as useful or concerning for science?

1222
00:51:48.380 --> 00:51:49.920
<v Phillip Adams>Science fiction, now you're

1223
00:51:50.100 --> 00:51:50.720
<v Phillip Adams>a literary critic.

1224
00:51:50.980 --> 00:51:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Some of my best friends

1225
00:51:53.760 --> 00:51:54.580
<v Speaker 4>write science fiction.

1226
00:51:54.840 --> 00:51:57.520
<v Speaker 4>We just hosted a lecture at the

1227
00:51:57.520 --> 00:51:59.940
<v Speaker 4>Beyond Center in Arizona

1228
00:52:00.600 --> 00:52:01.820
<v Speaker 4>from David Brin,

1229
00:52:01.940 --> 00:52:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the science fiction writer.

1230
00:52:04.900 --> 00:52:06.020
<v Speaker 4>And it's

1231
00:52:06.020 --> 00:52:07.120
<v Speaker 4>of course a two-way street.

1232
00:52:07.260 --> 00:52:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Science fiction writers draw inspiration

1233
00:52:09.120 --> 00:52:11.800
<v Speaker 4>from work at the frontier of science

1234
00:52:11.800 --> 00:52:14.000
<v Speaker 4>and sometimes scientists

1235
00:52:14.000 --> 00:52:15.940
<v Speaker 4>draw inspiration from science fiction.

1236
00:52:16.120 --> 00:52:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I like to quote a postdoc

1237
00:52:17.880 --> 00:52:20.020
<v Speaker 4>of mine from many years ago who said he owed

1238
00:52:20.100 --> 00:52:22.080
<v Speaker 4>a great debt of gratitude to Superman

1239
00:52:22.080 --> 00:52:23.960
<v Speaker 4>without whom he would never have

1240
00:52:23.960 --> 00:52:24.640
<v Speaker 4>become a physicist.

1241
00:52:25.100 --> 00:52:28.060
<v Speaker 4>I think it does work in both

1242
00:52:28.060 --> 00:52:28.480
<v Speaker 4>directions.

1243
00:52:30.220 --> 00:52:31.900
<v Phillip Adams>While I await another

1244
00:52:31.900 --> 00:52:33.140
<v Phillip Adams>question here, Brian,

1245
00:52:33.320 --> 00:52:35.980
<v Phillip Adams>you've revealed that your father

1246
00:52:35.980 --> 00:52:38.040
<v Phillip Adams>was a scientist, a biologist.

1247
00:52:38.600 --> 00:52:39.900
<v Phillip Adams>So, clearly

1248
00:52:39.900 --> 00:52:42.180
<v Phillip Adams>you're both nature

1249
00:52:42.180 --> 00:52:43.960
<v Phillip Adams>and nurture, but I'm not

1250
00:52:43.960 --> 00:52:45.360
<v Phillip Adams>quite sure about you, Paul.

1251
00:52:45.500 --> 00:52:46.900
<v Phillip Adams>How did you happen?

1252
00:52:47.340 --> 00:52:50.080
<v Speaker 4>My parents never got over the

1253
00:52:50.100 --> 00:52:52.120
<v Speaker 4>shock when I said I wanted

1254
00:52:52.120 --> 00:52:53.780
<v Speaker 4>to be a physicist. I mean, first thing is

1255
00:52:53.780 --> 00:52:55.480
<v Speaker 4>what's that? And secondly, well, why?

1256
00:52:56.880 --> 00:52:57.760
<v Speaker 4>And so

1257
00:52:57.760 --> 00:52:59.820
<v Speaker 4>I think I was the only

1258
00:52:59.820 --> 00:53:01.820
<v Speaker 4>scientist, probably still am,

1259
00:53:02.000 --> 00:53:03.820
<v Speaker 4>in as much of the family

1260
00:53:03.820 --> 00:53:06.080
<v Speaker 4>as I can trace. So, very much

1261
00:53:06.080 --> 00:53:07.100
<v Speaker 4>an aberration.

1262
00:53:08.460 --> 00:53:09.420
<v Speaker 4>So, my...

1263
00:53:09.420 --> 00:53:11.180
<v Speaker 4>You were talking about Eureka moments.

1264
00:53:11.360 --> 00:53:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Was there one for you?

1265
00:53:13.340 --> 00:53:15.380
<v Speaker 4>I usually say I was born a physicist.

1266
00:53:16.980 --> 00:53:18.120
<v Speaker 4>There is such a thing

1267
00:53:18.120 --> 00:53:19.940
<v Speaker 4>as a calling. You can be born

1268
00:53:20.100 --> 00:53:21.680
<v Speaker 4>with a calling. So, for me,

1269
00:53:21.760 --> 00:53:24.060
<v Speaker 4>it was the lure of physics.

1270
00:53:24.280 --> 00:53:26.020
<v Speaker 4>For the earliest age, I was just fascinated

1271
00:53:26.020 --> 00:53:28.060
<v Speaker 4>with things seen and unseen.

1272
00:53:28.340 --> 00:53:29.220
<v Speaker 4>And particularly things unseen.

1273
00:53:29.640 --> 00:53:31.620
<v Speaker 4>The fact that they're all around atoms.

1274
00:53:32.060 --> 00:53:34.020
<v Speaker 4>I used to be fascinated by atoms, even

1275
00:53:34.020 --> 00:53:35.900
<v Speaker 4>as a small child, when I read about

1276
00:53:35.900 --> 00:53:38.040
<v Speaker 4>how many of them you could put on a line.

1277
00:53:38.140 --> 00:53:39.720
<v Speaker 4>And thinking, well, how do they know that?

1278
00:53:39.760 --> 00:53:41.760
<v Speaker 4>How do they get an atom? How do you do something

1279
00:53:41.760 --> 00:53:43.340
<v Speaker 4>with an atom? It's so small,

1280
00:53:43.520 --> 00:53:45.940
<v Speaker 4>you can't muck around with it. How do you get at it?

1281
00:53:46.100 --> 00:53:48.140
<v Speaker 4>And I was just fascinated by the notion

1282
00:53:48.140 --> 00:53:49.960
<v Speaker 4>of little invisible things.

1283
00:53:50.100 --> 00:53:52.120
<v Phillip Adams>I find this very reassuring.

1284
00:53:52.420 --> 00:53:53.820
<v Phillip Adams>Because I've always suspected

1285
00:53:53.820 --> 00:53:55.760
<v Phillip Adams>you were an alien from another planet.

1286
00:53:56.860 --> 00:53:57.340
<v Phillip Adams>Sir?

1287
00:53:58.740 --> 00:53:59.980
<v Audience>I find it hard

1288
00:53:59.980 --> 00:54:02.040
<v Audience>not to feel that dark energy and dark

1289
00:54:02.040 --> 00:54:03.620
<v Audience>matter are kind of fudge factors.

1290
00:54:03.940 --> 00:54:06.100
<v Audience>What's the minimum amount of physics that I would

1291
00:54:06.100 --> 00:54:08.120
<v Audience>need to study to be convinced, from a

1292
00:54:08.120 --> 00:54:10.140
<v Audience>theoretical standpoint, that these things are necessary?

1293
00:54:10.580 --> 00:54:12.320
<v Audience>Or just aren't errors in models?

1294
00:54:12.980 --> 00:54:13.940
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually...

1295
00:54:13.940 --> 00:54:15.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to tell you that everything we know

1296
00:54:15.960 --> 00:54:17.800
<v Speaker 3>in physics, and I'm going to maybe be

1297
00:54:17.800 --> 00:54:20.080
<v Speaker 3>contrary to Paul, is a fudge factor at some level.

1298
00:54:20.100 --> 00:54:22.060
<v Speaker 3>We have a set

1299
00:54:22.060 --> 00:54:23.420
<v Speaker 3>of ideas to understand

1300
00:54:24.100 --> 00:54:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and predict what things go on.

1301
00:54:26.220 --> 00:54:27.540
<v Speaker 3>We call them particles.

1302
00:54:27.680 --> 00:54:29.040
<v Speaker 3>We have a whole hierarchy.

1303
00:54:29.580 --> 00:54:32.120
<v Speaker 3>No one has shown that that description

1304
00:54:32.120 --> 00:54:34.120
<v Speaker 3>is unique. It may well

1305
00:54:34.120 --> 00:54:36.160
<v Speaker 3>not be unique. Maybe it is. I don't

1306
00:54:36.160 --> 00:54:38.280
<v Speaker 3>know. But we know, for example,

1307
00:54:38.420 --> 00:54:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'll take the example of gravity.

1308
00:54:40.400 --> 00:54:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Newton's laws,

1309
00:54:41.940 --> 00:54:44.000
<v Speaker 3>very useful. I use

1310
00:54:44.000 --> 00:54:46.040
<v Speaker 3>them all the time. If I'm going to go and

1311
00:54:46.040 --> 00:54:47.980
<v Speaker 3>calculate how fast this glass

1312
00:54:47.980 --> 00:54:49.960
<v Speaker 3>drops and hits the floor, I

1313
00:54:50.100 --> 00:54:51.900
<v Speaker 3>use Newton's laws. I don't mess around

1314
00:54:51.900 --> 00:54:53.180
<v Speaker 3>with general relativity. It's too hard.

1315
00:54:54.280 --> 00:54:55.860
<v Speaker 3>And yet, we know that

1316
00:54:55.860 --> 00:54:57.380
<v Speaker 3>general relativity is a better description

1317
00:54:57.940 --> 00:54:59.980
<v Speaker 3>than Newton's laws. But we

1318
00:54:59.980 --> 00:55:01.940
<v Speaker 3>also know general relativity doesn't work in the quantum

1319
00:55:01.940 --> 00:55:03.420
<v Speaker 3>world. So it's not right.

1320
00:55:04.180 --> 00:55:05.940
<v Speaker 3>So what's reality? Reality

1321
00:55:05.940 --> 00:55:08.100
<v Speaker 3>is the best job we have right now.

1322
00:55:08.420 --> 00:55:09.660
<v Speaker 3>We have a set of particles,

1323
00:55:10.000 --> 00:55:11.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, 17 particles,

1324
00:55:12.340 --> 00:55:13.740
<v Speaker 3>which may or may not be

1325
00:55:14.780 --> 00:55:15.980
<v Speaker 3>absolutely accurate. But

1326
00:55:15.980 --> 00:55:18.120
<v Speaker 3>we know there's probably dark matter out there

1327
00:55:18.120 --> 00:55:19.900
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't describe. So maybe

1328
00:55:20.100 --> 00:55:21.900
<v Speaker 3>in figuring out how to describe dark matter,

1329
00:55:22.060 --> 00:55:23.440
<v Speaker 3>the whole picture

1330
00:55:24.100 --> 00:55:26.000
<v Speaker 3>will disintegrate and we'll have

1331
00:55:26.000 --> 00:55:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to come up with a new one. Maybe not.

1332
00:55:27.940 --> 00:55:29.980
<v Speaker 3>String theory would say you'd really come up with a whole

1333
00:55:29.980 --> 00:55:31.180
<v Speaker 3>new set of ideas.

1334
00:55:32.020 --> 00:55:32.460
<v Speaker 3>So,

1335
00:55:33.580 --> 00:55:36.080
<v Speaker 3>the fudge factor of dark matter and dark energy

1336
00:55:37.000 --> 00:55:37.700
<v Speaker 3>is useful

1337
00:55:37.700 --> 00:55:39.860
<v Speaker 3>because we keep on being able to test it.

1338
00:55:39.940 --> 00:55:41.480
<v Speaker 3>And we keep on getting the right answer.

1339
00:55:41.820 --> 00:55:44.180
<v Speaker 3>Just like Newton's laws get the right answer

1340
00:55:44.180 --> 00:55:45.880
<v Speaker 3>all the time. Certainly,

1341
00:55:46.000 --> 00:55:47.360
<v Speaker 3>I would guess, imperfect,

1342
00:55:48.340 --> 00:55:49.900
<v Speaker 3>but very useful. Like

1343
00:55:50.100 --> 00:55:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Newton's laws are in gravity.

1344
00:55:52.560 --> 00:55:54.000
<v Speaker 4>We know that

1345
00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:55.600
<v Speaker 4>there is some dark matter,

1346
00:55:55.700 --> 00:55:58.020
<v Speaker 4>neutrinos for example, but they don't weigh

1347
00:55:58.020 --> 00:55:59.820
<v Speaker 4>enough to make up for

1348
00:55:59.820 --> 00:56:01.840
<v Speaker 4>what the astronomical observations

1349
00:56:01.840 --> 00:56:02.920
<v Speaker 4>suggest are there.

1350
00:56:03.420 --> 00:56:06.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, people here may be baffled

1351
00:56:06.160 --> 00:56:07.080
<v Speaker 4>by what we're talking about.

1352
00:56:07.780 --> 00:56:10.100
<v Speaker 4>But a very easy way

1353
00:56:10.100 --> 00:56:11.560
<v Speaker 4>to think about this is that

1354
00:56:12.100 --> 00:56:13.980
<v Speaker 4>the galaxy is rotating.

1355
00:56:14.360 --> 00:56:15.800
<v Speaker 4>The sun goes around the galaxy.

1356
00:56:16.440 --> 00:56:17.600
<v Speaker 4>All the stars

1357
00:56:17.600 --> 00:56:20.000
<v Speaker 4>go around. And the stars need

1358
00:56:20.100 --> 00:56:20.860
<v Speaker 4>to be at the edge of the galaxy

1359
00:56:20.860 --> 00:56:22.940
<v Speaker 4>moving much too fast

1360
00:56:22.940 --> 00:56:25.940
<v Speaker 4>to remain bound within the galaxy.

1361
00:56:26.180 --> 00:56:27.840
<v Speaker 4>The whole thing should unravel like an exploding

1362
00:56:27.840 --> 00:56:30.080
<v Speaker 4>flywheel, unless there was a lot of other stuff

1363
00:56:30.080 --> 00:56:31.120
<v Speaker 4>pulling on them.

1364
00:56:31.380 --> 00:56:33.620
<v Speaker 4>And we don't see that stuff, so it's called dark.

1365
00:56:33.900 --> 00:56:34.960
<v Speaker 4>And it's not really

1366
00:56:34.960 --> 00:56:38.060
<v Speaker 4>a surprise that there are some things.

1367
00:56:38.320 --> 00:56:39.840
<v Speaker 4>They may be dark because they

1368
00:56:39.840 --> 00:56:42.100
<v Speaker 4>don't shine, or they may be dark because

1369
00:56:42.760 --> 00:56:44.020
<v Speaker 4>they just don't interact

1370
00:56:44.020 --> 00:56:46.200
<v Speaker 4>much with ordinary matter.

1371
00:56:46.440 --> 00:56:47.760
<v Speaker 4>And it's very easy to think of what these

1372
00:56:47.760 --> 00:56:49.980
<v Speaker 4>candidates might be. What we'd really like

1373
00:56:50.100 --> 00:56:52.100
<v Speaker 4>is just one that would make up

1374
00:56:52.100 --> 00:56:53.640
<v Speaker 4>the lion's share of that dark matter.

1375
00:56:53.880 --> 00:56:56.440
<v Speaker 4>And this would be a particle like a neutrino

1376
00:56:56.440 --> 00:56:57.920
<v Speaker 4>that would go right through you, or maybe

1377
00:56:57.920 --> 00:56:59.320
<v Speaker 4>even through the Earth, mostly.

1378
00:56:59.600 --> 00:57:01.840
<v Speaker 4>It would interact only weakly with ordinary matter.

1379
00:57:01.960 --> 00:57:03.940
<v Speaker 4>But it would have a large mass and would just make up

1380
00:57:03.940 --> 00:57:05.240
<v Speaker 4>for that missing stuff.

1381
00:57:05.460 --> 00:57:07.820
<v Speaker 4>There's a chance that such a particle

1382
00:57:07.820 --> 00:57:10.580
<v Speaker 4>might be made at the Large Hadron Collider

1383
00:57:10.580 --> 00:57:11.940
<v Speaker 4>at CERN, or might be

1384
00:57:11.940 --> 00:57:14.320
<v Speaker 4>picked up in one of these delicate experiments

1385
00:57:14.320 --> 00:57:15.760
<v Speaker 4>that people do down deep mines.

1386
00:57:15.900 --> 00:57:17.380
<v Speaker 4>So I think there's a good chance within

1387
00:57:18.100 --> 00:57:19.920
<v Speaker 4>a decade or so that we might actually

1388
00:57:20.100 --> 00:57:20.980
<v Speaker 4>have nailed that one down.

1389
00:57:21.200 --> 00:57:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Dark energy is a rather different story,

1390
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:25.860
<v Speaker 4>and we've already talked about that, so let's move on.

1391
00:57:26.320 --> 00:57:27.960
<v Phillip Adams>Life, the universe, and everything.

1392
00:57:28.080 --> 00:57:29.820
<v Phillip Adams>One final question, sir.

1393
00:57:30.320 --> 00:57:32.040
<v Audience>A question for Brian Schmidt.

1394
00:57:32.440 --> 00:57:34.280
<v Audience>In the first couple of papers

1395
00:57:34.280 --> 00:57:36.160
<v Audience>by Hubble, you get the feeling

1396
00:57:36.160 --> 00:57:37.480
<v Audience>that he was seeing

1397
00:57:38.260 --> 00:57:40.200
<v Audience>redshifted galaxies, but he hadn't

1398
00:57:40.200 --> 00:57:41.900
<v Audience>quite got to

1399
00:57:43.040 --> 00:57:43.560
<v Audience>expansion.

1400
00:57:44.180 --> 00:57:45.820
<v Audience>Can I get you to just

1401
00:57:46.460 --> 00:57:47.960
<v Audience>give a kind of a

1402
00:57:47.960 --> 00:57:48.420
<v Audience>personal

1403
00:57:50.100 --> 00:57:51.120
<v Audience>description of your discovery?

1404
00:57:51.400 --> 00:57:52.900
<v Audience>How long was it between actually

1405
00:57:52.900 --> 00:57:54.880
<v Audience>seeing the data and

1406
00:57:55.700 --> 00:57:57.460
<v Audience>realizing what you had in your hands?

1407
00:57:57.760 --> 00:57:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Alright, so at the end of

1408
00:58:00.100 --> 00:58:01.960
<v Speaker 3>1997, we had gone out to measure

1409
00:58:01.960 --> 00:58:03.720
<v Speaker 3>how fast the universe

1410
00:58:03.720 --> 00:58:05.660
<v Speaker 3>was slowing down over time.

1411
00:58:06.140 --> 00:58:07.060
<v Speaker 3>And that's because

1412
00:58:07.820 --> 00:58:09.380
<v Speaker 3>gravity pulls on the universe,

1413
00:58:09.660 --> 00:58:12.060
<v Speaker 3>and the more gravity there is, the faster

1414
00:58:12.060 --> 00:58:13.040
<v Speaker 3>it will slow down

1415
00:58:13.760 --> 00:58:15.940
<v Speaker 3>the universe. In the same way that if I suddenly

1416
00:58:15.940 --> 00:58:17.280
<v Speaker 3>made the Earth heavier,

1417
00:58:17.520 --> 00:58:20.040
<v Speaker 3>if I throw a ball up, it will slow down more quickly.

1418
00:58:20.100 --> 00:58:21.280
<v Speaker 3>than if it was lighter.

1419
00:58:22.100 --> 00:58:23.800
<v Speaker 3>So, at the end of 1997,

1420
00:58:23.880 --> 00:58:26.160
<v Speaker 3>we made those measurements, and we found

1421
00:58:26.160 --> 00:58:27.520
<v Speaker 3>that the universe was expanding

1422
00:58:28.640 --> 00:58:29.940
<v Speaker 3>slower in the past, and

1423
00:58:29.940 --> 00:58:30.680
<v Speaker 3>actually sped up.

1424
00:58:31.640 --> 00:58:33.940
<v Speaker 3>So, my initial reaction was

1425
00:58:33.940 --> 00:58:36.060
<v Speaker 3>not to think we had discovered 70%

1426
00:58:36.060 --> 00:58:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of the universe. My initial reaction

1427
00:58:38.120 --> 00:58:39.860
<v Speaker 3>was to think that we had made

1428
00:58:39.860 --> 00:58:42.040
<v Speaker 3>some horrible mistake, and that I had wasted

1429
00:58:42.040 --> 00:58:43.040
<v Speaker 3>three years of my life.

1430
00:58:44.580 --> 00:58:46.160
<v Speaker 3>And through a lot of work

1431
00:58:46.160 --> 00:58:47.980
<v Speaker 3>that me and the team went through,

1432
00:58:48.080 --> 00:58:49.980
<v Speaker 3>and we went through every single piece of the

1433
00:58:50.100 --> 00:58:51.920
<v Speaker 3>experiment, and we did it in multiple

1434
00:58:51.920 --> 00:58:54.020
<v Speaker 3>ways. And it was only

1435
00:58:54.020 --> 00:58:55.880
<v Speaker 3>after we had done all those things that

1436
00:58:55.880 --> 00:58:57.940
<v Speaker 3>we sort of said, geez, I guess

1437
00:58:57.940 --> 00:58:59.860
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have to tell the world about this. And I knew

1438
00:58:59.860 --> 00:59:01.780
<v Speaker 3>what it implied, because of Einstein

1439
00:59:01.780 --> 00:59:03.660
<v Speaker 3>could have told us what it implied.

1440
00:59:04.400 --> 00:59:06.080
<v Speaker 3>But I have to admit, I was

1441
00:59:06.080 --> 00:59:07.960
<v Speaker 3>scratching my head, and it was hard for me to

1442
00:59:07.960 --> 00:59:09.860
<v Speaker 3>accept, because I knew

1443
00:59:09.860 --> 00:59:11.840
<v Speaker 3>my data was right, but the

1444
00:59:11.840 --> 00:59:13.980
<v Speaker 3>interpretation, I was worried we were

1445
00:59:13.980 --> 00:59:15.960
<v Speaker 3>missing something. And so it

1446
00:59:15.960 --> 00:59:17.660
<v Speaker 3>really didn't sink in until 2000,

1447
00:59:18.480 --> 00:59:19.720
<v Speaker 3>when another experiment

1448
00:59:20.100 --> 00:59:21.720
<v Speaker 3>came in that essentially

1449
00:59:21.720 --> 00:59:23.820
<v Speaker 3>meant I didn't see there was any way for

1450
00:59:23.820 --> 00:59:25.900
<v Speaker 3>our experiment to be wrong. And you need to

1451
00:59:25.900 --> 00:59:27.960
<v Speaker 3>hear an hour long explanation why I thought

1452
00:59:27.960 --> 00:59:29.720
<v Speaker 3>that. So it was really not until

1453
00:59:29.720 --> 00:59:31.900
<v Speaker 3>2000 that I said, oh geez, I guess we're

1454
00:59:31.900 --> 00:59:33.880
<v Speaker 3>right after all. When I saw another piece

1455
00:59:33.880 --> 00:59:35.900
<v Speaker 3>of data that sort of

1456
00:59:35.900 --> 00:59:37.960
<v Speaker 3>fit in and made the whole story make sense to me.

1457
00:59:38.200 --> 00:59:39.820
<v Phillip Adams>It was a good head to scratch,

1458
00:59:39.980 --> 00:59:42.000
<v Phillip Adams>Brian. That's a wrap. Thank you

1459
00:59:42.000 --> 00:59:43.240
<v Phillip Adams>very much, Festival,

1460
00:59:43.660 --> 00:59:46.320
<v Phillip Adams>for having us. Thank you, Paul Davies.

1461
00:59:46.620 --> 00:59:47.960
<v Phillip Adams>And the Festival has been

1462
00:59:47.960 --> 00:59:49.500
<v Phillip Adams>conducted in Paul's honor.

1463
00:59:50.100 --> 00:59:51.700
<v Phillip Adams>Paul, of course, theoretical physicist,

1464
00:59:51.960 --> 00:59:53.820
<v Phillip Adams>cosmologist, astrobiologist,

1465
00:59:54.160 --> 00:59:55.920
<v Phillip Adams>best-selling author, etc.

1466
00:59:56.220 --> 00:59:57.840
<v Phillip Adams>He's got more. He's got a

1467
00:59:57.840 --> 00:59:59.940
<v Phillip Adams>CV that's rather longer than the credits for

1468
00:59:59.940 --> 01:00:01.380
<v Phillip Adams>Superman. And

1469
01:00:01.380 --> 01:00:03.100
<v Phillip Adams>Professor Brian Schmidt,

1470
01:00:03.680 --> 01:00:05.840
<v Phillip Adams>Laureate Fellow at the ANU's Mount

1471
01:00:05.840 --> 01:00:08.000
<v Phillip Adams>Stromlo Observatory, and

1472
01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:09.700
<v Phillip Adams>co-winner of the Nobel Prize.

1473
01:00:10.020 --> 01:00:12.020
<v Phillip Adams>Thank you, audience. That's a

1474
01:00:12.020 --> 01:00:13.880
<v Phillip Adams>wrap from here and from Late Night

1475
01:00:13.880 --> 01:00:15.640
<v Phillip Adams>Live. We'll see you later.

1476
01:00:17.940 --> 01:00:18.800
<v Phillip Adams>Thank you.

1477
01:00:20.340 --> 01:00:21.280
<v Audience>Thank you.

