WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.920
<v Michael Barber>Welcome to this session of the 2009 Adelaide Festival of Ideas.

2
00:00:05.020 --> 00:00:08.680
<v Michael Barber>My name is Michael Barber. I'm Vice-Chancellor of Flinders University,

3
00:00:08.980 --> 00:00:13.200
<v Michael Barber>and it's my great pleasure this morning to chair this session,

4
00:00:13.740 --> 00:00:16.720
<v Michael Barber>of which our speaker will be Dr Peter Shergold,

5
00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:20.900
<v Michael Barber>and I'll say a little about him in a moment before I hand over the lectern to him.

6
00:00:21.060 --> 00:00:26.740
<v Michael Barber>I think many people in the audience are, of course, well-knowing of the format of the Festival of the Ideas.

7
00:00:26.740 --> 00:00:31.060
<v Michael Barber>It's one of, perhaps I think, one of the most exciting festivals in this festival city,

8
00:00:31.740 --> 00:00:37.000
<v Michael Barber>and today certainly the theme of pushing the limits, as Robert Fideon said in his foreword,

9
00:00:37.100 --> 00:00:42.320
<v Michael Barber>came at a very interesting time where the world, financially, economically, environmentally,

10
00:00:42.560 --> 00:00:44.520
<v Michael Barber>is perhaps pushing back on us.

11
00:00:44.700 --> 00:00:49.120
<v Michael Barber>So today we have the pleasure to hear from Dr Peter Shergold,

12
00:00:49.120 --> 00:00:53.500
<v Michael Barber>talking on the theme of has corporate responsibility reached its limits.

13
00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:56.720
<v Michael Barber>Peter was appointed to Professor of the Arts,

14
00:00:56.740 --> 00:00:59.140
<v Michael Barber>at the Australian School of Business at the University of New South Wales,

15
00:00:59.300 --> 00:01:04.300
<v Michael Barber>where he is the Macquarie Group Foundation Chair of the newly established Centre for Social Impact,

16
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:09.880
<v Michael Barber>a cross-university collaboration which aims to deliver business management teaching and research

17
00:01:09.880 --> 00:01:13.680
<v Michael Barber>for social enterprises and promote corporate social responsibility.

18
00:01:14.160 --> 00:01:18.120
<v Michael Barber>I think many of us have not actually realised how much in Australia that third sector

19
00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:25.040
<v Michael Barber>of non-government and social organisations are playing in the full life of the nation.

20
00:01:26.740 --> 00:01:30.060
<v Michael Barber>Peter has been the CEO of the Australian Public Service for over two decades.

21
00:01:30.420 --> 00:01:33.860
<v Michael Barber>I first met him back in 2002 when I joined CSIRO,

22
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:37.340
<v Michael Barber>and Peter at that time was Secretary of Education, Science and Training,

23
00:01:37.420 --> 00:01:39.160
<v Michael Barber>and he joined the CSIRO Board.

24
00:01:39.520 --> 00:01:44.620
<v Michael Barber>Prior to that he'd been Chief Executive Officer of Comcare,

25
00:01:44.820 --> 00:01:48.360
<v Michael Barber>he was a Public Service Commissioner from 1995 to 1998.

26
00:01:48.760 --> 00:01:52.940
<v Michael Barber>He then served as Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business,

27
00:01:53.160 --> 00:01:55.000
<v Michael Barber>and then transferred, as I said,

28
00:01:55.060 --> 00:01:56.560
<v Michael Barber>to the Department of Education.

29
00:01:56.740 --> 00:01:57.740
<v Michael Barber>He then served as the Director of Education, Science and Training.

30
00:01:57.940 --> 00:02:00.920
<v Michael Barber>For five years, from February 2003,

31
00:02:02.080 --> 00:02:05.040
<v Michael Barber>Dr Shergo was Australia's most senior public administrator,

32
00:02:05.260 --> 00:02:07.920
<v Michael Barber>serving as Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

33
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:12.120
<v Michael Barber>In all, he served directly three Prime Ministers and eight Ministers

34
00:02:12.120 --> 00:02:14.380
<v Michael Barber>in both Coalition and Labor Governments.

35
00:02:14.540 --> 00:02:19.260
<v Michael Barber>He was made a Member of the Order of Australia for Public Service in 1996,

36
00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:23.420
<v Michael Barber>and in 2007 he was elevated to his Australian Highest Award,

37
00:02:23.620 --> 00:02:25.380
<v Michael Barber>the Companion in the Order of Australia.

38
00:02:25.380 --> 00:02:30.500
<v Michael Barber>As a senior officer, you do get to interact with both politicians and public servants

39
00:02:30.500 --> 00:02:31.980
<v Michael Barber>at various levels of government,

40
00:02:32.140 --> 00:02:38.140
<v Michael Barber>and I have to admit, of all of the senior bureaucrats and public servants I've met

41
00:02:38.140 --> 00:02:43.640
<v Michael Barber>in my engagement in public life, Peter Shergold stands right up at the top of them.

42
00:02:43.720 --> 00:02:47.900
<v Michael Barber>A man of great integrity, great intelligence and great fun.

43
00:02:48.020 --> 00:02:50.380
<v Michael Barber>I've always enjoyed conversations with Peter.

44
00:02:50.500 --> 00:02:54.060
<v Michael Barber>He can be challenging, as you might have been, as you were on the CSIRO Board,

45
00:02:54.060 --> 00:02:57.840
<v Michael Barber>but wisely challenging, and always in a great role.

46
00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:01.620
<v Michael Barber>So with that background, I've ever been an academic, a public service,

47
00:03:01.640 --> 00:03:05.820
<v Michael Barber>and now returned to academia, he is in fact an admirable person to take on

48
00:03:05.820 --> 00:03:09.740
<v Michael Barber>an interesting role in the Australian School of Business at the University of New South Wales,

49
00:03:09.860 --> 00:03:14.720
<v Michael Barber>and to talk to us today about corporate responsibility, has it reached its limits?

50
00:03:14.880 --> 00:03:15.820
<v Michael Barber>Dr Peter Shergold.

51
00:03:24.060 --> 00:03:27.960
<v Peter Shergold>Well, thank you so much for that wonderfully warm introduction.

52
00:03:29.060 --> 00:03:35.560
<v Peter Shergold>I must say I was somewhat worried when I saw I was doing this session on Sunday morning

53
00:03:36.380 --> 00:03:39.580
<v Peter Shergold>about whether there would be an audience, but I was more worried,

54
00:03:39.660 --> 00:03:46.040
<v Peter Shergold>having now done four panel discussions, that I would actually have run out of my stock of ideas

55
00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:48.480
<v Peter Shergold>by the time that I got here.

56
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:54.000
<v Peter Shergold>So I hope that isn't the case, because the issue I want to address this morning

57
00:03:54.060 --> 00:04:01.900
<v Peter Shergold>I think is profoundly important, and it does go to the festival theme about pushing the limits.

58
00:04:03.180 --> 00:04:08.480
<v Peter Shergold>What I want to do this morning, under the cloud of economic recession,

59
00:04:09.340 --> 00:04:13.980
<v Peter Shergold>in an environment in which business is doing it tough,

60
00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:17.820
<v Peter Shergold>and many Australians are doing it far tougher,

61
00:04:17.940 --> 00:04:21.520
<v Peter Shergold>to talk about corporate responsibility.

62
00:04:23.460 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Peter Shergold>Corporate responsibility, it's often postulated,

63
00:04:27.460 --> 00:04:34.600
<v Peter Shergold>is about business doing good because it's good for business.

64
00:04:35.540 --> 00:04:41.940
<v Peter Shergold>The question is, is it only good for business when business is good?

65
00:04:42.660 --> 00:04:48.100
<v Peter Shergold>And that seems to me to imply three other quite fundamental questions

66
00:04:48.100 --> 00:04:51.500
<v Peter Shergold>related to the limits of business.

67
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:57.380
<v Peter Shergold>The first, and it is a profound question,

68
00:04:58.520 --> 00:05:05.660
<v Peter Shergold>is in what way did corporate responsibility fail us in the global financial crisis?

69
00:05:07.020 --> 00:05:13.140
<v Peter Shergold>The second is, is corporate responsibility now collapsing

70
00:05:13.140 --> 00:05:17.420
<v Peter Shergold>under the strain of worldwide economic recession?

71
00:05:17.420 --> 00:05:23.000
<v Peter Shergold>And the third, the final question which I will address,

72
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:29.140
<v Peter Shergold>is whether corporate responsibility can learn from its failures,

73
00:05:29.320 --> 00:05:33.140
<v Peter Shergold>can, if you will, make itself over,

74
00:05:34.420 --> 00:05:42.780
<v Peter Shergold>can reassess and re-articulate and revitalise its ethos and its mission.

75
00:05:43.860 --> 00:05:48.880
<v Peter Shergold>So as we start to grapple with these ideas,

76
00:05:49.320 --> 00:05:53.480
<v Peter Shergold>let's look at what the evidence is.

77
00:05:56.220 --> 00:06:02.080
<v Peter Shergold>The first thing that is clear is that corporate responsibility

78
00:06:02.780 --> 00:06:10.820
<v Peter Shergold>is a concept that has been made manifest in a variety of different forms.

79
00:06:10.820 --> 00:06:14.380
<v Peter Shergold>If you think back over the last 10 or 15 years,

80
00:06:14.540 --> 00:06:20.320
<v Peter Shergold>there are times when it's usually been articulated in terms of business ethics.

81
00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:24.680
<v Peter Shergold>There was a time a decade ago when, many of us will remember,

82
00:06:24.900 --> 00:06:29.160
<v Peter Shergold>it became the thing to do triple bottom line reporting.

83
00:06:31.020 --> 00:06:36.380
<v Peter Shergold>And then of course, corporate social responsibility or CSR,

84
00:06:37.060 --> 00:06:40.400
<v Peter Shergold>which then often evolved over the last few years

85
00:06:40.400 --> 00:06:40.800
<v Peter Shergold>to become the most important form of business ethics.

86
00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:42.380
<v Peter Shergold>And then there's the notion of corporate sustainability.

87
00:06:43.980 --> 00:06:47.560
<v Peter Shergold>Some businesses call it corporate citizenship.

88
00:06:48.800 --> 00:06:51.680
<v Peter Shergold>All of these, in my address this morning,

89
00:06:52.800 --> 00:06:55.880
<v Peter Shergold>I'm going to embrace under the notion of corporate responsibility.

90
00:06:56.920 --> 00:07:04.140
<v Peter Shergold>And the range of activities that is embraced by corporate responsibility

91
00:07:04.140 --> 00:07:09.980
<v Peter Shergold>are, I think, as rich and as diverse as a semantic vocabulary.

92
00:07:09.980 --> 00:07:10.780
<v Peter Shergold>And I think that's the key.

93
00:07:11.900 --> 00:07:14.600
<v Peter Shergold>You can go and see this for yourself.

94
00:07:14.700 --> 00:07:20.280
<v Peter Shergold>You can go and look at some of the large Australian corporates

95
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:22.120
<v Peter Shergold>and look at the report.

96
00:07:22.380 --> 00:07:26.140
<v Peter Shergold>They nearly always now produce an annual report on social responsibility

97
00:07:26.140 --> 00:07:28.020
<v Peter Shergold>or sustainability or citizenship.

98
00:07:28.480 --> 00:07:34.780
<v Peter Shergold>Go and look at the reports of organisations like the National Australia Bank,

99
00:07:34.780 --> 00:07:41.340
<v Peter Shergold>Coca-Cola Amatil, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Rio Tinto, McDonald's.

100
00:07:41.380 --> 00:07:46.300
<v Peter Shergold>All now produce an annual report on what they do in corporate responsibility.

101
00:07:46.720 --> 00:07:51.420
<v Peter Shergold>Of course, many corporates do it through the foundations that they have established.

102
00:07:51.720 --> 00:07:53.620
<v Peter Shergold>And they too have annual reports.

103
00:07:54.780 --> 00:08:00.080
<v Peter Shergold>The AMP Foundation, Telstra, Macquarie Group, Westpac, Qantas.

104
00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:04.780
<v Peter Shergold>So it's quite easy to pick up the publication.

105
00:08:05.780 --> 00:08:08.500
<v Peter Shergold>Usually it must be said, a glossy publication.

106
00:08:08.680 --> 00:08:12.060
<v Peter Shergold>Usually it must be said full of inspiring photographs.

107
00:08:12.440 --> 00:08:16.040
<v Peter Shergold>But you can pick that up and get a good sense very quickly

108
00:08:16.580 --> 00:08:22.200
<v Peter Shergold>of what these corporates see as corporate responsibility.

109
00:08:23.060 --> 00:08:25.780
<v Peter Shergold>Get a sense of how diverse it is.

110
00:08:25.780 --> 00:08:28.640
<v Peter Shergold>But also, I think, very quickly get a sense

111
00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:36.580
<v Peter Shergold>that virtually every business interprets its corporate responsibility differently.

112
00:08:37.420 --> 00:08:45.620
<v Peter Shergold>At its very narrowest, I think you will find that business identifies corporate responsibility

113
00:08:46.280 --> 00:08:49.040
<v Peter Shergold>with operating within the law.

114
00:08:49.900 --> 00:08:51.640
<v Peter Shergold>Responsible business practices.

115
00:08:51.900 --> 00:08:53.020
<v Peter Shergold>Honest governance.

116
00:08:53.780 --> 00:08:55.760
<v Peter Shergold>Effectively not just meeting the needs of the business.

117
00:08:55.780 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Peter Shergold>Not just the letter of the law.

118
00:08:57.300 --> 00:09:00.340
<v Peter Shergold>But the spirit and purpose of the law.

119
00:09:01.060 --> 00:09:04.780
<v Peter Shergold>That, I think, is the narrowest definition.

120
00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:13.320
<v Peter Shergold>But corporate responsibility today is usually seen as going beyond what is legally necessary.

121
00:09:14.780 --> 00:09:21.020
<v Peter Shergold>So that, for example, it is usually seen to embrace fair labor conditions for workers.

122
00:09:21.840 --> 00:09:25.160
<v Peter Shergold>And a good occupational health and safety scheme.

123
00:09:25.780 --> 00:09:27.740
<v Peter Shergold>And promoting workforce diversity.

124
00:09:28.780 --> 00:09:33.580
<v Peter Shergold>In most instances, to a greater or lesser extent,

125
00:09:33.820 --> 00:09:37.640
<v Peter Shergold>it embraces the support of community endeavor.

126
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:43.280
<v Peter Shergold>Not just providing financial support for community organizations.

127
00:09:44.280 --> 00:09:50.440
<v Peter Shergold>But in particular, providing pro bono and volunteer support to the community sector.

128
00:09:51.420 --> 00:09:55.140
<v Peter Shergold>In the last decade, increasingly,

129
00:09:55.140 --> 00:10:01.180
<v Peter Shergold>that corporate responsibility has taken the form of environmental responsibility.

130
00:10:02.140 --> 00:10:04.480
<v Peter Shergold>With an emphasis on energy efficiency.

131
00:10:05.640 --> 00:10:08.660
<v Peter Shergold>And offsetting the production of emissions.

132
00:10:08.840 --> 00:10:11.980
<v Peter Shergold>And reducing carbon footprints.

133
00:10:14.040 --> 00:10:22.920
<v Peter Shergold>It has, or should, also embrace the notion of ethical governance arrangements within the business.

134
00:10:23.800 --> 00:10:34.840
<v Peter Shergold>And, crucially, it should always embrace reporting on this range of activities in an open and transparent manner.

135
00:10:36.660 --> 00:10:41.480
<v Peter Shergold>Now, I have to say that for most of the large corporations now,

136
00:10:42.280 --> 00:10:49.400
<v Peter Shergold>corporate responsibility is not just what we sometimes label a tier one activity.

137
00:10:49.600 --> 00:10:50.920
<v Peter Shergold>What I mean by that

138
00:10:50.920 --> 00:10:56.820
<v Peter Shergold>is that it has been extended backwards along the supply chain.

139
00:10:57.100 --> 00:11:04.380
<v Peter Shergold>In other words, increasingly it's recognized that resource production or manufacturing

140
00:11:05.420 --> 00:11:09.880
<v Peter Shergold>in multinational companies that are located or headquartered in the developed world

141
00:11:10.420 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Peter Shergold>is being sourced from developing countries.

142
00:11:14.500 --> 00:11:18.180
<v Peter Shergold>And therefore, as you look down the supply chain,

143
00:11:18.400 --> 00:11:20.800
<v Peter Shergold>there is a greater emphasis on

144
00:11:20.920 --> 00:11:24.460
<v Peter Shergold>issues such as product safety and human rights.

145
00:11:25.920 --> 00:11:29.880
<v Peter Shergold>What I find interesting is that corporate responsibility,

146
00:11:29.980 --> 00:11:34.700
<v Peter Shergold>as it has become increasingly global over the last decade,

147
00:11:35.020 --> 00:11:37.820
<v Peter Shergold>as its nature has evolved,

148
00:11:38.060 --> 00:11:41.560
<v Peter Shergold>so it has taken on the particular emphasis,

149
00:11:42.420 --> 00:11:46.760
<v Peter Shergold>which is often quite different from corporate responsibility

150
00:11:47.420 --> 00:11:50.640
<v Peter Shergold>as it's been articulated in North America and Europe,

151
00:11:50.920 --> 00:11:52.660
<v Peter Shergold>and Australia and New Zealand.

152
00:11:53.700 --> 00:12:00.640
<v Peter Shergold>We talk about corporate responsibility as something that has emerged from the corporate sector.

153
00:12:02.520 --> 00:12:05.580
<v Peter Shergold>China now embraces corporate responsibility.

154
00:12:06.460 --> 00:12:10.680
<v Peter Shergold>Its major business schools include it in their curricula.

155
00:12:11.840 --> 00:12:14.940
<v Peter Shergold>And yet it is, in a sense, quite different,

156
00:12:15.000 --> 00:12:17.280
<v Peter Shergold>because for the Chinese government,

157
00:12:17.280 --> 00:12:23.860
<v Peter Shergold>they see this as important as a fundamental basis of creating a harmonious society.

158
00:12:24.180 --> 00:12:28.580
<v Peter Shergold>You go to countries like Singapore, where I went earlier this year,

159
00:12:29.280 --> 00:12:32.340
<v Peter Shergold>and you can see that when they talk about corporate responsibility,

160
00:12:32.620 --> 00:12:35.940
<v Peter Shergold>it is something that has actually been driven by government.

161
00:12:36.360 --> 00:12:39.820
<v Peter Shergold>It is the Singapore government that has brought together

162
00:12:39.820 --> 00:12:44.640
<v Peter Shergold>corporates and unions in a very Singaporean way

163
00:12:45.280 --> 00:12:47.260
<v Peter Shergold>to embrace corporate responsibility.

164
00:12:48.480 --> 00:12:55.240
<v Peter Shergold>So it means different things to different companies in different countries.

165
00:12:56.840 --> 00:12:59.240
<v Peter Shergold>Certainly in the developed world,

166
00:12:59.360 --> 00:13:04.260
<v Peter Shergold>it has evolved from notions of charity or even philanthropy

167
00:13:04.260 --> 00:13:07.480
<v Peter Shergold>to the notion of social investment.

168
00:13:08.980 --> 00:13:14.600
<v Peter Shergold>Just as the economic activities of the firm bring a return to shareholders,

169
00:13:14.600 --> 00:13:20.140
<v Peter Shergold>so corporate responsibility activities bring a return to society

170
00:13:20.140 --> 00:13:22.200
<v Peter Shergold>in which the business operates.

171
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:31.620
<v Peter Shergold>Concurrently, corporate responsibility is no longer just seen as doing good for society.

172
00:13:31.960 --> 00:13:37.440
<v Peter Shergold>It is increasingly argued that it does good for business.

173
00:13:39.060 --> 00:13:42.620
<v Peter Shergold>Now, let me just make two things clear,

174
00:13:42.620 --> 00:13:48.480
<v Peter Shergold>because I don't want to be misinterpreted in the final stage of my remarks.

175
00:13:48.740 --> 00:13:52.860
<v Peter Shergold>The first is that I have no doubt whatever

176
00:13:53.620 --> 00:13:57.840
<v Peter Shergold>that the activities embraced as corporate responsibility

177
00:13:58.620 --> 00:14:01.960
<v Peter Shergold>have benefited society in many different ways.

178
00:14:02.260 --> 00:14:03.900
<v Peter Shergold>So we're not arguing about this.

179
00:14:04.540 --> 00:14:07.680
<v Peter Shergold>It has done good.

180
00:14:08.660 --> 00:14:12.160
<v Peter Shergold>Corporate support for emergency relief and social welfare

181
00:14:12.160 --> 00:14:13.620
<v Peter Shergold>and environmental sustainability,

182
00:14:14.240 --> 00:14:16.560
<v Peter Shergold>corporate support for heritage protection

183
00:14:16.560 --> 00:14:20.840
<v Peter Shergold>and support of the arts and education and medical research

184
00:14:20.840 --> 00:14:25.100
<v Peter Shergold>and so on and so on has been beneficial.

185
00:14:25.360 --> 00:14:26.840
<v Peter Shergold>That's not an argument.

186
00:14:29.060 --> 00:14:35.820
<v Peter Shergold>Business through these activities has made our society a better place.

187
00:14:36.620 --> 00:14:38.040
<v Peter Shergold>And indeed, I'd go further.

188
00:14:39.160 --> 00:14:40.140
<v Peter Shergold>In some instances,

189
00:14:40.140 --> 00:14:46.360
<v Peter Shergold>I can see that corporate Australia has been willing to engage

190
00:14:46.360 --> 00:14:51.100
<v Peter Shergold>and take a stand in areas where governments have feared to tread.

191
00:14:51.840 --> 00:14:54.120
<v Peter Shergold>The most obvious instance, I think,

192
00:14:54.140 --> 00:14:58.160
<v Peter Shergold>is the willingness of many of Australia's mining companies

193
00:14:59.140 --> 00:15:03.620
<v Peter Shergold>to seriously engage in indigenous community support

194
00:15:04.140 --> 00:15:06.820
<v Peter Shergold>and training and employment and education,

195
00:15:06.820 --> 00:15:09.860
<v Peter Shergold>often to pick up where governments have failed.

196
00:15:10.820 --> 00:15:14.980
<v Peter Shergold>Some of you may have noticed that last week in The Weekend Australia,

197
00:15:15.820 --> 00:15:21.700
<v Peter Shergold>Noel Pearson was outraged about the way governments were now claiming

198
00:15:22.820 --> 00:15:23.760
<v Peter Shergold>the Cape York initiatives.

199
00:15:24.740 --> 00:15:26.440
<v Peter Shergold>And I understand why,

200
00:15:26.580 --> 00:15:29.980
<v Peter Shergold>because those were initiatives that came from the community.

201
00:15:30.800 --> 00:15:33.800
<v Peter Shergold>And the first organisations

202
00:15:33.800 --> 00:15:36.740
<v Peter Shergold>and organisations that he won to support them

203
00:15:36.740 --> 00:15:39.000
<v Peter Shergold>were not governments or public services.

204
00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:42.720
<v Peter Shergold>They were corporates and corporate foundations.

205
00:15:43.160 --> 00:15:47.760
<v Peter Shergold>It was governments that came in somewhat reluctantly later.

206
00:15:48.800 --> 00:15:50.080
<v Peter Shergold>The second thing I want to make clear

207
00:15:50.080 --> 00:15:54.300
<v Peter Shergold>is that corporate expenditure on corporate responsibility

208
00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:58.060
<v Peter Shergold>is undoubtedly being wound back.

209
00:15:58.160 --> 00:16:00.060
<v Peter Shergold>So this is not a cause of argument.

210
00:16:00.060 --> 00:16:05.320
<v Peter Shergold>Are corporate responsibility activities now being reduced?

211
00:16:05.380 --> 00:16:08.500
<v Peter Shergold>The answer categorically is yes.

212
00:16:09.080 --> 00:16:11.940
<v Peter Shergold>As businesses tighten their belts,

213
00:16:12.060 --> 00:16:16.660
<v Peter Shergold>they are tightening too their responsibility belts.

214
00:16:16.960 --> 00:16:19.700
<v Peter Shergold>And the amount of financial support

215
00:16:19.700 --> 00:16:22.860
<v Peter Shergold>being provided by corporates and foundations,

216
00:16:23.040 --> 00:16:24.780
<v Peter Shergold>although it is continuing,

217
00:16:25.560 --> 00:16:26.980
<v Peter Shergold>is being reduced.

218
00:16:27.580 --> 00:16:29.820
<v Peter Shergold>In early next month,

219
00:16:29.860 --> 00:16:30.040
<v Peter Shergold>I will be talking about

220
00:16:30.040 --> 00:16:34.440
<v Peter Shergold>a very important study, I think,

221
00:16:35.040 --> 00:16:36.300
<v Peter Shergold>supported, interestingly,

222
00:16:36.520 --> 00:16:37.940
<v Peter Shergold>by PricewaterhouseCoopers

223
00:16:37.940 --> 00:16:41.400
<v Peter Shergold>as well as the Fundraising Institute of Australia,

224
00:16:41.640 --> 00:16:43.600
<v Peter Shergold>which is looking in detail

225
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:46.220
<v Peter Shergold>at what impact the economic recession

226
00:16:46.220 --> 00:16:49.060
<v Peter Shergold>is having on community organisation funding

227
00:16:49.060 --> 00:16:50.780
<v Peter Shergold>and as part of that,

228
00:16:50.880 --> 00:16:53.240
<v Peter Shergold>what is happening to corporate support.

229
00:16:53.860 --> 00:16:55.920
<v Peter Shergold>I think it is a very interesting story.

230
00:16:56.060 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Peter Shergold>If any of you would like to make sure

231
00:16:58.200 --> 00:16:59.860
<v Peter Shergold>you get access to that straight away,

232
00:16:59.960 --> 00:17:00.020
<v Peter Shergold>please do.

233
00:17:00.020 --> 00:17:01.740
<v Peter Shergold>If you come down at the end

234
00:17:01.740 --> 00:17:03.200
<v Peter Shergold>and give me an email address,

235
00:17:03.420 --> 00:17:05.140
<v Peter Shergold>I will make sure that you are sent that

236
00:17:05.140 --> 00:17:06.560
<v Peter Shergold>early next month.

237
00:17:07.240 --> 00:17:09.840
<v Peter Shergold>So, those are two statements.

238
00:17:10.080 --> 00:17:12.380
<v Peter Shergold>But the important question is,

239
00:17:12.600 --> 00:17:14.980
<v Peter Shergold>will the activities of corporate responsibility,

240
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:17.840
<v Peter Shergold>the very concept of corporate responsibility,

241
00:17:18.740 --> 00:17:21.580
<v Peter Shergold>survive this significant economic recession?

242
00:17:21.800 --> 00:17:24.300
<v Peter Shergold>Has it reached its limits?

243
00:17:25.620 --> 00:17:26.780
<v Peter Shergold>I've got to tell you,

244
00:17:26.780 --> 00:17:30.880
<v Peter Shergold>this is one humdinger of a debate.

245
00:17:31.020 --> 00:17:34.220
<v Peter Shergold>We could have had a really good panel discussion on this

246
00:17:34.220 --> 00:17:37.420
<v Peter Shergold>because there are two antithetical views.

247
00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:39.140
<v Peter Shergold>On the positive side,

248
00:17:39.260 --> 00:17:40.520
<v Peter Shergold>there are those who believe

249
00:17:40.520 --> 00:17:43.160
<v Peter Shergold>that companies that have built

250
00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:45.100
<v Peter Shergold>their responsible business reputation

251
00:17:45.780 --> 00:17:49.140
<v Peter Shergold>at some considerable cost over many years

252
00:17:49.140 --> 00:17:52.340
<v Peter Shergold>are not now readily going to sacrifice it

253
00:17:52.340 --> 00:17:55.060
<v Peter Shergold>for short-term financial savings.

254
00:17:56.780 --> 00:17:59.800
<v Peter Shergold>The positive argument is that

255
00:17:59.800 --> 00:18:02.400
<v Peter Shergold>a global financial crisis

256
00:18:03.280 --> 00:18:06.380
<v Peter Shergold>that has undermined public trust in business ethics

257
00:18:07.280 --> 00:18:09.580
<v Peter Shergold>and in which the natural impulse of governments

258
00:18:09.580 --> 00:18:12.120
<v Peter Shergold>will now be to regulate corporate activities,

259
00:18:12.240 --> 00:18:13.740
<v Peter Shergold>in that environment,

260
00:18:13.820 --> 00:18:17.720
<v Peter Shergold>corporate responsibility is more important

261
00:18:18.280 --> 00:18:19.140
<v Peter Shergold>rather than less important.

262
00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:23.100
<v Peter Shergold>On the other side of this debate,

263
00:18:23.260 --> 00:18:24.360
<v Peter Shergold>on the negative side,

264
00:18:24.360 --> 00:18:26.700
<v Peter Shergold>there are those who believe

265
00:18:26.700 --> 00:18:30.560
<v Peter Shergold>that actually there never was

266
00:18:30.560 --> 00:18:33.360
<v Peter Shergold>any real substantive quality

267
00:18:33.900 --> 00:18:36.560
<v Peter Shergold>to corporate responsibility.

268
00:18:37.420 --> 00:18:41.400
<v Peter Shergold>It was a fig leaf of social responsibility,

269
00:18:41.720 --> 00:18:44.460
<v Peter Shergold>driven by corporate communications,

270
00:18:44.680 --> 00:18:48.460
<v Peter Shergold>embracing things like the greenwashing

271
00:18:48.460 --> 00:18:50.260
<v Peter Shergold>of corporate products,

272
00:18:50.460 --> 00:18:53.240
<v Peter Shergold>not fully embraced or understood

273
00:18:53.240 --> 00:18:55.440
<v Peter Shergold>by senior management or the board.

274
00:18:55.620 --> 00:18:56.860
<v Peter Shergold>It was, in other words,

275
00:18:57.800 --> 00:18:59.400
<v Peter Shergold>a valuable illusion

276
00:19:00.140 --> 00:19:02.720
<v Peter Shergold>created by public relations spin,

277
00:19:02.920 --> 00:19:04.700
<v Peter Shergold>a publicity stunt.

278
00:19:05.300 --> 00:19:08.020
<v Peter Shergold>As one businessman once described it to me,

279
00:19:08.740 --> 00:19:10.700
<v Peter Shergold>a launch, a lunch and a logo.

280
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:13.760
<v Peter Shergold>And me?

281
00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:16.160
<v Peter Shergold>Well, my answer,

282
00:19:16.260 --> 00:19:17.280
<v Peter Shergold>and I'll give it to you now

283
00:19:17.280 --> 00:19:19.660
<v Peter Shergold>just in case you want to leave early

284
00:19:19.660 --> 00:19:21.740
<v Peter Shergold>and see if there are some other better sessions around,

285
00:19:21.880 --> 00:19:23.040
<v Peter Shergold>my answer is,

286
00:19:23.040 --> 00:19:27.100
<v Peter Shergold>yes, corporate responsibility will survive.

287
00:19:28.460 --> 00:19:30.820
<v Peter Shergold>There will be reduced financial commitment

288
00:19:30.820 --> 00:19:31.840
<v Peter Shergold>in the short term.

289
00:19:32.380 --> 00:19:35.580
<v Peter Shergold>There will be a separation at the corporate level

290
00:19:35.580 --> 00:19:38.080
<v Peter Shergold>between the true believers and the fellow travelers.

291
00:19:38.980 --> 00:19:40.140
<v Peter Shergold>Having said that,

292
00:19:40.260 --> 00:19:42.120
<v Peter Shergold>I think that corporate responsibility

293
00:19:42.120 --> 00:19:45.260
<v Peter Shergold>will only properly grow if it is transformed.

294
00:19:46.600 --> 00:19:48.720
<v Peter Shergold>And now, what I want to tell you

295
00:19:48.720 --> 00:19:50.280
<v Peter Shergold>is why I've come to that conclusion,

296
00:19:50.440 --> 00:19:53.000
<v Peter Shergold>which is actually a more interesting story,

297
00:19:53.020 --> 00:19:55.340
<v Peter Shergold>than the bold outcome.

298
00:19:56.660 --> 00:19:57.860
<v Peter Shergold>Corporate responsibility,

299
00:19:59.020 --> 00:20:00.480
<v Peter Shergold>I'm using that now as a shorthand

300
00:20:00.480 --> 00:20:03.000
<v Peter Shergold>for all this diversity of activities,

301
00:20:03.460 --> 00:20:06.420
<v Peter Shergold>will survive if it is,

302
00:20:06.560 --> 00:20:08.400
<v Peter Shergold>actually is,

303
00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:11.020
<v Peter Shergold>seen as good for business.

304
00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:11.980
<v Peter Shergold>This is important.

305
00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:13.900
<v Peter Shergold>Too often one sees the community

306
00:20:13.900 --> 00:20:16.020
<v Peter Shergold>and environmental activities of businesses

307
00:20:16.020 --> 00:20:18.300
<v Peter Shergold>being criticized in the media

308
00:20:18.300 --> 00:20:20.000
<v Peter Shergold>as cynical ploys.

309
00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:21.980
<v Peter Shergold>You'll see, you know,

310
00:20:21.980 --> 00:20:24.620
<v Peter Shergold>business isn't doing this because they really care,

311
00:20:24.760 --> 00:20:27.300
<v Peter Shergold>but because they see there are some advantages to themselves.

312
00:20:27.640 --> 00:20:29.940
<v Peter Shergold>They're getting something out of this activity.

313
00:20:30.740 --> 00:20:31.760
<v Peter Shergold>I've got to tell you,

314
00:20:31.820 --> 00:20:34.280
<v Peter Shergold>I think that is a completely, utterly,

315
00:20:34.980 --> 00:20:36.420
<v Peter Shergold>wrong-headed line of attack.

316
00:20:36.920 --> 00:20:38.720
<v Peter Shergold>What we should look for

317
00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:40.860
<v Peter Shergold>in a corporate responsibility program

318
00:20:41.480 --> 00:20:44.340
<v Peter Shergold>is something that is mutually advantageous,

319
00:20:44.340 --> 00:20:45.720
<v Peter Shergold>a genuine partnership

320
00:20:46.480 --> 00:20:48.580
<v Peter Shergold>between the private and the community,

321
00:20:48.620 --> 00:20:50.220
<v Peter Shergold>or third sectors.

322
00:20:50.220 --> 00:20:52.980
<v Peter Shergold>For it's that benefit to business

323
00:20:52.980 --> 00:20:54.480
<v Peter Shergold>that is going to sustain

324
00:20:55.220 --> 00:20:58.020
<v Peter Shergold>and to strengthen community benefit.

325
00:20:58.720 --> 00:20:59.940
<v Peter Shergold>And what are

326
00:21:00.720 --> 00:21:02.580
<v Peter Shergold>the avowed benefits to business?

327
00:21:03.620 --> 00:21:05.300
<v Peter Shergold>Well, I will give you four.

328
00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:08.640
<v Peter Shergold>First, there is a view that it is very important

329
00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:10.680
<v Peter Shergold>in increasing the loyalty of employees.

330
00:21:11.500 --> 00:21:14.880
<v Peter Shergold>The fact is that many of those who work in the private sector

331
00:21:15.720 --> 00:21:17.640
<v Peter Shergold>relate more strongly to a company

332
00:21:18.220 --> 00:21:19.360
<v Peter Shergold>that shows itself

333
00:21:19.360 --> 00:21:20.200
<v Peter Shergold>committed to the business.

334
00:21:20.220 --> 00:21:21.900
<v Peter Shergold>They are committed to fair labor conditions

335
00:21:21.900 --> 00:21:23.880
<v Peter Shergold>and ONH standards

336
00:21:23.880 --> 00:21:25.320
<v Peter Shergold>and community support

337
00:21:25.320 --> 00:21:27.280
<v Peter Shergold>and environmental responsibility.

338
00:21:29.220 --> 00:21:31.120
<v Peter Shergold>People want to work for companies

339
00:21:31.720 --> 00:21:34.540
<v Peter Shergold>that support not-for-profit organizations,

340
00:21:35.100 --> 00:21:38.000
<v Peter Shergold>that provide time off to employees to volunteer,

341
00:21:38.220 --> 00:21:41.100
<v Peter Shergold>which promote payroll giving in the workplace.

342
00:21:42.160 --> 00:21:44.060
<v Peter Shergold>Many companies tell me

343
00:21:44.060 --> 00:21:46.700
<v Peter Shergold>that they find it easier to recruit top talent

344
00:21:46.700 --> 00:21:48.380
<v Peter Shergold>and to retain it

345
00:21:48.380 --> 00:21:50.400
<v Peter Shergold>and to maintain its enthusiasm

346
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:51.680
<v Peter Shergold>and increase its morale

347
00:21:51.680 --> 00:21:55.080
<v Peter Shergold>by the fact that the staff, the employees,

348
00:21:55.880 --> 00:21:58.880
<v Peter Shergold>identify with the corporate responsibility activities

349
00:21:58.880 --> 00:22:01.140
<v Peter Shergold>of the company for which they work.

350
00:22:01.440 --> 00:22:03.240
<v Peter Shergold>Second, of course,

351
00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:06.000
<v Peter Shergold>it's meant to promote the loyalty of customers and clients.

352
00:22:07.140 --> 00:22:08.720
<v Peter Shergold>Now, often in the past,

353
00:22:08.920 --> 00:22:11.040
<v Peter Shergold>this has been made manifest

354
00:22:11.880 --> 00:22:14.380
<v Peter Shergold>only when there is a negative campaign

355
00:22:15.920 --> 00:22:17.500
<v Peter Shergold>against a business.

356
00:22:20.540 --> 00:22:22.700
<v Peter Shergold>And therefore, there is a tendency

357
00:22:22.700 --> 00:22:24.300
<v Peter Shergold>to see corporate responsibility

358
00:22:24.300 --> 00:22:27.200
<v Peter Shergold>as preparing you for negative publicity.

359
00:22:27.760 --> 00:22:30.180
<v Peter Shergold>We know how damaging it is

360
00:22:30.180 --> 00:22:32.440
<v Peter Shergold>when companies become exposed

361
00:22:32.440 --> 00:22:34.480
<v Peter Shergold>because their products are unsafe

362
00:22:34.480 --> 00:22:37.260
<v Peter Shergold>or because they have exploited child labor

363
00:22:37.260 --> 00:22:39.780
<v Peter Shergold>or they are not involved in fair trade

364
00:22:39.780 --> 00:22:42.200
<v Peter Shergold>or they are not environmentally safe.

365
00:22:42.560 --> 00:22:45.480
<v Peter Shergold>All of those things can and do

366
00:22:45.480 --> 00:22:47.140
<v Peter Shergold>directly affect

367
00:22:47.140 --> 00:22:48.360
<v Peter Shergold>the financial situation.

368
00:22:48.360 --> 00:22:48.560
<v Peter Shergold>And so,

369
00:22:48.560 --> 00:22:50.200
<v Peter Shergold>the actual bottom line of companies

370
00:22:50.200 --> 00:22:51.900
<v Peter Shergold>and everything from training shoes

371
00:22:51.900 --> 00:22:54.320
<v Peter Shergold>to diamonds to wool to toys

372
00:22:54.320 --> 00:22:55.380
<v Peter Shergold>to chocolate and coffee.

373
00:22:55.840 --> 00:22:57.200
<v Peter Shergold>But increasingly,

374
00:22:57.520 --> 00:22:58.540
<v Peter Shergold>corporates are now saying,

375
00:22:58.720 --> 00:23:01.040
<v Peter Shergold>let's not just have a defense,

376
00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:03.780
<v Peter Shergold>but let's actually go on the front foot

377
00:23:03.780 --> 00:23:06.440
<v Peter Shergold>and be proactive in this area.

378
00:23:06.660 --> 00:23:09.880
<v Peter Shergold>Take ethical standards to the marketplace

379
00:23:12.080 --> 00:23:16.580
<v Peter Shergold>and thereby build consumer support

380
00:23:16.580 --> 00:23:20.060
<v Peter Shergold>and client support for our products and our business.

381
00:23:20.420 --> 00:23:23.900
<v Peter Shergold>The third is that it can be very useful

382
00:23:23.900 --> 00:23:25.980
<v Peter Shergold>in terms of loyalty of investors

383
00:23:25.980 --> 00:23:29.760
<v Peter Shergold>because what's happened particularly over the last decade

384
00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:32.100
<v Peter Shergold>is there is increasingly a movement

385
00:23:32.100 --> 00:23:34.020
<v Peter Shergold>by those who want to invest

386
00:23:34.020 --> 00:23:36.220
<v Peter Shergold>to invest ethically,

387
00:23:36.380 --> 00:23:38.380
<v Peter Shergold>to at the very least do no harm

388
00:23:38.380 --> 00:23:41.680
<v Peter Shergold>and hopefully to do good from one's investment.

389
00:23:41.900 --> 00:23:45.320
<v Peter Shergold>So, you've got the emergence of ethical investment firms.

390
00:23:45.320 --> 00:23:49.620
<v Peter Shergold>This too can feed into the financial bottom line of companies.

391
00:23:50.080 --> 00:23:51.140
<v Peter Shergold>And fourth, of course,

392
00:23:51.180 --> 00:23:53.600
<v Peter Shergold>you can actually get direct cost savings

393
00:23:54.820 --> 00:23:56.220
<v Peter Shergold>out of responsible activity.

394
00:23:57.820 --> 00:23:59.760
<v Peter Shergold>Better occupational health and safety

395
00:24:00.320 --> 00:24:01.520
<v Peter Shergold>improves the bottom line.

396
00:24:02.820 --> 00:24:03.940
<v Peter Shergold>Greater energy efficiency,

397
00:24:04.300 --> 00:24:05.180
<v Peter Shergold>reduced travel

398
00:24:05.820 --> 00:24:07.640
<v Peter Shergold>improves the bottom line.

399
00:24:08.900 --> 00:24:11.940
<v Peter Shergold>Rising investment in green power

400
00:24:11.940 --> 00:24:14.180
<v Peter Shergold>is often driven by

401
00:24:14.180 --> 00:24:16.900
<v Peter Shergold>a quite rational economic expectation

402
00:24:16.900 --> 00:24:19.700
<v Peter Shergold>that demand for clean power is going to increase.

403
00:24:20.020 --> 00:24:21.880
<v Peter Shergold>So, these economic benefits,

404
00:24:22.680 --> 00:24:24.160
<v Peter Shergold>I think, are important.

405
00:24:25.840 --> 00:24:27.340
<v Peter Shergold>It's got to be said, though,

406
00:24:28.180 --> 00:24:31.320
<v Peter Shergold>having told you that there are these potential economic benefits,

407
00:24:32.180 --> 00:24:34.540
<v Peter Shergold>that the reality of corporate responsibility

408
00:24:34.540 --> 00:24:38.440
<v Peter Shergold>is often far less persuasive than the rhetoric.

409
00:24:39.080 --> 00:24:42.980
<v Peter Shergold>Because if you actually look at what many businesses do,

410
00:24:44.180 --> 00:24:47.760
<v Peter Shergold>it is not clearly related to the business of their business.

411
00:24:48.220 --> 00:24:51.220
<v Peter Shergold>It's often marked by a lack of coherence.

412
00:24:51.300 --> 00:24:52.300
<v Peter Shergold>What we often find

413
00:24:52.300 --> 00:24:55.020
<v Peter Shergold>is the projects that are supported by business

414
00:24:55.020 --> 00:24:58.620
<v Peter Shergold>are the ones that are close to the heart of the chairman

415
00:24:58.620 --> 00:25:01.140
<v Peter Shergold>or the CEO or members of the board

416
00:25:01.140 --> 00:25:04.180
<v Peter Shergold>with very little relationship to their business.

417
00:25:04.400 --> 00:25:07.040
<v Peter Shergold>There tends to be a lack of strategy.

418
00:25:07.460 --> 00:25:09.440
<v Peter Shergold>It's often, if you look,

419
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:13.980
<v Peter Shergold>driven by the public relations, corporate communications part.

420
00:25:14.180 --> 00:25:15.360
<v Peter Shergold>of the business,

421
00:25:15.540 --> 00:25:19.000
<v Peter Shergold>not discussed very frequently at the board level,

422
00:25:19.120 --> 00:25:21.640
<v Peter Shergold>not understood by senior management,

423
00:25:22.680 --> 00:25:27.220
<v Peter Shergold>not seen as a real contribution to investment.

424
00:25:28.180 --> 00:25:30.720
<v Peter Shergold>And it's often marked in reality

425
00:25:30.720 --> 00:25:32.860
<v Peter Shergold>by a lack of consistency

426
00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:35.460
<v Peter Shergold>between the business of the business

427
00:25:35.460 --> 00:25:37.960
<v Peter Shergold>and the business of corporate responsibility.

428
00:25:38.380 --> 00:25:42.300
<v Peter Shergold>And it's that last part, I think,

429
00:25:42.300 --> 00:25:45.820
<v Peter Shergold>which is the potentially life-threatening weakness

430
00:25:45.820 --> 00:25:47.360
<v Peter Shergold>of corporate responsibility.

431
00:25:47.580 --> 00:25:50.440
<v Peter Shergold>And it has been traumatically exposed

432
00:25:51.300 --> 00:25:53.260
<v Peter Shergold>by the global financial crisis.

433
00:25:55.480 --> 00:25:57.000
<v Peter Shergold>It's going to take some years

434
00:25:57.000 --> 00:25:58.820
<v Peter Shergold>to write a comprehensive economic history

435
00:25:58.820 --> 00:26:02.480
<v Peter Shergold>of what happened over the last two or three years.

436
00:26:02.560 --> 00:26:06.080
<v Peter Shergold>But I think the key elements are already starkly apparent.

437
00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:10.360
<v Peter Shergold>There was poor management of the substantial and growing risk

438
00:26:10.360 --> 00:26:12.720
<v Peter Shergold>attached to the opaque nature

439
00:26:12.720 --> 00:26:17.340
<v Peter Shergold>of bundles of securitized borrowings and collateralized debt.

440
00:26:17.460 --> 00:26:19.200
<v Peter Shergold>There was insufficient attention

441
00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:21.780
<v Peter Shergold>to the inadequacy of the capital

442
00:26:21.780 --> 00:26:24.720
<v Peter Shergold>required to support the trading of those investments.

443
00:26:24.880 --> 00:26:29.280
<v Peter Shergold>It was driven by super profits and excessive remuneration

444
00:26:29.280 --> 00:26:32.040
<v Peter Shergold>that could be gained in the short term

445
00:26:32.040 --> 00:26:34.940
<v Peter Shergold>on the basis of heavily leveraged activity.

446
00:26:35.840 --> 00:26:37.540
<v Peter Shergold>It could not last.

447
00:26:37.900 --> 00:26:39.500
<v Peter Shergold>And now, of course,

448
00:26:39.500 --> 00:26:40.340
<v Peter Shergold>as the world deals with it,

449
00:26:40.360 --> 00:26:44.440
<v Peter Shergold>the leverages were undergoing a profound period of redemption.

450
00:26:44.940 --> 00:26:47.240
<v Peter Shergold>So let's just quickly come to a summary.

451
00:26:47.440 --> 00:26:50.240
<v Peter Shergold>What do we then know of the key features

452
00:26:50.860 --> 00:26:52.540
<v Peter Shergold>of the global financial crisis?

453
00:26:52.840 --> 00:26:57.940
<v Peter Shergold>One, that there was inadequate management of risk

454
00:26:58.860 --> 00:27:02.140
<v Peter Shergold>with the potential for very real reputational damage.

455
00:27:03.120 --> 00:27:07.260
<v Peter Shergold>Second, that you had structures of decision-making

456
00:27:07.860 --> 00:27:09.660
<v Peter Shergold>and structures of incentivization

457
00:27:09.660 --> 00:27:10.340
<v Peter Shergold>which were not in line with the goals of the global financial crisis.

458
00:27:10.360 --> 00:27:12.820
<v Peter Shergold>Which were short-term and unsustainable.

459
00:27:12.900 --> 00:27:17.020
<v Peter Shergold>And third, that the opaqueness of the system,

460
00:27:17.120 --> 00:27:19.640
<v Peter Shergold>the opaqueness of the financial products,

461
00:27:19.720 --> 00:27:24.260
<v Peter Shergold>of the structures that underlay the movement of capital and debt,

462
00:27:25.360 --> 00:27:29.080
<v Peter Shergold>the opaqueness of the governance of decision-making prevailed.

463
00:27:30.580 --> 00:27:33.520
<v Peter Shergold>Reputational risk, unsustainable growth,

464
00:27:33.920 --> 00:27:37.260
<v Peter Shergold>inadequate transparency, poor governance.

465
00:27:38.820 --> 00:27:40.340
<v Peter Shergold>Any history of the global financial crisis

466
00:27:40.340 --> 00:27:43.160
<v Peter Shergold>will expose those.

467
00:27:43.780 --> 00:27:45.920
<v Peter Shergold>And now just think.

468
00:27:46.180 --> 00:27:49.140
<v Peter Shergold>What do we know about what are meant to be

469
00:27:49.140 --> 00:27:52.340
<v Peter Shergold>the avowed benefits of corporate responsibility?

470
00:27:53.400 --> 00:27:55.640
<v Peter Shergold>It's the mirror image.

471
00:27:56.020 --> 00:27:58.060
<v Peter Shergold>First, that corporate responsibility

472
00:27:58.060 --> 00:28:02.180
<v Peter Shergold>is intended to enhance public reputation,

473
00:28:02.580 --> 00:28:06.140
<v Peter Shergold>improve your reputation with clients and customers

474
00:28:06.140 --> 00:28:08.300
<v Peter Shergold>and investors and employees.

475
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:10.320
<v Peter Shergold>To persuade the public that you are not the only one

476
00:28:10.320 --> 00:28:13.140
<v Peter Shergold>in the public that the company cares about them.

477
00:28:13.240 --> 00:28:17.720
<v Peter Shergold>To persuade governments that the companies can themselves self-regulate.

478
00:28:18.600 --> 00:28:21.340
<v Peter Shergold>And that's what corporate responsibility is meant to do.

479
00:28:22.320 --> 00:28:26.300
<v Peter Shergold>Second, it's meant to disposition a company

480
00:28:26.300 --> 00:28:30.100
<v Peter Shergold>so it can sustain its activities over the long term.

481
00:28:30.300 --> 00:28:33.900
<v Peter Shergold>And third, corporate responsibility

482
00:28:34.820 --> 00:28:38.600
<v Peter Shergold>is based upon greater levels of transparency and openness

483
00:28:38.600 --> 00:28:41.600
<v Peter Shergold>and openness in the way it reports its activities.

484
00:28:43.080 --> 00:28:45.000
<v Peter Shergold>So here is the crunch.

485
00:28:46.040 --> 00:28:50.320
<v Peter Shergold>The behaviours that were the business of the business

486
00:28:51.100 --> 00:28:54.580
<v Peter Shergold>turned out to be the mirror opposite of the values

487
00:28:55.100 --> 00:28:57.780
<v Peter Shergold>which were meant to underlie corporate responsibility.

488
00:28:58.280 --> 00:28:59.780
<v Peter Shergold>The exact opposite.

489
00:29:00.360 --> 00:29:05.100
<v Peter Shergold>And worst, worst, the experts didn't see it coming.

490
00:29:05.240 --> 00:29:07.660
<v Peter Shergold>They had their eyes on the wrong ball.

491
00:29:08.600 --> 00:29:12.080
<v Peter Shergold>And I'm not just talking here about the financial markets or governments.

492
00:29:12.180 --> 00:29:16.880
<v Peter Shergold>I'm talking about those socially responsible investment funds

493
00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:18.180
<v Peter Shergold>who may have taken your money

494
00:29:18.180 --> 00:29:22.000
<v Peter Shergold>because you wanted to make sure you were investing your money ethically.

495
00:29:23.460 --> 00:29:25.500
<v Peter Shergold>I've got to tell you, where did they put your money?

496
00:29:26.820 --> 00:29:27.700
<v Peter Shergold>Lehman Brothers?

497
00:29:29.420 --> 00:29:29.980
<v Peter Shergold>Citigroup?

498
00:29:31.240 --> 00:29:32.360
<v Peter Shergold>Bear Stearns?

499
00:29:32.820 --> 00:29:33.760
<v Peter Shergold>Northern Rock?

500
00:29:34.440 --> 00:29:35.280
<v Peter Shergold>Fannie Mae?

501
00:29:36.040 --> 00:29:38.580
<v Peter Shergold>This is where ethical investments would be.

502
00:29:38.580 --> 00:29:38.880
<v Peter Shergold>This is where the money was being made.

503
00:29:39.060 --> 00:29:40.280
<v Peter Shergold>What went wrong?

504
00:29:40.460 --> 00:29:47.420
<v Peter Shergold>Well, the investment funds were looking at the external part of corporate responsibility.

505
00:29:47.940 --> 00:29:52.220
<v Peter Shergold>Wasn't it wonderful that they had a program to reduce carbon emissions?

506
00:29:52.360 --> 00:29:57.080
<v Peter Shergold>A program to get more women and black people in positions of authority?

507
00:29:58.460 --> 00:30:00.700
<v Peter Shergold>Supporting community enterprises?

508
00:30:01.300 --> 00:30:02.800
<v Peter Shergold>Supporting medical research?

509
00:30:03.100 --> 00:30:06.540
<v Peter Shergold>In other words, they were looking at the external manifestation

510
00:30:06.540 --> 00:30:12.680
<v Peter Shergold>of corporate responsibility rather than going back into the business of the business

511
00:30:12.680 --> 00:30:15.480
<v Peter Shergold>and seeing how that was being conducted.

512
00:30:16.540 --> 00:30:19.040
<v Peter Shergold>And that, I think, is the real tragedy.

513
00:30:20.540 --> 00:30:25.660
<v Peter Shergold>So, in my view, corporations, businesses need to rebuild corporate responsibility

514
00:30:25.660 --> 00:30:29.700
<v Peter Shergold>in a way which ensures that the internal management and governance

515
00:30:29.700 --> 00:30:34.480
<v Peter Shergold>and the external manifestations of social and environmental responsibility

516
00:30:34.480 --> 00:30:40.280
<v Peter Shergold>are, in fact, premised and predicated on the same values

517
00:30:40.980 --> 00:30:45.480
<v Peter Shergold>of reputation, sustainability, openness, good governance.

518
00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:49.480
<v Peter Shergold>A corporate responsibility that has a strategic coherence

519
00:30:50.120 --> 00:30:55.360
<v Peter Shergold>that can be readily understood, not only by customers and investors and suppliers,

520
00:30:55.760 --> 00:30:58.340
<v Peter Shergold>but by all those who work for the company.

521
00:30:58.560 --> 00:31:03.500
<v Peter Shergold>A corporate responsibility that responds not only to government policy

522
00:31:03.500 --> 00:31:08.640
<v Peter Shergold>and public expectations, but learns from and is informed by

523
00:31:08.640 --> 00:31:11.240
<v Peter Shergold>the experience of the community sector.

524
00:31:11.420 --> 00:31:15.260
<v Peter Shergold>Because, let us remember, it is not for profit organizations

525
00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:22.840
<v Peter Shergold>who have had generations of experience in having to balance community mission

526
00:31:22.840 --> 00:31:25.480
<v Peter Shergold>against financial sustainability.

527
00:31:26.420 --> 00:31:33.380
<v Peter Shergold>In conclusion, I'm cautiously optimistic that beyond the current economic

528
00:31:33.380 --> 00:31:38.360
<v Peter Shergold>gloom, driven by the redemptive lessons of the global financial crisis

529
00:31:38.880 --> 00:31:45.240
<v Peter Shergold>and the regulatory impulse of governments, there will emerge a new articulation

530
00:31:45.240 --> 00:31:46.800
<v Peter Shergold>of corporate responsibility.

531
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:51.500
<v Peter Shergold>One that's based on collaborative leadership across the public,

532
00:31:51.600 --> 00:31:53.300
<v Peter Shergold>private, community sectors.

533
00:31:53.860 --> 00:32:00.320
<v Peter Shergold>A corporate responsibility that genuinely sees its labor and social

534
00:32:00.320 --> 00:32:06.020
<v Peter Shergold>and environmental activities as the foundation of sustainable wealth creation.

535
00:32:06.880 --> 00:32:13.640
<v Peter Shergold>And what gives me so much cautious optimism isn't only that large businesses

536
00:32:13.640 --> 00:32:19.020
<v Peter Shergold>and small businesses are reassessing how they have articulated what they've done,

537
00:32:19.120 --> 00:32:23.540
<v Peter Shergold>but I think more importantly, because although corporate profits

538
00:32:23.540 --> 00:32:28.080
<v Peter Shergold>and dividends and shareholder value have all fallen significantly,

539
00:32:28.080 --> 00:32:33.180
<v Peter Shergold>consumer consciences have not been put on hold.

540
00:32:33.420 --> 00:32:38.360
<v Peter Shergold>The public will still demand corporate responsibility.

541
00:32:39.200 --> 00:32:46.220
<v Peter Shergold>I look forward to a form of corporate responsibility explicitly founded

542
00:32:46.220 --> 00:32:50.080
<v Peter Shergold>on a notion of a social contract.

543
00:32:50.200 --> 00:32:57.460
<v Peter Shergold>That corporate responsibility is the basis on which we should give business

544
00:32:57.460 --> 00:33:00.720
<v Peter Shergold>a license to operate in a market economy.

545
00:33:01.540 --> 00:33:03.360
<v Peter Shergold>Very happy to answer questions if I may.

546
00:33:05.740 --> 00:33:06.760
<v Michael Barber>Thank you Peter.

547
00:33:12.280 --> 00:33:14.560
<v Michael Barber>I think the warm applause says it all.

548
00:33:14.620 --> 00:33:20.280
<v Michael Barber>Thank you for a very interesting and challenging little speech and presentation.

549
00:33:20.600 --> 00:33:24.460
<v Michael Barber>I suppose one thing we can take away, that if the next generation of corporate leaders

550
00:33:24.460 --> 00:33:27.400
<v Michael Barber>are going to come through business schools, then I'm sure that your students

551
00:33:27.400 --> 00:33:33.040
<v Michael Barber>in the months and years ahead will have a great foundation on which they will deliver that thing.

552
00:33:33.300 --> 00:33:35.920
<v Michael Barber>We have perhaps 10 minutes or so.

553
00:33:36.640 --> 00:33:38.160
<v Michael Barber>Questions up the back there.

554
00:33:39.000 --> 00:33:43.000
<v Audience>Yes, Peter, I've found the diagnosis of the problem,

555
00:33:43.320 --> 00:33:48.600
<v Audience>I suppose the financial crisis is a concern that you made was very good.

556
00:33:50.560 --> 00:33:53.640
<v Audience>The long term interests of corporations

557
00:33:53.640 --> 00:33:57.100
<v Audience>and society hopefully going on the same track.

558
00:33:58.060 --> 00:34:00.740
<v Audience>Good ideas there, but the thing that struck me was,

559
00:34:01.400 --> 00:34:06.180
<v Audience>I think I can say all voluntary, I'm skeptical,

560
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:08.660
<v Audience>and I think some of my British dentists would be very skeptical,

561
00:34:08.920 --> 00:34:12.220
<v Audience>that we can trust business to that extent.

562
00:34:14.440 --> 00:34:17.480
<v Audience>So how much can we legislate for these sorts of things?

563
00:34:17.580 --> 00:34:21.420
<v Audience>I think that we need to sometimes have that compulsion.

564
00:34:21.420 --> 00:34:24.200
<v Audience>Sometimes we can't trust companies to do these sorts of things,

565
00:34:24.260 --> 00:34:27.820
<v Audience>and the sorts of problems we're facing as a climate change line, for example.

566
00:34:28.100 --> 00:34:30.460
<v Audience>We need to go more powerfully, more quickly,

567
00:34:30.540 --> 00:34:32.800
<v Audience>than just hoping that they're going to do the right thing.

568
00:34:33.060 --> 00:34:34.860
<v Audience>And this is obviously moral persuasion.

569
00:34:34.920 --> 00:34:39.820
<v Audience>We need to, I think sometimes, at least have some sort of genuine compulsion

570
00:34:39.820 --> 00:34:45.240
<v Audience>and enforcement from the government to make sure that they do what needs to be done.

571
00:34:47.760 --> 00:34:49.580
<v Peter Shergold>I agree with that.

572
00:34:49.640 --> 00:34:50.400
<v Peter Shergold>I mean, it is...

573
00:34:50.400 --> 00:34:55.880
<v Peter Shergold>the challenge of getting the balance between the genuine benefits of the market

574
00:34:56.400 --> 00:34:58.140
<v Peter Shergold>with the need to regulate its activities.

575
00:34:59.000 --> 00:35:01.840
<v Peter Shergold>I think what has happened in the last two years

576
00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:08.280
<v Peter Shergold>is that corporate responsibility has failed in a quite comprehensive way

577
00:35:09.240 --> 00:35:15.840
<v Peter Shergold>to live up to its argument that in most instances it could be expected to self-regulate.

578
00:35:17.400 --> 00:35:19.240
<v Peter Shergold>It has destroyed its reputation.

579
00:35:20.400 --> 00:35:23.700
<v Peter Shergold>I am certain as polls appear, as they appear each year,

580
00:35:23.760 --> 00:35:28.180
<v Peter Shergold>on levels of trust, we will have seen a very significant reduction

581
00:35:28.180 --> 00:35:31.360
<v Peter Shergold>in levels of trust for business.

582
00:35:32.280 --> 00:35:35.840
<v Peter Shergold>But of course, ironically, I suspect it will also match

583
00:35:36.400 --> 00:35:40.960
<v Peter Shergold>declining levels of trust in governments and politicians.

584
00:35:41.200 --> 00:35:45.640
<v Peter Shergold>At the very point, I think you're right, at which it is probably necessary

585
00:35:45.640 --> 00:35:48.640
<v Peter Shergold>for there to be greater regulatory intervention.

586
00:35:50.400 --> 00:35:55.400
<v Peter Shergold>I think that on the whole, the state is not good at regulating ethics.

587
00:35:56.400 --> 00:35:59.660
<v Peter Shergold>And our expectations of business should be more,

588
00:35:59.760 --> 00:36:01.840
<v Peter Shergold>and their own expectations should be more,

589
00:36:02.000 --> 00:36:04.560
<v Peter Shergold>than what is required of the regulatory framework.

590
00:36:05.060 --> 00:36:08.700
<v Peter Shergold>Having said that, I would strongly support, for example,

591
00:36:09.400 --> 00:36:12.540
<v Peter Shergold>increased regulation of business into the future,

592
00:36:12.620 --> 00:36:17.440
<v Peter Shergold>which would set limits on the extent of capital that is required

593
00:36:17.440 --> 00:36:22.900
<v Peter Shergold>to underpin the variety of financial derivatives that is being traded.

594
00:36:23.100 --> 00:36:24.420
<v Peter Shergold>And that was a clear failure.

595
00:36:24.600 --> 00:36:28.580
<v Peter Shergold>I would even, but I'd have to say more reluctantly,

596
00:36:28.680 --> 00:36:33.780
<v Peter Shergold>have greater regulatory control over the remuneration paid.

597
00:36:34.260 --> 00:36:37.740
<v Peter Shergold>I mean, I understand why people, including myself,

598
00:36:37.960 --> 00:36:40.660
<v Peter Shergold>can be outraged by levels of remuneration.

599
00:36:40.800 --> 00:36:45.780
<v Peter Shergold>But it seems to me, although that's the part that's most publicly visible,

600
00:36:45.780 --> 00:36:50.820
<v Peter Shergold>the really dangerous part is the systems and the structures and the culture

601
00:36:50.820 --> 00:36:54.300
<v Peter Shergold>which gave rise to that executive remuneration,

602
00:36:54.460 --> 00:36:56.720
<v Peter Shergold>which was always short-term.

603
00:36:57.060 --> 00:36:59.220
<v Peter Shergold>So I think there does need to be regulation.

604
00:36:59.700 --> 00:37:02.560
<v Peter Shergold>I think there will be greater government regulation.

605
00:37:02.900 --> 00:37:04.800
<v Peter Shergold>I don't think it will be sufficient.

606
00:37:05.000 --> 00:37:08.500
<v Peter Shergold>And I would always look to a definition of corporate responsibility

607
00:37:08.500 --> 00:37:14.280
<v Peter Shergold>that goes significantly beyond the legal and regulatory requirements.

608
00:37:15.780 --> 00:37:16.880
<v Michael Barber>Question over here.

609
00:37:17.940 --> 00:37:20.740
<v Audience>You mentioned that corporate responsibility

610
00:37:20.740 --> 00:37:24.220
<v Audience>sometimes means different things to different companies in different countries.

611
00:37:24.520 --> 00:37:29.480
<v Audience>And you cited Singapore as an example where government had engendered

612
00:37:29.480 --> 00:37:33.080
<v Audience>a high degree of corporate responsibility,

613
00:37:33.300 --> 00:37:37.380
<v Audience>and perhaps that reflects a deeper cultural situation in that country.

614
00:37:37.680 --> 00:37:41.780
<v Audience>But I'm interested to ask you, companies that operate in two countries,

615
00:37:42.780 --> 00:37:45.140
<v Audience>or more countries around the world,

616
00:37:45.140 --> 00:37:48.880
<v Audience>do you find they settle at the government's expected level

617
00:37:48.880 --> 00:37:51.300
<v Audience>of corporate responsibility in different countries,

618
00:37:51.340 --> 00:37:55.320
<v Audience>or do they standardise their corporate responsibility across the globe?

619
00:37:55.660 --> 00:38:01.980
<v Audience>Is there evidence that government expectations therefore do affect this?

620
00:38:02.960 --> 00:38:08.020
<v Peter Shergold>I think one of the benefits of multinational corporations

621
00:38:09.140 --> 00:38:14.060
<v Peter Shergold>with long supply chains is that increasingly they are expected

622
00:38:14.060 --> 00:38:19.400
<v Peter Shergold>to behave in a way which meets the standard of the developed country,

623
00:38:19.740 --> 00:38:21.200
<v Peter Shergold>which is usually greater.

624
00:38:21.720 --> 00:38:25.280
<v Peter Shergold>So that it is no longer okay to say,

625
00:38:25.380 --> 00:38:31.460
<v Peter Shergold>well, the child labour that we are using in Bangladesh fully meets

626
00:38:33.080 --> 00:38:35.020
<v Peter Shergold>Bangladeshi legal requirements,

627
00:38:35.260 --> 00:38:40.060
<v Peter Shergold>because people are now expecting it to judge it by the standards of Australia

628
00:38:40.060 --> 00:38:42.680
<v Peter Shergold>or the United States or the United Kingdom.

629
00:38:42.900 --> 00:38:44.040
<v Peter Shergold>I think one of the most important things is that people are now expecting it to judge it

630
00:38:44.060 --> 00:38:44.200
<v Peter Shergold>by the standards of Australia or the United States or the United Kingdom.

631
00:38:44.200 --> 00:38:46.560
<v Peter Shergold>And I think one of the most hopeful aspects of corporate responsibility

632
00:38:46.560 --> 00:38:50.880
<v Peter Shergold>is the way that it can move down the supply chain.

633
00:38:51.120 --> 00:38:56.440
<v Peter Shergold>Now by doing that, it gets corporates into some very uncomfortable areas,

634
00:38:56.640 --> 00:39:00.340
<v Peter Shergold>because often when you're dealing with labour in some of these countries,

635
00:39:00.460 --> 00:39:04.460
<v Peter Shergold>it isn't just about occupational health and safety or fair labour standards.

636
00:39:04.960 --> 00:39:09.460
<v Peter Shergold>It does go quite fundamentally to the issue of human rights.

637
00:39:09.900 --> 00:39:13.980
<v Peter Shergold>And my view is that if you're a company operating here in Australia,

638
00:39:14.060 --> 00:39:19.480
<v Peter Shergold>you can't ignore the issue of human rights in many of the countries

639
00:39:19.480 --> 00:39:24.100
<v Peter Shergold>in which you are producing resources or undertaking your manufacturing.

640
00:39:25.180 --> 00:39:26.720
<v Michael Barber>No question down here.

641
00:39:27.300 --> 00:39:28.100
<v Michael Barber>Yes.

642
00:39:30.040 --> 00:39:32.700
<v Audience>You've just mentioned human rights

643
00:39:32.700 --> 00:39:36.100
<v Audience>and previously you mentioned the need for fair labour practices.

644
00:39:36.760 --> 00:39:42.200
<v Audience>And my question focuses on the role of the media

645
00:39:42.200 --> 00:39:45.660
<v Audience>in spreading this message so that you get this public perception

646
00:39:46.200 --> 00:39:47.300
<v Audience>of corporate responsibility.

647
00:39:48.160 --> 00:39:52.320
<v Audience>But in that regard, I would like to say that when Mrs Walker

648
00:39:53.200 --> 00:39:56.140
<v Audience>managed to break through the glass ceiling and get a directorship

649
00:39:56.140 --> 00:40:01.160
<v Audience>in the National External Bank, she was quickly ditched because

650
00:40:02.200 --> 00:40:09.600
<v Audience>she wanted an outside firm to investigate wrongdoings

651
00:40:10.200 --> 00:40:11.520
<v Audience>within the organisation.

652
00:40:12.320 --> 00:40:13.880
<v Audience>And that's all she wanted.

653
00:40:13.980 --> 00:40:17.860
<v Audience>And she tried to do it quietly behind the scenes and nothing happened.

654
00:40:18.060 --> 00:40:20.740
<v Audience>So she went public, so she's now a whistleblower.

655
00:40:21.020 --> 00:40:27.260
<v Audience>And then she got her ditched from her directorship in the National External Bank.

656
00:40:27.520 --> 00:40:30.140
<v Audience>But in terms of the media response,

657
00:40:31.620 --> 00:40:36.680
<v Audience>the Financial Times were quick after that in reporting that

658
00:40:37.200 --> 00:40:39.220
<v Audience>when her other directorship expired,

659
00:40:39.220 --> 00:40:43.880
<v Audience>she would never again get a significant directorship

660
00:40:43.880 --> 00:40:48.720
<v Audience>in any significant company.

661
00:40:48.960 --> 00:40:50.020
<v Audience>That's what they were told.

662
00:40:50.580 --> 00:40:55.100
<v Audience>So I'm wondering how all this fits in with the idea of human rights

663
00:40:55.100 --> 00:40:59.760
<v Audience>because surely human rights were being breached.

664
00:40:59.860 --> 00:41:04.260
<v Audience>And there wasn't any question of justice used.

665
00:41:05.320 --> 00:41:08.380
<v Peter Shergold>Well, let me take the general rather than the specific issue,

666
00:41:08.380 --> 00:41:09.500
<v Peter Shergold>which I can't comment on.

667
00:41:09.640 --> 00:41:10.820
<v Peter Shergold>And it's been fascinating.

668
00:41:11.040 --> 00:41:16.360
<v Peter Shergold>I think every session that I have been on a panel at this festival

669
00:41:16.360 --> 00:41:19.260
<v Peter Shergold>has in one way or another come back to the role of the media

670
00:41:19.260 --> 00:41:21.120
<v Peter Shergold>and the role that the media plays.

671
00:41:21.420 --> 00:41:22.200
<v Peter Shergold>And it is important.

672
00:41:24.740 --> 00:41:28.140
<v Peter Shergold>I think that this is an area in which the media can play

673
00:41:28.140 --> 00:41:32.980
<v Peter Shergold>and has played very often a very valuable role

674
00:41:34.640 --> 00:41:36.400
<v Peter Shergold>by particularly internationally

675
00:41:36.400 --> 00:41:43.360
<v Peter Shergold>exposing unfair labour standards or inadequate human rights.

676
00:41:43.480 --> 00:41:46.420
<v Peter Shergold>So the media has been valuable in that regard,

677
00:41:47.400 --> 00:41:49.780
<v Peter Shergold>particularly when it's doing what it does best,

678
00:41:49.980 --> 00:41:51.400
<v Peter Shergold>which is being negative.

679
00:41:52.400 --> 00:41:55.160
<v Peter Shergold>One of the difficulties I have in this area

680
00:41:55.160 --> 00:42:00.240
<v Peter Shergold>is that it's very, very difficult to get the media

681
00:42:00.240 --> 00:42:02.680
<v Peter Shergold>to take an interest in a positive story.

682
00:42:03.580 --> 00:42:06.880
<v Peter Shergold>I can always get the media to take an interest

683
00:42:06.880 --> 00:42:10.740
<v Peter Shergold>in yet another story about the appalling status

684
00:42:10.740 --> 00:42:13.680
<v Peter Shergold>of indigenous social and economic disadvantage.

685
00:42:14.220 --> 00:42:17.500
<v Peter Shergold>But it is almost impossible to get the media

686
00:42:17.500 --> 00:42:20.900
<v Peter Shergold>to take an interest in a hopeful and positive story

687
00:42:20.900 --> 00:42:22.740
<v Peter Shergold>of indigenous achievement.

688
00:42:23.200 --> 00:42:28.400
<v Peter Shergold>And so I think that the media can be extraordinarily powerful

689
00:42:28.400 --> 00:42:32.180
<v Peter Shergold>in pushing and promoting corporate responsibility

690
00:42:32.180 --> 00:42:35.740
<v Peter Shergold>by the way it opens corporate activities to scrutiny.

691
00:42:35.900 --> 00:42:38.300
<v Peter Shergold>I wish it played a more positive role

692
00:42:38.300 --> 00:42:41.920
<v Peter Shergold>in supporting what is positive that is happening.

693
00:42:42.660 --> 00:42:44.540
<v Peter Shergold>I mean, as you said in your introduction,

694
00:42:44.780 --> 00:42:47.860
<v Peter Shergold>we work in and live in an Australia

695
00:42:48.400 --> 00:42:52.980
<v Peter Shergold>which has 750,000 not-for-profit organisations

696
00:42:52.980 --> 00:42:56.660
<v Peter Shergold>doing a variety of most extraordinarily beneficial things.

697
00:42:56.660 --> 00:42:58.180
<v Peter Shergold>Most of us are members,

698
00:42:58.320 --> 00:43:00.800
<v Peter Shergold>and yet none of us realise how important this is

699
00:43:00.800 --> 00:43:05.540
<v Peter Shergold>because it never genuinely makes the media.

700
00:43:06.240 --> 00:43:12.500
<v Peter Shergold>It simply exists below the radar of media interest.

701
00:43:13.600 --> 00:43:17.240
<v Michael Barber>Well, I'm afraid my KPI is to keep everyone on time

702
00:43:17.240 --> 00:43:19.940
<v Michael Barber>because there are other sessions which are about to start,

703
00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:21.100
<v Michael Barber>and I'm sure people in the audience.

704
00:43:21.360 --> 00:43:23.340
<v Michael Barber>It's always a measure of a talk if,

705
00:43:23.360 --> 00:43:25.580
<v Michael Barber>when the Chair has to shut off question time,

706
00:43:25.580 --> 00:43:26.820
<v Michael Barber>and I apologise for that,

707
00:43:26.840 --> 00:43:29.620
<v Michael Barber>but I would like you all to join me in one final round of applause.

708
00:43:30.400 --> 00:43:31.020
<v Michael Barber>Thank you.

