WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.880
<v Duncan Steel>This afternoon to Professor Rachel Webster from the University of Melbourne,

2
00:00:04.040 --> 00:00:11.560
<v Duncan Steel>Professor of Astrophysics there, has just finished, I believe, serving as Chair of the National Astronomy Committee,

3
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:14.380
<v Duncan Steel>Council, whatever it's called, I can never remember exactly.

4
00:00:17.100 --> 00:00:19.160
<v Duncan Steel>Rachel has a long background in this area.

5
00:00:19.240 --> 00:00:23.840
<v Duncan Steel>I think the only time I met her previously was probably when I was giving a talk at the University of Melbourne,

6
00:00:23.880 --> 00:00:27.020
<v Duncan Steel>I think in 1994, and I think you'd just come back from Rice University, is that right?

7
00:00:27.780 --> 00:00:28.200
<v Rachel Webster>Toronto.

8
00:00:28.520 --> 00:00:28.940
<v Duncan Steel>Toronto.

9
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:36.620
<v Duncan Steel>She must have been in Toronto because she said Toronto in the way in which the locals do.

10
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:43.580
<v Duncan Steel>Also been very active in promoting the physical sciences for female students,

11
00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:45.360
<v Duncan Steel>which I think is a fundamentally important thing,

12
00:00:45.420 --> 00:00:50.100
<v Duncan Steel>and actually it's amazing how many female students do get attracted into the sciences by astronomy.

13
00:00:50.940 --> 00:00:52.660
<v Duncan Steel>Astronomy is a fantastic thing.

14
00:00:53.580 --> 00:00:56.800
<v Duncan Steel>Lots of people very, very interested in it, obvious from the audience here.

15
00:00:57.160 --> 00:00:59.980
<v Duncan Steel>And so without further ado, because you want to listen to her,

16
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Duncan Steel>not to me, I'll hand over to Rachel Webster to talk about new directions in astronomy.

17
00:01:09.460 --> 00:01:12.420
<v Rachel Webster>Well, thank you very much indeed, Duncan.

18
00:01:14.000 --> 00:01:20.700
<v Rachel Webster>So I'm going to speak today, I'm going to talk a little bit about how I came to be an astronomer.

19
00:01:20.740 --> 00:01:25.540
<v Rachel Webster>I'm going to talk a little bit about astronomy and then just make some broader comments about,

20
00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:28.080
<v Rachel Webster>well, indeed, women in astronomy and other things.

21
00:01:28.840 --> 00:01:29.940
<v Rachel Webster>So for the person...

22
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.320
<v Rachel Webster>For the past 30 years, I've had the privilege of working in astrophysics and cosmology,

23
00:01:35.120 --> 00:01:39.780
<v Rachel Webster>and my career in this area has been at once a realisation of a passion,

24
00:01:39.860 --> 00:01:41.500
<v Rachel Webster>but also perhaps an accident.

25
00:01:41.780 --> 00:01:49.320
<v Rachel Webster>In my late teens, I heard that an American cousin of mine had been selected to attend an international school

26
00:01:49.320 --> 00:01:52.440
<v Rachel Webster>on inner and outer space at the University of Sydney.

27
00:01:52.880 --> 00:01:57.740
<v Rachel Webster>So I wrote to Professor Harry Messel, as you do when you're 16 and don't know any better,

28
00:01:57.860 --> 00:01:59.840
<v Rachel Webster>and asked if I could go too.

29
00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:03.840
<v Rachel Webster>And that was my first introduction to cosmology.

30
00:02:04.220 --> 00:02:07.580
<v Rachel Webster>To say that it blew my mind was an understatement.

31
00:02:08.140 --> 00:02:14.340
<v Rachel Webster>So perhaps a decade later, when I was reorganising the office accommodation in the Victorian Public Service,

32
00:02:14.700 --> 00:02:18.320
<v Rachel Webster>I realised that I didn't want to reach 40 and end up saying,

33
00:02:18.460 --> 00:02:22.780
<v Rachel Webster>oh my God, I always wanted to be a cosmologist and look, I got stuck in the public service.

34
00:02:23.300 --> 00:02:29.780
<v Rachel Webster>So I applied to a bunch of UK universities and surprisingly, in retrospect, was accepted to a couple.

35
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:35.180
<v Rachel Webster>But I really wanted to go to Cambridge, having read that there was a really fine cosmologist there.

36
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:41.120
<v Rachel Webster>Martin Rees wrote to me and said he would be interested in having me as a student,

37
00:02:41.200 --> 00:02:43.840
<v Rachel Webster>but first of all, I had to establish that I could do physics,

38
00:02:43.980 --> 00:02:46.340
<v Rachel Webster>and then Cambridge could consider my application.

39
00:02:47.020 --> 00:02:50.420
<v Rachel Webster>So I completed a Masters and gained a place at Cambridge,

40
00:02:50.580 --> 00:02:53.120
<v Rachel Webster>and indeed ended up with Martin Rees as my supervisor.

41
00:02:54.140 --> 00:02:57.400
<v Rachel Webster>As far as I was concerned, I was following my passion.

42
00:02:57.980 --> 00:02:59.280
<v Rachel Webster>But for reasons...

43
00:02:59.280 --> 00:02:59.980
<v Rachel Webster>But for reasons...

44
00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:02.100
<v Rachel Webster>For reasons that are not completely clear to me now,

45
00:03:02.300 --> 00:03:08.200
<v Rachel Webster>I considered that my other colleagues who had reached or had places at Cambridge

46
00:03:08.200 --> 00:03:12.560
<v Rachel Webster>by much more normal academic routes had a greater entitlement than I did.

47
00:03:13.380 --> 00:03:17.580
<v Rachel Webster>And I actually remember using the term dilettante to describe myself.

48
00:03:17.740 --> 00:03:19.660
<v Rachel Webster>I was there to follow a great passion.

49
00:03:20.500 --> 00:03:22.820
<v Rachel Webster>But I've got quite a different perspective now.

50
00:03:23.360 --> 00:03:27.600
<v Rachel Webster>I see colleagues around me jockeying for positions of prestige,

51
00:03:28.340 --> 00:03:29.520
<v Rachel Webster>for honours,

52
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:32.680
<v Rachel Webster>and for any recognition that will increase the metrics

53
00:03:32.680 --> 00:03:35.060
<v Rachel Webster>which measure a successful scientific life.

54
00:03:35.620 --> 00:03:38.640
<v Rachel Webster>But for me, it's still the passion

55
00:03:38.640 --> 00:03:41.780
<v Rachel Webster>to understand a vast universe out there

56
00:03:41.780 --> 00:03:44.460
<v Rachel Webster>which is of paramount importance.

57
00:03:45.140 --> 00:03:48.220
<v Rachel Webster>So today what I want to do is to discuss two ideas

58
00:03:48.220 --> 00:03:51.380
<v Rachel Webster>which now dominate our ideas in cosmology.

59
00:03:51.860 --> 00:03:54.100
<v Rachel Webster>Those are what is the nature of the universe,

60
00:03:54.360 --> 00:03:55.560
<v Rachel Webster>and what is life.

61
00:03:56.060 --> 00:03:57.520
<v Rachel Webster>To answer these questions,

62
00:03:57.640 --> 00:03:59.100
<v Rachel Webster>we need to be able to apply...

63
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:02.860
<v Rachel Webster>a scientific method to understand observations of objects

64
00:04:02.860 --> 00:04:05.200
<v Rachel Webster>which are on the other side of the universe.

65
00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:09.460
<v Rachel Webster>And I'm going to start by talking about the nature of the universe.

66
00:04:10.320 --> 00:04:12.320
<v Rachel Webster>For about 50 years,

67
00:04:12.440 --> 00:04:15.640
<v Rachel Webster>we've understood the basic stuff that we're made from.

68
00:04:15.860 --> 00:04:17.600
<v Rachel Webster>We call these baryons.

69
00:04:17.760 --> 00:04:22.040
<v Rachel Webster>And these were initially made in something that we call the Big Bang.

70
00:04:22.640 --> 00:04:25.980
<v Rachel Webster>Now, the Big Bang has absolutely nothing to do with an explosion.

71
00:04:26.260 --> 00:04:28.280
<v Rachel Webster>It's quite a misnomer in that way.

72
00:04:28.360 --> 00:04:29.500
<v Rachel Webster>But simply refers...

73
00:04:29.520 --> 00:04:31.180
<v Rachel Webster>to the earliest times in the universe.

74
00:04:31.700 --> 00:04:34.340
<v Rachel Webster>At those times, hydrogen and helium,

75
00:04:34.520 --> 00:04:38.660
<v Rachel Webster>the first two elements in the periodic table, were made.

76
00:04:38.780 --> 00:04:39.820
<v Rachel Webster>And not much else.

77
00:04:40.360 --> 00:04:44.420
<v Rachel Webster>And so where did the elements that are so crucial to life come from?

78
00:04:45.200 --> 00:04:49.340
<v Rachel Webster>Well, the only place to manufacture those heavier elements

79
00:04:50.320 --> 00:04:53.720
<v Rachel Webster>is in the death throes of a very, very massive star,

80
00:04:53.940 --> 00:04:56.000
<v Rachel Webster>which in its last few moments

81
00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:59.100
<v Rachel Webster>goes through a cycle of collapsing and heating up,

82
00:04:59.520 --> 00:05:01.600
<v Rachel Webster>and it ends with a very massive explosion

83
00:05:02.180 --> 00:05:05.540
<v Rachel Webster>which actually generates oxygen, iron, carbon,

84
00:05:05.620 --> 00:05:10.480
<v Rachel Webster>and all the elements that we know of as constituents for life.

85
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:15.380
<v Rachel Webster>And in that explosion, those elements are spewed out into space,

86
00:05:15.560 --> 00:05:17.720
<v Rachel Webster>and they then form the gas clouds

87
00:05:17.720 --> 00:05:20.120
<v Rachel Webster>out of which the next generation of stars is made.

88
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:25.600
<v Rachel Webster>So in a very, very real sense, we are made from stardust.

89
00:05:25.760 --> 00:05:28.560
<v Rachel Webster>The actual atoms in your bodies and in mine

90
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:29.500
<v Rachel Webster>were manufactured by the Big Bang.

91
00:05:29.500 --> 00:05:31.000
<v Rachel Webster>Manufactured in a supernova explosion

92
00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:34.200
<v Rachel Webster>which occurred before our solar system was made.

93
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:36.620
<v Rachel Webster>Quite extraordinary if you think about it.

94
00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:39.540
<v Rachel Webster>But the magic of the universe doesn't end there.

95
00:05:40.400 --> 00:05:42.760
<v Rachel Webster>Astronomers have a very simple technique

96
00:05:42.760 --> 00:05:45.220
<v Rachel Webster>to weigh objects on the other side of the universe.

97
00:05:45.700 --> 00:05:48.600
<v Rachel Webster>Obviously, it's quite difficult to go out there with a set of scales

98
00:05:48.600 --> 00:05:50.180
<v Rachel Webster>and figure out what a galaxy weighs.

99
00:05:50.740 --> 00:05:55.000
<v Rachel Webster>But what we do is we assume that the objects that we see

100
00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:56.420
<v Rachel Webster>are in equilibrium.

101
00:05:57.000 --> 00:05:59.340
<v Rachel Webster>And by equilibrium, we simply mean

102
00:05:59.500 --> 00:06:02.280
<v Rachel Webster>that they're going to sit there for quite a long time

103
00:06:02.280 --> 00:06:04.740
<v Rachel Webster>and remain in the state that they're in.

104
00:06:05.020 --> 00:06:06.720
<v Rachel Webster>It doesn't mean that they're stationary,

105
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:08.680
<v Rachel Webster>but they'll just remain the way they are

106
00:06:08.680 --> 00:06:10.020
<v Rachel Webster>for perhaps billions of years.

107
00:06:10.820 --> 00:06:13.960
<v Rachel Webster>If we see a concentration of stars or of galaxies

108
00:06:13.960 --> 00:06:16.360
<v Rachel Webster>that are remaining constant like this,

109
00:06:16.540 --> 00:06:19.140
<v Rachel Webster>then what it tells us is that the gravity

110
00:06:19.140 --> 00:06:20.760
<v Rachel Webster>which is holding that object together

111
00:06:20.760 --> 00:06:24.140
<v Rachel Webster>must be perfectly balanced by the motions of the objects

112
00:06:24.140 --> 00:06:25.460
<v Rachel Webster>wanting to hold it up.

113
00:06:25.560 --> 00:06:27.280
<v Rachel Webster>So we have an equilibrium situation.

114
00:06:31.080 --> 00:06:33.760
<v Rachel Webster>The motions, of course, would drive the body apart,

115
00:06:33.900 --> 00:06:35.980
<v Rachel Webster>and so the gravity holds it together.

116
00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:40.460
<v Rachel Webster>Now, we can measure quite readily with our large telescopes,

117
00:06:40.520 --> 00:06:42.260
<v Rachel Webster>we can measure the motions of the objects,

118
00:06:42.280 --> 00:06:43.660
<v Rachel Webster>whether they're stars or galaxies.

119
00:06:44.060 --> 00:06:46.140
<v Rachel Webster>And so what that allows us then to do

120
00:06:46.140 --> 00:06:48.760
<v Rachel Webster>is to calculate how much gravity is needed

121
00:06:48.760 --> 00:06:50.020
<v Rachel Webster>to hold the object together.

122
00:06:50.740 --> 00:06:55.120
<v Rachel Webster>And when we do that, we can work out what the mass of the object is,

123
00:06:55.200 --> 00:06:58.900
<v Rachel Webster>because that is just a measure of the gravity.

124
00:06:59.500 --> 00:07:02.620
<v Rachel Webster>So when we do this, we discover that there must be

125
00:07:02.620 --> 00:07:06.360
<v Rachel Webster>about five times as much matter in these objects

126
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:08.000
<v Rachel Webster>as the matter that we can see.

127
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:11.900
<v Rachel Webster>And the evidence for this additional matter

128
00:07:11.900 --> 00:07:13.960
<v Rachel Webster>is really very, very strong now.

129
00:07:14.100 --> 00:07:19.080
<v Rachel Webster>It's probably completely without argument, I would say.

130
00:07:19.400 --> 00:07:23.040
<v Rachel Webster>And so we've given a name to this matter that we can't see.

131
00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:26.500
<v Rachel Webster>We call it dark matter, because we literally can't see it.

132
00:07:26.740 --> 00:07:29.220
<v Rachel Webster>So our colleagues, the particle physicists,

133
00:07:29.500 --> 00:07:33.080
<v Rachel Webster>are hunting for this stuff in their experiments at CERN

134
00:07:33.080 --> 00:07:34.940
<v Rachel Webster>using the Large Hadron Collider.

135
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:36.960
<v Rachel Webster>This is the very big accelerator,

136
00:07:37.020 --> 00:07:41.900
<v Rachel Webster>which is under parts of France and Switzerland, near Geneva.

137
00:07:42.160 --> 00:07:45.880
<v Rachel Webster>And they accelerate charged particles to very, very high velocities

138
00:07:45.880 --> 00:07:49.620
<v Rachel Webster>and crash them together to see if they can in fact form

139
00:07:49.620 --> 00:07:54.480
<v Rachel Webster>these dark matter particles that we know must exist.

140
00:07:55.100 --> 00:07:57.620
<v Rachel Webster>The theoreticians have quite a few ideas

141
00:07:57.620 --> 00:07:59.480
<v Rachel Webster>of where these particles might fit in.

142
00:07:59.500 --> 00:08:01.360
<v Rachel Webster>To their models for the structure of matter.

143
00:08:01.540 --> 00:08:05.380
<v Rachel Webster>But as yet, nobody has actually detected one of these dark matter particles.

144
00:08:05.680 --> 00:08:08.220
<v Rachel Webster>So we don't actually have a name, if you like,

145
00:08:08.380 --> 00:08:12.500
<v Rachel Webster>or a proper definition of exactly what this dark matter is.

146
00:08:12.660 --> 00:08:15.380
<v Rachel Webster>But astronomers have been able to tell the physicists

147
00:08:15.380 --> 00:08:17.000
<v Rachel Webster>that it definitely exists.

148
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:21.660
<v Rachel Webster>This story has really only solidified in the last 15 years or so.

149
00:08:21.960 --> 00:08:24.080
<v Rachel Webster>And it seems strange enough.

150
00:08:24.440 --> 00:08:28.100
<v Rachel Webster>But it's actually not the end of the strange story of cosmology

151
00:08:28.100 --> 00:08:29.300
<v Rachel Webster>as we understand it today.

152
00:08:29.300 --> 00:08:32.840
<v Rachel Webster>Our understanding of the universe has recently taken

153
00:08:32.840 --> 00:08:35.020
<v Rachel Webster>a new and totally unexpected direction.

154
00:08:36.960 --> 00:08:39.060
<v Rachel Webster>There's another constituent in the universe.

155
00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:43.220
<v Rachel Webster>And this one is not like baryonic matter, which we know and love,

156
00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:45.920
<v Rachel Webster>or dark matter, which has at least been around for a while

157
00:08:45.920 --> 00:08:47.680
<v Rachel Webster>and we think we can describe.

158
00:08:48.280 --> 00:08:51.160
<v Rachel Webster>Both of these sorts of matter behave quite reasonably,

159
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:54.580
<v Rachel Webster>and they have mass, and they gravitationally attract.

160
00:08:54.860 --> 00:08:57.720
<v Rachel Webster>So we can describe their behaviour in a quite straightforward way.

161
00:08:59.300 --> 00:09:00.660
<v Rachel Webster>But this stuff behaves very differently.

162
00:09:01.300 --> 00:09:06.800
<v Rachel Webster>It actually acts to cause the universe to expand on the very larger scales.

163
00:09:07.200 --> 00:09:10.820
<v Rachel Webster>It acts in the opposite way to gravity.

164
00:09:11.880 --> 00:09:14.820
<v Rachel Webster>We're used to the idea that the universe is expanding,

165
00:09:15.040 --> 00:09:17.760
<v Rachel Webster>although I think this is quite a challenging idea

166
00:09:17.760 --> 00:09:21.740
<v Rachel Webster>for somebody who hasn't necessarily worked in cosmology for a while.

167
00:09:21.880 --> 00:09:24.540
<v Rachel Webster>But as a cosmologist, you get quite used to the idea

168
00:09:24.540 --> 00:09:26.240
<v Rachel Webster>that the universe is actually expanding.

169
00:09:26.700 --> 00:09:28.080
<v Rachel Webster>But until now,

170
00:09:29.300 --> 00:09:32.220
<v Rachel Webster>we've believed that that expansion has been slowing down with time

171
00:09:32.220 --> 00:09:35.800
<v Rachel Webster>as the gravitational force of the matter in the universe

172
00:09:35.800 --> 00:09:38.680
<v Rachel Webster>actually acts to cause a deceleration.

173
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:42.060
<v Rachel Webster>So we've got an expanding universe, but it's actually slowing down.

174
00:09:42.380 --> 00:09:43.980
<v Rachel Webster>And the question has always been

175
00:09:43.980 --> 00:09:45.940
<v Rachel Webster>whether or not it would slow down enough

176
00:09:45.940 --> 00:09:48.200
<v Rachel Webster>to stop and turn around and collapse again,

177
00:09:48.380 --> 00:09:50.800
<v Rachel Webster>or whether the expansion was stronger

178
00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:52.620
<v Rachel Webster>and it would in fact expand forever.

179
00:09:53.180 --> 00:09:57.540
<v Rachel Webster>It turns out that both of those scenarios are quite wrong.

180
00:09:57.540 --> 00:10:00.440
<v Rachel Webster>The universe isn't going to do either of those things

181
00:10:00.440 --> 00:10:03.360
<v Rachel Webster>because there's this new component in the universe,

182
00:10:03.460 --> 00:10:04.220
<v Rachel Webster>this new stuff,

183
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:07.460
<v Rachel Webster>which is actually increasing the rate of expansion.

184
00:10:07.780 --> 00:10:09.860
<v Rachel Webster>So it's expanding and then it's increasing,

185
00:10:10.040 --> 00:10:12.320
<v Rachel Webster>and that rate of expansion is actually accelerating.

186
00:10:12.920 --> 00:10:15.360
<v Rachel Webster>So we do know what sort of universe we live in.

187
00:10:15.420 --> 00:10:17.320
<v Rachel Webster>It's one where the expansion is accelerating.

188
00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:22.260
<v Rachel Webster>It's driven by stuff that is really quite foreign to us

189
00:10:22.260 --> 00:10:24.760
<v Rachel Webster>in any way that we've understood up until now.

190
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:26.620
<v Rachel Webster>We've coined a term, of course,

191
00:10:26.620 --> 00:10:27.600
<v Rachel Webster>to describe this stuff.

192
00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:28.640
<v Rachel Webster>It's called dark energy.

193
00:10:29.680 --> 00:10:33.420
<v Rachel Webster>But to say that we have much deeper understanding than that

194
00:10:33.420 --> 00:10:36.820
<v Rachel Webster>would be stretching a point, I think.

195
00:10:39.120 --> 00:10:41.560
<v Rachel Webster>So we can write down a few simple equations

196
00:10:41.560 --> 00:10:43.120
<v Rachel Webster>to describe the dark energy,

197
00:10:43.280 --> 00:10:46.900
<v Rachel Webster>but at this stage, as I say,

198
00:10:46.940 --> 00:10:49.400
<v Rachel Webster>we understand very little else about it.

199
00:10:50.280 --> 00:10:53.880
<v Rachel Webster>So I think it should come as no surprise

200
00:10:54.620 --> 00:10:56.600
<v Rachel Webster>that the universe still has major,

201
00:10:56.620 --> 00:10:58.140
<v Rachel Webster>new challenges to offer us.

202
00:10:58.560 --> 00:11:00.040
<v Rachel Webster>As physical scientists,

203
00:11:00.180 --> 00:11:03.380
<v Rachel Webster>we've concentrated on trying to describe the physical universe,

204
00:11:03.680 --> 00:11:07.620
<v Rachel Webster>even suggesting that we might be able to develop

205
00:11:07.620 --> 00:11:08.780
<v Rachel Webster>a theory of everything.

206
00:11:09.780 --> 00:11:12.500
<v Rachel Webster>Yet we've completely ignored the fact

207
00:11:12.500 --> 00:11:16.640
<v Rachel Webster>that life, intelligence, consciousness, and so on,

208
00:11:16.660 --> 00:11:18.400
<v Rachel Webster>all must exist in our universe

209
00:11:18.400 --> 00:11:20.740
<v Rachel Webster>and must, in some sense,

210
00:11:20.880 --> 00:11:23.260
<v Rachel Webster>be a consequence of the nature and structure

211
00:11:23.260 --> 00:11:24.720
<v Rachel Webster>of the universe that we live in.

212
00:11:25.440 --> 00:11:27.540
<v Rachel Webster>This last decade has seen the development

213
00:11:27.540 --> 00:11:30.060
<v Rachel Webster>of a major new area called astrobiology,

214
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:33.040
<v Rachel Webster>or the search for life amongst the stars.

215
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:35.160
<v Rachel Webster>It's still in its infancy,

216
00:11:35.300 --> 00:11:38.720
<v Rachel Webster>however the roadmap for this search is starting to bear fruit.

217
00:11:39.220 --> 00:11:41.600
<v Rachel Webster>We are starting to ask the right questions

218
00:11:41.600 --> 00:11:43.240
<v Rachel Webster>and even to answer some of them.

219
00:11:44.260 --> 00:11:49.580
<v Rachel Webster>We found our first planet outside our solar system in 1995,

220
00:11:49.960 --> 00:11:51.880
<v Rachel Webster>so that's just 14 years ago,

221
00:11:52.060 --> 00:11:53.360
<v Rachel Webster>and at last count,

222
00:11:53.360 --> 00:11:57.960
<v Rachel Webster>we knew of over 350 planets outside our solar system.

223
00:11:58.120 --> 00:12:01.460
<v Rachel Webster>They're coming in at the moment at the rate of a few a week,

224
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:02.780
<v Rachel Webster>so quite rapidly.

225
00:12:03.460 --> 00:12:05.200
<v Rachel Webster>Most of the planets we're finding

226
00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:08.800
<v Rachel Webster>are quite in solar systems that are quite different from our own.

227
00:12:08.960 --> 00:12:12.160
<v Rachel Webster>So this has been our first surprise, if you like.

228
00:12:12.640 --> 00:12:16.180
<v Rachel Webster>But that may still just be what we call a selection effect.

229
00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:19.260
<v Rachel Webster>It may just be a result of the sort of observations

230
00:12:19.260 --> 00:12:21.580
<v Rachel Webster>that we've been able to make up until now.

231
00:12:21.940 --> 00:12:23.340
<v Rachel Webster>What we're finding a lot,

232
00:12:23.340 --> 00:12:25.080
<v Rachel Webster>are lots of planets like Jupiter,

233
00:12:25.220 --> 00:12:26.500
<v Rachel Webster>lots of Jupiter-like planets,

234
00:12:27.500 --> 00:12:30.300
<v Rachel Webster>but the thing that has been surprising

235
00:12:30.300 --> 00:12:33.940
<v Rachel Webster>is that a lot of them are sitting closer to their star than Mercury.

236
00:12:34.280 --> 00:12:36.980
<v Rachel Webster>Okay, so really, really quite close in.

237
00:12:37.060 --> 00:12:38.420
<v Rachel Webster>We call these hot Jupiters.

238
00:12:39.400 --> 00:12:42.320
<v Rachel Webster>We found a few planets with masses as low as Earth,

239
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:45.020
<v Rachel Webster>but those planets are quite difficult to detect

240
00:12:45.020 --> 00:12:48.800
<v Rachel Webster>and our techniques for doing that are just starting to bear fruit.

241
00:12:49.960 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Rachel Webster>And what we're now starting to do is to look for planets,

242
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:54.160
<v Rachel Webster>which might have liquid water.

243
00:12:54.500 --> 00:12:58.040
<v Rachel Webster>Because generally, we expect that if you want to find life,

244
00:12:58.260 --> 00:13:04.280
<v Rachel Webster>then liquid water or something that operates in a very similar way to liquid water

245
00:13:04.280 --> 00:13:08.620
<v Rachel Webster>will be necessary to protect life in its early stages of evolution.

246
00:13:09.720 --> 00:13:11.860
<v Rachel Webster>So astronomers are working with biologists

247
00:13:11.860 --> 00:13:15.800
<v Rachel Webster>to understand what might constitute a signature for life

248
00:13:15.800 --> 00:13:18.760
<v Rachel Webster>as we look at a planet, not halfway across the universe,

249
00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:21.140
<v Rachel Webster>but somewhere out there in our galaxy.

250
00:13:21.140 --> 00:13:25.000
<v Rachel Webster>And in that process, of course,

251
00:13:25.140 --> 00:13:27.400
<v Rachel Webster>we're also starting, along with the biologists

252
00:13:27.400 --> 00:13:28.900
<v Rachel Webster>who have been doing this for much longer,

253
00:13:29.020 --> 00:13:32.220
<v Rachel Webster>to think about what constitutes a definition of life.

254
00:13:32.400 --> 00:13:36.960
<v Rachel Webster>What is life and what would we expect to detect?

255
00:13:37.920 --> 00:13:42.440
<v Rachel Webster>I believe that finding life somewhere other than on Earth

256
00:13:42.440 --> 00:13:45.340
<v Rachel Webster>would constitute a radical shift in our understanding

257
00:13:45.340 --> 00:13:47.080
<v Rachel Webster>of who we are in the universe,

258
00:13:47.280 --> 00:13:49.520
<v Rachel Webster>comparable to the shift in understanding

259
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:51.120
<v Rachel Webster>developed by the universe.

260
00:13:51.140 --> 00:13:54.160
<v Rachel Webster>And that's what, when Copernicus described the solar system,

261
00:13:54.300 --> 00:13:57.400
<v Rachel Webster>a solar system where Earth was not at the centre of our universe,

262
00:13:57.620 --> 00:14:02.200
<v Rachel Webster>but simply one of a number of planets orbiting around a very ordinary star,

263
00:14:02.420 --> 00:14:03.100
<v Rachel Webster>our Sun.

264
00:14:04.160 --> 00:14:06.840
<v Rachel Webster>So, finally, what I would like to comment on

265
00:14:06.840 --> 00:14:11.020
<v Rachel Webster>is what it means to be a woman in astronomy.

266
00:14:11.780 --> 00:14:13.500
<v Rachel Webster>How do women do science,

267
00:14:13.700 --> 00:14:16.980
<v Rachel Webster>and how do they fare as members of the scientific community?

268
00:14:17.980 --> 00:14:20.600
<v Rachel Webster>The following comments reflect the things

269
00:14:21.140 --> 00:14:21.880
<v Rachel Webster>that have been observed and understood

270
00:14:21.880 --> 00:14:25.900
<v Rachel Webster>over the past 30 years or so working as an astronomer.

271
00:14:26.300 --> 00:14:30.560
<v Rachel Webster>Astronomy is perhaps one of the softest of the hard sciences

272
00:14:31.140 --> 00:14:34.340
<v Rachel Webster>and has allowed for some collective introspection

273
00:14:35.140 --> 00:14:36.700
<v Rachel Webster>from a group of active women researchers

274
00:14:36.700 --> 00:14:38.940
<v Rachel Webster>who have risen through the ranks internationally.

275
00:14:39.660 --> 00:14:43.840
<v Rachel Webster>So the following comments reflect not only experience in astronomy,

276
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:45.780
<v Rachel Webster>but probably more broadly as well, I think.

277
00:14:46.100 --> 00:14:48.720
<v Rachel Webster>So the first thing that I want to comment on

278
00:14:48.720 --> 00:14:50.880
<v Rachel Webster>is that I think women see,

279
00:14:50.880 --> 00:14:54.160
<v Rachel Webster>a more complex web or network,

280
00:14:54.380 --> 00:14:57.960
<v Rachel Webster>not only in the prosecution of their scientific endeavours,

281
00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:00.100
<v Rachel Webster>but also in their personal relationships

282
00:15:00.100 --> 00:15:03.220
<v Rachel Webster>with the others who are undertaking study with them.

283
00:15:03.460 --> 00:15:05.720
<v Rachel Webster>For the most part, they don't work in isolation,

284
00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:08.460
<v Rachel Webster>but strive to be part of a community of scholars.

285
00:15:09.620 --> 00:15:13.320
<v Rachel Webster>The second comment I would make is that in science,

286
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:14.960
<v Rachel Webster>if you're broadly focused,

287
00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:18.800
<v Rachel Webster>it's much harder to scale extraordinary heights

288
00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:20.200
<v Rachel Webster>in some narrow area.

289
00:15:20.200 --> 00:15:22.200
<v Rachel Webster>It's a very competitive arena,

290
00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:26.560
<v Rachel Webster>and the accolades go to those who can push to the greatest heights,

291
00:15:26.800 --> 00:15:29.780
<v Rachel Webster>spend the longest hours, travel at the drop of a hat,

292
00:15:30.040 --> 00:15:33.700
<v Rachel Webster>move to a new position every few years, and so on.

293
00:15:33.980 --> 00:15:36.680
<v Rachel Webster>There are actually few women amongst us

294
00:15:36.680 --> 00:15:40.920
<v Rachel Webster>who are prepared to forego the joys of family life,

295
00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:43.080
<v Rachel Webster>support of a community,

296
00:15:43.260 --> 00:15:46.360
<v Rachel Webster>and the more holistic lifestyle

297
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:48.600
<v Rachel Webster>simply to pursue a scientific career.

298
00:15:49.500 --> 00:15:50.180
<v Rachel Webster>So,

299
00:15:50.200 --> 00:15:52.860
<v Rachel Webster>the third point is that I think women are certainly

300
00:15:52.860 --> 00:15:57.480
<v Rachel Webster>no less intellectually able than their male counterparts.

301
00:15:57.920 --> 00:15:59.960
<v Rachel Webster>But perhaps they may have more choices

302
00:15:59.960 --> 00:16:01.660
<v Rachel Webster>from being more broadly talented.

303
00:16:02.740 --> 00:16:06.200
<v Rachel Webster>Provocatively, I'll say that there is now some evidence

304
00:16:06.200 --> 00:16:09.340
<v Rachel Webster>that women who are rather good at maths and science

305
00:16:09.340 --> 00:16:11.240
<v Rachel Webster>often excel in the humanities as well,

306
00:16:11.380 --> 00:16:14.840
<v Rachel Webster>and that, of course, offers them a broader choice of career.

307
00:16:15.560 --> 00:16:19.480
<v Rachel Webster>So, in summary, I would say that the proclivities and choices of women

308
00:16:19.480 --> 00:16:23.580
<v Rachel Webster>have mitigated against them making science a career.

309
00:16:24.100 --> 00:16:25.860
<v Rachel Webster>Of course, there are additional issues,

310
00:16:25.920 --> 00:16:27.480
<v Rachel Webster>such as the absence of mentoring, etc.,

311
00:16:28.220 --> 00:16:30.220
<v Rachel Webster>which can affect a woman's career.

312
00:16:31.100 --> 00:16:34.640
<v Rachel Webster>But I think those broad issues that I mentioned first

313
00:16:34.640 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Rachel Webster>are probably the dominant ones.

314
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:43.340
<v Rachel Webster>So, let me sort of draw the comments that I wanted to make

315
00:16:43.340 --> 00:16:45.760
<v Rachel Webster>to a conclusion.

316
00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:49.060
<v Rachel Webster>Science has taught us how to understand the stars.

317
00:16:49.060 --> 00:16:52.400
<v Rachel Webster>But the universe is actually turning out to be

318
00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:55.920
<v Rachel Webster>a much more complex and interesting place than we expected.

319
00:16:56.380 --> 00:17:00.100
<v Rachel Webster>It is unclear that our journey to understand it has an end point.

320
00:17:00.340 --> 00:17:04.220
<v Rachel Webster>It may, in fact, be a journey without an end point.

321
00:17:04.780 --> 00:17:08.820
<v Rachel Webster>And the practice of scientific endeavour

322
00:17:08.820 --> 00:17:13.520
<v Rachel Webster>has been quite gendered, I think, over the last century or so.

323
00:17:15.060 --> 00:17:18.700
<v Rachel Webster>And indeed, the last few comments I want to make

324
00:17:18.700 --> 00:17:19.040
<v Rachel Webster>are about the importance of science.

325
00:17:19.060 --> 00:17:21.840
<v Rachel Webster>They are about our broader management of our planet,

326
00:17:22.020 --> 00:17:26.200
<v Rachel Webster>which is, after all, just a small and rather insignificant part of the universe.

327
00:17:26.600 --> 00:17:29.020
<v Rachel Webster>And I believe our management of our planet

328
00:17:29.020 --> 00:17:31.440
<v Rachel Webster>has actually been...

329
00:17:32.060 --> 00:17:35.560
<v Rachel Webster>..has left us in a rather untenable and unsustainable position.

330
00:17:36.180 --> 00:17:40.600
<v Rachel Webster>This is something that we would now term climate change.

331
00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:43.460
<v Rachel Webster>And what we need is a much more holistic approach

332
00:17:43.460 --> 00:17:47.720
<v Rachel Webster>not only to our science, but to its role in the wider community.

333
00:17:47.720 --> 00:17:50.400
<v Rachel Webster>We have the opportunity to take lessons

334
00:17:50.400 --> 00:17:52.540
<v Rachel Webster>from understanding the stars and the planets,

335
00:17:53.840 --> 00:17:56.780
<v Rachel Webster>understanding what happens in the atmospheres of planets

336
00:17:56.780 --> 00:17:58.220
<v Rachel Webster>in our own solar system,

337
00:17:58.300 --> 00:18:00.320
<v Rachel Webster>and apply that to our own backyard.

338
00:18:00.780 --> 00:18:02.660
<v Rachel Webster>And I believe that climate change

339
00:18:02.660 --> 00:18:05.340
<v Rachel Webster>is going to force us to reconsider how we live.

340
00:18:06.840 --> 00:18:10.840
<v Rachel Webster>The outcome cannot be a scientifically-based society

341
00:18:10.840 --> 00:18:13.400
<v Rachel Webster>which exploits its physical and human resources

342
00:18:13.400 --> 00:18:15.740
<v Rachel Webster>to provide great material comfort for a few.

343
00:18:16.160 --> 00:18:17.700
<v Rachel Webster>Rather, we need to develop a system

344
00:18:17.700 --> 00:18:18.260
<v Rachel Webster>to develop a society

345
00:18:18.260 --> 00:18:21.200
<v Rachel Webster>which will provide a comfortable existence for all,

346
00:18:21.320 --> 00:18:24.560
<v Rachel Webster>and as a bonus, free all of us to explore

347
00:18:24.560 --> 00:18:28.120
<v Rachel Webster>intellectual, artistic, emotional, philosophical

348
00:18:28.700 --> 00:18:31.260
<v Rachel Webster>and other what I call energy-free pursuits

349
00:18:31.260 --> 00:18:36.020
<v Rachel Webster>which can only enhance our collective and individual wellbeing.

350
00:18:36.600 --> 00:18:37.620
<v Rachel Webster>OK, thank you.

351
00:18:46.900 --> 00:18:48.600
<v Duncan Steel>Thank you very much, Rachel.

352
00:18:48.620 --> 00:18:49.800
<v Duncan Steel>We've got plenty of time for questions,

353
00:18:49.860 --> 00:18:50.580
<v Duncan Steel>which is a great thing,

354
00:18:50.580 --> 00:18:51.960
<v Duncan Steel>usually we have a shorter time for questions.

355
00:18:52.100 --> 00:18:53.440
<v Duncan Steel>Now, there's a roving mic over here

356
00:18:53.440 --> 00:18:57.880
<v Duncan Steel>which I'd like to just give the lady a chance to get to you

357
00:18:57.880 --> 00:18:59.280
<v Duncan Steel>so everybody else can hear your question.

358
00:18:59.720 --> 00:19:00.280
<v Audience>Please, sir.

359
00:19:00.700 --> 00:19:01.340
<v Audience>Two questions.

360
00:19:01.480 --> 00:19:02.480
<v Audience>Firstly, a technical one.

361
00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:05.560
<v Audience>The Earth, as I understand it, is mainly iron and nickel,

362
00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:06.700
<v Audience>a big lump,

363
00:19:06.700 --> 00:19:09.060
<v Audience>and the oxygen and water and all that sort of stuff

364
00:19:09.060 --> 00:19:10.220
<v Audience>is part of the cloud,

365
00:19:10.300 --> 00:19:12.640
<v Audience>the dust that is collected from the stars.

366
00:19:13.460 --> 00:19:17.540
<v Audience>Did the Earth pop out of one of these explosions as a whole lump?

367
00:19:17.920 --> 00:19:20.800
<v Audience>And then all the other bits that got on it come later?

368
00:19:21.500 --> 00:19:22.480
<v Audience>That's the first question.

369
00:19:22.500 --> 00:19:25.040
<v Audience>And the second question is more on the career aspect

370
00:19:25.040 --> 00:19:26.000
<v Audience>that you were talking about.

371
00:19:29.000 --> 00:19:32.880
<v Audience>Is or does modern technology allow you

372
00:19:32.880 --> 00:19:35.780
<v Audience>to get out of this geographical trap you seem to be in

373
00:19:35.780 --> 00:19:36.160
<v Audience>about...

374
00:19:36.700 --> 00:19:37.220
<v Audience>having to...

375
00:19:37.220 --> 00:19:37.980
<v Audience>What have you got to chase?

376
00:19:38.100 --> 00:19:40.900
<v Audience>The radio telescopes or something in your career?

377
00:19:41.360 --> 00:19:41.880
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

378
00:19:42.280 --> 00:19:45.400
<v Rachel Webster>Let me answer the first question

379
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:47.660
<v Rachel Webster>about the formation of the solar system first of all.

380
00:19:47.860 --> 00:19:53.460
<v Rachel Webster>So the idea we have for the evolution of the solar system

381
00:19:53.460 --> 00:19:57.020
<v Rachel Webster>is that we start with just a gas cloud,

382
00:19:58.800 --> 00:20:00.980
<v Rachel Webster>which wouldn't necessarily be very dense,

383
00:20:01.040 --> 00:20:01.920
<v Rachel Webster>might be quite large,

384
00:20:02.700 --> 00:20:05.380
<v Rachel Webster>and then it starts to collapse under gravity,

385
00:20:05.380 --> 00:20:06.480
<v Rachel Webster>so it contracts.

386
00:20:06.800 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Rachel Webster>It might have a little bit of rotation initially,

387
00:20:09.360 --> 00:20:11.320
<v Rachel Webster>but of course just like an ice skater,

388
00:20:11.340 --> 00:20:16.180
<v Rachel Webster>as it contracts it spins up until it's rotating quite quickly.

389
00:20:17.940 --> 00:20:21.000
<v Rachel Webster>The stuff at the centre condenses to form the sun,

390
00:20:21.120 --> 00:20:23.400
<v Rachel Webster>and around the sun is a disk of material

391
00:20:23.400 --> 00:20:26.160
<v Rachel Webster>which still has that...

392
00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:27.820
<v Rachel Webster>what we call...

393
00:20:27.820 --> 00:20:31.460
<v Rachel Webster>would still have the same concentration of elements as the sun.

394
00:20:31.580 --> 00:20:32.960
<v Rachel Webster>So it would still be, you know,

395
00:20:32.980 --> 00:20:33.560
<v Rachel Webster>90...

396
00:20:34.360 --> 00:20:35.560
<v Rachel Webster>99% hydrogen,

397
00:20:36.320 --> 00:20:37.200
<v Rachel Webster>you know, a bit of helium,

398
00:20:37.340 --> 00:20:39.400
<v Rachel Webster>and a few of the heavier elements.

399
00:20:40.020 --> 00:20:43.200
<v Rachel Webster>Then as time progresses in that disk,

400
00:20:44.420 --> 00:20:47.380
<v Rachel Webster>little bits of dust and stuff start sticking together,

401
00:20:47.440 --> 00:20:49.720
<v Rachel Webster>so you start to form snowballs in the disk.

402
00:20:49.980 --> 00:20:51.980
<v Rachel Webster>And then when the sun turns on,

403
00:20:52.080 --> 00:20:55.380
<v Rachel Webster>it actually blows away all of the light elements,

404
00:20:55.420 --> 00:20:56.760
<v Rachel Webster>like hydrogen and helium,

405
00:20:56.900 --> 00:20:58.720
<v Rachel Webster>in the inner part of the solar system,

406
00:20:58.820 --> 00:21:01.620
<v Rachel Webster>and you're left with the heavier elements,

407
00:21:01.680 --> 00:21:03.540
<v Rachel Webster>like the iron and nickel and silver,

408
00:21:03.540 --> 00:21:04.840
<v Rachel Webster>and so on that you spoke of.

409
00:21:05.180 --> 00:21:07.140
<v Rachel Webster>And in the outer part of the solar system,

410
00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:08.980
<v Rachel Webster>where it's cooler and not so warm,

411
00:21:09.100 --> 00:21:10.480
<v Rachel Webster>you still have, you know,

412
00:21:10.500 --> 00:21:12.860
<v Rachel Webster>quite a lot of hydrogen, helium and so on.

413
00:21:13.100 --> 00:21:14.200
<v Rachel Webster>So what you end up with,

414
00:21:14.320 --> 00:21:16.240
<v Rachel Webster>and this is in the case of our own solar system,

415
00:21:16.480 --> 00:21:18.360
<v Rachel Webster>it may be a different story

416
00:21:18.360 --> 00:21:19.840
<v Rachel Webster>when we start to learn about some of the others,

417
00:21:19.940 --> 00:21:22.120
<v Rachel Webster>but in the inner part we have rocky planets,

418
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:25.700
<v Rachel Webster>so that's the four rocky planets that we know and love,

419
00:21:25.840 --> 00:21:27.380
<v Rachel Webster>and then as you go further out,

420
00:21:27.420 --> 00:21:29.520
<v Rachel Webster>where the influence of the sun has been much less,

421
00:21:29.640 --> 00:21:31.340
<v Rachel Webster>we get the gas giants,

422
00:21:31.420 --> 00:21:33.320
<v Rachel Webster>which still have all their hydrogen and helium,

423
00:21:33.540 --> 00:21:35.780
<v Rachel Webster>as well as probably the same concentrations

424
00:21:35.780 --> 00:21:37.880
<v Rachel Webster>of, you know, iron and nickel and so on.

425
00:21:38.100 --> 00:21:40.920
<v Rachel Webster>So that, you know, roughly that's the sort of process.

426
00:21:41.300 --> 00:21:41.660
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

427
00:21:42.420 --> 00:21:43.720
<v Rachel Webster>So that's the first question.

428
00:21:43.900 --> 00:21:45.240
<v Duncan Steel>Can I just add something to that?

429
00:21:45.320 --> 00:21:46.800
<v Duncan Steel>You started off by saying it was a cloud of gas,

430
00:21:46.820 --> 00:21:47.920
<v Duncan Steel>of course it's gas and dust,

431
00:21:48.020 --> 00:21:50.320
<v Duncan Steel>and I think the gentleman may have been a little bit confused

432
00:21:50.320 --> 00:21:51.600
<v Duncan Steel>in thinking about...

433
00:21:52.580 --> 00:21:54.940
<v Duncan Steel>The dust, of course, is the nickel and iron and so on.

434
00:21:55.020 --> 00:21:55.300
<v Duncan Steel>Yes.

435
00:21:55.300 --> 00:21:58.020
<v Duncan Steel>Which has been spawned by supernova explosions in the past,

436
00:21:58.040 --> 00:22:00.680
<v Duncan Steel>so the reason that we're mostly rocky and nickel and iron

437
00:22:00.680 --> 00:22:02.460
<v Duncan Steel>is that a lot of the rest of the stuff,

438
00:22:02.460 --> 00:22:04.060
<v Duncan Steel>the hydrogen and helium, has been lost from the Earth.

439
00:22:04.300 --> 00:22:06.400
<v Duncan Steel>So it isn't the Earth was there originally

440
00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:07.500
<v Duncan Steel>and then stuff has come in.

441
00:22:08.300 --> 00:22:08.940
<v Duncan Steel>Is that OK?

442
00:22:09.180 --> 00:22:12.200
<v Rachel Webster>It's been an agglomeration process, yep.

443
00:22:12.420 --> 00:22:14.840
<v Rachel Webster>And Duncan's perfectly right.

444
00:22:14.960 --> 00:22:15.780
<v Rachel Webster>I say gas...

445
00:22:16.980 --> 00:22:19.160
<v Rachel Webster>Gas means, you know, iron as well,

446
00:22:19.280 --> 00:22:22.300
<v Rachel Webster>but it's gas and dust is a better way to put it.

447
00:22:22.300 --> 00:22:24.700
<v Duncan Steel>To astronomers, there's only hydrogen, helium and metals in the universe.

448
00:22:25.060 --> 00:22:28.640
<v Duncan Steel>Metals mean something different to what it means to a chemist.

449
00:22:29.620 --> 00:22:30.060
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

450
00:22:30.140 --> 00:22:32.440
<v Rachel Webster>The second question is a very interesting one.

451
00:22:32.460 --> 00:22:37.360
<v Rachel Webster>You know, in the past, as astronomers,

452
00:22:37.500 --> 00:22:39.100
<v Rachel Webster>we went and did our own observations.

453
00:22:39.240 --> 00:22:40.620
<v Rachel Webster>You know, I would go to Coonabarabran,

454
00:22:40.660 --> 00:22:42.740
<v Rachel Webster>use the Anglo-Australian telescope or Parkes or wherever.

455
00:22:43.580 --> 00:22:47.500
<v Rachel Webster>But that is actually changing quite markedly now.

456
00:22:48.160 --> 00:22:50.340
<v Rachel Webster>I don't go and use the Hubble Space Telescope.

457
00:22:51.060 --> 00:22:53.120
<v Rachel Webster>What happens is it's run by computers

458
00:22:53.120 --> 00:22:55.640
<v Rachel Webster>and the data gets delivered to my computer

459
00:22:55.640 --> 00:22:57.120
<v Rachel Webster>at the University of Melbourne.

460
00:22:59.100 --> 00:23:01.680
<v Rachel Webster>Australia owns a share of the Gemini telescopes,

461
00:23:01.760 --> 00:23:02.440
<v Rachel Webster>one of which is the Hubble Space Telescope,

462
00:23:02.460 --> 00:23:04.340
<v Rachel Webster>one of which is in Hawaii and one of which is in Chile.

463
00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:06.460
<v Rachel Webster>And most of the observations there,

464
00:23:06.600 --> 00:23:08.420
<v Rachel Webster>the data is taken by somebody else

465
00:23:08.420 --> 00:23:10.800
<v Rachel Webster>and it's delivered to my computer at the University of Melbourne.

466
00:23:10.900 --> 00:23:13.140
<v Rachel Webster>So I don't actually have to travel to do the observing.

467
00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:15.860
<v Rachel Webster>However, what you still do have to do,

468
00:23:15.960 --> 00:23:19.860
<v Rachel Webster>because you're part of an international community of scholars,

469
00:23:20.100 --> 00:23:23.100
<v Rachel Webster>if you were to try and stay at the University of Melbourne

470
00:23:23.100 --> 00:23:24.700
<v Rachel Webster>all your academic life,

471
00:23:24.880 --> 00:23:27.080
<v Rachel Webster>well, in fact, you probably couldn't do it. OK?

472
00:23:27.620 --> 00:23:30.940
<v Rachel Webster>And the reason is that you wouldn't have the links

473
00:23:30.940 --> 00:23:34.320
<v Rachel Webster>and the collaborations and everything else

474
00:23:34.320 --> 00:23:36.080
<v Rachel Webster>that you need for a broad scientific life.

475
00:23:36.360 --> 00:23:39.540
<v Rachel Webster>So in fact, if you train in one location,

476
00:23:39.780 --> 00:23:41.900
<v Rachel Webster>the rules of the game largely are

477
00:23:41.900 --> 00:23:44.060
<v Rachel Webster>you must go somewhere very, very different

478
00:23:44.060 --> 00:23:45.700
<v Rachel Webster>for your first postdoc,

479
00:23:45.840 --> 00:23:49.080
<v Rachel Webster>somewhere very, very different again for your second one, and so on.

480
00:23:49.160 --> 00:23:52.260
<v Rachel Webster>And so you get this large mix of...

481
00:23:53.340 --> 00:23:55.180
<v Rachel Webster>within the international community

482
00:23:55.940 --> 00:23:58.100
<v Rachel Webster>of where people are at any one time.

483
00:24:00.120 --> 00:24:00.920
<v Duncan Steel>Lady over there.

484
00:24:00.920 --> 00:24:01.660
<v Duncan Steel>Over there with the microphone, please.

485
00:24:01.980 --> 00:24:02.640
<v Audience>Yes, thank you.

486
00:24:03.280 --> 00:24:04.840
<v Audience>Endersby, who was of Monash,

487
00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:07.220
<v Audience>put out a book, Journey of Discovery.

488
00:24:07.880 --> 00:24:09.400
<v Audience>I got hold of it in the library.

489
00:24:09.480 --> 00:24:10.220
<v Audience>It was fascinating.

490
00:24:10.560 --> 00:24:13.720
<v Audience>And he believes that the Earth itself is expanding.

491
00:24:14.020 --> 00:24:16.240
<v Audience>Do we know anything further on that?

492
00:24:16.340 --> 00:24:18.000
<v Audience>And secondly, who discovered...

493
00:24:18.000 --> 00:24:20.520
<v Audience>Who was the person who discovered dark energy?

494
00:24:21.380 --> 00:24:21.820
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

495
00:24:22.160 --> 00:24:25.240
<v Rachel Webster>So in answer to your first question, I've, in fact...

496
00:24:26.660 --> 00:24:28.660
<v Rachel Webster>I've mostly read Lance Enderby's book.

497
00:24:29.320 --> 00:24:30.820
<v Rachel Webster>And for the life of me,

498
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:31.920
<v Rachel Webster>I couldn't figure out

499
00:24:31.920 --> 00:24:35.980
<v Rachel Webster>what the physics of an expanding Earth would be.

500
00:24:36.960 --> 00:24:37.600
<v Rachel Webster>So...

501
00:24:39.880 --> 00:24:43.940
<v Rachel Webster>I haven't actually had detailed discussions with him,

502
00:24:43.980 --> 00:24:46.760
<v Rachel Webster>but I don't think it works, is the short answer.

503
00:24:47.920 --> 00:24:48.360
<v Rachel Webster>Dark energy.

504
00:24:48.880 --> 00:24:49.520
<v Rachel Webster>Interestingly,

505
00:24:52.080 --> 00:24:54.860
<v Rachel Webster>the attribution for the discovery of dark energy

506
00:24:54.860 --> 00:24:57.400
<v Rachel Webster>to two teams of astronomers

507
00:24:57.920 --> 00:25:00.900
<v Rachel Webster>who were measuring very distant supernovae

508
00:25:00.920 --> 00:25:02.760
<v Rachel Webster>in the universe,

509
00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:05.380
<v Rachel Webster>and they were using this to measure the geometry of the universe.

510
00:25:05.660 --> 00:25:08.940
<v Rachel Webster>One team was led by a guy called Pearl Mutter,

511
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:10.400
<v Rachel Webster>who is an American,

512
00:25:10.560 --> 00:25:13.780
<v Rachel Webster>and the second team is actually led by an Australian

513
00:25:13.780 --> 00:25:15.940
<v Rachel Webster>called Brian Schmidt, who's at ANU.

514
00:25:16.180 --> 00:25:19.100
<v Rachel Webster>And so all the accolades at the moment

515
00:25:19.100 --> 00:25:20.680
<v Rachel Webster>are going to those two teams

516
00:25:20.680 --> 00:25:22.320
<v Rachel Webster>for the discovery of dark energy.

517
00:25:24.020 --> 00:25:26.160
<v Audience>Can you tell us what the status is

518
00:25:26.160 --> 00:25:28.920
<v Audience>for the one-square-kilometre radio telescope?

519
00:25:29.420 --> 00:25:30.160
<v Rachel Webster>Yes, I can.

520
00:25:30.160 --> 00:25:30.860
<v Rachel Webster>LAUGHTER

521
00:25:33.820 --> 00:25:35.300
<v Rachel Webster>So, let me...

522
00:25:35.300 --> 00:25:36.780
<v Rachel Webster>For those of you in the audience

523
00:25:36.780 --> 00:25:40.620
<v Rachel Webster>who may not be familiar with the square-kilometre array,

524
00:25:40.820 --> 00:25:43.400
<v Rachel Webster>which we usually call the SKA

525
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:46.520
<v Rachel Webster>in this horrible way of using acronyms the whole time,

526
00:25:46.640 --> 00:25:50.900
<v Rachel Webster>but the idea is to build a radio telescope

527
00:25:50.900 --> 00:25:53.580
<v Rachel Webster>that has a square kilometre of collecting area,

528
00:25:53.780 --> 00:25:55.180
<v Rachel Webster>which is a hell of a lot.

529
00:25:55.380 --> 00:25:58.280
<v Rachel Webster>And that's sort of the easy bit to say.

530
00:25:58.460 --> 00:25:59.520
<v Rachel Webster>The hard bit to say

531
00:25:59.520 --> 00:26:01.240
<v Rachel Webster>is to build it for a billion dollars,

532
00:26:01.460 --> 00:26:03.880
<v Rachel Webster>which I still don't know

533
00:26:03.880 --> 00:26:05.520
<v Rachel Webster>if we're going to be able to do it cheaply enough

534
00:26:05.520 --> 00:26:07.420
<v Rachel Webster>to actually make it feasible.

535
00:26:07.800 --> 00:26:09.900
<v Rachel Webster>But an important aspect of this

536
00:26:09.900 --> 00:26:12.220
<v Rachel Webster>is that the square kilometre of collecting area

537
00:26:12.220 --> 00:26:14.380
<v Rachel Webster>is not all going to be in one place.

538
00:26:14.600 --> 00:26:17.000
<v Rachel Webster>The core of the telescope,

539
00:26:17.300 --> 00:26:19.080
<v Rachel Webster>if it's located in Australia,

540
00:26:19.280 --> 00:26:20.380
<v Rachel Webster>will be at Bulardi,

541
00:26:21.020 --> 00:26:22.920
<v Rachel Webster>a place in Western Australia

542
00:26:22.920 --> 00:26:26.240
<v Rachel Webster>about 10 hours north-east of Perth.

543
00:26:26.360 --> 00:26:28.720
<v Rachel Webster>But it's an interferometer, right,

544
00:26:28.720 --> 00:26:30.620
<v Rachel Webster>which means that the collecting area

545
00:26:30.620 --> 00:26:33.380
<v Rachel Webster>will be distributed over large areas.

546
00:26:33.820 --> 00:26:36.520
<v Rachel Webster>So in fact there'll be bits of that telescope

547
00:26:36.520 --> 00:26:38.340
<v Rachel Webster>in South Australia, in Victoria,

548
00:26:38.720 --> 00:26:41.420
<v Rachel Webster>New South Wales, New Zealand, and so on.

549
00:26:41.480 --> 00:26:43.480
<v Rachel Webster>You can see the politics of this already, I'm sure.

550
00:26:44.140 --> 00:26:47.620
<v Rachel Webster>But anyway, the idea is to have what we call baselines,

551
00:26:47.760 --> 00:26:50.060
<v Rachel Webster>which are separations between the elements

552
00:26:50.060 --> 00:26:53.300
<v Rachel Webster>that are about 3,000 kilometres in two directions.

553
00:26:53.300 --> 00:26:54.860
<v Rachel Webster>So it'll cover the whole of Australia.

554
00:26:55.280 --> 00:26:58.700
<v Rachel Webster>Now, this idea has been bought by the Australian government

555
00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:00.000
<v Rachel Webster>by the scientific...

556
00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:01.840
<v Rachel Webster>the international scientific community.

557
00:27:01.960 --> 00:27:05.900
<v Rachel Webster>So the square kilometre array will be an international telescope

558
00:27:05.900 --> 00:27:07.940
<v Rachel Webster>with everybody buying into it, basically.

559
00:27:08.340 --> 00:27:09.640
<v Rachel Webster>The process...

560
00:27:09.640 --> 00:27:12.320
<v Rachel Webster>So they went through a process to establish

561
00:27:12.320 --> 00:27:15.640
<v Rachel Webster>where it might be built about three years ago,

562
00:27:15.820 --> 00:27:17.720
<v Rachel Webster>and two places came out on top.

563
00:27:17.860 --> 00:27:19.800
<v Rachel Webster>So they down-selected down to two places.

564
00:27:19.860 --> 00:27:22.780
<v Rachel Webster>One was Australia, the Bulardi site that I've mentioned,

565
00:27:22.960 --> 00:27:24.660
<v Rachel Webster>and the second place is South Africa.

566
00:27:24.980 --> 00:27:27.980
<v Rachel Webster>So at the moment, Australia is in competition with South Africa

567
00:27:27.980 --> 00:27:31.560
<v Rachel Webster>for the right to physically host the square kilometre array.

568
00:27:32.020 --> 00:27:36.180
<v Rachel Webster>Now, of course, this is a pretty big deal internationally,

569
00:27:37.200 --> 00:27:40.500
<v Rachel Webster>and it'll be, you know, about a billion dollars of investment,

570
00:27:40.760 --> 00:27:43.660
<v Rachel Webster>although, you know, these telescopes usually end up costing

571
00:27:43.660 --> 00:27:46.220
<v Rachel Webster>two or three times what you set out to...

572
00:27:46.980 --> 00:27:48.100
<v Rachel Webster>you know, what you say at the onset.

573
00:27:49.080 --> 00:27:52.820
<v Rachel Webster>But the selection between Australia and South Africa

574
00:27:52.820 --> 00:27:55.420
<v Rachel Webster>at the moment is supposed to occur in 2012,

575
00:27:55.640 --> 00:27:57.880
<v Rachel Webster>but most of us wouldn't be surprised

576
00:27:57.980 --> 00:27:59.320
<v Rachel Webster>if that date slipped a little bit.

577
00:27:59.580 --> 00:28:02.080
<v Rachel Webster>In the meantime, what we're trying to do in Australia

578
00:28:02.080 --> 00:28:06.300
<v Rachel Webster>is to build our credentials to be the host for this telescope,

579
00:28:06.480 --> 00:28:09.860
<v Rachel Webster>and that has involved buying the cattle station.

580
00:28:10.020 --> 00:28:11.980
<v Rachel Webster>So CSIRO has bought the cattle station,

581
00:28:12.900 --> 00:28:16.840
<v Rachel Webster>setting up legal requirements about radio quietness

582
00:28:16.840 --> 00:28:18.820
<v Rachel Webster>around the area, which are quite strict.

583
00:28:18.900 --> 00:28:22.340
<v Rachel Webster>There's no other place on Earth that has requirements like this.

584
00:28:22.440 --> 00:28:26.700
<v Rachel Webster>I should say the area around the site, around Bulardi,

585
00:28:26.700 --> 00:28:29.260
<v Rachel Webster>an area the size of the Netherlands,

586
00:28:29.500 --> 00:28:32.320
<v Rachel Webster>where we always like to compare it with what somebody understands,

587
00:28:32.800 --> 00:28:35.180
<v Rachel Webster>has about 100 people living in it.

588
00:28:35.260 --> 00:28:37.120
<v Rachel Webster>There are no gazetted towns in this area.

589
00:28:37.480 --> 00:28:39.960
<v Rachel Webster>And so this makes it a very, very competitive site

590
00:28:39.960 --> 00:28:41.340
<v Rachel Webster>for a telescope of this nature,

591
00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:45.240
<v Rachel Webster>because every time you turn on your mobile phone, start your car,

592
00:28:45.460 --> 00:28:46.500
<v Rachel Webster>turn on your microwave,

593
00:28:46.760 --> 00:28:50.480
<v Rachel Webster>you send out radio emission that can stuff up the observations,

594
00:28:50.780 --> 00:28:52.740
<v Rachel Webster>the very sensitive observations that we want to make.

595
00:28:53.000 --> 00:28:55.160
<v Rachel Webster>So that's currently where it sits.

596
00:28:55.420 --> 00:28:56.680
<v Rachel Webster>It will be a very sensitive site.

597
00:28:56.700 --> 00:28:58.120
<v Rachel Webster>It's a very political process in the end.

598
00:28:59.380 --> 00:29:00.020
<v Duncan Steel>Thanks, Rachel.

599
00:29:00.120 --> 00:29:01.940
<v Duncan Steel>I know there's a question at the back of the microphone.

600
00:29:02.220 --> 00:29:04.460
<v Duncan Steel>Then the gentleman here with the blue sweater and the scarf,

601
00:29:04.580 --> 00:29:05.780
<v Duncan Steel>and then there was a question down the front.

602
00:29:06.320 --> 00:29:08.840
<v Audience>I wonder if you can update my concepts.

603
00:29:08.920 --> 00:29:10.820
<v Audience>I've read that space,

604
00:29:11.300 --> 00:29:15.380
<v Audience>and I'm a bit uneasy with the definition of space,

605
00:29:15.520 --> 00:29:17.160
<v Audience>but is saddle-shaped,

606
00:29:17.760 --> 00:29:20.780
<v Audience>which to me indicates that it has a limit,

607
00:29:20.820 --> 00:29:23.240
<v Audience>it has a boundary between the saddle

608
00:29:23.240 --> 00:29:26.360
<v Audience>and the imaginary non-existent horse.

609
00:29:26.700 --> 00:29:26.860
<v Audience>I wonder what that means.

610
00:29:26.960 --> 00:29:30.280
<v Audience>But that horse is nothing.

611
00:29:30.620 --> 00:29:33.820
<v Audience>Now, the saddle is expanding into nothing.

612
00:29:35.700 --> 00:29:36.700
<v Audience>Has nothing a boundary?

613
00:29:36.860 --> 00:29:37.180
<v Audience>OK.

614
00:29:37.820 --> 00:29:40.240
<v Rachel Webster>But can you see my confusion?

615
00:29:40.240 --> 00:29:41.560
<v Rachel Webster>I can. I can.

616
00:29:42.080 --> 00:29:44.140
<v Rachel Webster>And yes, you know...

617
00:29:45.380 --> 00:29:46.140
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

618
00:29:46.380 --> 00:29:48.420
<v Rachel Webster>So, in fact,

619
00:29:49.520 --> 00:29:55.080
<v Rachel Webster>the saddle is a two-dimensional analogue

620
00:29:55.080 --> 00:30:00.180
<v Rachel Webster>of what we call openly curved space, right?

621
00:30:00.260 --> 00:30:03.160
<v Rachel Webster>So what we're trying to do when we put that saddle out there

622
00:30:03.160 --> 00:30:04.960
<v Rachel Webster>that looks like a Pringles potato chip

623
00:30:04.960 --> 00:30:08.260
<v Rachel Webster>is to try and give some sense

624
00:30:08.260 --> 00:30:09.460
<v Rachel Webster>of what...

625
00:30:10.940 --> 00:30:12.940
<v Rachel Webster>..what curved space looks like.

626
00:30:13.140 --> 00:30:15.740
<v Rachel Webster>So the idea here, quite simply,

627
00:30:15.840 --> 00:30:19.460
<v Rachel Webster>space can be what we call flat,

628
00:30:19.600 --> 00:30:22.420
<v Rachel Webster>or it can be positively curved or negatively curved.

629
00:30:22.800 --> 00:30:25.060
<v Rachel Webster>This is very hard to imagine in three dimensions.

630
00:30:25.080 --> 00:30:26.840
<v Rachel Webster>So what we usually try and do

631
00:30:26.840 --> 00:30:28.980
<v Rachel Webster>is to describe it in two dimensions

632
00:30:28.980 --> 00:30:30.320
<v Rachel Webster>and then just say,

633
00:30:30.460 --> 00:30:33.900
<v Rachel Webster>OK, now use your brain and take that into the third dimension.

634
00:30:34.260 --> 00:30:36.620
<v Rachel Webster>So when we do it in two dimensions, it's quite easy.

635
00:30:36.720 --> 00:30:38.280
<v Rachel Webster>Flat just means, you know,

636
00:30:38.360 --> 00:30:40.020
<v Rachel Webster>what the sheet of paper looks like.

637
00:30:40.340 --> 00:30:42.820
<v Rachel Webster>And that's what we call Euclidean geometry.

638
00:30:43.380 --> 00:30:45.660
<v Rachel Webster>And the neat thing is that you probably think

639
00:30:45.660 --> 00:30:46.960
<v Rachel Webster>that that's all geometry is

640
00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:48.700
<v Rachel Webster>because you're used to the angles of a triangle

641
00:30:48.700 --> 00:30:50.060
<v Rachel Webster>adding up to 180 degrees

642
00:30:50.660 --> 00:30:53.820
<v Rachel Webster>and, you know, the circumference of a circle being 2 pi r

643
00:30:53.820 --> 00:30:54.800
<v Rachel Webster>and all of that sort of stuff.

644
00:30:56.260 --> 00:30:58.940
<v Rachel Webster>Now, unfortunately, Euclid did us a great disservice

645
00:30:58.940 --> 00:31:01.320
<v Rachel Webster>because he stopped us thinking about other sorts of space.

646
00:31:01.500 --> 00:31:04.120
<v Rachel Webster>And we can, of course, have curved two-dimensional space.

647
00:31:04.300 --> 00:31:07.440
<v Rachel Webster>The surface of a ball is two-dimensional, OK,

648
00:31:07.520 --> 00:31:09.000
<v Rachel Webster>and it's positively curved.

649
00:31:09.200 --> 00:31:11.360
<v Rachel Webster>And if you go on to the surface of a sphere,

650
00:31:11.540 --> 00:31:14.880
<v Rachel Webster>then the angles of a triangle do not add up to 180 degrees.

651
00:31:15.140 --> 00:31:17.200
<v Rachel Webster>They're always more than 280 degrees...

652
00:31:17.200 --> 00:31:19.020
<v Rachel Webster>Sorry, 180 degrees. What am I talking about?

653
00:31:19.160 --> 00:31:21.140
<v Rachel Webster>They're always more than 180 degrees.

654
00:31:21.380 --> 00:31:23.340
<v Rachel Webster>You know, the circumference of a circle

655
00:31:23.340 --> 00:31:25.060
<v Rachel Webster>no longer is 2 pi r,

656
00:31:25.080 --> 00:31:27.320
<v Rachel Webster>it's less than 2 pi r, and so on.

657
00:31:27.520 --> 00:31:30.460
<v Rachel Webster>Now, negatively curved space is harder to imagine.

658
00:31:30.520 --> 00:31:31.880
<v Rachel Webster>The balls we're quite used to,

659
00:31:31.960 --> 00:31:34.120
<v Rachel Webster>but it's that saddle shape, OK?

660
00:31:34.860 --> 00:31:37.760
<v Rachel Webster>And so that's where the saddle bit comes in, OK?

661
00:31:37.820 --> 00:31:39.240
<v Rachel Webster>It's a two-dimensional analogue

662
00:31:39.240 --> 00:31:41.600
<v Rachel Webster>of what might be three-dimensional space.

663
00:31:41.980 --> 00:31:45.220
<v Rachel Webster>But space is actually not negatively curved

664
00:31:45.220 --> 00:31:46.200
<v Rachel Webster>or positively curved.

665
00:31:46.320 --> 00:31:47.180
<v Rachel Webster>It is, in fact, flat,

666
00:31:47.280 --> 00:31:49.340
<v Rachel Webster>just to be unutterably perverse.

667
00:31:50.800 --> 00:31:52.940
<v Rachel Webster>So the flat bit works, OK?

668
00:31:53.260 --> 00:31:55.020
<v Rachel Webster>But, you know, and...

669
00:31:55.080 --> 00:31:57.820
<v Rachel Webster>Until we knew about this dark energy stuff,

670
00:31:58.100 --> 00:32:00.220
<v Rachel Webster>which, you know, as I said, is very, very recent.

671
00:32:00.300 --> 00:32:02.740
<v Rachel Webster>We're really talking about the last six or seven years.

672
00:32:03.240 --> 00:32:05.660
<v Rachel Webster>Those other possibilities were still on the table.

673
00:32:05.940 --> 00:32:08.360
<v Rachel Webster>And now, I think, to a large part,

674
00:32:08.480 --> 00:32:10.520
<v Rachel Webster>they're off the table because we know it's flat.

675
00:32:12.820 --> 00:32:13.920
<v Rachel Webster>I hope that helped.

676
00:32:15.960 --> 00:32:17.140
<v Rachel Webster>Thanks. Thank you.

677
00:32:18.240 --> 00:32:20.560
<v Audience>In approximately four billion years,

678
00:32:20.800 --> 00:32:22.780
<v Audience>the sun will become a red giant.

679
00:32:23.040 --> 00:32:23.060
<v Audience>Mm.

680
00:32:23.680 --> 00:32:26.740
<v Audience>But I've also read that within one billion years,

681
00:32:26.820 --> 00:32:28.180
<v Audience>or just after one billion years,

682
00:32:28.400 --> 00:32:32.140
<v Audience>our Earth will be uninhabitable because of the extreme heat.

683
00:32:32.360 --> 00:32:33.760
<v Audience>So what is...

684
00:32:33.760 --> 00:32:36.540
<v Audience>What goes on between one billion years

685
00:32:36.540 --> 00:32:38.880
<v Audience>and four billion years when it becomes a red giant?

686
00:32:39.220 --> 00:32:42.220
<v Audience>Does it expand into a red giant quite slowly, or...?

687
00:32:42.220 --> 00:32:44.520
<v Rachel Webster>Yeah, look, there is a process.

688
00:32:44.580 --> 00:32:46.860
<v Rachel Webster>The evolution of a star, you know,

689
00:32:46.900 --> 00:32:48.360
<v Rachel Webster>is obviously a continuous process.

690
00:32:48.580 --> 00:32:50.740
<v Rachel Webster>At, you know, four billion years,

691
00:32:50.900 --> 00:32:53.040
<v Rachel Webster>you know, the actual outer layers of the Earth,

692
00:32:53.060 --> 00:32:55.960
<v Rachel Webster>the size of the sun will expand to, you know, include the Earth.

693
00:32:56.120 --> 00:32:58.800
<v Rachel Webster>But before that, there's a gradual warming, OK?

694
00:32:59.640 --> 00:33:02.880
<v Rachel Webster>I think our understanding of the evolution of a star

695
00:33:02.880 --> 00:33:06.560
<v Rachel Webster>is not so precise that you'd want to put a time on it.

696
00:33:06.960 --> 00:33:09.740
<v Rachel Webster>But, you know, it will start to warm up a little beforehand.

697
00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:13.060
<v Rachel Webster>It's a billion years, though, so I wouldn't sweat too much.

698
00:33:13.600 --> 00:33:15.780
<v Rachel Webster>We've got some more immediate problems before then.

699
00:33:16.800 --> 00:33:17.820
<v Rachel Webster>Thanks. Gentleman down here.

700
00:33:19.340 --> 00:33:20.780
<v Audience>I wanted to ask a couple of questions

701
00:33:20.780 --> 00:33:21.900
<v Audience>about the structure of the universe.

702
00:33:21.960 --> 00:33:22.960
<v Audience>I hope you're not going to see me

703
00:33:22.960 --> 00:33:23.840
<v Audience>being too naive.

704
00:33:24.040 --> 00:33:28.080
<v Audience>One is that if the universe started at a single point

705
00:33:28.080 --> 00:33:28.720
<v Audience>and then expanded,

706
00:33:29.360 --> 00:33:33.240
<v Audience>is all the matter distributed on the surface of a shape,

707
00:33:33.460 --> 00:33:36.800
<v Audience>or is it actually homogeneously distributed throughout there?

708
00:33:36.920 --> 00:33:37.720
<v Audience>And if it is the latter,

709
00:33:37.860 --> 00:33:39.320
<v Audience>how did the bits in the middle get there?

710
00:33:41.860 --> 00:33:42.340
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

711
00:33:43.620 --> 00:33:44.100
<v Rachel Webster>So...

712
00:33:45.560 --> 00:33:48.680
<v Rachel Webster>So this is one of those interesting things

713
00:33:48.680 --> 00:33:52.940
<v Rachel Webster>where you have to do some quite strong measurements

714
00:33:52.960 --> 00:33:54.280
<v Rachel Webster>on mental gymnastics, OK?

715
00:33:54.820 --> 00:33:55.260
<v Rachel Webster>So...

716
00:33:56.320 --> 00:33:57.720
<v Rachel Webster>So when we talk about...

717
00:33:57.720 --> 00:33:59.980
<v Rachel Webster>Well, first of all, the universe is largely homogeneous,

718
00:34:00.880 --> 00:34:01.760
<v Rachel Webster>except that...

719
00:34:02.420 --> 00:34:04.080
<v Rachel Webster>Of course, it's not completely homogeneous.

720
00:34:04.240 --> 00:34:05.720
<v Rachel Webster>Obviously, we're in this room

721
00:34:05.720 --> 00:34:09.100
<v Rachel Webster>and there's probably 30 orders of magnitude difference

722
00:34:09.100 --> 00:34:10.240
<v Rachel Webster>in the density in this room

723
00:34:10.240 --> 00:34:11.900
<v Rachel Webster>than there is on average in the universe, right?

724
00:34:11.980 --> 00:34:14.700
<v Rachel Webster>So... So this is not a typical place in the universe.

725
00:34:14.860 --> 00:34:15.140
<v Rachel Webster>OK.

726
00:34:15.220 --> 00:34:18.220
<v Rachel Webster>But on average, if you go to a big enough volume,

727
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:22.140
<v Rachel Webster>then the universe is sort of pretty uniform, OK?

728
00:34:22.960 --> 00:34:27.800
<v Rachel Webster>Now, then you have to start talking about exactly what the universe is.

729
00:34:27.940 --> 00:34:33.140
<v Rachel Webster>Now, where we sit today, there's something called the horizon, right?

730
00:34:33.300 --> 00:34:39.720
<v Rachel Webster>And the horizon is simply the distance that we can see

731
00:34:42.640 --> 00:34:45.500
<v Rachel Webster>over the full time that the universe has existed.

732
00:34:45.720 --> 00:34:48.920
<v Rachel Webster>So I just realised I should back up there just for a second.

733
00:34:48.960 --> 00:34:51.940
<v Rachel Webster>The universe, quote-unquote, did have a beginning, right?

734
00:34:51.940 --> 00:34:54.100
<v Rachel Webster>And we actually know how old the universe is.

735
00:34:54.280 --> 00:34:56.100
<v Rachel Webster>It's about 1.3 billion years.

736
00:34:56.320 --> 00:34:57.620
<v Rachel Webster>Sorry, 13 billion years.

737
00:34:57.760 --> 00:34:59.380
<v Rachel Webster>13.4 billion years or something.

738
00:34:59.620 --> 00:35:02.580
<v Rachel Webster>So there is a finite time associated with the universe.

739
00:35:03.340 --> 00:35:05.540
<v Rachel Webster>The speed of light has a finite velocity.

740
00:35:05.920 --> 00:35:09.000
<v Rachel Webster>So if you take a finite velocity, multiply by a finite time,

741
00:35:09.020 --> 00:35:09.920
<v Rachel Webster>you get a finite distance.

742
00:35:10.720 --> 00:35:12.860
<v Rachel Webster>And that's sort of the horizon.

743
00:35:13.320 --> 00:35:17.560
<v Rachel Webster>That's the distance that we can theoretically see in the universe today.

744
00:35:18.080 --> 00:35:21.920
<v Rachel Webster>But the really bizarre thing about our universe,

745
00:35:21.940 --> 00:35:26.400
<v Rachel Webster>is that as time passes, obviously we can see further

746
00:35:26.400 --> 00:35:28.120
<v Rachel Webster>because the universe is older, right?

747
00:35:28.220 --> 00:35:29.780
<v Rachel Webster>And so we can see to a greater distance.

748
00:35:30.240 --> 00:35:35.020
<v Rachel Webster>And what we have discovered is that the new stuff that we can see

749
00:35:35.820 --> 00:35:39.540
<v Rachel Webster>is exactly sort of the same as the stuff that was already here.

750
00:35:39.880 --> 00:35:42.040
<v Rachel Webster>And yet, in very simple terms,

751
00:35:42.260 --> 00:35:44.400
<v Rachel Webster>there was no way that that stuff can have known

752
00:35:44.400 --> 00:35:46.480
<v Rachel Webster>that it should look like this stuff here, okay?

753
00:35:46.680 --> 00:35:49.700
<v Rachel Webster>Because, you know, things have to talk to each other

754
00:35:49.700 --> 00:35:51.840
<v Rachel Webster>to be at the same temperature and to be at the same density.

755
00:35:51.940 --> 00:35:55.580
<v Rachel Webster>So how does that stuff that is coming within our horizon now

756
00:35:55.580 --> 00:35:59.580
<v Rachel Webster>know that it was supposed to have this temperature and this density, right?

757
00:35:59.880 --> 00:36:06.500
<v Rachel Webster>And so what that has led to are some very interesting ideas

758
00:36:07.060 --> 00:36:10.800
<v Rachel Webster>about how the very early universe might have evolved.

759
00:36:11.260 --> 00:36:14.300
<v Rachel Webster>So, for example, and these are ideas.

760
00:36:14.500 --> 00:36:15.660
<v Rachel Webster>I want to stress these are ideas.

761
00:36:15.800 --> 00:36:18.640
<v Rachel Webster>They're good ideas, but we don't have...

762
00:36:19.600 --> 00:36:21.200
<v Rachel Webster>You know, it's very hard to test these ideas.

763
00:36:21.280 --> 00:36:21.920
<v Rachel Webster>We're talking about...

764
00:36:21.940 --> 00:36:26.660
<v Rachel Webster>We're talking about the universe when it was 10 to the minus 30 seconds old.

765
00:36:26.920 --> 00:36:28.840
<v Rachel Webster>So, you know, something completely ridiculous

766
00:36:28.840 --> 00:36:30.540
<v Rachel Webster>to even start trying to think about.

767
00:36:30.760 --> 00:36:35.500
<v Rachel Webster>But in order to get this very strange consistency,

768
00:36:36.360 --> 00:36:39.600
<v Rachel Webster>we believe that the universe must have essentially inflated

769
00:36:39.600 --> 00:36:41.460
<v Rachel Webster>in a very, very rapid way

770
00:36:41.460 --> 00:36:47.000
<v Rachel Webster>so that there was a very large volume, if you like,

771
00:36:47.160 --> 00:36:49.700
<v Rachel Webster>of our universe created at that time,

772
00:36:49.760 --> 00:36:51.620
<v Rachel Webster>which is slowly coming back.

773
00:36:51.620 --> 00:36:53.280
<v Rachel Webster>Within our horizon, okay?

774
00:36:53.420 --> 00:36:56.060
<v Rachel Webster>And so that's the current explanation.

775
00:36:56.480 --> 00:37:02.080
<v Rachel Webster>And the way it's usually framed is as a very special sort of phase transition

776
00:37:02.080 --> 00:37:05.080
<v Rachel Webster>in the early universe that allowed this exponential growth.

777
00:37:05.540 --> 00:37:08.180
<v Rachel Webster>But I do want to stress that these are ideas

778
00:37:08.180 --> 00:37:13.020
<v Rachel Webster>and it is actually quite hard to test these ideas in a very rigorous way.

779
00:37:13.220 --> 00:37:18.800
<v Rachel Webster>But what is absolutely true is that the stuff that's coming through

780
00:37:18.800 --> 00:37:21.540
<v Rachel Webster>knows what temperature it has to be at.

781
00:37:21.620 --> 00:37:22.680
<v Rachel Webster>And that's actually very important.

782
00:37:22.940 --> 00:37:23.440
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

783
00:37:23.580 --> 00:37:24.640
<v Rachel Webster>Don't know if that helps.

784
00:37:26.180 --> 00:37:27.140
<v Rachel Webster>Question over here.

785
00:37:28.140 --> 00:37:30.400
<v Audience>You would have heard of this question before.

786
00:37:30.680 --> 00:37:33.680
<v Audience>What are the chances of SETI succeeding?

787
00:37:35.200 --> 00:37:35.760
<v Rachel Webster>Ah.

788
00:37:38.080 --> 00:37:41.260
<v Rachel Webster>Well, are you familiar with Drake's equation?

789
00:37:42.420 --> 00:37:42.980
<v Rachel Webster>Okay.

790
00:37:43.160 --> 00:37:49.120
<v Rachel Webster>Well, so there's a very famous astronomer called Frank Drake

791
00:37:49.120 --> 00:37:51.280
<v Rachel Webster>who thought very hard about whether...

792
00:37:51.620 --> 00:37:53.720
<v Rachel Webster>that extraterrestrial life could exist out there.

793
00:37:54.140 --> 00:37:59.240
<v Rachel Webster>And he put the question on a firm mathematical basis.

794
00:37:59.380 --> 00:38:01.080
<v Rachel Webster>He said this is a question of probabilities.

795
00:38:01.660 --> 00:38:06.020
<v Rachel Webster>And so what we're going to do is we're going to construct a probability argument

796
00:38:06.020 --> 00:38:09.100
<v Rachel Webster>that says, you know, how many stars are there in the universe?

797
00:38:09.280 --> 00:38:11.040
<v Rachel Webster>How many of those stars have got planets?

798
00:38:11.280 --> 00:38:13.680
<v Rachel Webster>How many of those planets could have life?

799
00:38:13.980 --> 00:38:16.820
<v Rachel Webster>On how many of those will the life become intelligent?

800
00:38:16.940 --> 00:38:21.300
<v Rachel Webster>And, you know, what's the probability that intelligent life will communicate?

801
00:38:21.300 --> 00:38:21.920
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

802
00:38:22.120 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Rachel Webster>Now, in that sequence, the last factor in this probability sequence says,

803
00:38:29.600 --> 00:38:32.740
<v Rachel Webster>suppose that you have an intelligent communicating civilization,

804
00:38:33.260 --> 00:38:35.640
<v Rachel Webster>which is supposedly what we call ourselves.

805
00:38:36.020 --> 00:38:36.540
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

806
00:38:36.680 --> 00:38:40.140
<v Rachel Webster>Then how long will this civilization live for?

807
00:38:40.280 --> 00:38:46.400
<v Rachel Webster>Because that will tell you in the end how many of such civilizations there are in the universe.

808
00:38:46.640 --> 00:38:47.040
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

809
00:38:47.240 --> 00:38:49.400
<v Rachel Webster>So then this is...

810
00:38:49.400 --> 00:38:50.160
<v Rachel Webster>this is then when...

811
00:38:50.160 --> 00:38:51.280
<v Rachel Webster>where it gets very interesting.

812
00:38:51.300 --> 00:38:52.720
<v Rachel Webster>Because if...

813
00:38:53.840 --> 00:38:56.560
<v Rachel Webster>to get to that stage, you have to be very aggressive.

814
00:38:56.840 --> 00:39:00.920
<v Rachel Webster>And then, you know, when you get to a hundred years, which is...

815
00:39:00.920 --> 00:39:06.200
<v Rachel Webster>Oh, and I should say we've been intelligent and communicating in this sense since the Second World War.

816
00:39:06.320 --> 00:39:09.960
<v Rachel Webster>That was when radar was discovered or, you know, was used.

817
00:39:10.120 --> 00:39:16.360
<v Rachel Webster>And so we've been intelligent and communicating for about, you know, 60 years, 70 years.

818
00:39:16.560 --> 00:39:16.940
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

819
00:39:17.080 --> 00:39:20.760
<v Rachel Webster>So you could argue that if we get to a hundred years

820
00:39:20.760 --> 00:39:23.700
<v Rachel Webster>and we blow ourselves up because we're too aggressive, okay,

821
00:39:23.800 --> 00:39:28.100
<v Rachel Webster>then an intelligent communicating civilization only lives for a hundred years.

822
00:39:28.360 --> 00:39:32.060
<v Rachel Webster>And if you do the sums and you put a hundred years on it,

823
00:39:32.140 --> 00:39:33.760
<v Rachel Webster>then we're alone.

824
00:39:34.460 --> 00:39:35.260
<v Rachel Webster>And we're not...

825
00:39:35.260 --> 00:39:36.680
<v Rachel Webster>there's going to be nobody else out there.

826
00:39:37.000 --> 00:39:38.120
<v Rachel Webster>But if...

827
00:39:39.100 --> 00:39:40.780
<v Rachel Webster>and, you know, we get our act together

828
00:39:40.780 --> 00:39:44.100
<v Rachel Webster>and somehow we manage to live with each other and continue to move forward

829
00:39:44.100 --> 00:39:46.500
<v Rachel Webster>and, you know, look after the planet and all the rest of it,

830
00:39:46.540 --> 00:39:50.740
<v Rachel Webster>and our civilization lives for, you know, a hundred thousand years,

831
00:39:50.740 --> 00:39:52.660
<v Rachel Webster>just saying, or even longer,

832
00:39:52.800 --> 00:39:55.720
<v Rachel Webster>then there's going to be quite a lot of civilizations out there

833
00:39:56.240 --> 00:39:57.840
<v Rachel Webster>that have gone through the same process.

834
00:39:58.220 --> 00:40:01.500
<v Rachel Webster>And if there's a lot of them, then you can just do the probability arguments

835
00:40:01.500 --> 00:40:03.480
<v Rachel Webster>and you can figure out where the closest one is

836
00:40:03.480 --> 00:40:05.920
<v Rachel Webster>and then you can work out, you know, what the prob...

837
00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:08.300
<v Rachel Webster>you know, what our chances are of actually talking to them

838
00:40:08.300 --> 00:40:10.720
<v Rachel Webster>by using speed of light arguments and so on.

839
00:40:11.300 --> 00:40:13.360
<v Rachel Webster>So that's basically the way to think about it.

840
00:40:14.820 --> 00:40:15.220
<v Duncan Steel>Thanks.

841
00:40:15.400 --> 00:40:15.700
<v Duncan Steel>What's the result?

842
00:40:16.180 --> 00:40:16.580
<v Duncan Steel>Eh?

843
00:40:17.620 --> 00:40:18.340
<v Duncan Steel>What's the answer?

844
00:40:19.640 --> 00:40:20.720
<v Duncan Steel>Somebody's asking you to give a different answer.

845
00:40:20.720 --> 00:40:21.420
<v Duncan Steel>I don't know the definitive answer.

846
00:40:23.140 --> 00:40:23.840
<v Rachel Webster>We're looking.

847
00:40:25.920 --> 00:40:26.720
<v Duncan Steel>We don't know.

848
00:40:26.820 --> 00:40:28.020
<v Duncan Steel>We have no data to go on.

849
00:40:29.800 --> 00:40:32.320
<v Duncan Steel>Time's flying by, so we've got just time for one more question.

850
00:40:32.440 --> 00:40:32.740
<v Duncan Steel>Thank you.

851
00:40:33.220 --> 00:40:37.780
<v Audience>When do you think humans will launch the first spacecraft to Mars

852
00:40:37.780 --> 00:40:41.500
<v Audience>and humans will set foot on the red planet?

853
00:40:42.540 --> 00:40:42.980
<v Rachel Webster>Okay.

854
00:40:43.220 --> 00:40:44.640
<v Rachel Webster>That's a really good question.

855
00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:45.860
<v Rachel Webster>That's a really good question.

856
00:40:46.020 --> 00:40:47.960
<v Rachel Webster>So we can already...

857
00:40:48.620 --> 00:40:50.700
<v Rachel Webster>we can already send people to Mars quite easily.

858
00:40:50.720 --> 00:40:51.340
<v Rachel Webster>Okay?

859
00:40:51.900 --> 00:40:53.980
<v Rachel Webster>Technologically, that's not particularly difficult.

860
00:40:54.480 --> 00:40:58.020
<v Rachel Webster>It's actually not even particularly expensive, necessarily.

861
00:40:58.320 --> 00:41:00.640
<v Rachel Webster>So, you know, we could afford to do this tomorrow

862
00:41:00.640 --> 00:41:02.240
<v Rachel Webster>if we decided to do it.

863
00:41:02.760 --> 00:41:07.140
<v Rachel Webster>And so all that it's going to take is somebody to make that decision

864
00:41:07.140 --> 00:41:11.040
<v Rachel Webster>and then, of course, a couple of people to volunteer to go and do it.

865
00:41:11.580 --> 00:41:13.920
<v Rachel Webster>It may be a one-way trip, you know,

866
00:41:14.940 --> 00:41:18.100
<v Rachel Webster>because, you know, it's quite dangerous doing something like this

867
00:41:18.100 --> 00:41:19.920
<v Rachel Webster>and you can't always guarantee you're going to come back.

868
00:41:19.920 --> 00:41:22.760
<v Rachel Webster>But there's a society called the Mars Society,

869
00:41:22.940 --> 00:41:24.660
<v Rachel Webster>which I think you're quite involved with,

870
00:41:24.780 --> 00:41:30.020
<v Rachel Webster>who are preparing for that eventuality.

871
00:41:30.100 --> 00:41:31.580
<v Rachel Webster>They've been running experiments

872
00:41:31.580 --> 00:41:34.240
<v Rachel Webster>where people have been living in the Australian desert

873
00:41:34.240 --> 00:41:38.820
<v Rachel Webster>and other inhospitable places in isolated circumstances

874
00:41:38.820 --> 00:41:42.440
<v Rachel Webster>to prepare them for the possibility of going and living on Mars.

875
00:41:42.540 --> 00:41:48.900
<v Rachel Webster>So, you know, you would have to create a closed, you know, dome or something to live in.

876
00:41:48.900 --> 00:41:52.140
<v Rachel Webster>But if there's water there, which we're almost certain there is now,

877
00:41:52.280 --> 00:41:54.500
<v Rachel Webster>then you could take your seeds along, grow your plants,

878
00:41:54.640 --> 00:41:56.380
<v Rachel Webster>generate oxygen and all the rest of it

879
00:41:56.900 --> 00:42:00.900
<v Rachel Webster>and probably have quite a happy life all by yourself on the Red Planet.

880
00:42:03.160 --> 00:42:06.480
<v Duncan Steel>Yes, there's a group of NASA scientists right now up in the Flinders Ranges

881
00:42:06.480 --> 00:42:10.460
<v Duncan Steel>conducting a field trip along with some American teachers

882
00:42:10.460 --> 00:42:11.720
<v Duncan Steel>and seven Australian teachers

883
00:42:11.720 --> 00:42:14.820
<v Duncan Steel>who I hope will be touring around and inspiring students.

884
00:42:15.400 --> 00:42:18.000
<v Duncan Steel>And if you're really interested, Mars Society Australia,

885
00:42:18.000 --> 00:42:18.920
<v Duncan Steel>look that up on the web.

886
00:42:18.960 --> 00:42:21.160
<v Duncan Steel>They've got their annual conference here in Adelaide next weekend.

887
00:42:21.840 --> 00:42:23.400
<v Duncan Steel>If you're interested in astrophysics,

888
00:42:23.660 --> 00:42:26.680
<v Duncan Steel>please join the Astronomical Society of South Australia.

889
00:42:26.760 --> 00:42:28.680
<v Duncan Steel>It's the biggest and just about the most active.

890
00:42:28.800 --> 00:42:29.560
<v Duncan Steel>I shouldn't say the best.

891
00:42:29.720 --> 00:42:31.960
<v Duncan Steel>I'm sure Melbourne's got a good Astronomical Society.

892
00:42:32.240 --> 00:42:32.440
<v Duncan Steel>It does.

893
00:42:32.680 --> 00:42:35.840
<v Duncan Steel>But please look up the Astronomical Society of South Australia.

894
00:42:35.980 --> 00:42:38.600
<v Duncan Steel>They've got 400 or 500 members, very, very active,

895
00:42:38.780 --> 00:42:40.740
<v Duncan Steel>and you'll learn a lot from them.

896
00:42:40.820 --> 00:42:42.780
<v Duncan Steel>That goes for people of absolutely all ages.

897
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:45.420
<v Duncan Steel>A bit of fascinating afternoon.

898
00:42:45.660 --> 00:42:46.860
<v Duncan Steel>Thank you very much for that, Rachel.

899
00:42:46.860 --> 00:42:48.960
<v Duncan Steel>Can we thank Rachel just one more time?

