WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.340
<v Derek Abbott>Greetings, ladies and gentlemen.

2
00:00:01.460 --> 00:00:06.480
<v Derek Abbott>Welcome to this session of the Adelaide Festival of Ideas.

3
00:00:07.300 --> 00:00:10.900
<v Derek Abbott>This session, as you know, is the robots are coming.

4
00:00:11.640 --> 00:00:12.960
<v Derek Abbott>Will machines take over?

5
00:00:13.200 --> 00:00:15.060
<v Derek Abbott>My name's Derek Abbott.

6
00:00:15.340 --> 00:00:18.540
<v Derek Abbott>I'm the director of the Biomedical Engineering Center

7
00:00:18.540 --> 00:00:19.900
<v Derek Abbott>here at Adelaide Uni.

8
00:00:20.080 --> 00:00:24.380
<v Derek Abbott>And it's my great pleasure to introduce our two speakers,

9
00:00:25.160 --> 00:00:27.000
<v Derek Abbott>Rodney Brooks and Margaret Wertheim.

10
00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:33.680
<v Derek Abbott>Rodney is the guy who possibly might be responsible

11
00:00:33.680 --> 00:00:36.180
<v Derek Abbott>for robots taking the world over one day

12
00:00:36.180 --> 00:00:39.320
<v Derek Abbott>because he's the head of the AI laboratory

13
00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:43.840
<v Derek Abbott>at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the USA, MIT.

14
00:00:44.980 --> 00:00:47.300
<v Derek Abbott>He's also the iRobot Corporation

15
00:00:47.300 --> 00:00:50.320
<v Derek Abbott>and a few other companies making robots in the USA.

16
00:00:52.760 --> 00:00:56.980
<v Derek Abbott>His group is so big that if you look at it,

17
00:00:56.980 --> 00:00:59.340
<v Derek Abbott>if you look at his website at MIT,

18
00:00:59.680 --> 00:01:04.160
<v Derek Abbott>you need a search engine just to see all the names of the people in his lab.

19
00:01:04.300 --> 00:01:04.760
<v Derek Abbott>It's incredible.

20
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.920
<v Derek Abbott>It just gives you some idea of the magnitude.

21
00:01:09.180 --> 00:01:14.680
<v Derek Abbott>He's arguably the leading expert in robots in the world.

22
00:01:16.960 --> 00:01:20.340
<v Derek Abbott>He's originally from Adelaide and now lives in Boston.

23
00:01:21.080 --> 00:01:25.560
<v Derek Abbott>Now, Margaret Wertheim is a highly acclaimed science writer.

24
00:01:26.980 --> 00:01:28.060
<v Derek Abbott>She's written a couple of books,

25
00:01:28.180 --> 00:01:32.500
<v Derek Abbott>The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace and Pythagoras's Trousers.

26
00:01:34.040 --> 00:01:35.340
<v Derek Abbott>Or was it underwear?

27
00:01:35.940 --> 00:01:37.000
<v Derek Abbott>Trousers, that's right.

28
00:01:38.840 --> 00:01:42.100
<v Derek Abbott>She's actually originally from Melbourne

29
00:01:42.100 --> 00:01:44.160
<v Derek Abbott>but was brought up in Brizzy

30
00:01:44.160 --> 00:01:46.560
<v Derek Abbott>and also spent some time in Adelaide

31
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:48.400
<v Derek Abbott>but now is actually living in Los Angeles.

32
00:01:50.600 --> 00:01:55.840
<v Derek Abbott>I did see a copy of Pythagoras's Trousers in the tent behind there.

33
00:01:55.900 --> 00:01:56.860
<v Derek Abbott>In fact, a few copies.

34
00:01:56.980 --> 00:02:01.140
<v Derek Abbott>I think Margaret said she'll be there at the end to sign any

35
00:02:01.140 --> 00:02:03.720
<v Derek Abbott>if you'd like to get some at the end.

36
00:02:04.180 --> 00:02:05.300
<v Derek Abbott>Without further ado,

37
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:09.580
<v Derek Abbott>I'd like to hand it over to the speakers.

38
00:02:09.920 --> 00:02:12.480
<v Derek Abbott>What's going to happen is Rodney's going to come up first

39
00:02:12.480 --> 00:02:15.900
<v Derek Abbott>and make a little bit of a slide presentation about robots

40
00:02:15.900 --> 00:02:18.580
<v Derek Abbott>and then we'll just enter into a conversation

41
00:02:19.380 --> 00:02:22.320
<v Derek Abbott>and then at the end there'll be some time for some questions.

42
00:02:22.740 --> 00:02:25.140
<v Derek Abbott>Can we greet the speakers in the usual way?

43
00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:25.760
<v Derek Abbott>Thank you.

44
00:02:36.840 --> 00:02:37.980
<v Rodney Brooks>Well, thank you, Derek.

45
00:02:39.180 --> 00:02:40.480
<v Rodney Brooks>It's a great pleasure to be here.

46
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:45.560
<v Rodney Brooks>Yesterday morning at the same time I gave a longer talk by myself in this auditorium

47
00:02:45.560 --> 00:02:50.700
<v Rodney Brooks>and I want to recap just a little tiny bit of that for about a minute and a half

48
00:02:50.700 --> 00:02:53.780
<v Rodney Brooks>and then go into context and set up some context

49
00:02:53.780 --> 00:02:56.960
<v Rodney Brooks>for the discussion today about will machines take over.

50
00:02:56.980 --> 00:03:01.780
<v Rodney Brooks>And so the first two or three slides are really from yesterday's talk

51
00:03:02.320 --> 00:03:06.160
<v Rodney Brooks>where I showed that there'd been a big resurgence in the last 10 years

52
00:03:06.160 --> 00:03:10.680
<v Rodney Brooks>of building robots with human form and here are some examples of robots being built

53
00:03:10.680 --> 00:03:11.920
<v Rodney Brooks>around the world in laboratories.

54
00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:16.120
<v Rodney Brooks>The robots with human forms are not out in the world in any way.

55
00:03:16.200 --> 00:03:18.700
<v Rodney Brooks>There are lots of other robots that are getting out into the world,

56
00:03:18.820 --> 00:03:21.560
<v Rodney Brooks>home domestic robots, toys, et cetera.

57
00:03:21.760 --> 00:03:26.820
<v Rodney Brooks>The robots with human form, which is what most people think of as the perhaps,

58
00:03:26.820 --> 00:03:30.060
<v Rodney Brooks>threatening robots of the future, are in the research labs.

59
00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:33.540
<v Rodney Brooks>And I wanted to show you one of those robots from my lab

60
00:03:33.540 --> 00:03:35.240
<v Rodney Brooks>to show you the current state of the art.

61
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:40.200
<v Rodney Brooks>This is a robot called Kismet, which is a neck and head robot

62
00:03:40.800 --> 00:03:46.820
<v Rodney Brooks>which understands people's emotional state and their faces, et cetera,

63
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:48.860
<v Rodney Brooks>and their movements, doesn't understand their language

64
00:03:49.460 --> 00:03:55.400
<v Rodney Brooks>and it generates pre-linguistic babbling with prosody in its voice.

65
00:03:55.540 --> 00:03:56.700
<v Rodney Brooks>And here's just an example.

66
00:03:56.700 --> 00:03:59.300
<v Rodney Brooks>This is an example of a naive subject taken off the street,

67
00:03:59.440 --> 00:04:04.540
<v Rodney Brooks>not exactly taken off the street, volunteer, who we put in front of the robot,

68
00:04:04.740 --> 00:04:08.120
<v Rodney Brooks>we've done this with hundreds of people, and asked him to talk to the robot

69
00:04:08.120 --> 00:04:09.100
<v Rodney Brooks>with no further instruction.

70
00:04:09.480 --> 00:04:12.360
<v Rodney Brooks>This just gives you an idea of the state of the level of interaction

71
00:04:12.360 --> 00:04:13.360
<v Rodney Brooks>as of today.

72
00:04:13.700 --> 00:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>There's something.

73
00:04:15.600 --> 00:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to show you something.

74
00:04:18.660 --> 00:04:24.180
<v Speaker 3>This is a watch that my girlfriend gave me.

75
00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:25.020
<v Speaker 4>How the hell?

76
00:04:25.300 --> 00:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, it's got a little blue thing.

77
00:04:26.680 --> 00:04:30.860
<v Speaker 3>And the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the

78
00:04:30.860 --> 00:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the

79
00:04:42.200 --> 00:04:42.780
<v Speaker 3>note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the

80
00:04:42.780 --> 00:04:56.660
<v Speaker 3>note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the note for the

81
00:05:09.200 --> 00:05:14.280
<v Rodney Brooks>So that's the sort of state of the art of social interaction between people and robots.

82
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:19.780
<v Rodney Brooks>And when people see these sorts of robots, there are two big questions that come up.

83
00:05:19.900 --> 00:05:23.240
<v Rodney Brooks>The first question is, will we accept them in the future?

84
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:28.780
<v Rodney Brooks>And the second question, which is really what this session is about, is will they want to take over?

85
00:05:29.900 --> 00:05:33.120
<v Rodney Brooks>Let me just say a couple of words about will we accept them.

86
00:05:33.380 --> 00:05:40.700
<v Rodney Brooks>And both of these questions have been addressed many times in books, science fiction books and movies.

87
00:05:40.960 --> 00:05:45.500
<v Rodney Brooks>And I've got a few images here from various movies about will we accept them.

88
00:05:46.360 --> 00:05:51.020
<v Rodney Brooks>And my position on that, which I talked at a little greater length yesterday,

89
00:05:51.020 --> 00:05:55.780
<v Rodney Brooks>is that whether we accept them and grant them personhood or not,

90
00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:04.680
<v Rodney Brooks>in order for us to grant them personhood, we will have to get over our want for specialness.

91
00:06:05.200 --> 00:06:08.340
<v Rodney Brooks>Historically, we have liked to think of ourselves as being special,

92
00:06:08.480 --> 00:06:13.660
<v Rodney Brooks>and science and technology has assaulted us on that issue over time.

93
00:06:14.480 --> 00:06:17.940
<v Rodney Brooks>500 years ago, the Earth was no longer the center of the universe.

94
00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:19.700
<v Rodney Brooks>There was a clash with the Catholic Church.

95
00:06:19.780 --> 00:06:21.000
<v Rodney Brooks>That made us less.

96
00:06:21.020 --> 00:06:21.660
<v Rodney Brooks>Less special.

97
00:06:21.920 --> 00:06:25.520
<v Rodney Brooks>And we've seen that with Darwin, that we're related to animals, et cetera.

98
00:06:25.700 --> 00:06:27.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And we keep getting assaulted.

99
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:34.000
<v Rodney Brooks>Recently, people have been saying maybe we didn't randomly arise here on Earth,

100
00:06:34.100 --> 00:06:38.540
<v Rodney Brooks>but life came from another planet, so we don't even have our own creation event.

101
00:06:38.780 --> 00:06:41.880
<v Rodney Brooks>More recently, we find we only have 35,000 genes.

102
00:06:42.040 --> 00:06:46.520
<v Rodney Brooks>This was just three or four months ago, and everyone got really upset that we had so few genes.

103
00:06:47.620 --> 00:06:50.940
<v Rodney Brooks>And whether we ultimately will get over ourselves.

104
00:06:51.020 --> 00:06:52.220
<v Rodney Brooks>And we all have to understand for ourselves that we're special,

105
00:06:52.320 --> 00:06:56.520
<v Rodney Brooks>because we have emotions, and those cold, hard machines can't have real emotions.

106
00:06:57.100 --> 00:07:00.980
<v Rodney Brooks>My position is we're going to have to retreat from our specialness again

107
00:07:01.540 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Rodney Brooks>before we grant that some sort of robots in the future can be living creatures.

108
00:07:06.060 --> 00:07:10.680
<v Rodney Brooks>So that's the will we accept them, but the next question is should we fear them?

109
00:07:11.220 --> 00:07:15.000
<v Rodney Brooks>And this has been a theme in many, many movies, of course,

110
00:07:15.120 --> 00:07:16.980
<v Rodney Brooks>and we'll probably mention a few others in the discussion.

111
00:07:16.980 --> 00:07:20.940
<v Rodney Brooks>and the issue here is

112
00:07:20.940 --> 00:07:24.320
<v Rodney Brooks>you know, we create these entities

113
00:07:24.320 --> 00:07:28.020
<v Rodney Brooks>we nurture them, we teach them everything we know

114
00:07:28.020 --> 00:07:30.360
<v Rodney Brooks>they start getting smarter and smarter

115
00:07:30.360 --> 00:07:32.820
<v Rodney Brooks>eventually they start thinking they're smarter than us

116
00:07:32.820 --> 00:07:34.200
<v Rodney Brooks>they get impatient with us

117
00:07:34.200 --> 00:07:36.520
<v Rodney Brooks>and they want us out of their lives

118
00:07:36.520 --> 00:07:38.580
<v Rodney Brooks>and this is very common with our teenagers

119
00:07:38.580 --> 00:07:41.000
<v Rodney Brooks>as I'm sure you know

120
00:07:45.560 --> 00:07:48.700
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't think this is necessarily going to happen

121
00:07:48.700 --> 00:07:52.740
<v Rodney Brooks>because we could choose to build dangerous robots

122
00:07:52.740 --> 00:07:55.740
<v Rodney Brooks>just like we could choose to build dangerous trains

123
00:07:55.740 --> 00:07:59.220
<v Rodney Brooks>but we choose not to build dangerous trains

124
00:07:59.220 --> 00:08:01.800
<v Rodney Brooks>we're sort of in control of what we build

125
00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:03.800
<v Rodney Brooks>so I think there's some argument there

126
00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:05.900
<v Rodney Brooks>that things aren't necessarily going to get away from us

127
00:08:05.900 --> 00:08:09.440
<v Rodney Brooks>but one of the scenarios that's popular in fiction

128
00:08:10.120 --> 00:08:10.980
<v Rodney Brooks>is the lack of control

129
00:08:11.000 --> 00:08:11.780
<v Rodney Brooks>there's a lone scientist

130
00:08:11.780 --> 00:08:14.160
<v Rodney Brooks>who's tinkering away

131
00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:17.140
<v Rodney Brooks>and accidentally builds

132
00:08:17.140 --> 00:08:19.760
<v Rodney Brooks>I built a 747 in the backyard

133
00:08:19.760 --> 00:08:22.480
<v Rodney Brooks>I just put these pieces together

134
00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:24.860
<v Rodney Brooks>and it flew like a jet airplane

135
00:08:24.860 --> 00:08:26.480
<v Rodney Brooks>that doesn't happen

136
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:28.600
<v Rodney Brooks>so I don't think that scenario is going to happen

137
00:08:28.600 --> 00:08:32.000
<v Rodney Brooks>building these things is a complex undertaking

138
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:34.040
<v Rodney Brooks>with lots of people working together

139
00:08:34.040 --> 00:08:37.160
<v Rodney Brooks>across many different organizations for many years

140
00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:39.160
<v Rodney Brooks>and we'll build them incrementally

141
00:08:39.160 --> 00:08:40.980
<v Rodney Brooks>we're not going to just suddenly build them

142
00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:44.240
<v Rodney Brooks>we're not going to build the robot with super intelligence

143
00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:45.740
<v Rodney Brooks>or the robot with emotions

144
00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:50.880
<v Rodney Brooks>we'll be building simpler robots

145
00:08:50.880 --> 00:08:52.140
<v Rodney Brooks>and then more complex robots

146
00:08:52.140 --> 00:08:53.340
<v Rodney Brooks>and more complex robots

147
00:08:53.340 --> 00:08:54.680
<v Rodney Brooks>so we'll gain experience with them

148
00:08:54.680 --> 00:08:58.880
<v Rodney Brooks>we will be the Darwinian influence on the robots

149
00:08:58.880 --> 00:09:00.940
<v Rodney Brooks>in deciding what we want to build

150
00:09:00.940 --> 00:09:01.800
<v Rodney Brooks>and how we build them

151
00:09:01.800 --> 00:09:03.460
<v Rodney Brooks>and we'll in a sense breed them

152
00:09:03.460 --> 00:09:07.220
<v Rodney Brooks>and modify them to be the right sort of robots that we want

153
00:09:07.220 --> 00:09:08.640
<v Rodney Brooks>if we start building robots

154
00:09:09.860 --> 00:09:10.980
<v Rodney Brooks>that are not Senate

155
00:09:10.980 --> 00:09:15.180
<v Rodney Brooks>are troublesome in one way, we'll modify them and build different sorts of robots.

156
00:09:15.320 --> 00:09:18.880
<v Rodney Brooks>So we'll have control over them while they're less than us. And that while

157
00:09:18.880 --> 00:09:22.560
<v Rodney Brooks>they're less than us may be the critical issue that this

158
00:09:23.140 --> 00:09:24.100
<v Rodney Brooks>whole session is about.

159
00:09:26.460 --> 00:09:30.220
<v Rodney Brooks>At the same time, we can't foresee all the uses and developments of them.

160
00:09:32.960 --> 00:09:35.080
<v Rodney Brooks>Now, I think

161
00:09:35.080 --> 00:09:38.800
<v Rodney Brooks>there's another issue that's going to happen fairly quickly, and that's us

162
00:09:38.800 --> 00:09:42.820
<v Rodney Brooks>as them. And this might make the question of whether the

163
00:09:42.820 --> 00:09:46.780
<v Rodney Brooks>robot's going to take over from us a little different. And maybe

164
00:09:46.780 --> 00:09:50.780
<v Rodney Brooks>it's the wrong perspective. Maybe we don't quite understand things and are asking the wrong

165
00:09:50.780 --> 00:09:54.160
<v Rodney Brooks>question. You know, in the last millennium, we came to rely on our machines.

166
00:09:54.960 --> 00:09:58.160
<v Rodney Brooks>In this millennium, I think we will become our machines.

167
00:09:58.800 --> 00:10:02.840
<v Rodney Brooks>And in the first instance, we're becoming our machines by putting

168
00:10:02.840 --> 00:10:06.700
<v Rodney Brooks>silicon and steel inside our bodies, often for good clinical reasons,

169
00:10:06.880 --> 00:10:07.920
<v Rodney Brooks>but that's going to

170
00:10:07.920 --> 00:10:08.780
<v Rodney Brooks>become

171
00:10:08.800 --> 00:10:13.000
<v Rodney Brooks>more cosmetic. The answer, I think, about whether

172
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:17.100
<v Rodney Brooks>they'll take over from us under this is we don't need to fear the machines

173
00:10:17.100 --> 00:10:20.880
<v Rodney Brooks>because we, the man machines, will always be a step ahead of the machine

174
00:10:20.880 --> 00:10:24.980
<v Rodney Brooks>machines because we'll be putting the technologies in our own bodies. There won't be any us for them

175
00:10:24.980 --> 00:10:27.180
<v Rodney Brooks>to take over from because them will be us.

176
00:10:29.880 --> 00:10:32.320
<v Rodney Brooks>So this uniting of flesh and machines,

177
00:10:32.700 --> 00:10:36.640
<v Rodney Brooks>you know, we see that already, leg and arm prostheses, cochlear implants,

178
00:10:36.840 --> 00:10:38.780
<v Rodney Brooks>there's tens of thousands of people walking around.

179
00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Rodney Brooks>On the planet today with direct neural connections into their cochlears,

180
00:10:43.100 --> 00:10:47.400
<v Rodney Brooks>into electronics interfacing to neurons so they can hear again.

181
00:10:47.660 --> 00:10:51.540
<v Rodney Brooks>There's experiments in retinal implants, people with macular degeneration.

182
00:10:52.820 --> 00:10:58.240
<v Rodney Brooks>There have been implants of artificial retinas, temporary implants into people's eyes.

183
00:10:59.600 --> 00:11:03.020
<v Rodney Brooks>Can't really, they don't really work yet, but there's a lot of clinical push.

184
00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:08.100
<v Rodney Brooks>If you have macular degeneration and there's a chance that a silicon retina will let you see something again,

185
00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:10.380
<v Rodney Brooks>that's something a lot of people are going to jump on.

186
00:11:10.800 --> 00:11:21.400
<v Rodney Brooks>And electrodes and the thalamus for Parkinson's disease, other sorts of interfaces for other diseases of the cerebellum

187
00:11:21.400 --> 00:11:25.120
<v Rodney Brooks>are really being pushed on right now. So direct connections into the brain.

188
00:11:25.260 --> 00:11:30.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And then there are people putting extra neural circuits into rat and mouse brains,

189
00:11:30.740 --> 00:11:37.300
<v Rodney Brooks>only being done with animals now, but that will change over time too because it's aimed at therapy.

190
00:11:38.100 --> 00:11:39.200
<v Rodney Brooks>For good clinical reasons.

191
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:43.760
<v Rodney Brooks>Once you have these clinical sorts of capabilities though,

192
00:11:43.860 --> 00:11:48.440
<v Rodney Brooks>there's going to be some real push for people to use these technologies,

193
00:11:48.640 --> 00:11:51.900
<v Rodney Brooks>not just for repairing damage, but for improving themselves.

194
00:11:52.580 --> 00:11:57.060
<v Rodney Brooks>So one can imagine someone saying, gee, you know,

195
00:11:59.540 --> 00:12:04.360
<v Rodney Brooks>first of all someone who's got macular degeneration in both eyes, they get one eye fixed the normal way.

196
00:12:04.560 --> 00:12:08.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And then they say, well, when my second eye gets fixed, it'd be great.

197
00:12:08.080 --> 00:12:10.900
<v Rodney Brooks>It'd be great to have an infrared camera in my left eye.

198
00:12:12.340 --> 00:12:23.700
<v Rodney Brooks>And maybe, you know, drug runners might choose to do that so they can evade the police or military or whoever better.

199
00:12:23.900 --> 00:12:32.040
<v Rodney Brooks>And one can imagine at some point some military organizations deciding they're going to augment their soldiers

200
00:12:32.040 --> 00:12:34.820
<v Rodney Brooks>with implants of some sort.

201
00:12:38.180 --> 00:12:46.340
<v Rodney Brooks>I think ultimately, and already we have a few quadriplegics in the world who can control a mouse just by thinking with direct neural implants.

202
00:12:46.520 --> 00:12:56.040
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't think it's going to be too long before we can have and expect some sort of wireless internet connection inside our heads.

203
00:12:56.880 --> 00:13:02.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And when we get that, that's really going to change who we are and how we interact with the world.

204
00:13:02.240 --> 00:13:06.100
<v Rodney Brooks>But more generally, we're putting more and more technology into our bodies.

205
00:13:08.080 --> 00:13:18.560
<v Rodney Brooks>But then as we're becoming silicon and steel in our bodies, which is already starting and will accelerate over the next 10, 20 years,

206
00:13:19.300 --> 00:13:23.360
<v Rodney Brooks>engineering will gain exquisite control over biological processes.

207
00:13:23.540 --> 00:13:27.940
<v Rodney Brooks>Right now, you know, all this genetic engineering is pretty primitive stuff.

208
00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:36.720
<v Rodney Brooks>The way cloning happens is you take an egg, you cut out a piece, you put in another nucleus, and then you zap it with electricity.

209
00:13:37.060 --> 00:13:38.060
<v Rodney Brooks>It's like an old Frankenstein.

210
00:13:38.080 --> 00:13:42.060
<v Rodney Brooks>That's the level of technological sophistication right now.

211
00:13:42.140 --> 00:13:44.020
<v Rodney Brooks>That is changing over time.

212
00:13:44.220 --> 00:13:50.240
<v Rodney Brooks>And Derek mentioned this, a lot of people in my lab, there's about 20 faculty in my lab,

213
00:13:50.320 --> 00:14:01.480
<v Rodney Brooks>and one of them is working on and has successfully built digitally controlled E. coli by having a compiler

214
00:14:02.100 --> 00:14:07.040
<v Rodney Brooks>which compiles programs into DNA strands, which he then inserts into the genome

215
00:14:07.040 --> 00:14:08.060
<v Rodney Brooks>of the E. coli.

216
00:14:08.060 --> 00:14:18.900
<v Rodney Brooks>And when the RNA transcription mechanism runs over that, it executes a digital program where different enzyme concentrations

217
00:14:18.900 --> 00:14:23.960
<v Rodney Brooks>represent the different numbers in the program, and he gets digital control of these E. coli.

218
00:14:24.040 --> 00:14:26.080
<v Rodney Brooks>So essentially they're living little tiny robots.

219
00:14:26.460 --> 00:14:29.220
<v Rodney Brooks>So this is just starting now.

220
00:14:29.300 --> 00:14:38.040
<v Rodney Brooks>And by the way, he's doing that in a lab that we built which cost about $100,000 to set up and didn't use any technology.

221
00:14:38.060 --> 00:14:41.200
<v Rodney Brooks>technology that's not available in some American high schools.

222
00:14:41.480 --> 00:14:45.460
<v Rodney Brooks>So this is not really difficult stuff to do anymore.

223
00:14:45.860 --> 00:14:49.140
<v Rodney Brooks>Engineering will gain exquisite control over biological processes,

224
00:14:49.840 --> 00:14:53.000
<v Rodney Brooks>and our whole manufacturing technologies are going to change as a result.

225
00:14:53.520 --> 00:14:59.340
<v Rodney Brooks>In 40 to 50 years, we won't grow a tree, cut it down, and build a table.

226
00:14:59.420 --> 00:15:00.520
<v Rodney Brooks>We'll grow a table.

227
00:15:01.520 --> 00:15:02.080
<v Rodney Brooks>Okay?

228
00:15:02.080 --> 00:15:08.440
<v Rodney Brooks>So our biological, our industrial infrastructure just has changed completely in the last 50 years.

229
00:15:08.500 --> 00:15:10.560
<v Rodney Brooks>Look at the industrial infrastructure from 50 years ago.

230
00:15:10.820 --> 00:15:14.960
<v Rodney Brooks>Totally different materials to what we use today is going to change again in the next 50 years,

231
00:15:15.060 --> 00:15:17.020
<v Rodney Brooks>and it's going to change to biological materials.

232
00:15:18.440 --> 00:15:22.180
<v Rodney Brooks>So the next generation of robots are going to be made out of that stuff.

233
00:15:22.500 --> 00:15:25.420
<v Rodney Brooks>The next generation of our industry is going to be made out of that stuff,

234
00:15:25.460 --> 00:15:27.340
<v Rodney Brooks>and it's the same stuff as us.

235
00:15:27.900 --> 00:15:31.360
<v Rodney Brooks>So I think that, in a sense, the robots will take over

236
00:15:31.360 --> 00:15:31.960
<v Rodney Brooks>because they will.

237
00:15:32.080 --> 00:15:36.900
<v Rodney Brooks>They will be us because we're going to ultimately merge in the 50 to 100-year time frame.

238
00:15:37.080 --> 00:15:39.240
<v Rodney Brooks>So that's my position on this question,

239
00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:46.180
<v Rodney Brooks>and maybe now we should get rid of that and have our discussion.

240
00:15:46.660 --> 00:15:51.180
<v Derek Abbott>Well, to kick off, I'd like to pick up on a point you made, Rodney,

241
00:15:51.240 --> 00:15:55.500
<v Derek Abbott>about we have control over the safety of trains.

242
00:15:55.780 --> 00:15:57.340
<v Derek Abbott>So you say trains are totally safe,

243
00:15:57.440 --> 00:16:01.100
<v Derek Abbott>but the analogy there, I think, is a little weak, perhaps,

244
00:16:01.160 --> 00:16:01.640
<v Derek Abbott>because...

245
00:16:02.080 --> 00:16:06.440
<v Derek Abbott>Trains don't have autonomy, whereas robots do,

246
00:16:06.560 --> 00:16:08.600
<v Derek Abbott>and perhaps the danger is their autonomy.

247
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:10.840
<v Derek Abbott>How can we guarantee safety and autonomy?

248
00:16:11.100 --> 00:16:12.800
<v Rodney Brooks>I would say not so much autonomy,

249
00:16:12.880 --> 00:16:16.660
<v Rodney Brooks>because actually many trains do have autonomy in lots of train systems.

250
00:16:16.780 --> 00:16:17.400
<v Rodney Brooks>It's willfulness.

251
00:16:17.780 --> 00:16:22.300
<v Rodney Brooks>They don't have willfulness, and I think that's an issue.

252
00:16:23.380 --> 00:16:26.700
<v Rodney Brooks>But I think, in the shorter term,

253
00:16:27.960 --> 00:16:31.140
<v Rodney Brooks>we can choose not to build trains with willfulness,

254
00:16:32.080 --> 00:16:33.220
<v Rodney Brooks>and robots with willfulness.

255
00:16:33.620 --> 00:16:36.880
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think in the shorter term, there's going to be a lot of...

256
00:16:36.880 --> 00:16:40.200
<v Rodney Brooks>Within the next 10 years, certainly, maybe within the next five years,

257
00:16:40.420 --> 00:16:44.220
<v Rodney Brooks>there'll be lots of issues that come up about international treaties

258
00:16:44.220 --> 00:16:48.220
<v Rodney Brooks>on the use of robots in warfare, extensions of the Geneva Convention.

259
00:16:48.380 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Rodney Brooks>Should we say that robots are allowed to make autonomous targeting decisions?

260
00:16:55.260 --> 00:16:59.620
<v Rodney Brooks>And we might decide, just as we've decided that biological warfare is a no-no,

261
00:16:59.700 --> 00:17:01.600
<v Rodney Brooks>we might decide that we don't want that.

262
00:17:02.080 --> 00:17:03.360
<v Rodney Brooks>And that might be a prudent decision.

263
00:17:05.640 --> 00:17:06.180
<v Rodney Brooks>Margaret.

264
00:17:07.940 --> 00:17:09.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>That's a very interesting question.

265
00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:11.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>There was a science fiction story, I forget who wrote it,

266
00:17:11.720 --> 00:17:16.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>about the notion that Americans build a supercomputer to take over their...

267
00:17:16.020 --> 00:17:18.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>basically to control their military,

268
00:17:18.200 --> 00:17:21.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>because they decided that these decisions are so complex

269
00:17:21.220 --> 00:17:25.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>that only a supercomputer could factor in all the equations,

270
00:17:25.380 --> 00:17:26.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>and then the Russians build one too.

271
00:17:27.180 --> 00:17:31.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>And very quickly, these two super-controlling machines decide

272
00:17:31.160 --> 00:17:32.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>that the only thing...

273
00:17:32.080 --> 00:17:33.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>worth talking to is each other.

274
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:37.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>And so they basically leave the humans out of the equation altogether.

275
00:17:38.020 --> 00:17:43.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think that does raise the issue of how much control should we hand over to these systems?

276
00:17:44.220 --> 00:17:47.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, we're already facing this problem in things like air traffic control,

277
00:17:48.400 --> 00:17:54.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>as systems, particularly traffic-type situations, get very, very complicated.

278
00:17:54.280 --> 00:17:55.000
<v Rodney Brooks>And the stock market.

279
00:17:55.220 --> 00:17:56.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>And the stock market.

280
00:17:56.260 --> 00:17:59.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>More and more of these kinds of very large-scale organizations,

281
00:18:00.260 --> 00:18:02.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>the decisions are, in fact, being made.

282
00:18:02.080 --> 00:18:02.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>They're being made by machines.

283
00:18:02.880 --> 00:18:06.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>And some people worry that, in fact, there are problems there.

284
00:18:06.200 --> 00:18:08.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>But, of course, then there is the other problem of,

285
00:18:08.060 --> 00:18:10.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>can a human being actually keep track of it all?

286
00:18:11.920 --> 00:18:15.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>So I think in that sense, as you said before, Rodney,

287
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:19.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>that already we are handing over a lot of tasks to machines,

288
00:18:19.780 --> 00:18:23.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>not necessarily robots, but certainly computer systems.

289
00:18:27.440 --> 00:18:30.620
<v Rodney Brooks>At the same time, as you say that, I think we do have to be careful

290
00:18:30.620 --> 00:18:36.300
<v Rodney Brooks>that a lot of our examples in thinking about this do come from science fiction and from movies.

291
00:18:36.500 --> 00:18:41.380
<v Rodney Brooks>And the motivation of the movie makers is to tell a good story that is going to rivet people.

292
00:18:41.700 --> 00:18:46.440
<v Rodney Brooks>And that's not necessarily the same as being a prediction of what the future will be like.

293
00:18:46.880 --> 00:18:51.560
<v Rodney Brooks>So I think these movies are good things to stimulate our thought,

294
00:18:51.700 --> 00:18:57.500
<v Rodney Brooks>but we shouldn't necessarily think that that is the prediction of the future

295
00:18:57.500 --> 00:18:59.020
<v Rodney Brooks>and that is how things are going to unfold.

296
00:18:59.020 --> 00:19:03.320
<v Rodney Brooks>And a good way to look at that is look at any old science fiction movie

297
00:19:03.320 --> 00:19:10.360
<v Rodney Brooks>or any old book written by a technology pundit predicting what the future is going to be like,

298
00:19:10.420 --> 00:19:11.660
<v Rodney Brooks>and they're all pretty much wrong.

299
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:16.040
<v Rodney Brooks>But it does raise questions that we need to start thinking about.

300
00:19:16.220 --> 00:19:21.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think the moral and ethical issues of all these technologies coming together

301
00:19:21.080 --> 00:19:23.860
<v Rodney Brooks>are going to be pretty severe for us over the next few years.

302
00:19:24.060 --> 00:19:29.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes. There was a lovely cartoon in the New Yorker last year that I thought it interesting.

303
00:19:29.020 --> 00:19:30.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>It in many ways summed up this whole issue very well.

304
00:19:30.760 --> 00:19:34.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>There's this guy standing in front of his microwave oven looking at it saying,

305
00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:38.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>no, I don't want to play chess, I just want you to reheat the lasagna.

306
00:19:40.800 --> 00:19:46.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>This is the kind of issue that is being raised in a lot of these films,

307
00:19:46.660 --> 00:19:50.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>like Blade Runner or the new Steven Spielberg film that's just come out in America

308
00:19:50.320 --> 00:19:56.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>called Artificial Intelligence about if we do have these increasingly intelligent machines,

309
00:19:57.520 --> 00:20:01.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>presumably that will come with some emerging level of self-awareness

310
00:20:01.780 --> 00:20:05.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>and what would our responsibility to such beings be.

311
00:20:05.780 --> 00:20:09.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>I suspect we're a fair way from them actually being conscious,

312
00:20:09.440 --> 00:20:12.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>although perhaps you'd like to correct me on that.

313
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:17.880
<v Rodney Brooks>No, actually in my lab we refer to that as the C word and we don't say it.

314
00:20:17.920 --> 00:20:18.140
<v Rodney Brooks>C word.

315
00:20:18.800 --> 00:20:24.800
<v Rodney Brooks>Because my opinion is that no one understands anything about it in any real sense.

316
00:20:25.060 --> 00:20:26.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>But even if you didn't understand it,

317
00:20:26.340 --> 00:20:27.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>it's possible that it could emerge.

318
00:20:29.080 --> 00:20:35.280
<v Rodney Brooks>Yes, but I don't think that's a plausible possibility, but I don't think, yeah, who knows.

319
00:20:36.040 --> 00:20:37.960
<v Derek Abbott>Could you be cruel to a robot?

320
00:20:39.220 --> 00:20:46.600
<v Rodney Brooks>Ah, there was a science fiction story called Beastie 3 and Beastie 4 from about 35 years ago.

321
00:20:47.040 --> 00:20:51.540
<v Rodney Brooks>A small robot, I think this was inspired by the Johns Hopkins Beast,

322
00:20:51.780 --> 00:20:55.340
<v Rodney Brooks>which was a robot built at Johns Hopkins University in the 60s.

323
00:20:55.340 --> 00:21:01.220
<v Rodney Brooks>A robot which went around and plugged itself into power outlets and got its own energy,

324
00:21:01.340 --> 00:21:05.800
<v Rodney Brooks>but it didn't have an off switch and it would run around

325
00:21:07.060 --> 00:21:15.320
<v Rodney Brooks>and if you caught it, you know, it would squeal and run off if you put it down on the ground

326
00:21:15.320 --> 00:21:17.080
<v Rodney Brooks>and you couldn't, because you couldn't switch it off,

327
00:21:17.120 --> 00:21:20.900
<v Rodney Brooks>you had to lock it in a room and starve it where there were no power outlets.

328
00:21:22.340 --> 00:21:24.340
<v Rodney Brooks>And the point of the story was,

329
00:21:24.400 --> 00:21:30.180
<v Rodney Brooks>someone claiming you couldn't be cruel to a robot because they didn't have any emotions,

330
00:21:30.320 --> 00:21:32.760
<v Rodney Brooks>because we're special and we have the emotions, not the robots.

331
00:21:33.000 --> 00:21:36.820
<v Rodney Brooks>And so the protagonist in the story gives it to this woman who's saying this and says,

332
00:21:36.940 --> 00:21:40.920
<v Rodney Brooks>well, you kill it then, and gives her a hammer and it's squealing and,

333
00:21:40.980 --> 00:21:41.140
<v Derek Abbott>ah!

334
00:21:41.940 --> 00:21:44.380
<v Rodney Brooks>And she can't bring herself to do it.

335
00:21:45.600 --> 00:21:47.440
<v Rodney Brooks>So can you be cruel to a robot?

336
00:21:47.560 --> 00:21:51.360
<v Rodney Brooks>I think cruelty is in the eye of the observer and beholder.

337
00:21:51.500 --> 00:21:53.720
<v Rodney Brooks>I mean, that's really, I think,

338
00:21:53.720 --> 00:21:58.480
<v Rodney Brooks>the basis of what we think of cruelty is our empathy for the thing we're being cruel to.

339
00:21:58.760 --> 00:22:02.580
<v Rodney Brooks>And, you know, there's studies that psychopathic killers,

340
00:22:02.800 --> 00:22:05.940
<v Rodney Brooks>you know, when they were children, did horrible things to animals

341
00:22:05.940 --> 00:22:08.300
<v Rodney Brooks>because they didn't feel empathy for the animals.

342
00:22:08.560 --> 00:22:10.580
<v Rodney Brooks>And so I think it gets down to an empathy issue,

343
00:22:10.680 --> 00:22:13.300
<v Rodney Brooks>whether we can identify with that creature.

344
00:22:13.400 --> 00:22:14.780
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think it depends on its behaviour.

345
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:22.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>There's also the philosopher in computer science, Brian Cantwell Smith,

346
00:22:22.160 --> 00:22:23.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>who raised an interesting point about that.

347
00:22:23.720 --> 00:22:28.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>And he says that if you did get some kind of artificial intelligence,

348
00:22:29.520 --> 00:22:32.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>you know, in some form of mechanistic form,

349
00:22:32.920 --> 00:22:35.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>that it would be a differently embodied being

350
00:22:35.720 --> 00:22:39.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>and that perhaps its whole emotional experience of the world would be different

351
00:22:39.480 --> 00:22:41.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>because it had a different embodiment to us.

352
00:22:41.420 --> 00:22:43.820
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I actually think that's a very important point,

353
00:22:43.920 --> 00:22:48.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>is that just because it had the same basic shape as us,

354
00:22:48.500 --> 00:22:50.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>just because it was a humanoid in form,

355
00:22:50.500 --> 00:22:53.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>would not necessarily mean that we should assume,

356
00:22:53.120 --> 00:22:56.760
<v Margaret Wertheim>that its emotional structure would in some sense mirror ours.

357
00:22:57.000 --> 00:22:59.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>Because that's always the sort of underlying premise

358
00:22:59.300 --> 00:23:01.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>of these science fiction books and films,

359
00:23:01.980 --> 00:23:07.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>that they would be like us, only they'd be mechanical rather than organic.

360
00:23:07.600 --> 00:23:08.920
<v Margaret Wertheim>But I think that he's right.

361
00:23:09.000 --> 00:23:12.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>It's not necessarily clear that they would mirror us psychologically.

362
00:23:13.100 --> 00:23:15.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>So maybe they would experience all of those things,

363
00:23:15.340 --> 00:23:19.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>including ethical concepts, very differently than we might imagine.

364
00:23:19.460 --> 00:23:21.660
<v Rodney Brooks>Yeah, but I think we have to remember that at the moment,

365
00:23:21.700 --> 00:23:23.100
<v Rodney Brooks>it certainly depends on how people view it.

366
00:23:23.120 --> 00:23:23.840
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think that's the key to building the robots.

367
00:23:24.000 --> 00:23:27.840
<v Rodney Brooks>So Brian Cantwell Smith's point about the form

368
00:23:27.840 --> 00:23:31.440
<v Rodney Brooks>is also another one that's taken by,

369
00:23:31.640 --> 00:23:33.520
<v Rodney Brooks>and now I have trouble with names,

370
00:23:34.720 --> 00:23:36.980
<v Rodney Brooks>the Berkeley philosopher who wrote

371
00:23:36.980 --> 00:23:38.500
<v Rodney Brooks>Women, Fire and Dangerous Things.

372
00:23:39.080 --> 00:23:41.620
<v Rodney Brooks>Oh, George Lakoff?

373
00:23:41.700 --> 00:23:43.460
<v Rodney Brooks>George Lakoff and Smith,

374
00:23:44.100 --> 00:23:48.260
<v Rodney Brooks>who argue that most of our conceptions of the world

375
00:23:48.260 --> 00:23:50.160
<v Rodney Brooks>are based on bodily metaphors.

376
00:23:50.180 --> 00:23:52.700
<v Rodney Brooks>So that anything with a different bodily form,

377
00:23:52.700 --> 00:23:55.680
<v Rodney Brooks>than us, will have a different basic understanding,

378
00:23:55.840 --> 00:23:58.040
<v Rodney Brooks>a different set of metaphors for the world.

379
00:23:58.200 --> 00:24:00.540
<v Rodney Brooks>Which is one of the reasons that so many people

380
00:24:00.540 --> 00:24:02.040
<v Rodney Brooks>are building robots with human form,

381
00:24:02.220 --> 00:24:05.800
<v Rodney Brooks>so that the robots will have the same sorts of experiences as humans have.

382
00:24:06.380 --> 00:24:10.460
<v Rodney Brooks>Additionally, though, there is this thing that we've observed very strongly,

383
00:24:10.640 --> 00:24:15.620
<v Rodney Brooks>that people seeing the human form react to it in a human-like way,

384
00:24:15.720 --> 00:24:17.360
<v Rodney Brooks>and know how to react to it.

385
00:24:17.740 --> 00:24:19.700
<v Rodney Brooks>Which then accelerates this process.

386
00:24:19.920 --> 00:24:22.460
<v Rodney Brooks>But underneath it all, it's still a matter of what it is,

387
00:24:22.700 --> 00:24:24.340
<v Rodney Brooks>what algorithms, what components,

388
00:24:25.080 --> 00:24:27.680
<v Rodney Brooks>computational components we put inside.

389
00:24:28.460 --> 00:24:32.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>What do you think, Rodney, of this guy, Stuart Wilkinson,

390
00:24:32.060 --> 00:24:34.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>who's making robots that eat,

391
00:24:34.480 --> 00:24:38.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than get their power from batteries or electricity,

392
00:24:38.740 --> 00:24:40.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>you know, just going down in Florida?

393
00:24:40.880 --> 00:24:43.360
<v Rodney Brooks>Yeah, there's actually a couple of other projects,

394
00:24:43.460 --> 00:24:44.880
<v Rodney Brooks>one at the University of West England,

395
00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:47.140
<v Rodney Brooks>and another one at Helsinki Institute of Technology,

396
00:24:48.980 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Rodney Brooks>where, you know, one of the aspects of what we're doing,

397
00:24:52.700 --> 00:24:53.220
<v Rodney Brooks>is that we're building living systems,

398
00:24:53.340 --> 00:24:55.180
<v Rodney Brooks>as they all supply their own energy,

399
00:24:56.860 --> 00:24:59.760
<v Rodney Brooks>and they do it by taking organic material

400
00:24:59.760 --> 00:25:02.060
<v Rodney Brooks>and decomposing it and getting energy out of that.

401
00:25:02.320 --> 00:25:03.760
<v Rodney Brooks>And so a few people are working on that.

402
00:25:04.020 --> 00:25:08.260
<v Rodney Brooks>But I think, even getting away from philosophy,

403
00:25:08.380 --> 00:25:11.100
<v Rodney Brooks>there's interesting technological reasons to do that.

404
00:25:11.180 --> 00:25:13.520
<v Rodney Brooks>An insect can fly around for days

405
00:25:14.140 --> 00:25:19.720
<v Rodney Brooks>with the energy that it's sort of gathered from around the world,

406
00:25:19.800 --> 00:25:20.840
<v Rodney Brooks>eating very simple things.

407
00:25:20.840 --> 00:25:25.060
<v Rodney Brooks>So building robots which could be self-sufficient

408
00:25:25.060 --> 00:25:27.080
<v Rodney Brooks>is much better than our current robots,

409
00:25:27.260 --> 00:25:30.360
<v Rodney Brooks>which rarely can last more than three or four hours on battery charges.

410
00:25:33.280 --> 00:25:35.060
<v Rodney Brooks>If that's ultimately successful,

411
00:25:35.500 --> 00:25:38.280
<v Rodney Brooks>then it may impinge on the philosophical debate.

412
00:25:38.420 --> 00:25:42.300
<v Rodney Brooks>I think it's a long way away from that at the moment.

413
00:25:42.560 --> 00:25:43.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes. Yes, I mean, at the moment,

414
00:25:43.820 --> 00:25:46.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>he certainly seems to be focusing on getting robots

415
00:25:46.560 --> 00:25:49.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>that could do things in an agricultural setting.

416
00:25:49.660 --> 00:25:50.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>But...

417
00:25:50.840 --> 00:25:51.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>..that being a problem,

418
00:25:51.720 --> 00:25:53.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>because they are always away from power sources.

419
00:25:54.020 --> 00:25:56.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>But one of the things that he talks about,

420
00:25:56.040 --> 00:25:57.620
<v Margaret Wertheim>which I think is quite an interesting idea,

421
00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:00.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>is that he believes that it's not impossible

422
00:26:00.640 --> 00:26:03.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>that you could use what he calls them gastro-bots,

423
00:26:03.920 --> 00:26:08.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>because, you know, they have a gastroenterological system, basically.

424
00:26:08.660 --> 00:26:12.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>And he suggested that, in fact, we could build these

425
00:26:12.440 --> 00:26:15.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>to solve various environmental problems,

426
00:26:15.420 --> 00:26:18.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>things like, in Florida, where he lives,

427
00:26:18.520 --> 00:26:20.180
<v Margaret Wertheim>this vine called kudzu

428
00:26:20.180 --> 00:26:23.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>has taken over large areas, including the Everglades.

429
00:26:23.700 --> 00:26:25.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>And he suggested you could make thousands

430
00:26:25.800 --> 00:26:28.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>of these little kudzu-eating robots,

431
00:26:29.240 --> 00:26:32.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>and they would be specifically tuned chemically,

432
00:26:32.100 --> 00:26:33.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>so that was the only thing they could digest,

433
00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:35.980
<v Margaret Wertheim>and that you could send them out into the environment

434
00:26:36.540 --> 00:26:38.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>and get them to eat all the kudzu.

435
00:26:38.660 --> 00:26:40.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>And basically, when the kudzu ran out,

436
00:26:40.420 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>they would run out of a food source,

437
00:26:42.400 --> 00:26:45.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>and that this could be a way to sort of solve

438
00:26:45.400 --> 00:26:50.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>a lot of the environmental problems of, you know, exotic imported species.

439
00:26:50.800 --> 00:26:54.300
<v Rodney Brooks>Our experience with using other biological systems

440
00:26:54.300 --> 00:26:55.640
<v Rodney Brooks>to do that hasn't been good.

441
00:26:55.740 --> 00:26:56.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>No. No.

442
00:26:57.460 --> 00:27:01.980
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, but his point is that nothing, because they would be...

443
00:27:01.980 --> 00:27:02.740
<v Rodney Brooks>Nothing can go wrong?

444
00:27:02.960 --> 00:27:04.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>Nothing, well, yes, nothing.

445
00:27:05.160 --> 00:27:05.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>Exactly.

446
00:27:05.880 --> 00:27:08.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>But it's kind of an interesting approach to the problem, I thought.

447
00:27:09.940 --> 00:27:12.360
<v Derek Abbott>I guess you could turn them off with radio control.

448
00:27:15.280 --> 00:27:18.700
<v Derek Abbott>Let me take you to this idea of...

449
00:27:18.700 --> 00:27:20.380
<v Derek Abbott>You were mentioning, Rodney, earlier,

450
00:27:20.380 --> 00:27:23.280
<v Derek Abbott>merging us with the robots,

451
00:27:25.100 --> 00:27:29.220
<v Derek Abbott>with all these cochlear implants and eye implants,

452
00:27:29.480 --> 00:27:32.740
<v Derek Abbott>and then we potentially one day will have more and more stuff,

453
00:27:32.920 --> 00:27:35.480
<v Derek Abbott>and then this leads to the question,

454
00:27:35.540 --> 00:27:38.100
<v Derek Abbott>what will be the difference between us and robots?

455
00:27:39.400 --> 00:27:41.660
<v Derek Abbott>It raises the question, what is life?

456
00:27:41.760 --> 00:27:42.540
<v Derek Abbott>What is us?

457
00:27:43.200 --> 00:27:46.640
<v Derek Abbott>Can I perhaps throw that open to you to discuss that?

458
00:27:46.880 --> 00:27:48.200
<v Rodney Brooks>I think I'll let Margaret handle it.

459
00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:49.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>What is life?

460
00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:54.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, I can't pretend that I have an answer to the question,

461
00:27:54.980 --> 00:27:56.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>what is life?

462
00:27:57.180 --> 00:27:59.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>Obviously, people have been asking that question

463
00:27:59.520 --> 00:28:01.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>for thousands and thousands of years,

464
00:28:01.440 --> 00:28:03.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>perhaps since the beginning of human life.

465
00:28:05.960 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that Rodney is right,

466
00:28:07.780 --> 00:28:09.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>that we're definitely heading into a future

467
00:28:09.540 --> 00:28:14.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>where there will be more and more prosthetic implants in human beings

468
00:28:14.360 --> 00:28:17.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>and therefore that in some sense we are going to become,

469
00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:20.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>more fused, perhaps even one with machines.

470
00:28:21.220 --> 00:28:24.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that there will be mechanisms,

471
00:28:24.980 --> 00:28:27.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>as science fiction novels have predicted,

472
00:28:27.180 --> 00:28:30.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>potentially for having direct neural implants

473
00:28:30.840 --> 00:28:36.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>that would enable you to be connected to the net via radio or whatever,

474
00:28:36.380 --> 00:28:38.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>through something implanted in your brain.

475
00:28:38.800 --> 00:28:41.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>And so I think that there will be that kind of merging

476
00:28:41.060 --> 00:28:43.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>of the mechanical and the organic.

477
00:28:43.640 --> 00:28:46.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>And that actually doesn't particularly bother me.

478
00:28:46.240 --> 00:28:46.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, it's...

479
00:28:46.940 --> 00:28:51.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't find that really problematic in a lot of ways.

480
00:28:53.560 --> 00:28:55.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that there is, however...

481
00:28:56.900 --> 00:28:59.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>In a way, I would prefer to see the question sort of...

482
00:28:59.860 --> 00:29:02.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>that kind of discussion framed in terms of

483
00:29:02.460 --> 00:29:07.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>why is it that we see the organic becoming the mechanical,

484
00:29:07.940 --> 00:29:12.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>perhaps rather than seeing the machine becoming organic in some way.

485
00:29:12.900 --> 00:29:16.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't know what the difference between life and non-life is,

486
00:29:16.120 --> 00:29:20.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>but life clearly does have some incredibly special characteristics,

487
00:29:20.280 --> 00:29:22.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>which perhaps emerges in a continuum.

488
00:29:22.760 --> 00:29:25.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, a virus, it's sort of a bit...

489
00:29:26.120 --> 00:29:28.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>Is a virus a living thing or not?

490
00:29:28.180 --> 00:29:29.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>It's almost like a chemical machine

491
00:29:29.700 --> 00:29:33.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>that's sort of hovering on the verge of organicness.

492
00:29:33.720 --> 00:29:34.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>So...

493
00:29:34.320 --> 00:29:38.760
<v Margaret Wertheim>But life, when we get to the level of animals or plants, humans,

494
00:29:39.180 --> 00:29:42.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>there clearly is some extraordinary thing about life.

495
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:45.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>And it seems to me what I'd like to kind of see is...

496
00:29:45.500 --> 00:29:48.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>the discussion framed in terms of...

497
00:29:50.300 --> 00:29:53.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>..bringing the machines up to the life in some way,

498
00:29:53.220 --> 00:29:57.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than sort of reducing the humans to the concept of a machine,

499
00:29:57.920 --> 00:30:00.180
<v Margaret Wertheim>which I think most people would feel is a reduction

500
00:30:00.180 --> 00:30:02.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than an elevation.

501
00:30:03.460 --> 00:30:06.500
<v Rodney Brooks>Well, I think that's the implicit assumption

502
00:30:06.500 --> 00:30:08.160
<v Rodney Brooks>of modern molecular biology,

503
00:30:08.420 --> 00:30:11.180
<v Rodney Brooks>that, even though it's not necessarily acknowledged,

504
00:30:11.300 --> 00:30:13.380
<v Rodney Brooks>that we are biological machines.

505
00:30:13.460 --> 00:30:13.740
<v Rodney Brooks>Machines, yes.

506
00:30:13.740 --> 00:30:15.240
<v Rodney Brooks>It's these biological molecules

507
00:30:15.240 --> 00:30:17.540
<v Rodney Brooks>that are interacting in some lawful way.

508
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:19.320
<v Rodney Brooks>Now, it may turn out

509
00:30:20.680 --> 00:30:24.260
<v Rodney Brooks>that there is some other physics that we don't know about,

510
00:30:24.380 --> 00:30:27.600
<v Rodney Brooks>you know, in the same way that Newtonian physics worked pretty well

511
00:30:27.600 --> 00:30:29.780
<v Rodney Brooks>as long as the velocities weren't too high

512
00:30:29.780 --> 00:30:31.260
<v Rodney Brooks>or the energies too large.

513
00:30:31.540 --> 00:30:35.260
<v Rodney Brooks>And when either of those things was violated,

514
00:30:35.280 --> 00:30:37.400
<v Rodney Brooks>it turned out some terms became non-zero,

515
00:30:37.480 --> 00:30:39.580
<v Rodney Brooks>which were close to zero in Newtonian physics,

516
00:30:39.660 --> 00:30:41.220
<v Rodney Brooks>and we had to invent new sorts of physics

517
00:30:41.220 --> 00:30:43.080
<v Rodney Brooks>at the beginning of the 20th century.

518
00:30:43.740 --> 00:30:46.520
<v Rodney Brooks>Physics has pretty much shied away

519
00:30:46.520 --> 00:30:48.320
<v Rodney Brooks>from trying to understand living systems.

520
00:30:48.420 --> 00:30:50.640
<v Rodney Brooks>Schrodinger and others looked at it

521
00:30:50.640 --> 00:30:53.200
<v Rodney Brooks>but didn't have a really good go at it.

522
00:30:53.500 --> 00:30:57.260
<v Rodney Brooks>It may turn out that there's some new physics

523
00:30:57.260 --> 00:30:58.920
<v Rodney Brooks>that's necessary to explain life,

524
00:30:58.980 --> 00:31:01.340
<v Rodney Brooks>and David Chalmers, originally from Adelaide,

525
00:31:01.480 --> 00:31:03.160
<v Rodney Brooks>has talked about that extensively.

526
00:31:04.120 --> 00:31:08.020
<v Rodney Brooks>Or it may turn out that it's nothing more

527
00:31:08.020 --> 00:31:10.440
<v Rodney Brooks>than the physics and chemistry that we currently understand

528
00:31:10.440 --> 00:31:11.740
<v Rodney Brooks>but some way of the organization

529
00:31:12.340 --> 00:31:13.720
<v Rodney Brooks>that we still can't quite understand.

530
00:31:13.740 --> 00:31:14.980
<v Rodney Brooks>we should put a finger on.

531
00:31:15.840 --> 00:31:19.200
<v Rodney Brooks>But I think even without knowing that deep question,

532
00:31:20.680 --> 00:31:24.120
<v Rodney Brooks>the 50 years we've had of analytical biochemistry

533
00:31:24.120 --> 00:31:25.940
<v Rodney Brooks>and all the tools that have been developed

534
00:31:25.940 --> 00:31:28.380
<v Rodney Brooks>are now getting into the hands of engineers

535
00:31:28.380 --> 00:31:32.480
<v Rodney Brooks>and people are starting to engineer the living systems

536
00:31:32.480 --> 00:31:37.260
<v Rodney Brooks>without fully understanding how the whole system works.

537
00:31:37.300 --> 00:31:41.380
<v Rodney Brooks>So we will see new sorts of machines

538
00:31:41.380 --> 00:31:45.000
<v Rodney Brooks>based on biology coming along more and more.

539
00:31:45.320 --> 00:31:45.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes.

540
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:51.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, the point I was trying to sort of get at was the will we.

541
00:31:51.860 --> 00:31:56.580
<v Margaret Wertheim>Is it a matter of seeing all of the living things being,

542
00:31:56.800 --> 00:31:59.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>if you like, seen as machines

543
00:31:59.320 --> 00:32:02.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>or perhaps ultimately seeing the machines becoming,

544
00:32:02.580 --> 00:32:03.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>in some sense, alive?

545
00:32:05.720 --> 00:32:08.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think it's a psychological point,

546
00:32:09.500 --> 00:32:10.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>but...

547
00:32:11.800 --> 00:32:14.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>I've always found there's a problem with the discussion

548
00:32:14.640 --> 00:32:17.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>about calling living things machines.

549
00:32:18.320 --> 00:32:20.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, obviously, in some sense, we are machines.

550
00:32:21.640 --> 00:32:25.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>But there is something different between me and this microphone.

551
00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:27.580
<v Margaret Wertheim>It can't reproduce.

552
00:32:28.120 --> 00:32:29.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>It doesn't have desires.

553
00:32:29.980 --> 00:32:32.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>It doesn't hope for the future.

554
00:32:33.320 --> 00:32:35.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think that there is...

555
00:32:35.520 --> 00:32:37.820
<v Rodney Brooks>But does my robot Kismet have desires?

556
00:32:38.340 --> 00:32:38.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes.

557
00:32:38.760 --> 00:32:39.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, that is...

558
00:32:39.380 --> 00:32:43.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>But see, I'd be more inclined to wish to call Kismet a living thing

559
00:32:43.520 --> 00:32:45.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than call myself a machine.

560
00:32:46.860 --> 00:32:49.000
<v Rodney Brooks>You're clinging to that specialness, aren't you?

561
00:32:49.140 --> 00:32:49.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>I am.

562
00:32:49.320 --> 00:32:50.460
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, it isn't.

563
00:32:51.340 --> 00:32:54.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, actually, yes, actually, in a way I am,

564
00:32:54.120 --> 00:32:55.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>because I think that...

565
00:32:56.680 --> 00:32:59.820
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that there is something special about life.

566
00:33:00.780 --> 00:33:03.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>However, that said, I do also believe that there's probably a continuum.

567
00:33:03.880 --> 00:33:08.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, I'm quite prepared to extend the realm of what...

568
00:33:08.420 --> 00:33:10.920
<v Margaret Wertheim>to believe that there is a continuous spectrum

569
00:33:10.920 --> 00:33:12.640
<v Margaret Wertheim>between the living and the non-living.

570
00:33:12.740 --> 00:33:15.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think Graham K. and Smith puts up a very good argument

571
00:33:15.060 --> 00:33:19.620
<v Margaret Wertheim>for the notion of clays as some very simple form of living organism.

572
00:33:20.960 --> 00:33:24.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>And viruses are obviously not fully living

573
00:33:24.120 --> 00:33:29.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>because they need to harness the DNA structures of other cells to reproduce.

574
00:33:29.100 --> 00:33:30.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>They cannot do it on their own.

575
00:33:30.680 --> 00:33:33.640
<v Rodney Brooks>Same argument that you guys made that men are not fully living

576
00:33:33.640 --> 00:33:36.040
<v Rodney Brooks>because they need to harness women in order to reproduce.

577
00:33:36.620 --> 00:33:37.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes.

578
00:33:37.100 --> 00:33:38.820
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, I think most of us would agree with that.

579
00:33:40.200 --> 00:33:41.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>Oh, I don't know about that.

580
00:33:43.160 --> 00:33:44.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>But, you know, I think there is a spectrum

581
00:33:44.960 --> 00:33:47.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>between the organic and the non-organic.

582
00:33:47.560 --> 00:33:49.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I'm not even...

583
00:33:49.100 --> 00:33:52.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>You know, people like Leibniz, of course, and Alfred North Whitehead

584
00:33:52.940 --> 00:33:56.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>have speculated that, in a sense, that the whole world,

585
00:33:57.220 --> 00:34:01.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>even right down to the atom, should be seen as in some way living.

586
00:34:02.680 --> 00:34:05.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I rather like that kind of a concept

587
00:34:05.040 --> 00:34:06.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>of sort of incorporating...

588
00:34:07.100 --> 00:34:09.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>the maximal possible into the realm of the living

589
00:34:09.320 --> 00:34:10.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than sort of...

590
00:34:10.440 --> 00:34:12.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>like lumping it all into the category of the living

591
00:34:12.900 --> 00:34:14.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than the mechanical,

592
00:34:14.840 --> 00:34:16.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>which at least in most people's mind

593
00:34:16.460 --> 00:34:21.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>sort of connotes something a bit less interesting, I think.

594
00:34:22.040 --> 00:34:26.540
<v Rodney Brooks>I understand your desire to do that,

595
00:34:26.620 --> 00:34:30.600
<v Rodney Brooks>but I think that we're probably still missing

596
00:34:30.600 --> 00:34:32.260
<v Rodney Brooks>some fundamental understanding,

597
00:34:33.060 --> 00:34:36.340
<v Rodney Brooks>which at some later point will help us...

598
00:34:37.800 --> 00:34:42.200
<v Rodney Brooks>understand that spectrum much better than we can now,

599
00:34:42.400 --> 00:34:44.860
<v Rodney Brooks>because we see it as poles right now,

600
00:34:44.940 --> 00:34:47.760
<v Rodney Brooks>because we have only very crude understandings.

601
00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:50.820
<v Rodney Brooks>Perhaps we will have some better understanding

602
00:34:50.820 --> 00:34:52.920
<v Rodney Brooks>which will let us classify things,

603
00:34:53.120 --> 00:34:54.680
<v Rodney Brooks>not just for classification's sake,

604
00:34:54.820 --> 00:34:55.880
<v Rodney Brooks>but to understand the relationship

605
00:34:56.320 --> 00:34:59.240
<v Rodney Brooks>between living and non-living better in the future.

606
00:34:59.860 --> 00:35:02.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yeah, well, I mean, a lot of people have believed,

607
00:35:02.500 --> 00:35:04.580
<v Margaret Wertheim>and I'm inclined to agree with this concept,

608
00:35:04.680 --> 00:35:06.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>that there is actually a fundamental...

609
00:35:07.700 --> 00:35:09.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>philosophical problem in the West

610
00:35:09.340 --> 00:35:12.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>because of the way that we have classified things.

611
00:35:12.340 --> 00:35:13.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>But it strikes me...

612
00:35:13.360 --> 00:35:16.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>And the fundamental classification that it brings up

613
00:35:16.040 --> 00:35:18.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>is the one between matter and mind,

614
00:35:18.520 --> 00:35:21.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>because we want to class things in terms of

615
00:35:21.300 --> 00:35:24.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>this is just matter, and then we clearly have minds.

616
00:35:24.940 --> 00:35:28.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>And where does the mental aspect of the world come into being,

617
00:35:28.540 --> 00:35:30.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>which is clearly a big aspect of living?

618
00:35:31.160 --> 00:35:35.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>And it seems to me that that mind-matter dichotomy,

619
00:35:35.220 --> 00:35:37.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>which runs through so much Western thought,

620
00:35:37.240 --> 00:35:39.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>is absolutely at the heart of this thing

621
00:35:39.140 --> 00:35:40.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>of what's living and what's not.

622
00:35:41.100 --> 00:35:43.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>And apparently some other cultures

623
00:35:43.000 --> 00:35:44.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>who don't have this harsh distinction

624
00:35:44.900 --> 00:35:47.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>between matter and mind

625
00:35:47.100 --> 00:35:48.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>that sort of classify the world in different ways

626
00:35:49.680 --> 00:35:52.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>don't actually have this dilemma that we have.

627
00:35:52.660 --> 00:35:55.120
<v Rodney Brooks>Yes, but you might still have it from an engineering point of view.

628
00:35:55.160 --> 00:35:58.340
<v Rodney Brooks>But let me just pick up on the matter-mind thing.

629
00:35:58.600 --> 00:36:00.420
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think this is an important...

630
00:36:00.420 --> 00:36:01.720
<v Rodney Brooks>brings up an important point

631
00:36:01.720 --> 00:36:04.960
<v Rodney Brooks>about the way we think about things and the metaphors we use,

632
00:36:04.960 --> 00:36:07.320
<v Rodney Brooks>how that affects the way we work.

633
00:36:07.700 --> 00:36:11.240
<v Rodney Brooks>You know, right now, many people view mind

634
00:36:11.240 --> 00:36:15.020
<v Rodney Brooks>as the software that runs on the hardware of the brain.

635
00:36:15.800 --> 00:36:19.300
<v Rodney Brooks>But, you know, if we look over historical times

636
00:36:19.300 --> 00:36:20.660
<v Rodney Brooks>at what the brain has been,

637
00:36:21.200 --> 00:36:23.880
<v Rodney Brooks>the brain at one point was a hydrodynamic system,

638
00:36:24.080 --> 00:36:25.900
<v Rodney Brooks>and later it was a steam engine.

639
00:36:26.260 --> 00:36:28.560
<v Rodney Brooks>And when I was a kid here in Adelaide,

640
00:36:28.600 --> 00:36:30.500
<v Rodney Brooks>I had a How and Why Wonder book

641
00:36:31.300 --> 00:36:34.100
<v Rodney Brooks>which said the brain was a telephone switching network.

642
00:36:34.100 --> 00:36:36.300
<v Rodney Brooks>And then later in the 60s,

643
00:36:36.300 --> 00:36:37.800
<v Rodney Brooks>the brain became a digital computer.

644
00:36:38.040 --> 00:36:40.840
<v Rodney Brooks>And then it became a massively parallel digital computer.

645
00:36:41.120 --> 00:36:43.580
<v Rodney Brooks>And I bet there's a kid's book out there somewhere

646
00:36:43.580 --> 00:36:45.240
<v Rodney Brooks>that says it's the World Wide Web,

647
00:36:45.360 --> 00:36:46.180
<v Rodney Brooks>with associations.

648
00:36:46.860 --> 00:36:49.040
<v Rodney Brooks>So we're always using the metaphor

649
00:36:49.040 --> 00:36:51.280
<v Rodney Brooks>of the most advanced technology we have.

650
00:36:51.340 --> 00:36:52.620
<v Rodney Brooks>That's what the brain must be.

651
00:36:52.800 --> 00:36:56.040
<v Rodney Brooks>And I suspect we don't have it right yet.

652
00:36:56.240 --> 00:36:58.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yeah. There's actually a book that's just come out

653
00:36:58.660 --> 00:37:00.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>from Cambridge University Press on this,

654
00:37:00.320 --> 00:37:01.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>a bit called Machine Dreams.

655
00:37:01.660 --> 00:37:03.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>And it goes right back to Plato

656
00:37:03.360 --> 00:37:05.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>and apparently in Plato's day,

657
00:37:05.220 --> 00:37:07.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>the mind was seen like a clay tablet

658
00:37:07.220 --> 00:37:09.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>which you, you know, impress the forms on.

659
00:37:09.820 --> 00:37:12.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>So it's exactly that point that has been going on

660
00:37:12.240 --> 00:37:13.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>for two and a half thousand years

661
00:37:13.360 --> 00:37:15.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>of reflecting the mind in terms of whatever

662
00:37:15.260 --> 00:37:16.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>is the latest technology.

663
00:37:17.180 --> 00:37:18.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I quite agree.

664
00:37:18.660 --> 00:37:21.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, all of those, now the notion of the mind

665
00:37:21.040 --> 00:37:23.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>is just some information processing system.

666
00:37:24.020 --> 00:37:25.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>Or indeed the entire world, universe,

667
00:37:26.000 --> 00:37:28.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>is just a pattern of information processing

668
00:37:28.600 --> 00:37:31.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>that's going on on the hardware of the atoms.

669
00:37:31.980 --> 00:37:33.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>I'm sure that will, in 50 years,

670
00:37:33.360 --> 00:37:37.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>be just as passe as the telephone switching network.

671
00:37:38.260 --> 00:37:42.160
<v Rodney Brooks>But the original topic of this was

672
00:37:42.160 --> 00:37:43.380
<v Rodney Brooks>will the machines take over?

673
00:37:43.600 --> 00:37:45.720
<v Rodney Brooks>And I haven't heard you express an opinion.

674
00:37:46.240 --> 00:37:48.320
<v Rodney Brooks>I expressed many contradictory opinions.

675
00:37:51.960 --> 00:37:55.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, the notion of will the machines take over

676
00:37:55.060 --> 00:37:58.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>in the sense of something like Blade Runner or Matrix

677
00:37:58.080 --> 00:38:00.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>or this new film, Artificial Intelligence,

678
00:38:01.760 --> 00:38:03.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>I personally don't think

679
00:38:03.360 --> 00:38:07.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't see that as something to worry about at all.

680
00:38:08.340 --> 00:38:13.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that the machines are already taking over

681
00:38:13.160 --> 00:38:16.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>in the sense that we are giving them,

682
00:38:16.380 --> 00:38:19.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>we are giving our machines so much more control

683
00:38:19.660 --> 00:38:24.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>over every aspect, so many practical aspects of our lives.

684
00:38:24.140 --> 00:38:28.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>In, for instance, cars that have got, you know,

685
00:38:29.820 --> 00:38:33.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>have got a connector to GPS systems and can tell you,

686
00:38:33.140 --> 00:38:35.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>how to get where you want to go.

687
00:38:35.160 --> 00:38:38.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>And there's talk now about having intelligent roads

688
00:38:38.200 --> 00:38:40.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>that would effectively guide your cars.

689
00:38:40.140 --> 00:38:43.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>So it seems to me that we are, in a sense,

690
00:38:45.500 --> 00:38:48.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>imparting to our machines consciously and willingly

691
00:38:48.100 --> 00:38:51.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>and often, you know, with great happiness,

692
00:38:51.300 --> 00:38:56.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>giving them aspect, control over aspects of our lives

693
00:38:56.140 --> 00:38:58.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>that we once had to do for ourselves.

694
00:38:58.640 --> 00:39:01.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>So in that sense, I think that the machines are.

695
00:39:01.560 --> 00:39:02.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, I don't know if we,

696
00:39:02.440 --> 00:39:04.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't know if it's the word taking over,

697
00:39:04.520 --> 00:39:08.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>but they are, I think, taking control in some sense

698
00:39:08.360 --> 00:39:12.760
<v Margaret Wertheim>of a lot more things that we used to have to do completely on our own.

699
00:39:13.040 --> 00:39:15.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>But that, I think, is not a bad thing.

700
00:39:15.640 --> 00:39:20.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't necessarily see the machines as taking over us,

701
00:39:20.580 --> 00:39:22.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>as supplanting us in terms of, you know,

702
00:39:22.720 --> 00:39:25.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>they are the next order of evolutionary step forward,

703
00:39:25.820 --> 00:39:27.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>which is what a lot of science fiction has suggested.

704
00:39:27.860 --> 00:39:31.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>That I don't see happening and I don't worry about it

705
00:39:31.240 --> 00:39:33.620
<v Margaret Wertheim>because I do think that we,

706
00:39:33.740 --> 00:39:37.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>for all of our machine-like qualities,

707
00:39:38.600 --> 00:39:43.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>also have these incredible minds that I don't see being supplanted.

708
00:39:43.700 --> 00:39:45.760
<v Rodney Brooks>Ah, so you are relying on the specialness argument.

709
00:39:46.340 --> 00:39:48.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>I do think that humans,

710
00:39:50.020 --> 00:39:52.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>not because we are intrinsically special,

711
00:39:52.680 --> 00:39:58.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>but just because it's taken evolution four billion years to get to us

712
00:39:58.480 --> 00:40:00.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>and we are incredibly sophisticated,

713
00:40:00.220 --> 00:40:01.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>and we are, you know,

714
00:40:01.240 --> 00:40:01.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>we are intelligent entities

715
00:40:01.480 --> 00:40:04.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>and I don't think that human beings can compete with that

716
00:40:04.140 --> 00:40:05.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>in the next few hundred years.

717
00:40:05.540 --> 00:40:06.740
<v Rodney Brooks>But machines can compete with that.

718
00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:08.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, we will not be,

719
00:40:08.200 --> 00:40:10.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>I don't believe that we will be able to,

720
00:40:10.200 --> 00:40:12.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>over the next few hundred years,

721
00:40:13.440 --> 00:40:17.920
<v Margaret Wertheim>evolve something that would compete with four billion years of evolution.

722
00:40:18.760 --> 00:40:19.200
<v Rodney Brooks>So...

723
00:40:19.200 --> 00:40:22.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>It's not a specialness in the eyes of God, it's simply...

724
00:40:22.100 --> 00:40:24.660
<v Rodney Brooks>Yeah, but there's an answer to that in that maybe we,

725
00:40:25.180 --> 00:40:28.540
<v Rodney Brooks>you know, maybe we are not smart enough to build really intelligent machines.

726
00:40:28.640 --> 00:40:31.220
<v Rodney Brooks>You know, you look at a raccoon and a raccoon is very dexterous.

727
00:40:31.220 --> 00:40:32.600
<v Rodney Brooks>They are incredible.

728
00:40:32.860 --> 00:40:36.900
<v Rodney Brooks>But you don't tend to think that a raccoon is going to build an artificial raccoon.

729
00:40:38.440 --> 00:40:43.580
<v Rodney Brooks>And the entities at Alpha Centauri might look down on us here on Earth,

730
00:40:43.700 --> 00:40:45.200
<v Rodney Brooks>and especially at my lab, the AI lab,

731
00:40:45.240 --> 00:40:46.600
<v Rodney Brooks>and look at those silly little humans.

732
00:40:46.680 --> 00:40:49.660
<v Rodney Brooks>They think they've got to be able to build something as clever as them.

733
00:40:49.660 --> 00:40:51.240
<v Rodney Brooks>So they're not smart enough to do that.

734
00:40:52.880 --> 00:40:57.940
<v Rodney Brooks>So the answer to that is, well, maybe then we can set up artificial evolution systems.

735
00:40:58.260 --> 00:41:00.080
<v Rodney Brooks>And have the systems evolve.

736
00:41:00.080 --> 00:41:03.180
<v Rodney Brooks>And that was a big push in the mid-90s,

737
00:41:03.180 --> 00:41:06.840
<v Rodney Brooks>which has sort of petered out because the artificial evolution systems

738
00:41:06.840 --> 00:41:08.360
<v Rodney Brooks>are not working as well as we'd hoped.

739
00:41:08.460 --> 00:41:12.960
<v Rodney Brooks>But maybe that just is part of this general problem that we don't quite understand life.

740
00:41:13.140 --> 00:41:18.140
<v Rodney Brooks>And we might hit upon a critical aspect of those artificial evolution systems

741
00:41:18.140 --> 00:41:22.580
<v Rodney Brooks>and be able to evolve the robots without us understanding them.

742
00:41:22.800 --> 00:41:27.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, I definitely think that artificial evolutionary systems are going to happen.

743
00:41:27.200 --> 00:41:30.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, there already are people doing successful software,

744
00:41:30.080 --> 00:41:33.580
<v Margaret Wertheim>software production by artificially evolving software packages

745
00:41:33.580 --> 00:41:36.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>rather than getting someone to sit down and code it.

746
00:41:36.780 --> 00:41:41.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>They let the software effectively evolve itself towards a solution.

747
00:41:41.740 --> 00:41:43.980
<v Margaret Wertheim>And there are already products on the market that have come from that.

748
00:41:44.080 --> 00:41:46.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>So I think that will definitely happen.

749
00:41:46.300 --> 00:41:51.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>But my feeling is, look, it did take organic evolution four billion years

750
00:41:51.800 --> 00:41:54.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>to get to anything like a mammal.

751
00:41:56.740 --> 00:41:57.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>If it could...

752
00:41:57.680 --> 00:41:59.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>If evolution could suddenly...

753
00:42:00.080 --> 00:42:03.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>go off with a huge spurt and happen very quickly,

754
00:42:04.140 --> 00:42:08.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>I would have thought that we would have seen something like that happen in nature.

755
00:42:09.040 --> 00:42:11.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>And in fact, we do know that historically in nature,

756
00:42:11.600 --> 00:42:13.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>evolution seems to sort of...

757
00:42:13.320 --> 00:42:17.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>There seems to be plateaus where not a lot happens for hundreds of millions of years

758
00:42:17.000 --> 00:42:21.180
<v Margaret Wertheim>and then suddenly there's great change over a relatively fast period of time.

759
00:42:21.220 --> 00:42:23.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>But we're still talking over a couple of million years.

760
00:42:23.060 --> 00:42:24.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>That's the theory of punctuated evolution.

761
00:42:25.320 --> 00:42:28.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>So while I do believe that artificial evolution

762
00:42:28.860 --> 00:42:31.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>will be an increasingly important thing in the future,

763
00:42:31.940 --> 00:42:34.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>I suspect that one thing we do...

764
00:42:34.860 --> 00:42:37.180
<v Margaret Wertheim>It seems to me that biology teaches us,

765
00:42:37.220 --> 00:42:39.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>the study of living systems teaches us,

766
00:42:39.180 --> 00:42:43.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>is that life is very much more complex than we first imagined.

767
00:42:44.300 --> 00:42:46.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>And so I think that it will take...

768
00:42:46.940 --> 00:42:49.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>Even with artificial evolution systems,

769
00:42:49.280 --> 00:42:52.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>it will still prove to be a long process.

770
00:42:52.540 --> 00:42:55.700
<v Rodney Brooks>Of course, we do have one advantage with our artificial evolution systems

771
00:42:55.700 --> 00:42:58.200
<v Rodney Brooks>in that we may be able to engineer them to be Lamarckian...

772
00:42:58.200 --> 00:42:58.780
<v Rodney Brooks>We can direct them.

773
00:42:58.780 --> 00:42:59.800
<v Rodney Brooks>...but purely Darwinian...

774
00:42:59.800 --> 00:43:00.280
<v Rodney Brooks>Yes.

775
00:43:00.320 --> 00:43:02.700
<v Rodney Brooks>...which may have accelerating concepts.

776
00:43:03.240 --> 00:43:03.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes.

777
00:43:03.540 --> 00:43:03.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yes.

778
00:43:04.680 --> 00:43:05.860
<v Derek Abbott>Without further ado,

779
00:43:06.020 --> 00:43:09.260
<v Derek Abbott>I think it's now time to throw this debate open to the audience.

780
00:43:10.200 --> 00:43:14.540
<v Derek Abbott>Now, we have a microphone, do we, for the audience?

781
00:43:14.940 --> 00:43:15.880
<v Derek Abbott>Up there.

782
00:43:16.220 --> 00:43:17.080
<v Derek Abbott>Some up there.

783
00:43:17.380 --> 00:43:17.900
<v Derek Abbott>Yeah.

784
00:43:17.920 --> 00:43:19.520
<v Derek Abbott>If you'd like to queue up...

785
00:43:19.520 --> 00:43:20.280
<v Derek Abbott>There's one upstairs too.

786
00:43:20.340 --> 00:43:21.220
<v Derek Abbott>...behind that microphone.

787
00:43:21.520 --> 00:43:24.780
<v Derek Abbott>And for those in the gallery, there's a microphone up there.

788
00:43:24.960 --> 00:43:26.460
<v Derek Abbott>And we'll take some questions.

789
00:43:26.700 --> 00:43:28.080
<v Derek Abbott>The lady in the green coat.

790
00:43:28.280 --> 00:43:28.760
<v Derek Abbott>Oh.

791
00:43:29.580 --> 00:43:30.140
<v Speaker 7>Hello.

792
00:43:32.540 --> 00:43:33.660
<v Speaker 7>I'm interested.

793
00:43:33.880 --> 00:43:36.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm a visual artist, or I'm studying visual art.

794
00:43:36.540 --> 00:43:42.360
<v Speaker 7>And I always think in other terms rather than just, are we smart enough, but in terms of

795
00:43:42.360 --> 00:43:43.700
<v Speaker 7>what do we collectively know?

796
00:43:44.160 --> 00:43:47.200
<v Speaker 7>And how can we bring that together?

797
00:43:47.440 --> 00:43:54.200
<v Speaker 7>And I was just thinking in terms of, if you're familiar with the philosopher, the Baldria

798
00:43:55.640 --> 00:43:57.060
<v Speaker 7>and the simulacra?

799
00:43:57.240 --> 00:43:58.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, the idea that...

800
00:43:59.580 --> 00:44:05.800
<v Speaker 7>There is no longer any reality principle, that anything that we refer to is just a reproduction.

801
00:44:06.320 --> 00:44:09.560
<v Speaker 7>And so the reproduction keeps evolving and reproducing itself.

802
00:44:10.160 --> 00:44:15.300
<v Speaker 7>And what I was interested in, can you see in the future that machines will produce culture?

803
00:44:15.900 --> 00:44:22.900
<v Speaker 7>Like, at the moment, we relate so much to television and now to digital computing games

804
00:44:22.900 --> 00:44:23.760
<v Speaker 7>and things like that.

805
00:44:23.840 --> 00:44:24.740
<v Speaker 7>Can you see like...

806
00:44:24.740 --> 00:44:27.420
<v Speaker 7>We have this phenomena of corporate pop now.

807
00:44:27.640 --> 00:44:27.900
<v Speaker 7>And...

808
00:44:27.900 --> 00:44:30.480
<v Speaker 7>And just formula shows and stuff like that.

809
00:44:30.540 --> 00:44:35.360
<v Speaker 7>Can you see machines, robots and stuff like that producing culture for human beings?

810
00:44:35.580 --> 00:44:40.520
<v Speaker 7>That we actually become completely passive in the creative process and that they make

811
00:44:40.520 --> 00:44:41.860
<v Speaker 7>our world for us.

812
00:44:41.880 --> 00:44:45.600
<v Speaker 7>Like, how we perceive ourselves, what we relate to.

813
00:44:47.220 --> 00:44:49.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, I would already...

814
00:44:49.080 --> 00:44:54.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>I would say that machines already are producing culture for us in the sense that take a film

815
00:44:54.720 --> 00:44:56.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>like Blade Runner or...

816
00:44:56.960 --> 00:45:01.980
<v Margaret Wertheim>A film that's just come out recently in America, Shrek, which is an animation, very charming

817
00:45:01.980 --> 00:45:03.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>sort of fairy tale animation.

818
00:45:04.140 --> 00:45:05.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>And although it looks...

819
00:45:05.800 --> 00:45:12.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>It's all these kind of cute fairy tale characters, the whole thing is computer generated.

820
00:45:12.620 --> 00:45:16.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>So, I mean, you couldn't have made a film like that or any of these films like Star

821
00:45:16.940 --> 00:45:24.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>Wars without an enormous cooperation between the human beings who are designing it, but

822
00:45:24.060 --> 00:45:26.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>the vast numbers of computers.

823
00:45:26.400 --> 00:45:30.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>The vast numbers of computers that are out there rendering it and using software packages

824
00:45:30.520 --> 00:45:33.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>to create these creatures.

825
00:45:33.380 --> 00:45:35.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>So, it seems to me that we already do have a situation.

826
00:45:36.060 --> 00:45:39.300
<v Rodney Brooks>But in that case, is that more than being a really good pen?

827
00:45:44.040 --> 00:45:46.640
<v Speaker 7>I think what I meant is...

828
00:45:46.640 --> 00:45:50.700
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I understand that that's what's happening, but I work with digital technology as well

829
00:45:50.700 --> 00:45:55.440
<v Speaker 7>and it's still an incredibly creative process on the part of myself and other artists who

830
00:45:55.440 --> 00:45:55.980
<v Speaker 7>work with it.

831
00:45:56.400 --> 00:46:01.100
<v Speaker 7>But what I'm saying is that we just don't need the human element in there anymore.

832
00:46:01.280 --> 00:46:02.300
<v Rodney Brooks>Maybe you should look at...

833
00:46:03.080 --> 00:46:09.840
<v Rodney Brooks>We've seen Aaron Cohen's program, which has been around for over 25 years now, which does

834
00:46:10.400 --> 00:46:11.760
<v Rodney Brooks>drawings and paintings.

835
00:46:11.940 --> 00:46:19.160
<v Rodney Brooks>And actually, Ray Kurzweil has recently adopted that system and you can see it at Kurzweil's

836
00:46:19.160 --> 00:46:23.900
<v Rodney Brooks>AI net and download it and have it produce paintings.

837
00:46:23.900 --> 00:46:28.180
<v Rodney Brooks>And it's paintings which to me appear to be have done by humans.

838
00:46:28.420 --> 00:46:34.880
<v Rodney Brooks>So, there has certainly been work in AI to produce creative systems and some of which

839
00:46:34.880 --> 00:46:38.500
<v Rodney Brooks>are starting to look reasonable now.

840
00:46:39.220 --> 00:46:43.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>And there are software packages to do that for music.

841
00:46:44.580 --> 00:46:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's what I mean.

842
00:46:46.460 --> 00:46:50.940
<v Speaker 7>Not so much culture in the sense of how we perceive it in a high sense of like painters

843
00:46:50.940 --> 00:46:52.720
<v Speaker 7>and musicians and things like that.

844
00:46:52.720 --> 00:46:58.220
<v Speaker 7>But as in the sense of popular culture, which is probably a more realistic sense of culture

845
00:46:58.220 --> 00:46:59.260
<v Speaker 7>in our day and age now.

846
00:46:59.560 --> 00:47:06.500
<v Speaker 7>And I mean, so that it's already at that point where the few produce culture for the many.

847
00:47:06.820 --> 00:47:08.220
<v Speaker 7>We pass it.

848
00:47:08.280 --> 00:47:12.100
<v Rodney Brooks>So, my answer to this is I think we're not there yet, but we might be in the future.

849
00:47:13.640 --> 00:47:14.080
<v Derek Abbott>Okay.

850
00:47:14.120 --> 00:47:15.960
<v Derek Abbott>Can we have the next question up in the gallery?

851
00:47:16.560 --> 00:47:17.000
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

852
00:47:17.000 --> 00:47:21.720
<v Speaker 8>I wonder how Rodney Brooks sees the future of robotics.

853
00:47:22.980 --> 00:47:29.840
<v Speaker 8>It's hard to accept the claims of Richard Satava from Yale with his battlefield tele-surgery.

854
00:47:29.980 --> 00:47:37.220
<v Speaker 8>The two problems I see is that at the fingertips you've got over 30 degrees of freedom and

855
00:47:37.220 --> 00:47:43.600
<v Speaker 8>you're also dealing with non-engineering materials, tissue which is gluggy and viscoelastic and unpredictable.

856
00:47:44.560 --> 00:47:45.240
<v Rodney Brooks>Yeah.

857
00:47:45.280 --> 00:47:50.860
<v Rodney Brooks>Well, Rick Satava really, who's now at Yale, really pushed this concept when he was at DARPA,

858
00:47:50.960 --> 00:47:51.700
<v Rodney Brooks>the Defense Advanced Research Center.

859
00:47:51.720 --> 00:47:52.720
<v Rodney Brooks>He's a member of the Defense Research Projects Agency.

860
00:47:52.900 --> 00:47:55.900
<v Rodney Brooks>And out of that actually has come some real surgical systems.

861
00:47:56.020 --> 00:48:01.180
<v Rodney Brooks>Intuitive Surgical, which is based in Mountain View, using some technology that was developed

862
00:48:01.180 --> 00:48:08.500
<v Rodney Brooks>in the artificial intelligence lab at MIT by Ken Salisbury and Akhil Madani, is now

863
00:48:08.500 --> 00:48:15.520
<v Rodney Brooks>being used for tele-surgery with the surgeon is in the same room as the patient and the

864
00:48:15.520 --> 00:48:19.080
<v Rodney Brooks>surgeon has their hands inside a master system.

865
00:48:19.080 --> 00:48:26.420
<v Rodney Brooks>And the surgery is going on inside a patient through a small incision with an eight degree

866
00:48:26.420 --> 00:48:32.420
<v Rodney Brooks>of freedom robot hand down there, which can be scaled to be moving at one-fifth the size

867
00:48:32.420 --> 00:48:33.280
<v Rodney Brooks>of the surgeon's hand.

868
00:48:33.440 --> 00:48:37.260
<v Rodney Brooks>And that has been used for things like heart valve replacement, et cetera.

869
00:48:37.520 --> 00:48:44.060
<v Rodney Brooks>Right now, a lot of push has been taken by some other work from Ken Salisbury, also done

870
00:48:44.060 --> 00:48:46.060
<v Rodney Brooks>in our lab with haptic feedback.

871
00:48:47.060 --> 00:48:48.980
<v Rodney Brooks>And it's being pushed at Mass General.

872
00:48:48.980 --> 00:48:56.180
<v Rodney Brooks>And it's being pushed at Mass General Hospital, where having characterized the way that various

873
00:48:57.460 --> 00:49:03.700
<v Rodney Brooks>materials feel inside human bodies, they've actually used pigs to collect the data, there's

874
00:49:03.700 --> 00:49:05.440
<v Rodney Brooks>feedback coming back to the surgeon.

875
00:49:05.640 --> 00:49:11.280
<v Rodney Brooks>And experimentally, then, the surgeon is able to do some surgeries much less invasively

876
00:49:11.280 --> 00:49:14.440
<v Rodney Brooks>than if they do it directly.

877
00:49:14.940 --> 00:49:17.440
<v Rodney Brooks>Now, there's still a human in the loop at the moment.

878
00:49:17.500 --> 00:49:18.960
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think there will be for quite a while.

879
00:49:18.960 --> 00:49:24.480
<v Rodney Brooks>But I don't think the dexterity per se is the limitation, because here the surgeon is

880
00:49:24.480 --> 00:49:27.260
<v Rodney Brooks>not actually having their hands inside the patient.

881
00:49:27.380 --> 00:49:33.060
<v Rodney Brooks>So I think we will see more and more robot surgery.

882
00:49:33.780 --> 00:49:37.980
<v Rodney Brooks>For quite a while, we will demand that there be a human in the loop.

883
00:49:38.800 --> 00:49:43.500
<v Rodney Brooks>And there won't be approval for surgical procedures without the human in the loop.

884
00:49:43.620 --> 00:49:48.840
<v Rodney Brooks>But I think that will start to change in the same way that in the US now, at least, and

885
00:49:48.960 --> 00:49:53.280
<v Rodney Brooks>probably here in Australia, I'm just not up on it, surgery can be done on your eyes

886
00:49:53.280 --> 00:49:57.400
<v Rodney Brooks>down at the mall, and people are going and getting their lens systems changed.

887
00:49:57.600 --> 00:50:02.720
<v Rodney Brooks>I think surgery is going to become much more democratic, which is not something that surgeons

888
00:50:02.720 --> 00:50:03.500
<v Rodney Brooks>like to hear.

889
00:50:05.340 --> 00:50:08.100
<v Derek Abbott>Could we have the questioner down here in the black jacket?

890
00:50:08.360 --> 00:50:08.780
<v Derek Abbott>Yes.

891
00:50:09.740 --> 00:50:11.460
<v Speaker 9>It's been a very interesting conversation.

892
00:50:11.540 --> 00:50:17.160
<v Speaker 9>But both of you, in your own way, if I may say, are technological triumphalists.

893
00:50:17.440 --> 00:50:18.940
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Margaret Wertheim, you've been a very interesting speaker.

894
00:50:18.940 --> 00:50:23.420
<v Speaker 9>And I think that Margaret Wertheim argues that we are in a way the pinnacle of evolution,

895
00:50:23.720 --> 00:50:26.200
<v Speaker 9>rather than merely the product of evolution.

896
00:50:26.660 --> 00:50:31.040
<v Speaker 9>And I think, Mrs. Brooks, you've also argued that there's something reassuring about the

897
00:50:31.040 --> 00:50:36.020
<v Speaker 9>fact that human beings will be in control of all these technical processes.

898
00:50:36.300 --> 00:50:42.340
<v Speaker 9>What is it about our recent history that gives you any assumption that that is an optimistic

899
00:50:42.940 --> 00:50:44.520
<v Speaker 9>and safe point of view?

900
00:50:45.200 --> 00:50:48.920
<v Margaret Wertheim>I would like to dispute the notion that we are in a world where we are not able to do

901
00:50:48.940 --> 00:50:49.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>anything.

902
00:50:49.540 --> 00:50:54.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that the reason that I suggested that human beings are the pinnacle of evolution

903
00:50:54.600 --> 00:50:59.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>– I don't think that at all – I actually made the statement that we were probably the

904
00:50:59.780 --> 00:51:01.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>most complex creatures.

905
00:51:01.920 --> 00:51:05.000
<v Margaret Wertheim>But in no way do I think we are the pinnacle of evolution.

906
00:51:05.340 --> 00:51:11.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, SHARC, which has been around for 200 million years, on any kind of empirical assessment

907
00:51:11.240 --> 00:51:17.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>of criteria would have to have outcompeted us simply because it's lasted for 200 million

908
00:51:17.480 --> 00:51:17.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>years.

909
00:51:17.880 --> 00:51:20.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>human beings haven't even lasted for a million years.

910
00:51:20.320 --> 00:51:23.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>So the notion of what constitutes a pinnacle of evolution

911
00:51:24.380 --> 00:51:28.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think is a totally bogus idea at all.

912
00:51:28.140 --> 00:51:30.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>There are different forms of creatures on planet Earth

913
00:51:30.740 --> 00:51:33.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>and if anything is the pinnacle of evolution in my mind

914
00:51:33.660 --> 00:51:37.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>it's the bacteria who really keep the planet going.

915
00:51:37.920 --> 00:51:40.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>But it's just that we are actually more complex

916
00:51:40.720 --> 00:51:43.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>in all kinds of ways

917
00:51:43.440 --> 00:51:46.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>and that doesn't make us the pinnacle.

918
00:51:46.200 --> 00:51:48.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>It simply makes us a different kind of a creature

919
00:51:48.500 --> 00:51:51.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>which has some very interesting qualities about it.

920
00:51:52.420 --> 00:51:55.200
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I certainly don't regard myself as a technological triumphalist.

921
00:51:56.000 --> 00:51:58.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>I wasn't commenting on whether I think it's good or bad

922
00:51:58.260 --> 00:52:01.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>that we increasingly fuse with machines.

923
00:52:01.380 --> 00:52:03.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think it's simply something that is going to happen.

924
00:52:05.040 --> 00:52:08.140
<v Margaret Wertheim>As Rodney was saying, there are all of these things going on

925
00:52:08.140 --> 00:52:09.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>to put prosthetics in cochleas

926
00:52:09.880 --> 00:52:13.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>and to fix retinal damage, etc.

927
00:52:13.560 --> 00:52:15.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think that there is going to be

928
00:52:15.800 --> 00:52:17.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>an awful lot more of that.

929
00:52:17.640 --> 00:52:19.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, my mother has a titanium hip

930
00:52:19.880 --> 00:52:22.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>and I'm sure that many, many more of us

931
00:52:22.880 --> 00:52:24.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>will have these implants as we get older.

932
00:52:25.540 --> 00:52:27.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>Is that a good or bad thing?

933
00:52:27.200 --> 00:52:29.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>Well, there are good things and bad things to be said for it.

934
00:52:29.900 --> 00:52:31.980
<v Margaret Wertheim>I think that is the way of history

935
00:52:33.700 --> 00:52:36.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>and one can have a whole other debate

936
00:52:36.040 --> 00:52:39.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>about whether that is the way we all think history should be going.

937
00:52:40.100 --> 00:52:41.720
<v Rodney Brooks>Let me just address those two questions.

938
00:52:42.080 --> 00:52:44.200
<v Rodney Brooks>First about us being the pinnacle of evolution.

939
00:52:44.460 --> 00:52:45.720
<v Rodney Brooks>I would certainly not say

940
00:52:45.720 --> 00:52:46.680
<v Rodney Brooks>that and I'd point out that

941
00:52:46.680 --> 00:52:49.880
<v Rodney Brooks>a potato has a much larger genome than us.

942
00:52:52.820 --> 00:52:55.620
<v Rodney Brooks>As Margaret said,

943
00:52:56.320 --> 00:52:58.500
<v Rodney Brooks>I'm saying I think the direction things will go

944
00:52:58.500 --> 00:53:01.240
<v Rodney Brooks>and I think that's largely because of our human nature,

945
00:53:01.400 --> 00:53:04.660
<v Rodney Brooks>which is something that we haven't been able to control

946
00:53:04.660 --> 00:53:06.400
<v Rodney Brooks>and it's something that we've had to contend with

947
00:53:07.440 --> 00:53:08.960
<v Rodney Brooks>for our whole history.

948
00:53:09.360 --> 00:53:13.820
<v Rodney Brooks>And I'm not arguing that our human nature is good or bad.

949
00:53:13.940 --> 00:53:14.940
<v Rodney Brooks>I'm just making predictions

950
00:53:14.940 --> 00:53:17.460
<v Rodney Brooks>about where our human nature is going to lead us

951
00:53:17.460 --> 00:53:19.740
<v Rodney Brooks>as these technologies become available

952
00:53:19.740 --> 00:53:22.980
<v Rodney Brooks>and that people will push on those technologies.

953
00:53:23.200 --> 00:53:25.700
<v Rodney Brooks>And if you think that you can somehow

954
00:53:26.740 --> 00:53:29.440
<v Rodney Brooks>legislate against technological development

955
00:53:29.440 --> 00:53:31.860
<v Rodney Brooks>or legislate against scientific curiosity,

956
00:53:32.480 --> 00:53:35.780
<v Rodney Brooks>I think you're trying to legislate against human nature

957
00:53:35.780 --> 00:53:37.360
<v Rodney Brooks>and will be ultimately unsuccessful.

958
00:53:39.040 --> 00:53:40.800
<v Derek Abbott>Let's have the questioner in the gallery.

959
00:53:41.120 --> 00:53:44.300
<v Speaker 4>Can I just follow up on that particular argument?

960
00:53:44.940 --> 00:53:48.740
<v Speaker 4>If we have a look at the technological evolution over time,

961
00:53:49.100 --> 00:53:51.420
<v Speaker 4>it's had both its positives and its negatives.

962
00:53:52.340 --> 00:53:55.300
<v Speaker 4>And for a lot of culture and environment generally,

963
00:53:55.460 --> 00:53:57.400
<v Speaker 4>there is a lot of people that argue that the negatives,

964
00:53:57.440 --> 00:54:00.180
<v Speaker 4>in fact, so far, far outweigh the positives

965
00:54:00.180 --> 00:54:02.500
<v Speaker 4>simply because those in control

966
00:54:02.500 --> 00:54:03.860
<v Speaker 4>and they get the technological edge

967
00:54:03.860 --> 00:54:05.800
<v Speaker 4>continue to push it.

968
00:54:05.880 --> 00:54:06.900
<v Speaker 4>And unfortunately, that's particularly

969
00:54:06.900 --> 00:54:08.120
<v Speaker 4>from a European worldview.

970
00:54:08.920 --> 00:54:10.340
<v Speaker 4>Now, if that's the case,

971
00:54:11.020 --> 00:54:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and if what you're saying is that human nature is inevitable

972
00:54:13.440 --> 00:54:16.880
<v Speaker 4>and that also technological innovation is inevitable,

973
00:54:17.640 --> 00:54:19.460
<v Speaker 4>then are we not going to see a time

974
00:54:19.460 --> 00:54:20.980
<v Speaker 4>where we, in fact, just become self-destructive?

975
00:54:21.140 --> 00:54:22.280
<v Speaker 4>And if that's the case,

976
00:54:22.800 --> 00:54:24.420
<v Speaker 4>what is the role of the scientist

977
00:54:24.420 --> 00:54:27.540
<v Speaker 4>in taking some sort of ethical or moral responsibility in that?

978
00:54:28.540 --> 00:54:29.320
<v Rodney Brooks>I think...

979
00:54:30.680 --> 00:54:32.820
<v Rodney Brooks>I think you shouldn't leave it to the scientists

980
00:54:32.820 --> 00:54:34.720
<v Rodney Brooks>to take the ethical and moral responsibility.

981
00:54:34.720 --> 00:54:37.100
<v Rodney Brooks>I think we're all responsible

982
00:54:38.800 --> 00:54:42.100
<v Rodney Brooks>and that, as with all technology over time,

983
00:54:42.260 --> 00:54:43.420
<v Rodney Brooks>it has been up to science to take the ethical and moral responsibility.

984
00:54:43.420 --> 00:54:45.600
<v Rodney Brooks>It's up to society to decide what it wants

985
00:54:45.600 --> 00:54:46.360
<v Rodney Brooks>and what it doesn't want.

986
00:54:46.500 --> 00:54:48.300
<v Rodney Brooks>I think the argument that technology

987
00:54:48.300 --> 00:54:50.100
<v Rodney Brooks>has been more bad than good

988
00:54:50.100 --> 00:54:51.900
<v Rodney Brooks>is a little specious.

989
00:54:52.040 --> 00:54:54.140
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't think that we all prefer

990
00:54:54.140 --> 00:54:56.600
<v Rodney Brooks>that we had lifespans of about 20 years

991
00:54:56.600 --> 00:55:00.160
<v Rodney Brooks>and lived as hunter-gatherers.

992
00:55:00.280 --> 00:55:02.020
<v Rodney Brooks>And that is what technology

993
00:55:02.020 --> 00:55:03.620
<v Rodney Brooks>from early agriculturalization

994
00:55:03.620 --> 00:55:05.620
<v Rodney Brooks>has given us and has changed us.

995
00:55:05.760 --> 00:55:08.300
<v Rodney Brooks>So to say that technology is all bad

996
00:55:08.300 --> 00:55:11.900
<v Rodney Brooks>or is overwhelmingly bad over good,

997
00:55:11.960 --> 00:55:12.340
<v Rodney Brooks>I think,

998
00:55:12.340 --> 00:55:13.820
<v Rodney Brooks>is not...

999
00:55:16.120 --> 00:55:19.400
<v Rodney Brooks>does not correlate with the way most of us choose to live.

1000
00:55:21.220 --> 00:55:22.640
<v Rodney Brooks>As for the responsibility,

1001
00:55:22.860 --> 00:55:24.620
<v Rodney Brooks>I think, yes, we all have responsibility

1002
00:55:24.620 --> 00:55:27.080
<v Rodney Brooks>and we have had responsibility in the past

1003
00:55:27.080 --> 00:55:28.520
<v Rodney Brooks>and that we have...

1004
00:55:28.520 --> 00:55:30.180
<v Rodney Brooks>there are many ethical issues

1005
00:55:30.180 --> 00:55:31.800
<v Rodney Brooks>that we should be debating

1006
00:55:31.800 --> 00:55:33.300
<v Rodney Brooks>and should be deciding about

1007
00:55:33.300 --> 00:55:35.720
<v Rodney Brooks>how we want to bring those things together.

1008
00:55:35.860 --> 00:55:37.320
<v Rodney Brooks>I think different societies,

1009
00:55:37.500 --> 00:55:38.600
<v Rodney Brooks>different countries,

1010
00:55:38.720 --> 00:55:41.760
<v Rodney Brooks>will make different decisions at different times

1011
00:55:41.760 --> 00:55:42.100
<v Rodney Brooks>and at different times.

1012
00:55:42.340 --> 00:55:43.660
<v Rodney Brooks>And we see that today.

1013
00:55:45.220 --> 00:55:47.640
<v Rodney Brooks>We see that Japan

1014
00:55:47.640 --> 00:55:50.140
<v Rodney Brooks>has not adopted organ transplants.

1015
00:55:50.260 --> 00:55:52.140
<v Rodney Brooks>I think there have only been two heart transplants there.

1016
00:55:52.420 --> 00:55:54.280
<v Rodney Brooks>Japanese people who want heart transplants

1017
00:55:54.280 --> 00:55:55.320
<v Rodney Brooks>often come to Australia

1018
00:55:55.320 --> 00:55:57.640
<v Rodney Brooks>or the United States.

1019
00:55:59.360 --> 00:56:01.300
<v Rodney Brooks>More kidney transplants in Japan

1020
00:56:01.300 --> 00:56:04.520
<v Rodney Brooks>but still not as many as in other countries.

1021
00:56:04.580 --> 00:56:06.480
<v Rodney Brooks>And it's not because their medical system can't do them.

1022
00:56:06.520 --> 00:56:08.060
<v Rodney Brooks>It's because of a moral decision

1023
00:56:08.060 --> 00:56:10.720
<v Rodney Brooks>that they as a society have made.

1024
00:56:10.940 --> 00:56:12.260
<v Rodney Brooks>So I think we,

1025
00:56:12.340 --> 00:56:12.780
<v Rodney Brooks>we all,

1026
00:56:13.020 --> 00:56:14.040
<v Rodney Brooks>and in different countries,

1027
00:56:14.080 --> 00:56:14.680
<v Rodney Brooks>different places,

1028
00:56:14.820 --> 00:56:15.900
<v Rodney Brooks>will need to choose

1029
00:56:15.900 --> 00:56:17.380
<v Rodney Brooks>and make our moral decisions.

1030
00:56:18.280 --> 00:56:19.540
<v Rodney Brooks>To say, though,

1031
00:56:19.640 --> 00:56:23.440
<v Rodney Brooks>that it's all up to the responsibility of the scientist,

1032
00:56:23.560 --> 00:56:24.020
<v Rodney Brooks>I think,

1033
00:56:24.020 --> 00:56:28.120
<v Rodney Brooks>is trying to abrogate the responsibility of all of us

1034
00:56:28.120 --> 00:56:31.340
<v Rodney Brooks>and that one shouldn't leave that to the scientists.

1035
00:56:32.440 --> 00:56:33.000
<v Rodney Brooks>Furthermore,

1036
00:56:33.660 --> 00:56:38.320
<v Rodney Brooks>I think it's very arrogant

1037
00:56:38.320 --> 00:56:40.320
<v Rodney Brooks>to think that you can predict

1038
00:56:40.320 --> 00:56:42.100
<v Rodney Brooks>where science will go

1039
00:56:42.340 --> 00:56:45.420
<v Rodney Brooks>and what is going to turn out to be good and bad

1040
00:56:45.420 --> 00:56:47.000
<v Rodney Brooks>as a result of science.

1041
00:56:47.160 --> 00:56:48.940
<v Rodney Brooks>And that one has to see

1042
00:56:48.940 --> 00:56:51.860
<v Rodney Brooks>and then make decisions about what we want to do

1043
00:56:51.860 --> 00:56:53.440
<v Rodney Brooks>with that science and technology.

1044
00:56:55.000 --> 00:56:56.600
<v Derek Abbott>Do you have a comment on that, Margaret?

1045
00:56:59.640 --> 00:57:02.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>Yeah, I mean, I do think that the concept

1046
00:57:02.740 --> 00:57:06.360
<v Margaret Wertheim>that technology is all bad is a very problematic one

1047
00:57:06.360 --> 00:57:09.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>because that, you know, technology also includes things

1048
00:57:09.900 --> 00:57:10.820
<v Margaret Wertheim>like writing.

1049
00:57:11.380 --> 00:57:12.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>Um, for example, you know, you can't write a book

1050
00:57:12.340 --> 00:57:13.440
<v Margaret Wertheim>without the use of fire.

1051
00:57:13.680 --> 00:57:15.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>So where does one draw the line?

1052
00:57:16.100 --> 00:57:18.760
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, one can take the stance of a group of people

1053
00:57:18.760 --> 00:57:19.820
<v Margaret Wertheim>who I have immense respect for,

1054
00:57:19.880 --> 00:57:22.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>somebody like the Amish who've decided

1055
00:57:22.940 --> 00:57:25.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>that they'll use the wheel but not the telephone.

1056
00:57:26.920 --> 00:57:31.220
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I think that people, there are groups in society

1057
00:57:31.220 --> 00:57:33.520
<v Margaret Wertheim>who make those decisions and draw the line

1058
00:57:33.520 --> 00:57:34.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>at a particular place.

1059
00:57:36.080 --> 00:57:38.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>And there's a lot of evidence to suggest that the Amish,

1060
00:57:38.800 --> 00:57:42.120
<v Margaret Wertheim>you know, are a very good and healthy community in some ways

1061
00:57:42.120 --> 00:57:45.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>that, you know, more technologically advanced society isn't.

1062
00:57:45.540 --> 00:57:48.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>But it is a very hard decision where do you draw the line.

1063
00:57:49.060 --> 00:57:52.160
<v Margaret Wertheim>Um, and to say that technology is all bad, I think,

1064
00:57:52.940 --> 00:57:55.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>does deny the realities of the fact that human beings

1065
00:57:55.240 --> 00:57:57.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>have from the beginning, I mean, from the moment

1066
00:57:57.500 --> 00:58:00.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>we picked up a stick and started making fire,

1067
00:58:00.660 --> 00:58:03.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>or even picked up a stick and tried to use it

1068
00:58:03.080 --> 00:58:05.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>to kill a creature, you know, a deer or something,

1069
00:58:05.240 --> 00:58:07.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>we have been technological creatures.

1070
00:58:07.420 --> 00:58:10.900
<v Margaret Wertheim>So technology isn't simply something that came about

1071
00:58:10.900 --> 00:58:11.940
<v Margaret Wertheim>with the microchip.

1072
00:58:12.120 --> 00:58:12.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>Or even with electricity.

1073
00:58:13.260 --> 00:58:16.660
<v Margaret Wertheim>We have been technological creatures pretty much

1074
00:58:16.660 --> 00:58:17.680
<v Margaret Wertheim>since the word go.

1075
00:58:18.840 --> 00:58:22.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>And to think that technology is something that's imposed

1076
00:58:22.400 --> 00:58:26.340
<v Margaret Wertheim>upon society at some fairly recent date, I think,

1077
00:58:26.340 --> 00:58:29.380
<v Margaret Wertheim>is to not understand the history of human culture.

1078
00:58:30.960 --> 00:58:34.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>That said, however, obviously we are seeing the coming

1079
00:58:34.540 --> 00:58:37.760
<v Margaret Wertheim>into being now of a tremendous number of new technologies

1080
00:58:38.620 --> 00:58:40.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>which do have tremendous consequences,

1081
00:58:41.600 --> 00:58:42.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>both for us and for the world.

1082
00:58:42.320 --> 00:58:52.320
<v Margaret Wertheim>And for all the Senate

1083
00:58:55.480 --> 00:58:59.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>one of my big arguments about why we need a more scientifically literate society

1084
00:58:59.800 --> 00:59:03.860
<v Margaret Wertheim>is because I believe we do need a population that can be actively involved

1085
00:59:03.860 --> 00:59:08.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>in helping to make the decisions about what we do want from science and technology,

1086
00:59:09.040 --> 00:59:12.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>what directions we think we should pursue, what directions perhaps we shouldn't.

1087
00:59:13.080 --> 00:59:17.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>And it seems to me that you need a scientifically and technologically literate society

1088
00:59:17.600 --> 00:59:21.960
<v Margaret Wertheim>to actually make those decisions with real insight.

1089
00:59:21.960 --> 00:59:26.020
<v Margaret Wertheim>And there's no way should we leave that just to the technologists and scientists themselves.

1090
00:59:29.500 --> 00:59:31.760
<v Rodney Brooks>And we don't. We don't.

1091
00:59:32.020 --> 00:59:38.620
<v Rodney Brooks>Everyone's clapping, but I think you're sort of clapping for a view of the world

1092
00:59:38.620 --> 00:59:42.540
<v Rodney Brooks>that Hollywood has projected upon you, that all those evil scientists are doing this stuff

1093
00:59:42.540 --> 00:59:43.560
<v Rodney Brooks>and you don't have any control.

1094
00:59:43.760 --> 00:59:47.600
<v Rodney Brooks>You have the control. The legislative bodies have the control.

1095
00:59:47.640 --> 00:59:48.680
<v Rodney Brooks>You do have the control.

1096
00:59:49.740 --> 00:59:51.400
<v Rodney Brooks>Let's have the next question down here.

1097
00:59:53.380 --> 00:59:56.640
<v Speaker 10>I'd like to ask Norman a question and then a follow-up question.

1098
00:59:57.240 --> 01:00:02.780
<v Speaker 10>Firstly, does he think that there is anything powerfully unique about human beings?

1099
01:00:04.380 --> 01:00:05.300
<v Rodney Brooks>You're asking me?

1100
01:00:06.760 --> 01:00:07.580
<v Rodney Brooks>Powerfully unique.

1101
01:00:07.860 --> 01:00:13.860
<v Rodney Brooks>I think there's something powerfully unique about human beings in our current situation here on Earth.

1102
01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:20.260
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't think that there is something

1103
01:00:21.960 --> 01:00:28.940
<v Rodney Brooks>magical in us that cannot, in principle, be built in some other form than us.

1104
01:00:30.720 --> 01:00:35.040
<v Speaker 10>Alright, well my follow-up question is, what do you think about free will?

1105
01:00:35.980 --> 01:00:42.160
<v Speaker 10>Does it exist? And if it doesn't, should we be acting as though it does exist?

1106
01:00:42.800 --> 01:00:45.340
<v Rodney Brooks>We certainly should be acting as though it does exist.

1107
01:00:48.680 --> 01:00:51.040
<v Speaker 10>And the other part of the question, does it exist?

1108
01:00:52.080 --> 01:00:53.060
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't know.

1109
01:00:53.880 --> 01:00:54.440
<v Derek Abbott>I don't know.

1110
01:00:56.680 --> 01:00:58.500
<v Derek Abbott>Next questioner, please, down here.

1111
01:01:00.840 --> 01:01:05.400
<v Speaker 11>I was wondering if I could possibly hear your comments on the singularity theory

1112
01:01:05.400 --> 01:01:11.860
<v Speaker 11>based on that computer processing power increases every 18 months or doubles every 18 months.

1113
01:01:13.120 --> 01:01:16.380
<v Rodney Brooks>Well, I think you're probably referring to Ray Kurzweil's arguments.

1114
01:01:16.640 --> 01:01:18.680
<v Rodney Brooks>Ray and a bunch of other people,

1115
01:01:21.240 --> 01:01:21.940
<v Rodney Brooks>more generally,

1116
01:01:21.960 --> 01:01:23.200
<v Rodney Brooks>referred to as

1117
01:01:23.200 --> 01:01:23.900
<v Rodney Brooks>extropians,

1118
01:01:24.600 --> 01:01:25.920
<v Rodney Brooks>take the view that

1119
01:01:25.920 --> 01:01:27.760
<v Rodney Brooks>technology is progressing

1120
01:01:28.460 --> 01:01:30.040
<v Rodney Brooks>faster and faster and faster

1121
01:01:30.040 --> 01:01:33.000
<v Rodney Brooks>and that we're going to hit some singularity

1122
01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:34.200
<v Rodney Brooks>where everything becomes

1123
01:01:34.200 --> 01:01:36.440
<v Rodney Brooks>fantastic and magical

1124
01:01:36.440 --> 01:01:37.220
<v Rodney Brooks>almost.

1125
01:01:38.820 --> 01:01:40.640
<v Rodney Brooks>And that people will be able to

1126
01:01:40.640 --> 01:01:42.360
<v Rodney Brooks>download themselves into computers

1127
01:01:42.360 --> 01:01:44.720
<v Rodney Brooks>and if you

1128
01:01:44.720 --> 01:01:46.360
<v Rodney Brooks>look at the people who make these predictions

1129
01:01:46.360 --> 01:01:48.460
<v Rodney Brooks>and see when they're predicting it will happen

1130
01:01:48.460 --> 01:01:49.980
<v Rodney Brooks>and look at their birth date,

1131
01:01:50.740 --> 01:01:51.540
<v Rodney Brooks>it always

1132
01:01:51.540 --> 01:01:53.540
<v Rodney Brooks>invariably is when they turn about 70.

1133
01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:59.580
<v Rodney Brooks>And I think there's a certain amount of wishful thinking.

1134
01:02:00.560 --> 01:02:01.660
<v Rodney Brooks>Now, clearly,

1135
01:02:01.780 --> 01:02:02.460
<v Rodney Brooks>clearly,

1136
01:02:02.620 --> 01:02:04.860
<v Rodney Brooks>there is an exponential increase

1137
01:02:04.860 --> 01:02:07.620
<v Rodney Brooks>in not only computational power

1138
01:02:07.620 --> 01:02:09.080
<v Rodney Brooks>but scientific knowledge.

1139
01:02:09.920 --> 01:02:12.460
<v Rodney Brooks>At all times for the last 500 years,

1140
01:02:12.700 --> 01:02:15.080
<v Rodney Brooks>over half of the scientists and technologists

1141
01:02:15.080 --> 01:02:17.380
<v Rodney Brooks>in the history of the Earth have been alive.

1142
01:02:17.740 --> 01:02:18.220
<v Rodney Brooks>I mean,

1143
01:02:18.300 --> 01:02:21.360
<v Rodney Brooks>that's just part of the nature of the increase,

1144
01:02:21.540 --> 01:02:22.220
<v Rodney Brooks>the increasing population

1145
01:02:23.260 --> 01:02:24.200
<v Rodney Brooks>that we've had.

1146
01:02:24.400 --> 01:02:24.720
<v Rodney Brooks>So,

1147
01:02:25.400 --> 01:02:28.180
<v Rodney Brooks>technology does seem to be going faster than it has before

1148
01:02:28.180 --> 01:02:31.480
<v Rodney Brooks>and that speed will continue to increase

1149
01:02:32.280 --> 01:02:35.320
<v Rodney Brooks>and exactly how that stabilizes out

1150
01:02:35.320 --> 01:02:37.520
<v Rodney Brooks>because I think is,

1151
01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:42.380
<v Rodney Brooks>I wouldn't like to predict.

1152
01:02:43.140 --> 01:02:45.740
<v Rodney Brooks>I don't think that the singularity that

1153
01:02:45.740 --> 01:02:48.240
<v Rodney Brooks>many people talk about, including Ray,

1154
01:02:48.380 --> 01:02:51.100
<v Rodney Brooks>will exactly happen because I think it's too colored

1155
01:02:51.100 --> 01:02:51.520
<v Rodney Brooks>by the

1156
01:02:51.540 --> 01:02:53.840
<v Rodney Brooks>their own fear of death.

1157
01:02:54.260 --> 01:02:58.100
<v Margaret Wertheim>I also think that this whole concept is very much

1158
01:02:58.100 --> 01:03:02.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>a technological version of the old religious idea.

1159
01:03:03.420 --> 01:03:04.400
<v Speaker 8>Yes, very much.

1160
01:03:04.400 --> 01:03:05.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>I mean, I see it very much

1161
01:03:05.880 --> 01:03:07.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>and the people that I've met

1162
01:03:08.020 --> 01:03:11.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>and, you know, had discussions with about this subject,

1163
01:03:11.260 --> 01:03:14.400
<v Margaret Wertheim>it is like a religious fervor that they have

1164
01:03:14.400 --> 01:03:18.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>that humans are going to be transformed into some

1165
01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:20.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>sort of superhuman,

1166
01:03:20.780 --> 01:03:21.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>human aspect.

1167
01:03:22.260 --> 01:03:25.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>You know, it is not dissimilar to the concept of,

1168
01:03:25.440 --> 01:03:27.740
<v Margaret Wertheim>you know, transformation into angels.

1169
01:03:28.780 --> 01:03:31.280
<v Margaret Wertheim>That we are somehow going to transcend this mortal flesh

1170
01:03:31.280 --> 01:03:35.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>and become like super wonderfulized versions of ourselves.

1171
01:03:36.040 --> 01:03:38.060
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I do actually think it is,

1172
01:03:38.060 --> 01:03:38.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>it is,

1173
01:03:40.400 --> 01:03:41.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>it's interesting,

1174
01:03:41.340 --> 01:03:44.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>I've occasionally had people from Asian countries

1175
01:03:44.800 --> 01:03:46.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>talk about this phenomena

1176
01:03:46.780 --> 01:03:49.420
<v Margaret Wertheim>and they see it as being a Western pathology,

1177
01:03:49.420 --> 01:03:51.180
<v Margaret Wertheim>which is an outgrowth of Christianity.

1178
01:03:51.920 --> 01:03:53.560
<v Margaret Wertheim>And it's kind of a secular,

1179
01:03:53.760 --> 01:03:55.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>a technological secularization

1180
01:03:56.420 --> 01:03:59.540
<v Margaret Wertheim>of the idea of transcending into some heavenly body.

1181
01:03:59.780 --> 01:04:04.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>And I have had both Indians and Japanese people tell me

1182
01:04:04.460 --> 01:04:07.800
<v Margaret Wertheim>that in their culture this idea is sort of just considered

1183
01:04:07.800 --> 01:04:09.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>to be Western nonsense.

1184
01:04:09.680 --> 01:04:11.480
<v Rodney Brooks>I think you've maybe beat up on,

1185
01:04:11.520 --> 01:04:13.580
<v Rodney Brooks>I think there's a couple of comments that have been made

1186
01:04:13.580 --> 01:04:16.300
<v Rodney Brooks>where we do beat up on Western ideas.

1187
01:04:16.520 --> 01:04:18.480
<v Rodney Brooks>I think there are lots of universal

1188
01:04:19.020 --> 01:04:20.760
<v Rodney Brooks>wacky ideas out there.

1189
01:04:20.840 --> 01:04:21.120
<v Rodney Brooks>Yes, yes.

1190
01:04:21.380 --> 01:04:25.740
<v Rodney Brooks>And one shouldn't put it too much in one particular culture,

1191
01:04:25.780 --> 01:04:29.480
<v Rodney Brooks>especially with the globalization of the culture that is happening.

1192
01:04:30.320 --> 01:04:31.300
<v Margaret Wertheim>No, no, but it is interesting.

1193
01:04:31.380 --> 01:04:34.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>I have had both Indian and Japanese people tell me

1194
01:04:34.040 --> 01:04:34.500
<v Margaret Wertheim>that in their,

1195
01:04:34.600 --> 01:04:37.040
<v Margaret Wertheim>that they see this as being,

1196
01:04:37.800 --> 01:04:40.080
<v Margaret Wertheim>they themselves said to me that they saw it

1197
01:04:40.080 --> 01:04:41.600
<v Margaret Wertheim>as a particularly Western thing.

1198
01:04:41.680 --> 01:04:42.300
<v Rodney Brooks>On the other hand,

1199
01:04:42.300 --> 01:04:45.000
<v Rodney Brooks>in the extropian organizations you can find both Indians

1200
01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:46.260
<v Rodney Brooks>and Japanese people.

1201
01:04:46.540 --> 01:04:47.240
<v Margaret Wertheim>Right, yes.

1202
01:04:47.400 --> 01:04:48.460
<v Margaret Wertheim>All the ones I've met have been.

1203
01:04:48.480 --> 01:04:48.780
<v Margaret Wertheim>All the ones I've met have been American.

1204
01:04:50.140 --> 01:04:51.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>But, but yeah, I mean I'm sure,

1205
01:04:51.840 --> 01:04:53.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>and obviously, you know,

1206
01:04:53.260 --> 01:04:55.580
<v Margaret Wertheim>we're not the only culture who has some idea

1207
01:04:55.580 --> 01:04:57.480
<v Margaret Wertheim>of some heavenly space.

1208
01:04:58.580 --> 01:05:00.880
<v Margaret Wertheim>But, but, but I think the wider point I want to make,

1209
01:05:00.940 --> 01:05:02.260
<v Margaret Wertheim>whether it's Western or not,

1210
01:05:02.480 --> 01:05:03.700
<v Margaret Wertheim>that I think it is,

1211
01:05:03.720 --> 01:05:05.720
<v Margaret Wertheim>it is effectively a transformation

1212
01:05:05.720 --> 01:05:07.840
<v Margaret Wertheim>of what is essentially a religious idea.

1213
01:05:09.640 --> 01:05:11.360
<v Derek Abbott>Could we have the next questioner

1214
01:05:11.360 --> 01:05:13.620
<v Derek Abbott>in the light blue shirt?

1215
01:05:14.820 --> 01:05:15.400
<v Derek Abbott>That's you.

1216
01:05:17.060 --> 01:05:18.440
<v Rodney Brooks>Whatever color it is.

1217
01:05:18.580 --> 01:05:18.760
<v Rodney Brooks>Sorry, I thought it was white.

1218
01:05:18.760 --> 01:05:19.660
<v Derek Abbott>Whatever color it is.

1219
01:05:19.860 --> 01:05:19.980
<v Derek Abbott>That's okay.

1220
01:05:21.280 --> 01:05:23.340
<v Speaker 6>I guess my question relates to this,

1221
01:05:23.400 --> 01:05:25.480
<v Speaker 6>what's been recently at issue.

1222
01:05:25.820 --> 01:05:27.680
<v Speaker 6>The notion of humanness.

1223
01:05:29.160 --> 01:05:31.140
<v Speaker 6>Genetic creation, my understanding anyway,

1224
01:05:31.200 --> 01:05:33.780
<v Speaker 6>is that genetic creation involves acts of chance

1225
01:05:33.780 --> 01:05:36.680
<v Speaker 6>and randomness and that evolution itself

1226
01:05:36.680 --> 01:05:38.900
<v Speaker 6>has been dependent upon random events,

1227
01:05:39.040 --> 01:05:40.560
<v Speaker 6>background radiation and so on,

1228
01:05:40.620 --> 01:05:41.340
<v Speaker 6>meteor strikes.

1229
01:05:42.260 --> 01:05:45.320
<v Speaker 6>And it strikes me that the brilliant minds

1230
01:05:45.400 --> 01:05:47.360
<v Speaker 6>that work on these technologies

1231
01:05:47.360 --> 01:05:51.200
<v Speaker 6>and projecting these machines and theories into the future

1232
01:05:51.200 --> 01:05:55.120
<v Speaker 6>are themselves the result of evolutionary processes

1233
01:05:55.120 --> 01:05:57.140
<v Speaker 6>that we still can't fully understand.

1234
01:05:57.380 --> 01:06:00.200
<v Speaker 6>The way the human brain works is,

1235
01:06:01.100 --> 01:06:03.020
<v Speaker 6>as I understand it,

1236
01:06:03.080 --> 01:06:05.180
<v Speaker 6>is still not entirely understood.

1237
01:06:05.640 --> 01:06:06.840
<v Rodney Brooks>Oh, no, we understand everything now.

1238
01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:07.300
<v Speaker 6>Oh, right.

1239
01:06:09.100 --> 01:06:10.980
<v Speaker 6>I think there's a kind of,

1240
01:06:11.900 --> 01:06:13.740
<v Speaker 6>there must be something in that,

1241
01:06:13.780 --> 01:06:14.620
<v Speaker 6>the sense that,

1242
01:06:14.620 --> 01:06:17.380
<v Speaker 6>the brilliant people working on these things

1243
01:06:17.380 --> 01:06:19.300
<v Speaker 6>are themselves the result of processes

1244
01:06:19.300 --> 01:06:20.900
<v Speaker 6>that cannot be controlled by humans.

1245
01:06:21.060 --> 01:06:24.380
<v Speaker 6>So therefore, is there not some faint absurdity

1246
01:06:24.380 --> 01:06:27.220
<v Speaker 6>in equating humanness and machineness

1247
01:06:27.220 --> 01:06:31.200
<v Speaker 6>if one sets the parameters?

1248
01:06:31.560 --> 01:06:32.340
<v Speaker 6>I mean...

1249
01:06:32.340 --> 01:06:33.860
<v Rodney Brooks>It's all absurd.

1250
01:06:34.300 --> 01:06:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Talking, well, setting,

1251
01:06:36.340 --> 01:06:37.340
<v Speaker 6>I guess my question is,

1252
01:06:38.640 --> 01:06:40.840
<v Speaker 6>if one sets,

1253
01:06:41.620 --> 01:06:43.580
<v Speaker 6>Rodney, you mentioned earlier about setting sort of,

1254
01:06:43.580 --> 01:06:45.940
<v Speaker 6>evolutionary machines at work,

1255
01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:48.800
<v Speaker 6>parameters involving, you know,

1256
01:06:48.800 --> 01:06:52.820
<v Speaker 6>setting a series of parameters

1257
01:06:52.820 --> 01:06:55.700
<v Speaker 6>within which these machines can, as it were, evolve.

1258
01:06:56.280 --> 01:06:57.760
<v Speaker 6>That is still nonetheless

1259
01:06:58.580 --> 01:07:01.140
<v Speaker 6>some parameters that have been set by humans,

1260
01:07:01.240 --> 01:07:02.920
<v Speaker 6>that all the boundaries have been,

1261
01:07:02.920 --> 01:07:04.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, prearranged

1262
01:07:04.240 --> 01:07:06.120
<v Speaker 6>and the thing's been set in motion

1263
01:07:06.120 --> 01:07:08.160
<v Speaker 6>and then the humans step back

1264
01:07:08.160 --> 01:07:10.000
<v Speaker 6>and presumably observe what happens.

1265
01:07:10.300 --> 01:07:11.960
<v Speaker 6>So is there not...

1266
01:07:11.960 --> 01:07:13.520
<v Rodney Brooks>Well, let me, let me, let me,

1267
01:07:13.520 --> 01:07:14.780
<v Rodney Brooks>let me answer in two ways

1268
01:07:14.780 --> 01:07:16.900
<v Rodney Brooks>and give two completely opposite answers.

1269
01:07:17.700 --> 01:07:19.340
<v Rodney Brooks>The first one is, you said,

1270
01:07:19.360 --> 01:07:21.760
<v Rodney Brooks>we're a product of evolution and random events,

1271
01:07:21.940 --> 01:07:24.660
<v Rodney Brooks>but only random relative to some encapsulation.

1272
01:07:25.160 --> 01:07:26.520
<v Rodney Brooks>If you look at the whole universe,

1273
01:07:26.740 --> 01:07:28.900
<v Rodney Brooks>that cosmic ray which was coming down

1274
01:07:28.900 --> 01:07:29.980
<v Rodney Brooks>wasn't a random event.

1275
01:07:30.060 --> 01:07:31.920
<v Rodney Brooks>It was caused by some other thing

1276
01:07:31.920 --> 01:07:35.720
<v Rodney Brooks>which has logical descriptors of what happened

1277
01:07:35.720 --> 01:07:38.560
<v Rodney Brooks>and you roll back to the big bang

1278
01:07:38.560 --> 01:07:40.780
<v Rodney Brooks>and have a slight asymmetry in there

1279
01:07:40.780 --> 01:07:43.500
<v Rodney Brooks>and it all just unfolds as a mechanical phenomenon.

1280
01:07:43.520 --> 01:07:44.140
<v Rodney Brooks>It's a thing going along

1281
01:07:44.140 --> 01:07:45.540
<v Rodney Brooks>and we have no free will

1282
01:07:45.540 --> 01:07:48.140
<v Rodney Brooks>and we have no random events, etc.

1283
01:07:49.100 --> 01:07:51.180
<v Rodney Brooks>That's one argument, one answer.

1284
01:07:51.280 --> 01:07:53.100
<v Rodney Brooks>The answer from a totally different direction

1285
01:07:53.100 --> 01:07:54.300
<v Rodney Brooks>contradicting that is,

1286
01:07:54.420 --> 01:07:56.740
<v Rodney Brooks>as we build these artificial evolution systems,

1287
01:07:57.460 --> 01:07:58.880
<v Rodney Brooks>yes, we have some parameters,

1288
01:07:59.120 --> 01:08:02.780
<v Rodney Brooks>but we can introduce randomness into them fairly easily

1289
01:08:04.620 --> 01:08:07.160
<v Rodney Brooks>just by having them over distributed systems

1290
01:08:07.160 --> 01:08:08.180
<v Rodney Brooks>over different networks.

1291
01:08:08.440 --> 01:08:12.380
<v Rodney Brooks>You know, it depends on what porn site

1292
01:08:12.380 --> 01:08:16.420
<v Rodney Brooks>some kid in Los Angeles is accessing

1293
01:08:16.420 --> 01:08:18.380
<v Rodney Brooks>will change the network parameters slightly

1294
01:08:18.920 --> 01:08:21.680
<v Rodney Brooks>and will change what evolves out as the future robots

1295
01:08:21.680 --> 01:08:23.320
<v Rodney Brooks>that are going to take over the universe.

1296
01:08:25.880 --> 01:08:29.840
<v Rodney Brooks>So there's plenty of parts of randomness in that process

1297
01:08:29.840 --> 01:08:31.620
<v Rodney Brooks>when you build a big computational system.

1298
01:08:31.860 --> 01:08:35.840
<v Rodney Brooks>Okay, I'm afraid I'm going to have to draw this stimulating discussion

1299
01:08:35.840 --> 01:08:37.840
<v Derek Abbott>to a close as we're now out of time.

1300
01:08:38.200 --> 01:08:41.040
<v Derek Abbott>Sorry for those of you who still wanted to ask questions.

1301
01:08:41.140 --> 01:08:42.160
<v Derek Abbott>However, both the speakers,

1302
01:08:42.160 --> 01:08:42.700
<v Derek Abbott>I think the speakers have agreed

1303
01:08:42.700 --> 01:08:45.520
<v Derek Abbott>they will be for a short while in the tent outside

1304
01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:46.860
<v Derek Abbott>for book signings.

1305
01:08:47.420 --> 01:08:50.640
<v Derek Abbott>Okay, can we thank both the speakers.

